**1. Introduction**

Pollinators are insects or vectors that transfer the pollen from the male part of the flower, i.e., anther to the female part of the flower i.e., stigma enabling fertilization and seed production [1, 2]. Pollination is an ecosystem service that enhances crop production and helps in sustaining human life [1, 3]. Furthermore, many wild plants that provide calories and micronutrients to human diets require pollination as well [4]. Approximately, 90% of wild flowering plant species worldwide rely on insect vectors for pollen transmission. These plants are essential for ecosystems to function properly because they supply food, habitat, and other resources to a variety of different species [5]. One-third of the agricultural plants, including the cultivars, are dependent on animal pollinators for their reproduction and increased fruit set [6]. Bees play a pivotal role among pollinators by visiting more than 9% of the leading global crop plants [3]. Unfortunately, agricultural intensification has led to a loss of habitat of many insect pollinators and monoculture plantings have

threatened insect biodiversity [7, 8]. A palpable concern for the global decline in pollinators can be sensed [9] which may affect fruit set or seed set [10] influencing its yield [11, 12]. The decline in pollinators would also result in a parallel decline in its associated plant species [9]. Insect pollination is therefore also known as an endangered ecosystem service [13–16]. The pollinator crisis threatens global and local food security and can destabilize human life [17]. Therefore, studies in crop pollination are upfront because of the perceived danger that it invites [16–18]. However, a detailed preview of pollination studies is incomplete or redundant [19]. Therefore, understanding the pollination needs of different cultivated plants is a prerequisite to understanding their dependency on animal pollinators [19].

In this regard, the pollination requirement of *Citrus* has been arising much curiosity. Domestication of *Citrus* sp. along with grafting has resulted in variation in the existing species in comparison to its wild progenitors [20, 21]. As such, the present cultivars exhibit tremendous variation in pollination requirements. *Citrus* was considered as a crop with little or no requirement for insect pollination [22]. Webber and Batchelor [23] emphasized, however, that no variety is ever static, and the possibility that its pollination requirements have changed cannot be ruled out. Further research over the period has proven Webber and Batchelor [23] to be correct. However, it has been found the pollination requirements of *Citrus* have been confusing and misleading. It has been reported that *Citrus* have complete or perfect flowers and generally pollinate themselves to produce fruit [24]. *Citrus* has been reported to exhibit varying breeding systems within species and cultivars of the same species [22, 25]. Pollinator reliance and breeding systems differ between and within *Citrus* species, and even between cultivars of the same species [25].

Several *Citrus* hybrid cultivars also exhibit sexual incompatibility which affects their yield [26]. Further, *Citrus* exhibit parthenocarpy and is an important trait that results in a seedless variety [27, 28]. Therefore, it would not be wrong to say that the pollination requirements for *Citrus* are quite diverse [22, 29]. The reason for such a varying breeding system can be attributed to its numerous varieties and the fact that more are being developed all the time. Moreover, each variety has its characteristics that determine the pollination mechanism in them [29]. For instance, some studies state that cross-pollination is not necessary for fruit sets [25, 30], whereas others showed that insect pollinators increased fruit production [31]. Most seeds are produced by asexual means in some cultivars. However, the benefits drawn from insect variation cannot be negated [22].

Given the complex breeding system of *Citrus*, it is difficult to predict the magnitude of the threat the dwindling pollinator number poses to the productivity of *Citrus*. As a step towards understanding the repercussion, we review the pollination requirements of some of the commercially important *Citrus* cultivars and highlight the danger that the global pollinator decline poses on such *Citrus* varieties.

### **2. Pollinators and its global decline**

Honeybee (*Apis mellifera*) is the primary pollinating agent of *Citrus*. They have shown to be effective pollinators of an array of cultivated crops, oilseeds, forage crops, fiber crops, and cereal crops [32]. Evidence suggests that 59% of the domestic honeybee colonies were lost between 1947 and 2005 [33] and 25% were lost in Europe between 1985 and 2005 [34]. Considerable fear has been sensed about the future availability of honeybee pollination. Further, it was observed that specialists (diet/ habitat) and sedentary bees and hoverflies tended to decline while mobile generalists tended to thrive [9]. Globally, *A. mellifera* is the predominantly managed pollinator to augment agricultural productivity [34] and ranks as the most frequent single

*Threat to* Citrus *in a Global Pollinator Decline Scenario: Current Understanding of Its… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101159*

species of pollinator for crops worldwide [35]. There has been increased mortality of managed *A. mellifera* colonies in some regions of the world [36, 37], which could spread to its wild population [38]. Considering the importance of *A. mellifera* in crop productivity, threats to its population could prove to be a disaster for crop reproduction and its productivity [1]. Further, reports suggest that the floral visits by *A. mellifera* were double that of all bumblebee species combined [38]. *A. mellifera* has also been observed to compete and displace native pollinators [39, 40] or compromise plant reproductive success [41]. Therefore, it is the competition between native and non-native pollinators along with various other factors such as pesticides, pathogens, parasites, and climate change that have been triggering the decline of pollinators worldwide [38].

### **3. Inflorescence of** *Citrus* **and its sexual process**

A *Citrus* flower usually comprises both male and female sex organs in the same flower [26]. Each flower has radial symmetry and consists of 5–6 sepals and 5 petals (**Figure 1B**). The inflorescence is a cyme or raceme, rarely of solitary flowers. The flowers are usually bisexual and actinomorphic, hypogynous, rarely epigynous. It consists of 4–5 (2–3) sepals or lobes. The corolla is apopetalous or sympetalous with 4–5 (0, 2–3) imbricate or valvate petals or lobes. The stamens are 8–10–∞ usually diplostemonous in 2 (1–4) whorls.

The stigma and ovary are connected by a white style that forms a knob [42]. The pistil is in the center of each flower and is surrounded by a whorl of stamens which consists of long filaments with anthers at the top (**Figure 1A**). The anthers are longitudinal indehiscence and consist of yellow pollen that gets shed on the sticky

#### **Figure 1.**

*Flowers of mandarin (*Citrus reticulata*): (A and B) single flower, (C) fertilized ovary, (D) female sex organ (pistil); An—anther, Fi—filament, Pe—petals, Ov—oary, Ne—nectar, Sti—stigma, Sty—style. ©Subhankar Gurung.*

surface of the stigma [26]. *Citrus* pollen is heavy and sticky [26], and is not adapted for wind pollination [43]. *Citrus* flowers are either self-pollinated, cross-pollinated [43], or can produce fruit by parthenocarpy or nucellar embryony [44]. At the bottom of the ovary, there is a nectary gland. *Citrus* produces nectar copiously [22] and is secreted continuously for at least 48 hours after the flower opening [45].

#### **3.1 Breeding system of mandarin and mandarin hybrid-complex**

Several mandarin hybrids of fine quality have been evolved that have become commercially important varieties. For instance, crosses between clementine and tangelo (*Citrus reticulata × [Citrus paradisi × C. reticulata*]) have produced hybrids such as Robinson, Lee, Osceola, Page, and Nova [46]. King mandarin *Citrus nobilis* proved to be an exceptional parent when crossed with other mandarin types in producing well-flavored hybrids [47]. Tangelo is a cross between tangerine, or mandarin orange (*C. reticulata*) with either grapefruit (*Citrus paradisi*) or pummelo (*Citrus grandis*) [24]. Clementine (*Citrus clementina*) is a hybrid between Mediterranean *Citrus deliciosa* and sweet orange [48]. While the hybrids were being released, issues in its pollination were recognized where the fruit set in Clementine mandarin was fewer in flowers enclosed in self-pollination without bees than those flowers enclosed with bees [49]. Clementine mandarin was identified to be selfincompatible but showed improved fruit characteristics when cross-pollinated with March grapefruit and Balady orange [48]. Besides, it has also been reported that Clementine mandarin develops a seedless fruit if cross-pollination does not occur [50]. Clementine mandarin cultivars (*Citrus clementina*) exhibit facultative parthenocarpy and is pollination independent [50]. However, "Clemenules" exhibits weak parthenocarpic ability than 'Marisol' indicating a difference in the parthenocarpic ability of Clementine cultivars. Further, studies on "Lee", "Page", "Nova" and "Robinson" identified them to be self-incompatible [51]. 'Afourer' mandarin was also found to be self-incompatible and produced relatively high fruit set by facultative and autonomous parthenocarpy [52]. On the contrary, studies demonstrated that "Osceola" was not completely self-incompatible [53]. Further studies showed that "Hyuganatsu" mandarin was self-sterile but cross-fertile [54]. Several experiments demonstrated that "Satsuma" mandarin benefitted 6.3% [55] and 7–11% [56, 57] by bees. They also present obligate parthenocarpy [58], and thus the sexual process is not always required for successful fruit development. There was no significant difference in the final fruit set between parthenocarpic and fertilized Satsuma mandarin [50]. Several mandarin cultivars also benefit tremendously from compatible pollinizers for successful fruit development. For instance: grapefruit pollen is an efficient pollinizer in fertilizing "Clementine" mandarins. Further, field experiments demonstrated that pollens derived from "Lee" enhanced the fruit size of "Page" cultivars [59]. Minneola tangelo increased its yield when cross-pollinated with "Seminole" or "Lake" pollen which indicated that the Minneola fruit set can be enhanced by planting a suitable pollinizer [60].

Some of the accessions of mandarin such as "Kunenbo" are self-incompatible because of incompatible alleles originating from pummelo [61] while mandarins that originated in China and India are self-compatible [62].

#### **3.2 Breeding system of sweet orange**

Breeding system of oranges is complex because of the variation in its cultivars. *Citrus sinensis* var. Pera-Rio benefitted from the visitation of bees resulting in heavier, less acidic fruit with fewer seed sets [63]. Further, the fruit production was 35.30% greater in uncovered flowers, fruit weight was higher (180.2 g) than covered *Threat to* Citrus *in a Global Pollinator Decline Scenario: Current Understanding of Its… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101159*

ones (168.5 g) [64]. However, bees did not affect the production of *C. sinensis* var. "Valencia" sweet oranges [65, 66]. Sanford [66] also mentions that 'Valencia' does not benefit much from pollination by bees. "Valencia" experienced lower pollen grain germination resulting in a lower seed set [50]. Defective ovule mutants encourage flawed pollen tube guidance [50], and therefore attributed low seed set in "Valencia" sweet orange to defects during female gametogenesis [67]. However, unlike the previous report, fertilization remains an important factor in its improved fruit set [50]. Similarly, ambiguity regarding the pollination of "washington navel" remained when studies demonstrated that cross-pollination might influence fruit set [68]. However, later studies reinstated that cross-pollination does not affect the yield of "washington navels" [69]. Atkins [70] stated that there is a possibility that cross-pollination by bees may cause them to retain more fruit [70]. There was a 31% increase in the fruit set, a 21% increase in fruit weight, 33% more juice, and 36% more seeds from fruits on trees visited by bees [71]. Further "washington navel" is male sterile and is incapable of sexual reproduction when used as a pollen parent [72]. Therefore, the likeliness of it requiring a pollinizer is high for a successful fruit set. In this context, it was observed that "washington navel" produced the most fruits when crossed with "Grusinian" orange [57]. However, the embryo sac of "washington navel" may also degenerate before pollen tubes penetrate through it.

#### **3.3 Breeding system of pummelo**

Most of the pummelo varieties are self-incompatible because pollen tubes cannot grow properly because of the genetic barrier to inbreeding [73]. Further, most pummelo trees are self-incompatible and should be inter-planted with other cultivars [74]. Shaddock (*Citrus maxima* L.) or (*Citrus grandis* L.) increased its fruit set %, fruit retention, fruit weight, fruit size when cross-pollinated with Balady orange pollen grains [48]. Further, Aala [74] suggested that bees are important for proper pollination and fruit set irrespective of a cultivar being selffertile or self-sterile. *Citrus maxima* (burm) Merr cv. *nambangan* is also reported to be self-incompatible and is dependent on insect pollinators for fruit sets [42]. However, Hoang et al. [75] reported that pollen tube growth of *Citrus grandis* cv. "Phuc Trach", "Dien" and "Red Pummelo" were arrested in the style inhibiting fertilization. "Da Xanh" and "Nam Roi" pummelos did not require pollination and produced large-sized seedless fruit by vegetative parthenocarpy [75]. Therefore, it is an established fact that few cultivars of pummelo are highly parthenocarpic [27] and pollination is unnecessary for commercial fruit production.

#### **3.4 Breeding system of grapefruit**

The pollination requirements and breeding system of grapefruit are poorly understood [76]. Some studies suggest that cross-pollination is not a prerequisite for fruit set [25, 77], whereas others demonstrate that the transfer of cross-pollen mediated by insects increases fruit production [31]. For example, there are species such as "Red Blush" grapefruit cultivar that is highly parthenocarpic while "Marsh" grapefruit set four times as many fruits in open-pollinated flowers than selfed flowers [78]. "Star Ruby" grapefruit (*C. paradisi* Macf.) consists of nonfunctional pollen, non-functional ovules and produces more fruits when crosspollinated [31]. Further, studies suggest that pollen transfer by insects and pollen tube development are important factors for fruit production in grapefruit [76, 79]. Chacoff and Aizen [76] also demonstrated that more cross-pollen tubes reached the ovary than self-pollen, indicating the importance of pollinators in successful fruit development.

#### **3.5 Breeding system of lemons and limes**

Lemons (*Citrus aurantiifolia* (Christm.) Swingle) is self-compatible and shows both autogamous and allogamous types of pollination [80]. On the contrary, "Tahiti" lime is strongly parthenocarpic and its dependency on pollination is feeble for increased fruit set [69]. Parthenocarpy in "Tahiti" lime is followed by chromosomal irregularity during meiosis, reflecting the triploid origin of the lines [81]. Likewise, parthenocarpy is high on thornless Rodan lime resulting in a fewer number of seeds [82]. However, the fruit set of *Citrus limettoides* was better in open-pollinated flowers than emasculated or hand-pollinated flowers [83]. Further, the flower-fruit ratio and fruit-seed ratio of lemons declined in the absence of pollinators than in open-pollinated conditions [80]. The yield is further enhanced in lemon with the planting of a suitable pollinizer. For instance, the yield of 'Kagzi Kalan' lemon is supposedly enhanced with the plantation of 10% pummelo along with it [84].

Studies have reported that *Citrus limon* L. was self-incompatible and fruit and seed sets were greater in cross-pollination than self-pollination [85]. Further, it has been observed that pollination by bees is not required for the production of fruits [86]. Further, lemons were reported to be self-compatible that produce fruit by self-pollination without the influence of pollinators [22]. Emasculated unpollinated flowers of *C. limon* produced seedless fruits, indicating its parthenocarpic ability [87]. Although cross-pollination helped *C. limon* produce fruits with germinable seeds, it was self-pollination that produced seedless fruits [87]. However, studies also demonstrated that lemon trees caged without bees produced 42.5% less than open-pollinated trees while trees caged with bees produced 10% less fruit indicating that bees contribute to geitonogamous self-pollination [88].

#### **3.6 Breeding system of citrons**

Citron is reported to be receptive to the pollen of the same species [89]. Citrons are presumably self-compatible and hence citrons as maternal parents are not common [89, 90]. Citrons have the lowest heterozygosity which results in their high rate of selfing [91]. It has been observed that the male and female organs of Corsican citrons mature simultaneously before the opening of the petals which indicates its self-fertilization mechanism [92]. As a result, citron propagation by seed in Israeli home gardens seldom results in hybrid seedlings [93]. Further, it has also been reported that no pollination problems have been observed on citron [22].

#### **4. Conclusion and future direction**

#### **4.1 Status of pollination study and its relevance in** *Citrus*

There is enough evidence to show that the global pollinator population is declining which is harming the agricultural productivity of the crop. *Citrus* is an important cash crop and has a varying degree of pollination requirements. Although, several studies have been conducted to ascertain the pollination requirement of *Citrus,* we found uncertainty in the importance of pollination in *Citrus* as far as market demands are concerned. There are several varieties of *Citrus* [23] that are poorly known from the pollinators and pollination requirement [76]. While McGregor [22] stated that few studies have been conducted in other groups of *Citrus*, we are in a much better position now than we have been in the past to

*Threat to* Citrus *in a Global Pollinator Decline Scenario: Current Understanding of Its… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101159*

understand the pollination requirements of the plants. Nonetheless, considering that new cultivars are developed every time, the study will always be in its infancy requiring constant monitoring to understand their breeding system. However, we suggest (i) recognizing the market need for *Citrus* varieties of superior eating and processing quality (ii) determining the relevance of pollinators based on prior demand of the market. For instance, consumers' favor seedless fruits because of their appealing appearance and ease of consumption, while producers prefer them due to their ease of processing. Given its relevance, efforts are being done to develop high-quality seedless fruits [58].

#### **4.2 The way forward**

In this review, we have explored commercially important *Citrus* species and tried to ascertain their adaptation to pollination requirements. We have also ascertained the breeding system of some of the commercially important *Citrus* varieties around the globe. However, growing evidence suggests that the pollination requirements of *Citrus* may be arguable, the biggest question that arises is the importance of pollination in the *Citrus* industry.

Further, we found a disparity in studies conducted between *Citrus* varieties probably because of the commercial popularity of some varieties over others. We still need studies to be conducted to document important pollinators and understand the breeding system of more varieties. The ever-increasing development of new cultivars poses challenges in understanding the breeding process of such cultivars and a constant effort to study such cultivars is the major challenge that needs to be addressed. It is also evident that there are substantial losses of pollinators in many regions of the globe, therefore segregating *Citrus* varieties and cultivars based on its breeding adaptation, pollination requirements, and most importantly based on the demand of the market would greatly determine the effect of the loss of pollinators in the productivity of *Citrus*. However, if the lack of pollinators does affect productivity and disrupts its market supply, targeting on development of seedless varieties can be a good alternative. Also, genetically selfincompatible cultivars that are dependent on pollinators need to be consistently investigated and their pollinators identified. Identifying suitable pollinizers can be another way in enhancing the productivity of *Citrus*. However, such a process also requires pollinators, and therefore, given the importance of pollination, efforts should be made in mitigating pollinator loss to sustainable pollination service. This can be achieved by acknowledging their intrinsic value, considering the core importance of pollinators for the productivity of *Citrus*, focusing on agri-environment schemes, protected area networks, and managing alternative pollinators.

#### **Acknowledgements**

The authors are grateful to the Department of Botany and the Central library of Sikkim University for providing access to the journals. The review was prepared without any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

### **Conflict of interest**

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

*Plant Reproductive Ecology - Recent Advances*
