**4.5 Analysis 5**

In this last analysis, branches of knowledge and academic year are ignored and importance is given to territorial context, self-perception of information and pro-environmental attitude. Based on this we make comparisons between these three different contexts which are students from Granada, Santiago de Compostela and Braga (in Portugal-which is considered the contrast context) through these variables according to those questions of the questionnaire that have to do with the water /CC relationship.

**Figure 4** refers to the general opinion questions on CC, but analyses the results considering the three contexts together. As can be seen, the pattern of the existence of CC, caused by human causes, scientific consensus or responsibility, is repeated.

If we analyse these same questions, but now independently in each context (**Figure 5**), we can see that the results are practically the same, although in the

**Figure 6.** *Conceptual questions about CC.*

#### *The Nature, Causes, Effects and Mitigation of Climate Change on the Environment*

#### **Figure 7.**

*Degree of information about CC and pro-environmental attitudes.*

case of responsibility, it is the contrasting context that feels less responsible, both individually and collectively.

The next figure (**Figure 6**) shows the conceptual questions on CC, and as mentioned above, the questionnaire is now not divided by dimensions, but those questions that have to do with the relationship between water and CC have been chosen.

And although this is so, as can be seen, those questions that have not been answered correctly are also questions that, although related to water, also refer to biophysical processes that have to do with CC, so that we see again a reflection of the pattern of the previous results.

This is where the interpretation of the results of this analysis becomes more important. As can be seen (**Figure 7**) when questions are asked concerning the degree of self-perception about the information students have about the phenomenon, we see how the contrast context is the one that feels the most informed in all the questions asked, and the same happens when asked about the degree of proenvironmental attitude they have.
