**2. Background**

School playgrounds are the normal sites of basic talent identification systems wherever team captains choose, one by one, from the foremost to the smallest amount in a position and fascinating teammates. Nowadays, it seems, we should always instead ask our children for a cheek swab to genetically take a look at Possibility of their movement. Despite advances in science and technology, there are still questions about reliability and validity, so it is not clear if there is any advantage in effectiveness. We tend to critically discuss here the conceptual and moral questions that arise in leveraging a genetically based approach to athletic talent identification (TI). It is believed and acknowledged by scientific and sporting communities that genetic factors undoubtedly contribute to athletic performance. As of 2009, more than 200 genetic variants had been associated with physical performance, with more than 20 variants being associated with elite contestant status. Despite the lack of evidence, recent years have witnessed the rise of an emerging market of direct-to consumer marketing (DTC) tests that claim to be able to establish children's athletic skills. Targeted customers embrace principally coaches and parents [3]. Recent analysis has targeted on trying to know the influence of heredity on athletic performance. This has led to the identification of multiple candidate genes that can help distinguish elite athletes from non-elite athletes. One of the most promising genes in this regard is ACTN3, which has undoubtedly been labeled the "speed gene" [4]. One among the foremost used advances during this field is that identification of variations in the DNA sequence, known as Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). Genetic evaluations should be combined with other tools to get a correct identification of athletes and their respective fields to attain optimum success.
