**Author details**

Ian Freckelton1,2,3\*

1 Law and Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

2 Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

3 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

\*Address all correspondence to: i.freckelton@vicbar.com.au

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**21**

2015.03.002

*Guarding the Gait: Evaluating Forensic Gait Analysis Evidence*

esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUK EwiZpIjTg4LxAhV3yjgGHTWYDUsQFj AAegQIBhAD&url=https%3A%2F%2F cbr.cba.org%2Findex.php%2Fcbr%2Far ticle%2Fdownload%2F4325%2F4318%2

F&usg=AOvVaw1FmwKg\_a\_

[11] Van Mastrigt, NM, Celie, K, Mieremet, AL, Ruifrok, ACC, Geradts A. Critical Review of the Use and Scientific Basis of Forensic Gait Analysis. Forensic Science Research. 2018; 3(3): 183-193. doi: 10.1080/

[12] Nirenberg M, Vernon W, Birch I. A review of the historical use and criticisms of gait analysis evidence. Sci Justice. 58(4):292-298; 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.03.002

[13] *R v Aitken* [2008] BCSC 1423. Available at: https://www.canlii.org/en/ bc/bcsc/doc/2008/2008bcsc1423/2008b csc1423.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQA GYWl0a2VuAAAAAAE&resultIndex=32

[14] *R v Aitken* [2012] BCCA 134. Available at: https://www.canlii.org/en/ bc/bcca/doc/2012/2012bcca134/2012b

[15] *Hashi v The Queen* [2014] EWCA Crim 1243. Available at: https://www. bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/

[16] *R v Crupi (Ruling No 1)* [2020] VSC

squarespace.com/static/58bb869e6a4963 d651b75a2e/t/5ffb9cc6346f087732a8b ecf/1610325193981/R+v+Crupi+2020+

[17] *R v Mohan* [1994] 2 SCR 9. Available at: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc /1994/1994canlii80/1994canlii80.html

[18] *R v Abbey* [2009] 97 OR (3d) 330. Available at: https://www.canlii.org/en/

654. Available at: https://static1.

cca134.html

2014/1243.html

VSC+654.pdf

20961790.2018.1503579.

F68I0DGCo\_oDk

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99491*

[1] Freckelton I, Expert Evidence: Law, Practice, Procedure and Advocacy. 6th ed. Sydney: Thomson Reuters; 2019.

[2] Freckelton, I, Goodman-Delahunty J, Horan J, McKimmie B. Expert Evidence and Criminal Jury Trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.

[3] Birch I, Nirenberg M, Vernon W, Birch M, editors. Forensic Gait Analysis: Principles and Practice. Boca Raton:

[4] Krishan K, Kanchan T, DiMaggio JA. Emergence of Forensic Podiatry – A Novel Discipline of Forensic Sciences. 2015. Forensic Science International.

[5] Royal Society and Royal Society of Edinburgh. Forensic Gait Analysis: A Primer for the Courts. 2017. Available at: https://www.rse.org.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2017/11/DES4929\_2\_Lawprimers-reports\_Gait-analysis\_WEB.pdf

[6] *Otway v The Queen* [2011] EWCA Crim 3. Available at: https://www.bailii. org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2011/3.html

[7] DiMaggio JA, Vernon W. Forensic Podiatry: Principles and Methods. 2nd edn. 2017. Boca Raton. CRC Press.

[9] Kelly HD. Forensic Gait Analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020.

[10] Cunliffe E and Edmond G. Gaitkeeping in Canada: Mis-Steps in Assessing the Reliability of Expert Testimony. Canadian Bar Review, 92: 327-368; 2014. Available at: https:// www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&

[8] Birch I, Vernon W, Walker J, Young M. Terminology and Forensic Gait Analysis. Science & Justice. 55(4) 279-284; 2015. doi: 10.1016/**j**.scijus.

CRC Press; 2020.

**References**

255: 16-27. doi: 10.1016/j. forsciint.2015.06.012

*Guarding the Gait: Evaluating Forensic Gait Analysis Evidence DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99491*
