Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications

*Lalla Btissam Drissi, El Hassan Saidi, Mosto Bousmina and Omar Fassi-Fehri*

## **Abstract**

Magnetic skyrmions have been subject of growing interest in recent years for their very promising applications in spintronics, quantum computation and future low power information technology devices. In this book chapter, we use the field theory method and coherent spin state ideas to investigate the properties of magnetic solitons in spacetime while focussing on 2D and 3D skyrmions. We also study the case of a rigid skyrmion dissolved in a magnetic background induced by the spin-tronics; and derive the effective rigid skyrmion equation of motion. We examine as well the interaction between electrons and skyrmions; and comment on the modified Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation. Other issues, including emergent electrodynamics and hot applications for next-generation high-density efficient information encoding, are also discussed.

**Keywords:** Geometric phases, magnetic monopoles and topology, soliton and holonomy, skyrmion dynamics and interactions, med-term future applications

### **1. Introduction**

During the last two decades, the magnetic skyrmions and antiskyrmions have been subject to an increasing interest in connection with the topological phase of matter [1–4], the spin-tronics [5, 6] and quantum computing [7, 8]; as well as in the search for advanced applications such as racetrack memory, microwave oscillators and logic nanodevices making skyrmionic states very promising candidates for future low power information technology devices [9–12]. Initially proposed by T. Skyrme to describe hadrons in the theory of quantum chromodynamics [13], skyrmions have however been observed in other fields of physics, including quantum Hall systems [14, 15], Bose-Einstein condensates [16] and liquid crystals [17]. In quantum Hall (QH) ferromagnets for example [18, 19], due to the exchange interaction; the electron spins spontaneously form a fully polarized ferromagnet close to the integer filling factor *ν*≃1; slightly away, other electrons organize into an intricate spin configuration because of a competitive interplay between the Coulomb and Zeeman interactions [18]. Being quasiparticles, the skyrmions of the QH system condense into a crystalline form leading to the crystallization of the skyrmions [20–23]; thus opening an important window on promising applications.

In order to overcome the lack of a prototype of a skyrmion-based spintronic devices for a possible fabrication of nanodevices of data storage and logic technologies, intense research has been carried out during the last few years [24, 25]. In this regard, several alternative nano-objects have been identified to host stable skyrmions at room temperature. The first experimental observation of crystalline skyrmionic states was in a three-dimensional metallic ferromagnet MnSi with a B20 structure using small angle neutron scattering [26]. Then, real-space imaging of the skyrmion has been reported using Lorentz transmission electron microscopy in non-centrosymmetric magnetic compounds and in thin films with broken inversion symmetry, including monosilicides, monogermanides, and their alloys, like Fe1–*x*Co*x*Si [27], FeGe [28], and MnGe [29].

while describing in detail the underside of the topological structure of these lowdimensional solitons. In Section 4, we extend the construction to approach topological properties to 3d skyrmions. In Section 5, we study the dynamics of rigid skyrmions without and with dissipation; and in Section 6, we use emergent gauge potential fields to describe the effective dynamics of electrons interacting with the skyrmion in the presence of a spin transfer torque. We end this study by making

In this section, we review some useful ingredients on the quantum SU(2) spin

We begin by recalling that in non relativistic 3D quantum mechanics, the spin states j i *Sz*, *S* of spinfull particles are characterised by two half integers ð Þ *Sz*, *S* , a positive *S*≥ 0 and an *Sz* taking 2*S* þ 1 values bounded as �*S*≤*Sz* ≤*S* with integral hoppings. For particles with spin 1/2 like electrons, one distinguishes two basis

that are eigenvalues of the scaled Pauli matrix <sup>ℏ</sup>

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>σ</sup>z*∣*Sz*, *<sup>S</sup>*><sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*Sz* (for short <sup>ℏ</sup>

*<sup>c</sup>* with *εabc* standing for the completely antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensor with non zero value *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>123</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1; its inverse is *<sup>ε</sup>cba* with *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>123</sup> ¼ �1. The time evolution of the

(*dH=dt* ¼ 0) is given by the Heisenberg representation of quantum mechanics. In

where the Pauli matrices *σ<sup>a</sup>* obey the usual commutation relations ½ �¼ *σa*, *σ<sup>b</sup>*

alised for generic values *S* of the SU 2ð Þ spin. For example, for a spin value *S*0, the ð Þ 2*S*<sup>0</sup> þ 1 states are given by f g j i *m*, *S*<sup>0</sup> and are labeled by �*S*<sup>0</sup> ≤ *m* ≤ *S*0; one of these

. For a generic value of the SU 2ð Þ spin *<sup>S</sup>*, the above relation extends as ^

ℏ*Ht*. So, many relations for the spin 1*=*2 may be straightforwardly gener-

<sup>2</sup> with dynamics governed by a stationary Hamiltonian operator

�*i*

*Sa* from classical *Sa*) is given by

*<sup>a</sup>*, here the three <sup>ℏ</sup>

<sup>2</sup> *σ<sup>z</sup>* and the

*<sup>a</sup>* are the

*Sa*ð Þ*t*

*Sa* ¼

!*:e* !

<sup>2</sup> operator ^

� �) is carried by the

<sup>2</sup> *σ<sup>a</sup>* with *σ<sup>a</sup>* ¼ *σ*

<sup>2</sup> *σ<sup>z</sup>*

*<sup>z</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ 0, 0, 1 *<sup>T</sup>*. For generic values of the SU 2ð Þ spin

!. From these ingredients, we

<sup>ℏ</sup>*Ht* (1)

*<sup>i</sup>* ¼ *σ<sup>i</sup>* respectively by bold symbols as *σ*, **e***i*, *σ:***e***<sup>i</sup>* ¼ *σi*.

operator, its underlying algebra and its time evolution while focussing on the interesting spin 1/2 states, concerning electrons in materials; and on coherent spin states which are at the basis of the study of skyrmions/antiskyrmions. First, we introduce rapidly the SU(2) spin operator **S** and the implementation of time dependence. Then, we investigate the non dissipative dynamics of the spin by using semiclassical theory approach (coherent states). These tools can be also viewed as a first step towards the topological study of spin induced 1D, 2D and 3D solitons under-

comments and describing perspectives in the study of skyrmions.

**2. Quantum SU(2) spin dynamics**

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

**2.1 Quantum spin 1/2 operator and beyond**

4 P<sup>3</sup> *<sup>a</sup>*¼<sup>1</sup>*σ*<sup>2</sup>

*<sup>z</sup>* with *e* !

this non dissipative description, the time dependence of the spin <sup>1</sup>

^ *Sa* ¼ *e i* <sup>ℏ</sup>*Ht* <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>a</sup>* 2 � �*<sup>e</sup>*

!, *e* ! *<sup>i</sup>*, *σ* !*:e* !

*S*, the spin operator reads as ℏ*Ja* where the three *Ja*'s are 2ð Þ� *S* þ 1 ð Þ 2*S* þ 1 generators of the SU 2ð Þ group satisfying the usual commutation relations *Ja*, *Jb* ½ �¼

three components of the spin 1/2 operator vector<sup>1</sup> *σ*

! *:e* !

(the hat is to distinguish the operator ^

<sup>1</sup> For convenience, we often refer to *σ*

taken in next sections.

vector states � <sup>1</sup>

*iεabcJ*

spin <sup>1</sup>

2*iεabcσ<sup>c</sup>*

<sup>ℏ</sup>*Ht* <sup>ℏ</sup>*Ja* ð Þ*e*�*<sup>i</sup>*

*e i*

**3**

quadratic (Casimir) operator <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup>

learn that the average <*Sz*, *S*∣ <sup>ℏ</sup>

z-direction since *Sz* ¼ *S*

<sup>2</sup> operator <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>a</sup>*

� � �

One of the key parameters in the formation of these topologically protected noncollinear spin textures is the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction (DMI) [30–32]. Originating from the strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) at the interfaces, the DM exchange between atomic spins controls the size and stability of the induced skyrmions. Depending on the symmetry of the crystal structures and the skyrmion windings number, the internal spins within a single skyrmion envelop a sphere in different arrangements [33]. The in-plane component of the magnetization, in the Néel skyrmion, is always pointed in the radial direction [34], while it is oriented perpendicularly with respect to the position vector in the Bloch skyrmion [26]**.** Different from these two well-known types of skyrmions are skyrmions with mixed Bloch-Néel topological spin textures observed in Co/Pd multilayers [35]. Magnetic antiskyrmions, having a more complex boundary compared to the chiral magnetic boundaries of skyrmions, exist above room temperature in tetragonal Heusler materials [36]. Higher-order skyrmions should be stabilized in anisotropic frustrated magnet at zero temperature [37] as well as in itinerant magnets with zero magnetic field [38].

In the quest to miniaturize magnetic storage devices, reduction of material's dimensions as well as preservation of the stability of magnetic nano-scale domains are necessary. One possible route to achieve this goal is the formation of topological protected skyrmions in certain 2D magnetic materials. To induce magnetic order and tune DMIs in 2D crystal structures, their centrosymmetric should first be broken using some efficient ways such a (i) generate one-atom thick hybrids where atoms are mixed in an alternating manner [39–41], (ii) apply bias voltage or strain [42–44], (iii) insert adsorbents, impurities and defects [45–47]. In graphene-like materials, fluorine chemisorption is an exothermic adsorption that gives rise to stable 2D structures [48] and to long-range magnetism [49, 50]. In semi-fluorinated graphene, a strong Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction has been predicted with the presence of ferromagnetic skyrmions [51]. The formation of a nanoskyrmion state in a Sn monolayer on a SiC(0001) surface has been reported on the basis of a generalized Hubbard model [52]. Strong DMI between the first nearest magnetic germanium neighbors in 2D semi-fluorinated germanene results in a potential antiferromagnetic skyrmion [53].

In this bookchapter, we use the coherent spin states approach and the field theory method (continuous limit of lattice magnetic models with DMI) to revisit some basic aspects and properties of magnetic solitons in spacetime while focusing on 1d kinks, 2d and 3d spatial skyrmions/antiskyrmions. We also study the case of a rigid skyrmion dissolved in a magnetic background induced by the electronic spins of magnetic atoms like Mn; and derive the effective rigid skyrmion equation of motion. In this regard, we describe the similarity between, on one hand, electrons in the electromagnetic background; and, on the other hand, rigid skyrmions bathing in a texture of magnetic moments. We also investigate the interaction between electrons and skyrmions as well as the effect of the spin transfer effect.

This bookchapter is organized as follows: In Section 2, we introduce some basic tools on quantum SU(2) spins and review useful aspects of their dynamics. In Section 3, we investigate the topological properties of kinks and 2d space solitons

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

regard, several alternative nano-objects have been identified to host stable skyrmions at room temperature. The first experimental observation of crystalline skyrmionic states was in a three-dimensional metallic ferromagnet MnSi with a B20 structure using small angle neutron scattering [26]. Then, real-space imaging of the skyrmion has been reported using Lorentz transmission electron microscopy in non-centrosymmetric magnetic compounds and in thin films with broken inversion symmetry, including monosilicides, monogermanides, and their alloys, like

One of the key parameters in the formation of these topologically protected noncollinear spin textures is the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction (DMI) [30–32]. Originating from the strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) at the interfaces, the DM exchange between atomic spins controls the size and stability of the induced skyrmions. Depending on the symmetry of the crystal structures and the skyrmion windings number, the internal spins within a single skyrmion envelop a sphere in different arrangements [33]. The in-plane component of the magnetization, in the Néel skyrmion, is always pointed in the radial direction [34], while it is oriented perpendicularly with respect to the position vector in the Bloch skyrmion [26]**.** Different from these two well-known types of skyrmions are skyrmions with mixed Bloch-Néel topological spin textures observed in Co/Pd multilayers [35]. Magnetic antiskyrmions, having a more complex boundary compared to the chiral magnetic boundaries of skyrmions, exist above room temperature in tetragonal Heusler materials [36]. Higher-order skyrmions should be stabilized in anisotropic frustrated magnet at zero temperature [37] as well as in itinerant magnets with zero

In the quest to miniaturize magnetic storage devices, reduction of material's dimensions as well as preservation of the stability of magnetic nano-scale domains are necessary. One possible route to achieve this goal is the formation of topological protected skyrmions in certain 2D magnetic materials. To induce magnetic order and tune DMIs in 2D crystal structures, their centrosymmetric should first be broken using some efficient ways such a (i) generate one-atom thick hybrids where atoms are mixed in an alternating manner [39–41], (ii) apply bias voltage or strain [42–44], (iii) insert adsorbents, impurities and defects [45–47]. In graphene-like materials, fluorine chemisorption is an exothermic adsorption that gives rise to stable 2D structures [48] and to long-range magnetism [49, 50]. In semi-fluorinated graphene, a strong Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction has been predicted with the presence of ferromagnetic skyrmions [51]. The formation of a nanoskyrmion state in a Sn monolayer on a SiC(0001) surface has been reported on the basis of a generalized Hubbard model [52]. Strong DMI between the first nearest magnetic germanium neighbors in 2D semi-fluorinated germanene results in a potential anti-

In this bookchapter, we use the coherent spin states approach and the field theory method (continuous limit of lattice magnetic models with DMI) to revisit some basic aspects and properties of magnetic solitons in spacetime while focusing on 1d kinks, 2d and 3d spatial skyrmions/antiskyrmions. We also study the case of a rigid skyrmion dissolved in a magnetic background induced by the electronic spins of magnetic atoms like Mn; and derive the effective rigid skyrmion equation of motion. In this regard, we describe the similarity between, on one hand, electrons in the electromagnetic background; and, on the other hand, rigid skyrmions bathing in a texture of magnetic moments. We also investigate the interaction between elec-

This bookchapter is organized as follows: In Section 2, we introduce some basic

tools on quantum SU(2) spins and review useful aspects of their dynamics. In Section 3, we investigate the topological properties of kinks and 2d space solitons

trons and skyrmions as well as the effect of the spin transfer effect.

Fe1–*x*Co*x*Si [27], FeGe [28], and MnGe [29].

magnetic field [38].

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

ferromagnetic skyrmion [53].

**2**

while describing in detail the underside of the topological structure of these lowdimensional solitons. In Section 4, we extend the construction to approach topological properties to 3d skyrmions. In Section 5, we study the dynamics of rigid skyrmions without and with dissipation; and in Section 6, we use emergent gauge potential fields to describe the effective dynamics of electrons interacting with the skyrmion in the presence of a spin transfer torque. We end this study by making comments and describing perspectives in the study of skyrmions.

## **2. Quantum SU(2) spin dynamics**

In this section, we review some useful ingredients on the quantum SU(2) spin operator, its underlying algebra and its time evolution while focussing on the interesting spin 1/2 states, concerning electrons in materials; and on coherent spin states which are at the basis of the study of skyrmions/antiskyrmions. First, we introduce rapidly the SU(2) spin operator **S** and the implementation of time dependence. Then, we investigate the non dissipative dynamics of the spin by using semiclassical theory approach (coherent states). These tools can be also viewed as a first step towards the topological study of spin induced 1D, 2D and 3D solitons undertaken in next sections.

### **2.1 Quantum spin 1/2 operator and beyond**

We begin by recalling that in non relativistic 3D quantum mechanics, the spin states j i *Sz*, *S* of spinfull particles are characterised by two half integers ð Þ *Sz*, *S* , a positive *S*≥ 0 and an *Sz* taking 2*S* þ 1 values bounded as �*S*≤*Sz* ≤*S* with integral hoppings. For particles with spin 1/2 like electrons, one distinguishes two basis vector states � <sup>1</sup> 2 , 1 2 � � � that are eigenvalues of the scaled Pauli matrix <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *σ<sup>z</sup>* and the quadratic (Casimir) operator <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup> 4 P<sup>3</sup> *<sup>a</sup>*¼<sup>1</sup>*σ*<sup>2</sup> *<sup>a</sup>*, here the three <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *σ<sup>a</sup>* with *σ<sup>a</sup>* ¼ *σ* !*:e* ! *<sup>a</sup>* are the three components of the spin 1/2 operator vector<sup>1</sup> *σ* !. From these ingredients, we learn that the average <*Sz*, *S*∣ <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>σ</sup>z*∣*Sz*, *<sup>S</sup>*><sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*Sz* (for short <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *σ<sup>z</sup>* � �) is carried by the z-direction since *Sz* ¼ *S* ! *:e* ! *<sup>z</sup>* with *e* ! *<sup>z</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ 0, 0, 1 *<sup>T</sup>*. For generic values of the SU 2ð Þ spin *S*, the spin operator reads as ℏ*Ja* where the three *Ja*'s are 2ð Þ� *S* þ 1 ð Þ 2*S* þ 1 generators of the SU 2ð Þ group satisfying the usual commutation relations *Ja*, *Jb* ½ �¼ *iεabcJ <sup>c</sup>* with *εabc* standing for the completely antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensor with non zero value *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>123</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1; its inverse is *<sup>ε</sup>cba* with *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>123</sup> ¼ �1. The time evolution of the spin <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> operator <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>a</sup>* <sup>2</sup> with dynamics governed by a stationary Hamiltonian operator (*dH=dt* ¼ 0) is given by the Heisenberg representation of quantum mechanics. In this non dissipative description, the time dependence of the spin <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> operator ^ *Sa*ð Þ*t* (the hat is to distinguish the operator ^ *Sa* from classical *Sa*) is given by

$$
\hat{S}\_{d} = e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}Ht} \left(\hbar \frac{\sigma\_{d}}{2}\right) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Ht} \tag{1}
$$

where the Pauli matrices *σ<sup>a</sup>* obey the usual commutation relations ½ �¼ *σa*, *σ<sup>b</sup>* 2*iεabcσ<sup>c</sup>* . For a generic value of the SU 2ð Þ spin *<sup>S</sup>*, the above relation extends as ^ *Sa* ¼ *e i* <sup>ℏ</sup>*Ht* <sup>ℏ</sup>*Ja* ð Þ*e*�*<sup>i</sup>* ℏ*Ht*. So, many relations for the spin 1*=*2 may be straightforwardly generalised for generic values *S* of the SU 2ð Þ spin. For example, for a spin value *S*0, the ð Þ 2*S*<sup>0</sup> þ 1 states are given by f g j i *m*, *S*<sup>0</sup> and are labeled by �*S*<sup>0</sup> ≤ *m* ≤ *S*0; one of these

<sup>1</sup> For convenience, we often refer to *σ* !, *e* ! *<sup>i</sup>*, *σ* !*:e* ! *<sup>i</sup>* ¼ *σ<sup>i</sup>* respectively by bold symbols as *σ*, **e***i*, *σ:***e***<sup>i</sup>* ¼ *σi*.

states namely j i *S*0, *S*<sup>0</sup> is very special; it is commonly known as the highest weight state (HWS) as it corresponds to the biggest value *m* ¼ *S*0; from this state one can generate all other spin states j i *m*, *S*<sup>0</sup> ; this feature will be used when describing coherent spin states. Because of the property *σ*<sup>2</sup> *<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>I</sup>*, the square ^ *S* 2 *<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup> <sup>4</sup> *I* is time independent; and then the time dynamics of ^ *Sa*ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* is rotational in the sense that *dS*^*<sup>a</sup> dt* is given by a commutator as follows *<sup>d</sup>*^ *Sa dt* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>* <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>H</sup>*^ *Sa* � ^ *SaH* � �*:* For the example where *<sup>H</sup>* is a linearly dependent function of ^ *Sa* like for the Zeeman coupling, the Hamiltonian reads as *HZ* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>P</sup> *aωa*^ *Sa* (for short *ωa*^ *Sa*) with the *ωa*'s are constants referring to the external source<sup>2</sup> ; then the time evolution of ^ *Sa* reads, after using the commutation relation ^ *Sa*, ^ *Sb* h i <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*ℏ*εabc*^ *S c* , as follows

$$\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{S}}\_a}{dt} = \varepsilon\_{abc} a^b \hat{\mathbf{S}}^\varepsilon \qquad \Leftrightarrow \qquad \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{S}}}{dt} = a \wedge \hat{\mathbf{S}} \tag{2}$$

*Rz*ð Þ *<sup>α</sup> Ry*ð Þ *<sup>β</sup> Rz*ð Þ*<sup>γ</sup>* where each *Ra <sup>ψ</sup><sup>a</sup>* ð Þ is a rotation *<sup>e</sup>*�*iψaJa* around the a- axis with an

*(a) Components of the spin orientation n; its time dynamics in presence of a magnetic field is given by Larmor*

with 0≤ *α*≤2*π* and 0 ≤*β* ≤*π*; they parameterise the unit 2-sphere <sup>2</sup>

gives a bridge between quantum spin operator and its classical description; it relies

�<sup>ℏ</sup> *Jc* ð Þ*abV<sup>c</sup>* with *Jc* ð Þ*ab* given by �*iεabc*; these *Jc*'s are precisely the generators of the

So, the magnetization vector describes (up to a sign) a coherent spin state with

<sup>0</sup> \$ HWS j i *<sup>S</sup>*0, *<sup>S</sup>*<sup>0</sup> ). In this regards, recall that the ^

*S c*

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>m</sup>* the gyromagnetic ratio); thus leading to *μ*

!ð Þ*t* � � �

� �

¼ ℏ*Sn*! can be also put in correspondence with the usual magnetic

*<sup>z</sup>*ðÞ¼ *t* 1 ⇔ *n*

For explicit calculations, this unit 2-sphere equation will be often expressed like *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1; this relation leads in turns to the property *nadna* <sup>¼</sup> 0 (indicating that *<sup>n</sup>*

*ua* ¼ ð Þ cos *β* cos *α*, cos *β* sin *α*, � sin *β* , *va* ¼ �ð Þ sin *α*, cos *α*, 0 (5)

and *dn*! are normal vectors); by implementing time, the variation **n***:d***n** gets mapped into **n***:***n**\_ ¼ 0 teaching us that the velocity **n**\_ is carried by **u** and **v**; two normal

isomorphic to *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> *<sup>=</sup>U*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> ; the missing angle *<sup>γ</sup>* parameterises a circle <sup>1</sup>

on thinking of the average < **S**^ **>** in terms of the classical vector *S*

classical 3-vectors *Vb* through its 3�3 matrix representation like ^

*SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> matrix representation *<sup>R</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>α</sup>*, *<sup>β</sup>*, *<sup>γ</sup>* ; by replacing *Vb* by the operator ^

*Sa*, ^ *Sb* h i <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*ℏ*εabc*^

*<sup>y</sup>* ðÞþ*<sup>t</sup> <sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

!

<sup>0</sup> is an eigen vector of *e*�*iγJz* ; it follows

!

. Notice also that the classical

<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*Sn*! 0

!ð Þ*t* parameterizing the

� <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> (4)

*Sa*,*Vb* h i <sup>¼</sup>

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** which is

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** , isomor-

*Sa* acts on

*Sb*, one

! ¼ j j *μ n* !.

!

0; this generic vector obeys as well the constraint

**n** ¼ ð Þ sin *β* cos *α*, sin *β* sin *α*, cos *β* (3)

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** . 3ð Þ the coherent spin state representation

angle *ψ<sup>a</sup>* and generator *Ja*. 2ð Þ As the unit *n*

*precession. (b) A configuration of several spins in spacetime.*

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

� � j j **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> 1 and is solved as follows.

phic to *<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> , that is fibred over <sup>2</sup>

discovers the SU 2ð Þ spin algebra ^

directions to **n** with components;

(with *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *ge*

*n*2 *<sup>x</sup>*ðÞþ*<sup>t</sup> <sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

amplitude ℏ*Sγ*; and a (opposite) time dependent direction *n*

!

! ¼ �*γ S* !

ð Þ **n** .

!

considered above (*S*

spin vector *S*

moment *μ*

2-sphere <sup>2</sup>

**5**

�*iβJy n* !

! reduces to *e*�*iαJz e*

that *n*

**Figure 1.**

*n* ! � � � � �

where appears the Levi-Civita *εabc* which, as we will see throughout this study, turns out to play an important role in the study of topological field theory [54, 55] including solitons and skyrmions we are interested in here [56–59]. In this regards, notice that, along with this *εabc*, we will encounter another completely antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensor namely *εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*; it is also due to DM interaction which in lattice description is given by *S* ! **<sup>r</sup>***μ*<sup>2</sup> ∧ *S* ! **r***μ*1 � �*:<sup>d</sup>* ! *<sup>μ</sup>*<sup>3</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*�<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>μ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*; and in continuous limit reads as *εabcS<sup>b</sup> Sc μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> *da μ*<sup>3</sup> … *μD*�<sup>2</sup> *εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup><sup>D</sup>* where, for convenience, we have set *S<sup>c</sup> <sup>μ</sup>*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>e</sup>***μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> *:*∇*S<sup>c</sup>* with **e***μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> ¼ **e***μ*<sup>2</sup> � **e***μ*<sup>1</sup> *:* To distinguish these two Levi-Civita tensors, we refer to *εabc* as the target space Levi-Civita with SO 3ð Þtarget symmetry; and to *εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup><sup>D</sup>* as the spacetime Levi-Civita with SO 1, ð Þ *D* � 1 Lorentz symmetry containing as subsymmetry the usual space rotation group SOð Þ *D* � 1 space. Notice also that for the case where the Hamiltonian *H* ^ *S* � � is a general function of the spin, the vector *<sup>ω</sup><sup>a</sup>* is spin dependent and is given by the gradient *<sup>∂</sup><sup>H</sup> ∂*^ *Sa :*

#### **2.2 Coherent spin states and semi-classical analysis**

To deal with the semi-classical dynamics of **<sup>S</sup>**^ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* evolved by a Hamiltonian *H* **S**^ � �, we use the algebra ^ *Sa*, ^ *Sb* h i <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*ℏ*εabc*^ *S c* to think of the quantum spin in terms of a coherent spin state [60] described by a (semi) classical vector *S* ! ¼ ℏ*Sn*! (no hat) of the Euclidean <sup>3</sup> ; see the **Figure 1**(a). This "classical" 3-vector has an amplitude ℏ*S* and a direction *n* ! related to a given unit vector *n* ! <sup>0</sup> as *n* ! ¼ *R*ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ n* ! 0; and parameterised by *α*, *β*, *γ*. In the above relation, the *n* ! <sup>0</sup> is thought of as the north direction of a 2-sphere <sup>2</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** given by the canonical vector 0, 0, 1 ð Þ*<sup>T</sup>*; it is invariant under the proper rotation; i.e. *Rz*ð Þ*γ n* ! <sup>0</sup> ¼ *n* ! 0; and consequently the generic *n* ! is independent of *γ*; i.e.: *n* ! ¼ *R*ð Þ *α*, *β n* ! <sup>0</sup>*:* Recall that the 3�3 matrix *R*ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* is an SO 3ð Þ rotation [SO 3ð Þ� *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> ] generating all other points of <sup>2</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** parameterised by ð Þ *α*, *β* . In this regards, it is interesting to recall some useful properties that we list here after as three points: 1ð Þ the rotation matrix *R*ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* can be factorised like

<sup>2</sup> For an electron with Zeeman field *<sup>B</sup><sup>a</sup>*, we have *<sup>ω</sup><sup>a</sup>* ¼ �*<sup>g</sup> qe* 2*me <sup>B</sup><sup>a</sup>* with *<sup>g</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 2 and *qe* ¼ �*e:*

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

**Figure 1.**

states namely j i *S*0, *S*<sup>0</sup> is very special; it is commonly known as the highest weight state (HWS) as it corresponds to the biggest value *m* ¼ *S*0; from this state one can generate all other spin states j i *m*, *S*<sup>0</sup> ; this feature will be used when describing

<sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>H</sup>*^

where appears the Levi-Civita *εabc* which, as we will see throughout this study, turns out to play an important role in the study of topological field theory [54, 55] including solitons and skyrmions we are interested in here [56–59]. In this regards, notice that, along with this *εabc*, we will encounter another completely antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensor namely *εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*; it is also due to DM interaction which in lattice

*Sa* � ^ *SaH* � �

*d***S**^

is a general function of the spin, the vector *ω<sup>a</sup>* is spin dependent

; see the **Figure 1**(a). This "classical" 3-vector has an amplitude

! <sup>0</sup> as *n*

!

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** given by the canonical vector 0, 0, 1 ð Þ*<sup>T</sup>*; it is invariant

*Sa dt* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*

> *S <sup>c</sup>* <sup>⇔</sup>

*:d* !

*εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup><sup>D</sup>* where, for convenience, we have set *S<sup>c</sup>*

To deal with the semi-classical dynamics of **<sup>S</sup>**^ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* evolved by a Hamiltonian

<sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*ℏ*εabc*^ *S c*

**e***μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> ¼ **e***μ*<sup>2</sup> � **e***μ*<sup>1</sup> *:* To distinguish these two Levi-Civita tensors, we refer to *εabc* as the target space Levi-Civita with SO 3ð Þtarget symmetry; and to *εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup><sup>D</sup>* as the spacetime Levi-Civita with SO 1, ð Þ *D* � 1 Lorentz symmetry containing as subsymmetry the usual space rotation group SOð Þ *D* � 1 space. Notice also that for the case where the

*<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>I</sup>*, the square ^

*Sa* like for the Zeeman coupling, the Hamiltonian

*Sa*) with the *ωa*'s are constants referring to the

*<sup>μ</sup>*<sup>3</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*�<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>μ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*; and in continuous limit reads as

to think of the quantum spin in terms

! ¼ *R*ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ n*

0; and consequently the generic *n*

*<sup>B</sup><sup>a</sup>* with *<sup>g</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 2 and *qe* ¼ �*e:*

<sup>0</sup>*:* Recall that the 3�3 matrix *R*ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* is an

<sup>0</sup> is thought of as the north

!

¼ ℏ*Sn*

! 0; and

! (no hat)

! is

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** parameterised by

*S* 2 *<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup>

*:* For the example where *H* is

*Sa*ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* is rotational in the sense that *dS*^*<sup>a</sup>*

*Sa* reads, after using the commutation

*dt* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ω</sup>*<sup>∧</sup> **<sup>S</sup>**^ (2)

*<sup>μ</sup>*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>e</sup>***μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> *:*∇*S<sup>c</sup>* with

<sup>4</sup> *I* is time

*dt* is

coherent spin states. Because of the property *σ*<sup>2</sup>

*Sa* (for short *ωa*^

; then the time evolution of ^

*dt* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcω<sup>b</sup>*^

, as follows

independent; and then the time dynamics of ^

given by a commutator as follows *<sup>d</sup>*^

*aωa*^

<sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*ℏ*εabc*^ *S c*

> *d*^ *Sa*

! **<sup>r</sup>***μ*<sup>2</sup> ∧ *S* ! **r***μ*1 � �

> *∂*^ *Sa :*

*Sa*, ^ *Sb* h i

of a coherent spin state [60] described by a (semi) classical vector *S*

! related to a given unit vector *n*

! <sup>0</sup> ¼ *n* !

ð Þ *α*, *β* . In this regards, it is interesting to recall some useful properties that we list here after as three points: 1ð Þ the rotation matrix *R*ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* can be factorised like

2*me*

!

SO 3ð Þ rotation [SO 3ð Þ� *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> ] generating all other points of <sup>2</sup>

**2.2 Coherent spin states and semi-classical analysis**

parameterised by *α*, *β*, *γ*. In the above relation, the *n*

<sup>2</sup> For an electron with Zeeman field *<sup>B</sup><sup>a</sup>*, we have *<sup>ω</sup><sup>a</sup>* ¼ �*<sup>g</sup> qe*

! ¼ *R*ð Þ *α*, *β n*

a linearly dependent function of ^

reads as *HZ* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>P</sup>

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

external source<sup>2</sup>

*Sa*, ^ *Sb* h i

description is given by *S*

*S* � �

, we use the algebra ^

under the proper rotation; i.e. *Rz*ð Þ*γ n*

and is given by the gradient *<sup>∂</sup><sup>H</sup>*

Hamiltonian *H* ^

of the Euclidean <sup>3</sup>

ℏ*S* and a direction *n*

direction of a 2-sphere <sup>2</sup>

independent of *γ*; i.e.: *n*

relation ^

*εabcS<sup>b</sup> Sc μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> *da μ*<sup>3</sup> … *μD*�<sup>2</sup>

*H* **S**^ � �

**4**

*(a) Components of the spin orientation n; its time dynamics in presence of a magnetic field is given by Larmor precession. (b) A configuration of several spins in spacetime.*

*Rz*ð Þ *<sup>α</sup> Ry*ð Þ *<sup>β</sup> Rz*ð Þ*<sup>γ</sup>* where each *Ra <sup>ψ</sup><sup>a</sup>* ð Þ is a rotation *<sup>e</sup>*�*iψaJa* around the a- axis with an angle *ψ<sup>a</sup>* and generator *Ja*. 2ð Þ As the unit *n* ! <sup>0</sup> is an eigen vector of *e*�*iγJz* ; it follows that *n* ! reduces to *e*�*iαJz e* �*iβJy n* ! 0; this generic vector obeys as well the constraint *n* ! � � � � � � � j j **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> 1 and is solved as follows.

$$\mathbf{n} = (\sin \beta \cos a, \sin \beta \sin a, \cos \beta) \tag{3}$$

with 0≤ *α*≤2*π* and 0 ≤*β* ≤*π*; they parameterise the unit 2-sphere <sup>2</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** which is isomorphic to *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> *<sup>=</sup>U*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> ; the missing angle *<sup>γ</sup>* parameterises a circle <sup>1</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** , isomorphic to *<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> , that is fibred over <sup>2</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** . 3ð Þ the coherent spin state representation gives a bridge between quantum spin operator and its classical description; it relies on thinking of the average < **S**^ **>** in terms of the classical vector *S* ! <sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*Sn*! 0 considered above (*S* ! <sup>0</sup> \$ HWS j i *<sup>S</sup>*0, *<sup>S</sup>*<sup>0</sup> ). In this regards, recall that the ^ *Sa* acts on classical 3-vectors *Vb* through its 3�3 matrix representation like ^ *Sa*,*Vb* h i <sup>¼</sup> �<sup>ℏ</sup> *Jc* ð Þ*abV<sup>c</sup>* with *Jc* ð Þ*ab* given by �*iεabc*; these *Jc*'s are precisely the generators of the *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> matrix representation *<sup>R</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>α</sup>*, *<sup>β</sup>*, *<sup>γ</sup>* ; by replacing *Vb* by the operator ^ *Sb*, one discovers the SU 2ð Þ spin algebra ^ *Sa*, ^ *Sb* h i <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*ℏ*εabc*^ *S c* . Notice also that the classical spin vector *S* ! ¼ ℏ*Sn*! can be also put in correspondence with the usual magnetic moment *μ* ! ¼ �*γ S* ! (with *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *ge* <sup>2</sup>*<sup>m</sup>* the gyromagnetic ratio); thus leading to *μ* ! ¼ j j *μ n* !. So, the magnetization vector describes (up to a sign) a coherent spin state with amplitude ℏ*Sγ*; and a (opposite) time dependent direction *n* !ð Þ*t* parameterizing the 2-sphere <sup>2</sup> ð Þ **n** .

$$n\_x^2(t) + n\_y^2(t) + n\_x^2(t) = \mathbf{1} \Leftrightarrow \left| \overrightarrow{n}(t) \right| = \mathbf{1} \tag{4}$$

For explicit calculations, this unit 2-sphere equation will be often expressed like *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1; this relation leads in turns to the property *nadna* <sup>¼</sup> 0 (indicating that *<sup>n</sup>* ! and *dn*! are normal vectors); by implementing time, the variation **n***:d***n** gets mapped into **n***:***n**\_ ¼ 0 teaching us that the velocity **n**\_ is carried by **u** and **v**; two normal directions to **n** with components;

$$u\_a = (\cos \beta \cos a, \cos \beta \sin a, -\sin \beta), \quad v\_a = (-\sin a, \cos a, 0) \tag{5}$$

and from which we learn that *dna* ¼ *uadβ* þ *va* sin *βdα*, [(**u**, **v**, **n**) form an orthogonal vector triad). So, the dynamics of *μ<sup>a</sup>* (and that of �*S* ! ) is brought to the dynamics of the unit *na* governed by a classical Hamiltonian H½ � *na*ð Þ *α*, *β* . The resulting time evolution is given by the so called Landau-Lifshitz (LL) equation [61]; it reads as *dna dt* ¼ � *<sup>γ</sup>* j j *<sup>μ</sup> <sup>ε</sup>abc <sup>∂</sup>bH* � �*n<sup>c</sup>* with *<sup>∂</sup>bH* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup><sup>H</sup> <sup>∂</sup>nb :* By using the relations *dβ* ¼ *uadna* and sin *<sup>β</sup>d<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *vadna* with *ua* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na <sup>∂</sup><sup>β</sup>* ; and *va* sin *<sup>β</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>* ; as well as the expressions *<sup>ε</sup>abcuanc* <sup>¼</sup> *vb* and *<sup>ε</sup>abcvanc* ¼ �*ub*, the above LL equation splits into two time evolution equations *<sup>d</sup><sup>β</sup> dt* ¼ �*γvb <sup>∂</sup>bH* � � and sin *<sup>β</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup> dt* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>ub <sup>∂</sup>bH* � �. These time evolutions can be also put into the form

$$
\sin\beta \frac{d\beta}{dt} + \gamma \frac{\partial H}{\partial \alpha} = 0, \quad \sin\beta \frac{da}{dt} - \gamma \frac{\partial H}{\partial \beta} = 0 \tag{6}
$$

theory method while focussing on particular solitons; namely the 1d kinks and the 2d skyrmions. In this extension, one encounters two types of spaces: 1ð Þ the target

regarding the 2d skyrmions dynamics. As we have two kinds of evolutions; time and space; we denote the time variable by *<sup>ξ</sup>*<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>t</sup>*; and the space coordinates by *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *x*, *y* . Moreover, the homologue of the tensors *δab* and *εabc* are respectively given by the usual Lorentzian spacetime metric *<sup>g</sup>μν*, with signature like *<sup>g</sup>μνξμξν* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>t</sup>*

In 1ð Þ <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> D spacetime, the local coordinates parameterising 1,1

in general three components ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> as described previously; but in what follows, we will simplify a little bit the picture by setting *n*<sup>3</sup> ¼ 0; thus leading to a magnetic 1d soliton with two component field variable **n** ¼ ð Þ *n*1, *n*<sup>2</sup> satisfying the constraint equation **n***:***n** ¼ 1 at each point of spacetime. As this constraint relation plays an important role in the construction, it is interesting to express it as *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1. Before describing the topological properties of one space dimensional solitons (kinks), we think it interesting to begin by giving first some useful features; in

The constraint *nan<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 can be also presented like *NN* <sup>¼</sup> 1 with *<sup>N</sup>* standing for

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** considered in previous section. 2ð Þ As for Eq. (5), the constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 leads to *nadna* <sup>¼</sup> 0; and so describes a rotational movement encoded in the relation *dn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abnb* where *<sup>ε</sup>ab* is the standard 2D antisymmetric tensor with *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>21</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>12</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1; this *εab* is related to the previous 3D Levi-Civita like *εzab*. Notice also that the

area *dn*<sup>1</sup> ∧ *dn*2, to be encountered later on, vanishes identically. In this regards, recall

where *εμν* is the antisymmetric tensor in 1+1 spacetime, and J is the Jacobian of the transformation ð Þ! *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*1, *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> . 3ð Þ The condition *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 can be dealt in two manners; either by inserting it by help of a Lagrange multiplier; or by solving it in term of a free angular variable like *na* ¼ ð Þ cos *α*, sin *α* from which we deduce the

the complex field *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *in*<sup>2</sup> that reads also like *<sup>e</sup><sup>i</sup><sup>α</sup>*. In this complex notation, the symmetry of the constraint is given by the phase change acting as *N* ! *UN* with *<sup>U</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>e</sup><sup>i</sup><sup>ψ</sup>* and corresponding to the shift *<sup>α</sup>* ! *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*. Moreover the correspondence ð Þ\$ *n*1, *n*<sup>2</sup> *n*<sup>1</sup> þ *in*<sup>2</sup> describes precisely the well known isomorphisms *SO*ð Þ� 2

**<sup>n</sup>** parameterised by *na* ¼ ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> with Euclidian metric *δab* and topolog-

*<sup>ξ</sup>* parameterised by *ξμ* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* , concerning

2,

ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* are given by

<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1 is invariant

. The field variable *na*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* has

*<sup>ξ</sup>* parameterised by *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* ,

2

*bnb* with orthogonal rotation matrix

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** is a circle; it is precisely the equatorial circle of the 2-sphere

*dn*<sup>1</sup> <sup>∧</sup> *dn*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>J</sup>*dt* <sup>∧</sup> *dx*, <sup>J</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>μν∂μn*1*∂νn*<sup>2</sup> (9)

*<sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>* reading as *ua* ¼ �ð Þ sin *α*, cos *α* . In term of the complex

, <sup>R</sup>*<sup>T</sup>*R ¼ *<sup>I</sup>* (8)

<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *dn*1; and consequently the

space <sup>3</sup>

ical Levi-Civita *<sup>ε</sup>abc*. 2ð Þ the spacetime 1,1

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

the 1d kink evolution; and the spacetime 1,2

and the spacetime Levi-Civita *εμνρ* with *ε*<sup>012</sup> ¼ 1.

*<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* ; so the metric is restricted to *<sup>g</sup>μνξμξν* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>t</sup>*

particular the three following ones. 1ð Þ The constraint ð Þ *n*<sup>1</sup>

*<sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> cos *<sup>ψ</sup>* sin *<sup>ψ</sup>* � sin *ψ* cos *ψ*

**3.1 One space dimensional solitons**

*SO*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** rotations acting as *<sup>n</sup>*0*<sup>a</sup>* ¼ R*<sup>a</sup>*

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** where <sup>1</sup>

normal direction *ua* <sup>¼</sup> *dn<sup>a</sup>*

*<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ� <sup>1</sup> <sup>1</sup>

2

**7**

R*a*

constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 implies moreover that *dn*<sup>2</sup> ¼ � *nn*

that we have the following transformation

and can be identified with the Euler- Lagrange equations following from the variation *<sup>δ</sup>*S ¼ 0 of an action S ¼ <sup>Ð</sup> *Ldt*. Here, the Lagrangian is related to the Hamiltonian like *L* ¼ *LB* � *H n*½ � *<sup>a</sup>*ð Þ *α*, *β* where *LB* is the Berry term [62] known to have the form <**n**|**n**\_>; this relation can be compared with the well known Legendre transform p*q*\_‐Hð Þ *<sup>q</sup>*, *<sup>p</sup>* . For later interpretation, we scale this hamiltonian as <sup>ℏ</sup>*Sγ<sup>H</sup>* such that the spin lagrangian takes the form *Lspin* ¼ *LB* � ℏ*SγH*. To determine *LB*, we identify the Eq. (6) with the extremal variation *δ*S*=δβ* ¼ 0 and *δ*S*=δα* ¼ 0. Straightforward calculations leads to

$$L\_B = -\hbar \mathbf{S} (\mathbf{1} - \cos \beta) \frac{da}{dt} \tag{7}$$

showing that *α* and *β* form a conjugate pair. By substituting sin *β <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup> dt* <sup>¼</sup> *va dna dt* back into above *LB*, we find that the Berry term has the form of Aharonov-Bohm coupling *LAB* <sup>¼</sup> *qeAa dna dt* with magnetic potential vector *Aa* given by *Aa* <sup>¼</sup> ℏ*S qe* ð Þ 1� cos *β* sin *<sup>β</sup> va:* However, this potential vector is suggestive as it has the same form as the potential vector **<sup>A</sup>**ð Þ *monopole* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> qer* ð Þ 1� cos *β* sin *<sup>β</sup>* **v** of a magnetic monopole. The curl of this potential is given by **B** ! <sup>¼</sup> *qm <sup>r</sup>* ! *<sup>r</sup>*<sup>3</sup> with magnetic charge *qm* ¼ � <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> qe* located at the centre of the 2-sphere; the flux Φ of this field through the unit sphere is then equal to �4*<sup>π</sup>* <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> qe* ; and reads as �2*S*Φ<sup>0</sup> with a unit flux quanta <sup>Φ</sup><sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>h</sup> qe* as indicated by the value *S* ¼ 1*=*2. So, because 2*S* ¼ �*n* is an integer, it results that the flux is quantized as Φ ¼ *n*Φ0*:*

### **3. Magnetic solitons in lower dimensions**

In previous section, we have considered the time dynamics of coherent spin states with amplitude ℏ*S* and direction described by *n* !ð Þ*t* as depicted by the **Figure 1(a)**; this is a 3-vector having with no space coordinate dependence, *gradn*! ¼ 0; and as such it can be interpreted as a 1ð Þ þ 0 *D* vector field; that is a vector belonging to 1,*<sup>d</sup>* with *<sup>d</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 (no space direction). In this section, we first turn on 1d space coordinate *x* and promotes the old unit- direction *n* !ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* to a 1ð Þ <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>D</sup> field *n* !ð Þ *t*, *x* . After that, we turn on two space directions ð Þ *x*, *y* ; thus leading to ð Þ 1 þ 2 D field *n* !ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* ; a picture is depicted by the **Figure 1(b)**. To deal with the dynamics of these local fields and their topological properties, we use the field

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

and from which we learn that *dna* ¼ *uadβ* þ *va* sin *βdα*, [(**u**, **v**, **n**) form an

dynamics of the unit *na* governed by a classical Hamiltonian H½ � *na*ð Þ *α*, *β* . The resulting time evolution is given by the so called Landau-Lifshitz (LL) equation

j j *<sup>μ</sup> <sup>ε</sup>abc <sup>∂</sup>bH* � �*n<sup>c</sup>* with *<sup>∂</sup>bH* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup><sup>H</sup>*

*dt* ¼ �*γvb <sup>∂</sup>bH* � � and sin *<sup>β</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>*

*∂H*

sions *<sup>ε</sup>abcuanc* <sup>¼</sup> *vb* and *<sup>ε</sup>abcvanc* ¼ �*ub*, the above LL equation splits into two time

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0, sin *<sup>β</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>*

and can be identified with the Euler- Lagrange equations following from the

*LB* ¼ �ℏ*S*ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>*

*dt* with magnetic potential vector *Aa* given by *Aa* <sup>¼</sup>

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>3</sup> with magnetic charge *qm* ¼ � <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup>*

sin *<sup>β</sup> va:* However, this potential vector is suggestive as it has the same form as

centre of the 2-sphere; the flux Φ of this field through the unit sphere is then equal

value *S* ¼ 1*=*2. So, because 2*S* ¼ �*n* is an integer, it results that the flux is quantized

In previous section, we have considered the time dynamics of coherent spin

!ð Þ *t*, *x* . After that, we turn on two space directions ð Þ *x*, *y* ; thus leading to

dynamics of these local fields and their topological properties, we use the field

!ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* ; a picture is depicted by the **Figure 1(b)**. To deal with the

**Figure 1(a)**; this is a 3-vector having with no space coordinate dependence, *gradn*! ¼ 0; and as such it can be interpreted as a 1ð Þ þ 0 *D* vector field; that is a vector belonging to 1,*<sup>d</sup>* with *<sup>d</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 (no space direction). In this section, we first

turn on 1d space coordinate *x* and promotes the old unit- direction *n*

Hamiltonian like *L* ¼ *LB* � *H n*½ � *<sup>a</sup>*ð Þ *α*, *β* where *LB* is the Berry term [62] known to have the form <**n**|**n**\_>; this relation can be compared with the well known Legendre transform p*q*\_‐Hð Þ *<sup>q</sup>*, *<sup>p</sup>* . For later interpretation, we scale this hamiltonian as <sup>ℏ</sup>*Sγ<sup>H</sup>* such that the spin lagrangian takes the form *Lspin* ¼ *LB* � ℏ*SγH*. To determine *LB*, we

identify the Eq. (6) with the extremal variation *δ*S*=δβ* ¼ 0 and *δ*S*=δα* ¼ 0.

showing that *α* and *β* form a conjugate pair. By substituting sin *β <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>*

*qer*

; and reads as �2*S*Φ<sup>0</sup> with a unit flux quanta <sup>Φ</sup><sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>h</sup>*

<sup>¼</sup> *qm <sup>r</sup>* !

!

**3. Magnetic solitons in lower dimensions**

states with amplitude ℏ*S* and direction described by *n*

into above *LB*, we find that the Berry term has the form of Aharonov-Bohm

ð Þ 1� cos *β*

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>β</sup>* ; and *va* sin *<sup>β</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na*

*dt* � *<sup>γ</sup>*

*∂H*

*Ldt*. Here, the Lagrangian is related to the

sin *<sup>β</sup>* **v** of a magnetic monopole. The curl of

*qe*

!

*<sup>∂</sup>nb :* By using the relations *dβ* ¼

*dt* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>ub <sup>∂</sup>bH* � �. These time evolutions

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>* ; as well as the expres-

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>β</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>0</sup> (6)

*dt* (7)

*qe*

!ð Þ*t* as depicted by the

*dt* <sup>¼</sup> *va dna*

located at the

!ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* to a 1ð Þ <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>D</sup>

as indicated by the

*dt* back

) is brought to the

orthogonal vector triad). So, the dynamics of *μ<sup>a</sup>* (and that of �*S*

[61]; it reads as *dna*

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

evolution equations *<sup>d</sup><sup>β</sup>*

can be also put into the form

variation *<sup>δ</sup>*S ¼ 0 of an action S ¼ <sup>Ð</sup>

Straightforward calculations leads to

the potential vector **<sup>A</sup>**ð Þ *monopole* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup>*

coupling *LAB* <sup>¼</sup> *qeAa dna*

this potential is given by **B**

ℏ*S qe*

ð Þ 1� cos *β*

to �4*<sup>π</sup>* <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> qe*

field *n*

**6**

ð Þ 1 þ 2 D field *n*

as Φ ¼ *n*Φ0*:*

*dt* ¼ � *<sup>γ</sup>*

sin *<sup>β</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>β</sup>*

*dt* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>*

*uadna* and sin *<sup>β</sup>d<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *vadna* with *ua* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na*

theory method while focussing on particular solitons; namely the 1d kinks and the 2d skyrmions. In this extension, one encounters two types of spaces: 1ð Þ the target space <sup>3</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** parameterised by *na* ¼ ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> with Euclidian metric *δab* and topological Levi-Civita *<sup>ε</sup>abc*. 2ð Þ the spacetime 1,1 *<sup>ξ</sup>* parameterised by *ξμ* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* , concerning the 1d kink evolution; and the spacetime 1,2 *<sup>ξ</sup>* parameterised by *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* , regarding the 2d skyrmions dynamics. As we have two kinds of evolutions; time and space; we denote the time variable by *<sup>ξ</sup>*<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>t</sup>*; and the space coordinates by *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *x*, *y* . Moreover, the homologue of the tensors *δab* and *εabc* are respectively given by the usual Lorentzian spacetime metric *<sup>g</sup>μν*, with signature like *<sup>g</sup>μνξμξν* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>t</sup>* 2, and the spacetime Levi-Civita *εμνρ* with *ε*<sup>012</sup> ¼ 1.

#### **3.1 One space dimensional solitons**

In 1ð Þ <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> D spacetime, the local coordinates parameterising 1,1 ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* are given by *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* ; so the metric is restricted to *<sup>g</sup>μνξμξν* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>t</sup>* 2 . The field variable *na*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* has in general three components ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> as described previously; but in what follows, we will simplify a little bit the picture by setting *n*<sup>3</sup> ¼ 0; thus leading to a magnetic 1d soliton with two component field variable **n** ¼ ð Þ *n*1, *n*<sup>2</sup> satisfying the constraint equation **n***:***n** ¼ 1 at each point of spacetime. As this constraint relation plays an important role in the construction, it is interesting to express it as *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1. Before describing the topological properties of one space dimensional solitons (kinks), we think it interesting to begin by giving first some useful features; in particular the three following ones. 1ð Þ The constraint ð Þ *n*<sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1 is invariant *SO*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** rotations acting as *<sup>n</sup>*0*<sup>a</sup>* ¼ R*<sup>a</sup> bnb* with orthogonal rotation matrix

$$\mathcal{R}\_b^a = \begin{pmatrix} \cos \psi & \sin \psi \\ -\sin \psi & \cos \psi \end{pmatrix}, \qquad \mathcal{R}^T \mathcal{R} = I \tag{8}$$

The constraint *nan<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 can be also presented like *NN* <sup>¼</sup> 1 with *<sup>N</sup>* standing for the complex field *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *in*<sup>2</sup> that reads also like *<sup>e</sup><sup>i</sup><sup>α</sup>*. In this complex notation, the symmetry of the constraint is given by the phase change acting as *N* ! *UN* with *<sup>U</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>e</sup><sup>i</sup><sup>ψ</sup>* and corresponding to the shift *<sup>α</sup>* ! *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*. Moreover the correspondence ð Þ\$ *n*1, *n*<sup>2</sup> *n*<sup>1</sup> þ *in*<sup>2</sup> describes precisely the well known isomorphisms *SO*ð Þ� 2 *<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ� <sup>1</sup> <sup>1</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** where <sup>1</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** is a circle; it is precisely the equatorial circle of the 2-sphere 2 ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** considered in previous section. 2ð Þ As for Eq. (5), the constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 leads to *nadna* <sup>¼</sup> 0; and so describes a rotational movement encoded in the relation *dn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abnb* where *<sup>ε</sup>ab* is the standard 2D antisymmetric tensor with *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>21</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>12</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1; this *εab* is related to the previous 3D Levi-Civita like *εzab*. Notice also that the constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 implies moreover that *dn*<sup>2</sup> ¼ � *nn <sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *dn*1; and consequently the area *dn*<sup>1</sup> ∧ *dn*2, to be encountered later on, vanishes identically. In this regards, recall that we have the following transformation

$$d n\_1 \wedge d n\_2 = \mathfrak{J} dt \wedge d \mathfrak{x}, \quad \mathfrak{J} = \varepsilon^{\mu \nu} \partial\_{\mu} n\_1 \partial\_{\nu} n\_2 \tag{9}$$

where *εμν* is the antisymmetric tensor in 1+1 spacetime, and J is the Jacobian of the transformation ð Þ! *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*1, *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> . 3ð Þ The condition *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 can be dealt in two manners; either by inserting it by help of a Lagrange multiplier; or by solving it in term of a free angular variable like *na* ¼ ð Þ cos *α*, sin *α* from which we deduce the normal direction *ua* <sup>¼</sup> *dn<sup>a</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>* reading as *ua* ¼ �ð Þ sin *α*, cos *α* . In term of the complex

field; we have *<sup>N</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *ei<sup>α</sup>* and *NdN* <sup>¼</sup> *idα*. Though interesting, the second way of doing hides an important property in which we are interested in here namely the non linear dynamics and the topological symmetry.

## *3.1.1 Constrained dynamics*

The classical spacetime dynamics of *na*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* is described by a field action S ¼ <sup>Ð</sup> *dtL* with Lagrangian *<sup>L</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *dx*L and density L; this field density is given by � 1 <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μna* � � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>na* ð Þ� *V n*ð Þ� <sup>Λ</sup> *<sup>n</sup><sup>a</sup>* ð Þ *na* � <sup>1</sup> with *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>∂</sup>ξ<sup>μ</sup>*; it reads in terms of the Hamiltonian density as follows

$$
\mathcal{L} = \pi^{a} \dot{n}\_{a} - \mathcal{H} \tag{10}
$$

freedom *α*; or by working with the constrained field *na:* In the first way, we think of

conserved current is a topological 1ð Þ þ 1 *D* spacetime vector *J<sup>μ</sup>* that is manifestly conserved; this feature follows from the relation between *J<sup>μ</sup>* and the antisymmetric

*<sup>J</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

Because of the *εμν*; the continuity relation *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>J<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

by (9); and can be presented into a covariant form like <sup>J</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

*J <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> εμν∂<sup>ν</sup>*

due to the antisymmetry property of *εμν*. The particularity of the above conserved *J<sup>μ</sup>* is its topological nature; it is due to the constraint *nan<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 without recourse to the solution *na* ¼ ð Þ cos *α*, sin *α* . Indeed, Eq. (13) can be derived by computing the

target space fields (*n*1, *n*2). Recall that the spacetime area *dt* ∧ *dx* can be written in

expression of the Jacobian J captures important informations; in particular the three following ones. 1ð Þ It can be expressed as a total divergence like *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>π</sup><sup>J</sup>*

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>μνna*

topological charged as just the usual winding number of the circle [encoded in the homotopy group relation *<sup>π</sup>*<sup>1</sup> <sup>1</sup> � � <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℤ</sup>]. 2ð Þ Because of the constraint *dn*<sup>2</sup> ¼ � *nn*

following from *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1, the Jacobian <sup>J</sup> vanishes identically; thus leading to the

dent despite the apparent t- variable in the integral (*dQ=dt* ¼ 0). By using (13), this

subject to a boundary condition like for instance the periodic *α*ð Þ¼ *t*, ∞ *α*ð Þþ *t*, �∞

interpreted as the winding number of the circle. In this regards, notice that: ð Þ*i* the winding interpretation can be justified by observing that under compactification of the space variable *x*, the infinite space line *<sup>x</sup>* ¼ �� ½ ∞, þ∞ gets mapped into a circle

� � <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℤ</sup>, a homotopy group property [63]. ð Þ *ii* The charge *<sup>Q</sup>* is independent

of the Lagrangian of the system as it follows completely from the field constraint

�<sup>∞</sup> *dx∂xα*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* and after integration leads to

*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0; i.e. <sup>J</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 0 and then *<sup>∂</sup>μ<sup>J</sup>*

Moreover, seen that *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, <sup>∞</sup> is an angular variable parameterising <sup>1</sup>

2*πN* with N an integer; this leads to an integral topological charge *Q* ¼ *N*

*<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>* with angular coordinate �*<sup>π</sup>* <sup>≤</sup>*<sup>φ</sup>* <sup>≤</sup>*π*; so, the integral <sup>1</sup>

ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>* ! <sup>1</sup>

extended object) wrapping the circle <sup>1</sup>

associated with the topological current is given by Ð <sup>þ</sup><sup>∞</sup>

2*π* Ð <sup>þ</sup><sup>∞</sup> *∂νnb*

*<sup>π</sup>* is a normalisation; it is introduced for the interpretation of the

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abdn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>b</sup>*

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>∂</sup>*1*<sup>α</sup>* and of the current density as *<sup>J</sup>*<sup>1</sup> ¼ � <sup>1</sup>

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>∂</sup>*0*α*. This

*α* vanishes identically

*α* (13)

. The Jacobian J is precisely given

*εab* (14)

*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0. 3ð Þ The conserved charge *<sup>Q</sup>*

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup>* ½ � *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ� *<sup>t</sup>*, <sup>∞</sup> *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, �<sup>∞</sup> (15)

2*π* Ð <sup>þ</sup><sup>∞</sup>

ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>* N times; this propery is captured by

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** ; the field *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>φ</sup>* then describes a soliton (one space

*<sup>∂</sup>φ*; and then the mapping *α<sup>t</sup>* : *φ* ! *α*ð Þ *t*, *φ* is a mapping between

�<sup>∞</sup> *dxJ*<sup>0</sup>ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* ; it is time indepen-

�<sup>∞</sup> *dx∂xα*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* gets

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>μν∂μna∂νnbεab*. This

*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ with

*<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *dn*<sup>1</sup>

**<sup>n</sup>**; it may be

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> εμν∂μ∂<sup>ν</sup>*

� � of the mapping from the 2d spacetime coordinates ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* to the

<sup>2</sup> *εμνdξ<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>d</sup>ξν* and, similarly, the target space area *dn*<sup>1</sup> <sup>∧</sup> *dn*<sup>2</sup> can be

the charge density *J*<sup>0</sup> like <sup>1</sup>

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

*εμν* as follows [57],

Jacobian <sup>J</sup> <sup>¼</sup> det *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup>*

terms of *εμν* like <sup>1</sup>

spacetime vector

and where <sup>1</sup>

conservation law *∂μJ*

charge reads also as <sup>1</sup>

1

*π*1 ð Þ *x* 1 ð Þ **n**

**9**

replaced by <sup>1</sup>

2*π* Ð <sup>þ</sup>*<sup>π</sup>* �*<sup>π</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>φ</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>*

two circles namely <sup>1</sup>

*∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>*

expressed in terms of as *εab* follows <sup>1</sup>

where *<sup>π</sup><sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *∂n*\_ *<sup>a</sup>* . In the above Lagrangian density, the auxiliary field Λð Þ*ξ* (no Kinetic term) is a Lagrange multiplier carrying the constraint relation *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1. The *V n*ð Þ is a potential energy density which play an important role for describing 1d kinks with finite size. Notice also that the variation *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>Λ</sup> ¼ 0 gives precisely the constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 while the *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>na* <sup>¼</sup> 0 gives the spacetime dynamics of *na* described by the spacetime equation *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂<sup>μ</sup>na* � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>V</sup> <sup>∂</sup>na* � <sup>Λ</sup>*n<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0. By substituting *na* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ cos *<sup>α</sup>*, sin *<sup>α</sup>* , we obtain L¼� <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μα* � � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ� *<sup>α</sup> <sup>V</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>α</sup>* . If setting *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ¼ *<sup>α</sup>* 0, we end up with the free field equation *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μα* <sup>¼</sup> 0 that expands like *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *<sup>x</sup>* � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *t* � �*<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0; it is invariant under spacetime translations with conserved current symmetry *<sup>∂</sup>μTμν* <sup>¼</sup> 0 with *Tμν* standing for the energy momentum tensor given by the 2�2 symmetric matrix *<sup>∂</sup>μα∂να* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>g</sup>μν*L. The energy density *<sup>T</sup>*<sup>00</sup> is given by <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>t<sup>α</sup>* <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>x<sup>α</sup>* <sup>2</sup> and the momentum density *T*<sup>10</sup> reads as *∂xφ∂xφ*. Focussing on *T*00, the conserved energy *E* reads then as follows

$$E = \frac{1}{2} \int\_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\mathbf{x} \left[ (\partial\_t a)^2 + (\partial\_\mathbf{x} a)^2 \right] \ge \mathbf{0} \tag{11}$$

with minimum corresponding to constant field (*α* ¼ *cte*). Notice that general solutions of *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μα* <sup>¼</sup> 0 are given by arbitrary functions *f x*ð Þ � *<sup>t</sup>* ; they include oscillating and non oscillating functions. A typical non vibrating solution that is interesting for the present study is the solitonic solution given (up to a constant *c*) by the following expression

$$\rho(t,\varkappa) = \pi \tanh\left(\frac{\varkappa + t}{\lambda}\right) \tag{12}$$

where *λ* is a positive parameter representing the width where the soliton *α*ð Þ *t*, *x* acquires a significant variation. Notice that for a given *t*, the field varies from *α*ð Þ¼� *t*, �∞ *π* to *α*ð Þ¼ *t*, þ∞ *π* regardless the value of *λ*. These limits are related to each other by a period 2*π*.

#### *3.1.2 Topological current and charge*

To start, notice that as far as conserved symmetries of (10) are concerned, there exists an exotic invariance generated by a conserved *Jμ*ð Þ *t*, *x* going beyond the spacetime translations generated by the energy momentum tensor *Tμν*. The conserved spacetime current *J<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ *J*0, *J*<sup>1</sup> ð Þ of this exotic symmetry can be introduced in two different, but equivalent, manners; either by using the free degree of

### *Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

field; we have *<sup>N</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *ei<sup>α</sup>* and *NdN* <sup>¼</sup> *idα*. Though interesting, the second way of doing hides an important property in which we are interested in here namely the non

The classical spacetime dynamics of *na*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* is described by a field action S ¼ <sup>Ð</sup>

Kinetic term) is a Lagrange multiplier carrying the constraint relation *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1. The *V n*ð Þ is a potential energy density which play an important role for describing 1d

ant under spacetime translations with conserved current symmetry *<sup>∂</sup>μTμν* <sup>¼</sup> 0 with *Tμν* standing for the energy momentum tensor given by the 2�2 symmetric matrix

momentum density *T*<sup>10</sup> reads as *∂xφ∂xφ*. Focussing on *T*00, the conserved energy *E*

with minimum corresponding to constant field (*α* ¼ *cte*). Notice that general solutions of *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μα* <sup>¼</sup> 0 are given by arbitrary functions *f x*ð Þ � *<sup>t</sup>* ; they include oscillating and non oscillating functions. A typical non vibrating solution that is interesting for the present study is the solitonic solution given (up to a constant *c*) by the

*<sup>φ</sup>*ð Þ¼ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup> <sup>π</sup>* tanh *<sup>x</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>t</sup>*

acquires a significant variation. Notice that for a given *t*, the field varies from *α*ð Þ¼� *t*, �∞ *π* to *α*ð Þ¼ *t*, þ∞ *π* regardless the value of *λ*. These limits are related to

exists an exotic invariance generated by a conserved *Jμ*ð Þ *t*, *x* going beyond the spacetime translations generated by the energy momentum tensor *Tμν*. The conserved spacetime current *J<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ *J*0, *J*<sup>1</sup> ð Þ of this exotic symmetry can be introduced in two different, but equivalent, manners; either by using the free degree of

where *λ* is a positive parameter representing the width where the soliton *α*ð Þ *t*, *x*

To start, notice that as far as conserved symmetries of (10) are concerned, there

*λ* � �

*dx* ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>t<sup>α</sup>* <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>x<sup>α</sup>* <sup>2</sup> h i

L ¼ *<sup>π</sup><sup>a</sup>*

*dx*L and density L; this field density is given by

. In the above Lagrangian density, the auxiliary field Λð Þ*ξ* (no

*<sup>∂</sup>ξ<sup>μ</sup>*; it reads in terms of the

*n*\_ *<sup>a</sup>* � H (10)

*<sup>δ</sup>na* <sup>¼</sup> 0 gives the spacetime dynamics of *na* described

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μα* � � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ� *<sup>α</sup> <sup>V</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>α</sup>* . If setting *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ¼ *<sup>α</sup>* 0, we end up

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>t<sup>α</sup>* <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>x</sup>* � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *t*

*<sup>∂</sup>na* � <sup>Λ</sup>*n<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0. By substituting *na* <sup>¼</sup>

*<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>Λ</sup> ¼ 0 gives precisely the

� �*<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0; it is invari-

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>x<sup>α</sup>* <sup>2</sup> and the

≥0 (11)

(12)

*dtL*

linear dynamics and the topological symmetry.

� � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>na* ð Þ� *V n*ð Þ� <sup>Λ</sup> *<sup>n</sup><sup>a</sup>* ð Þ *na* � <sup>1</sup> with *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>*

kinks with finite size. Notice also that the variation *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>S</sup>

*<sup>∂</sup>μα∂να* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>g</sup>μν*L. The energy density *<sup>T</sup>*<sup>00</sup> is given by <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>E</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 2 ðþ<sup>∞</sup> �∞

with the free field equation *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μα* <sup>¼</sup> 0 that expands like *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

*3.1.1 Constrained dynamics*

Hamiltonian density as follows

*∂n*\_ *<sup>a</sup>*

constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1 while the *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>S</sup>

ð Þ cos *<sup>α</sup>*, sin *<sup>α</sup>* , we obtain L¼� <sup>1</sup>

by the spacetime equation *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂<sup>μ</sup>na* � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>V</sup>*

with Lagrangian *<sup>L</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

where *<sup>π</sup><sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>L</sup>

reads then as follows

following expression

each other by a period 2*π*.

**8**

*3.1.2 Topological current and charge*

� 1 <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μna* freedom *α*; or by working with the constrained field *na:* In the first way, we think of the charge density *J*<sup>0</sup> like <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>∂</sup>*1*<sup>α</sup>* and of the current density as *<sup>J</sup>*<sup>1</sup> ¼ � <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>∂</sup>*0*α*. This conserved current is a topological 1ð Þ þ 1 *D* spacetime vector *J<sup>μ</sup>* that is manifestly conserved; this feature follows from the relation between *J<sup>μ</sup>* and the antisymmetric *εμν* as follows [57],

$$J\_{\mu} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \varepsilon\_{\mu\nu} \partial^{\nu} a \tag{13}$$

Because of the *εμν*; the continuity relation *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>J<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> εμν∂μ∂<sup>ν</sup> α* vanishes identically due to the antisymmetry property of *εμν*. The particularity of the above conserved *J<sup>μ</sup>* is its topological nature; it is due to the constraint *nan<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 without recourse to the solution *na* ¼ ð Þ cos *α*, sin *α* . Indeed, Eq. (13) can be derived by computing the Jacobian <sup>J</sup> <sup>¼</sup> det *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup> ∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>* � � of the mapping from the 2d spacetime coordinates ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* to the target space fields (*n*1, *n*2). Recall that the spacetime area *dt* ∧ *dx* can be written in terms of *εμν* like <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *εμνdξ<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>d</sup>ξν* and, similarly, the target space area *dn*<sup>1</sup> <sup>∧</sup> *dn*<sup>2</sup> can be expressed in terms of as *εab* follows <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abdn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>b</sup>* . The Jacobian J is precisely given by (9); and can be presented into a covariant form like <sup>J</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>μν∂μna∂νnbεab*. This expression of the Jacobian J captures important informations; in particular the three following ones. 1ð Þ It can be expressed as a total divergence like *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>π</sup><sup>J</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ with spacetime vector

$$J^{\mu} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \epsilon^{\mu\nu} n^a \partial\_\nu n^b \varepsilon\_{ab} \tag{14}$$

and where <sup>1</sup> *<sup>π</sup>* is a normalisation; it is introduced for the interpretation of the topological charged as just the usual winding number of the circle [encoded in the homotopy group relation *<sup>π</sup>*<sup>1</sup> <sup>1</sup> � � <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℤ</sup>]. 2ð Þ Because of the constraint *dn*<sup>2</sup> ¼ � *nn <sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *dn*<sup>1</sup> following from *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1, the Jacobian <sup>J</sup> vanishes identically; thus leading to the conservation law *∂μJ <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0; i.e. <sup>J</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 0 and then *<sup>∂</sup>μ<sup>J</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0. 3ð Þ The conserved charge *<sup>Q</sup>* associated with the topological current is given by Ð <sup>þ</sup><sup>∞</sup> �<sup>∞</sup> *dxJ*<sup>0</sup>ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* ; it is time independent despite the apparent t- variable in the integral (*dQ=dt* ¼ 0). By using (13), this charge reads also as <sup>1</sup> 2*π* Ð <sup>þ</sup><sup>∞</sup> �<sup>∞</sup> *dx∂xα*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* and after integration leads to

$$Q = \frac{1}{2\pi} [a(t, \infty) - a(t, -\infty)] \tag{15}$$

Moreover, seen that *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, <sup>∞</sup> is an angular variable parameterising <sup>1</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**; it may be subject to a boundary condition like for instance the periodic *α*ð Þ¼ *t*, ∞ *α*ð Þþ *t*, �∞ 2*πN* with N an integer; this leads to an integral topological charge *Q* ¼ *N* interpreted as the winding number of the circle. In this regards, notice that: ð Þ*i* the winding interpretation can be justified by observing that under compactification of the space variable *x*, the infinite space line *<sup>x</sup>* ¼ �� ½ ∞, þ∞ gets mapped into a circle 1 ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>* with angular coordinate �*<sup>π</sup>* <sup>≤</sup>*<sup>φ</sup>* <sup>≤</sup>*π*; so, the integral <sup>1</sup> 2*π* Ð <sup>þ</sup><sup>∞</sup> �<sup>∞</sup> *dx∂xα*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>* gets replaced by <sup>1</sup> 2*π* Ð <sup>þ</sup>*<sup>π</sup>* �*<sup>π</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>φ</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup> <sup>∂</sup>φ*; and then the mapping *α<sup>t</sup>* : *φ* ! *α*ð Þ *t*, *φ* is a mapping between two circles namely <sup>1</sup> ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>* ! <sup>1</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** ; the field *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>φ</sup>* then describes a soliton (one space extended object) wrapping the circle <sup>1</sup> ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>* N times; this propery is captured by *π*1 ð Þ *x* 1 ð Þ **n** � � <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℤ</sup>, a homotopy group property [63]. ð Þ *ii* The charge *<sup>Q</sup>* is independent of the Lagrangian of the system as it follows completely from the field constraint

**Figure 2.** *On left: a spin configuration with n*<sup>2</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>3</sup> ¼ 1 *dispatched on a 2-sphere. On right: a two space dimensional magnetic skyrmion given by the stereographic projection of* <sup>2</sup> *to plane.*

without any reference to the field action. ð Þ *iii* Under a scale transformation *ξ*<sup>0</sup> ¼ *ξ=λ* with a scaling parameter *λ*>0, the topological charge of the field (12) is invariant; but its total energy (11) get scaled as follows

$$Q'=Q, \qquad E'=\frac{1}{\lambda}E\tag{16}$$

space variable like Ð

H*latt na* **r***<sup>μ</sup>*

*dxdy*L3*<sup>D</sup>* and the density <sup>L</sup>3*<sup>D</sup>* ¼ � <sup>1</sup>

variating this action with respect to the fields **n** and Λ; we get from *<sup>δ</sup>*S3*<sup>D</sup>*

*<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup><sup>V</sup>*

are two manners to deal with the field constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1; either by using the Lagrange multiplier Λ; or by solving it in terms of two angular field variables as

the target space is a rotational movement; and so can be expressed like

the differential *dna* like *uad<sup>β</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *va* sin *<sup>α</sup>d<sup>α</sup>* with the two vector fields *ua* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na*

*ua* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcvbnc*

role in this study; they form a vector basis of the field space; they obey the usual cross products namely **n** ¼ **u** ∧ **v** and its homologue which given by cyclic permu-

Putting these Eq. (21) back into the expansion of *dna* in terms of *dα*, *dβ*; and comparing with Eq. (20), we end up with the explicit expression of the 1-form angular "speed" vector *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup>*; it reads as follows *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *vbd<sup>β</sup>* � *ub* sin *<sup>α</sup>dα*. Notice that by

given by Eq. (5). In the second case, we have the triad *na* ¼

The interest into this (18) is twice; first it can be put into the equivalent form *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc* where <sup>D</sup>*<sup>b</sup>* is an operator acting on *nc* to be derived later on [see Eq. (22) given below]; and second, it can be used to give the relation between the

*ua* ¼ ð Þ cos *β* cos *α*, cos *β* sin *α*, � sin *β* , *va* ¼ �ð Þ sin *α*, cos *α*, 0 (19)

but now *β* ¼ *β*ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* and *α* ¼ *α*ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* with 0≤ *β* ≤ *π* and 0 ≤*α*≤ 2*π:* Notice also that the variation of the filed constraint leads to *nadn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 teaching us interesting informations, in particular the two following useful ones. 1ð Þ the movement of *na* in

where the 1-form *ω<sup>b</sup>* is the rotation vector to be derived below. By substituting

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>* as given above. Notice that the three unit fields ð Þ **n**, **u**, **v** plays an important

, *va* ¼ �*εabcub*

*dna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcωbnc* <sup>⇔</sup> *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ω</sup>*<sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>⇔</sup> *<sup>ω</sup>* � **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** (20)

*na* <sup>¼</sup> 0. 2ð Þ Having two degrees of freedom *<sup>α</sup>* and *<sup>β</sup>*, we can expand

reads in term of the Hamiltonian density as follows.

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

precisely the field constraint **<sup>n</sup>***:***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> 1; and from *<sup>δ</sup>*S3*<sup>D</sup>*

Lagrange equation W**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup><sup>V</sup>*

scalar potential and the operator <sup>D</sup>*<sup>b</sup>*

ð Þ sin *β* cos *α*, sin *β* sin *α*, cos *β* and

(20) back into *nadna*, we obtain *εbcaωbnc*

property *εbcan<sup>c</sup>*

tations; for example,

*va* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na*

**11**

this is a function of the constrained 3-vector **n** and its space time gradient *∂μ***n**; it

In this expression, the H3*D*ð Þ **n** is the continuous limit of a lattice Hamiltonian

�� � � � involving, amongst others, the Heisenberg term, the Dyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction and the Zeeman coupling. The *V*ð Þ **n** in the first expression of L3*<sup>D</sup>* is the scalar potential energy density; it models the continuous limit of the interactions that include the DM and Zeeman ones [see Eq. (1.22) for its explicit relation]. The field Λð Þ*ξ* is an auxiliary 3D spacetime field; it is a Lagrange multiplier that carries the constraint **n***:***n** ¼ 1 which plays the same role as in subSection 3.1. By

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ� **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>Λ</sup>ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>***:***<sup>n</sup>** � <sup>1</sup> ;

*<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>Λ</sup> ¼ 0

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ¼ 0 the following Euler–

*<sup>∂</sup>na* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>Λ</sup>*na* (18)

. To that purpose, we start by noticing that there

*na* which vanishes identically due to the

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>β</sup>* and

*nc* (21)

L3*<sup>D</sup>* ¼ *π:***n**\_ � H3*D*ð Þ **n** (17)

*<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** þ Λ**n***:* For later use, we express this field equation like

This energy transformation shows that stable solitons with minimal energy correspond to *λ* ! ∞; and then to a trivial soliton spreading along the real axis. However, one can have non trivial solitonic configurations that are topologically protected and energetically stable with non diverging *λ*. This can done by turning on an appropriate potential energy density *V*ð Þ **n** in Eq. (10). An example of such potential is the one given by *<sup>g</sup>* <sup>8</sup> *n*<sup>4</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>4</sup> <sup>2</sup> � <sup>1</sup> � �, with positive *<sup>g</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>M</sup>*<sup>2</sup> , breaking *SO*ð Þ2 **<sup>n</sup>**; by using the constraint *n*<sup>2</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1, it can be put *<sup>g</sup>* <sup>4</sup> *n*<sup>2</sup> 1*n*2 2. In terms of the angular field *<sup>α</sup>*, it reads as *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ¼ *<sup>α</sup> <sup>g</sup>* <sup>16</sup> ð Þ 1 � cos 4*α* leading to the well known sine-Gordon Eq. [64, 65] namely *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μα* � *<sup>g</sup>* <sup>4</sup> sin 4*<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 with the symmetry property *<sup>α</sup>* ! *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>π</sup>* 2 . So, the solitonic solution is periodic with period *<sup>π</sup>* <sup>2</sup>; that is the quarter of the old 2*π* period of the free field case. For static field *α*ð Þ *x* , the sine Gordon equation reduces to *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *α dx*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>M</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>4</sup> sin 4*α* ¼ 0; its solution for *M* > 0 is given by arctan exp ½ � *Mx* representing a sine- Gordon field evolving from 0 to *<sup>π</sup>* <sup>2</sup> and describing a kink with topological charge *<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>4</sup> *:* For *<sup>M</sup>* <sup>&</sup>lt; 0, the soliton is an anti-kink evolving from *<sup>π</sup>* <sup>2</sup> to 0 with charge *<sup>Q</sup>* ¼ � <sup>1</sup> <sup>4</sup> *:* Time dependent solutions can be obtained by help of boost transformations *<sup>x</sup>* ! *<sup>x</sup>*�*vt* ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi <sup>1</sup>�*v*<sup>2</sup> <sup>p</sup> .

#### **3.2 Skyrmions in 2d space dimensions**

In this subsection, we investigate the topological properties of 2d Skyrmions by extending the field theory study we have done above for 1d kinks to two space dimensions. For that, we proceed as follows: First, we turn on the component *n*<sup>3</sup> so that the skyrmion field **n** is a real 3-vector with three components ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> constrained as in Eqs. (4) and (5); see **Figure 2**. Second, here we have **n** ¼ **n**ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* ; that is a 3 component field living in the 2ð Þ þ 1 space time with Lorentzian metric and coordinates *ξμ* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* . This means that *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �*dξ<sup>μ</sup>* ; explicitly *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>∂</sup><sup>t</sup> dt* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>∂</sup><sup>x</sup> dx* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>∂</sup><sup>y</sup> dy*.

#### *3.2.1 Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya potential*

The field action <sup>S</sup>3*<sup>D</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *dtL*3*<sup>D</sup>* describing the space time dynamics of **n**ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* has the same structure as Eq. (10); except that here the Lagrangian *L*3*<sup>D</sup>* involves two space variable like Ð *dxdy*L3*<sup>D</sup>* and the density <sup>L</sup>3*<sup>D</sup>* ¼ � <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ� **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>Λ</sup>ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>***:***<sup>n</sup>** � <sup>1</sup> ; this is a function of the constrained 3-vector **n** and its space time gradient *∂μ***n**; it reads in term of the Hamiltonian density as follows.

$$\mathcal{L}\_{3D} = \boldsymbol{\pi} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{n}} - \mathcal{H}\_{3D}(\mathbf{n}) \tag{17}$$

In this expression, the H3*D*ð Þ **n** is the continuous limit of a lattice Hamiltonian H*latt na* **r***<sup>μ</sup>* �� � � � involving, amongst others, the Heisenberg term, the Dyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction and the Zeeman coupling. The *V*ð Þ **n** in the first expression of L3*<sup>D</sup>* is the scalar potential energy density; it models the continuous limit of the interactions that include the DM and Zeeman ones [see Eq. (1.22) for its explicit relation]. The field Λð Þ*ξ* is an auxiliary 3D spacetime field; it is a Lagrange multiplier that carries the constraint **n***:***n** ¼ 1 which plays the same role as in subSection 3.1. By variating this action with respect to the fields **n** and Λ; we get from *<sup>δ</sup>*S3*<sup>D</sup> <sup>δ</sup>*<sup>Λ</sup> ¼ 0 precisely the field constraint **<sup>n</sup>***:***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> 1; and from *<sup>δ</sup>*S3*<sup>D</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ¼ 0 the following Euler– Lagrange equation W**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup><sup>V</sup> <sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** þ Λ**n***:* For later use, we express this field equation like

$$
\partial^{\mu}\partial\_{\mu}n\_{a} = \frac{\partial V}{\partial n^{a}} + \Lambda n\_{a} \tag{18}
$$

The interest into this (18) is twice; first it can be put into the equivalent form *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc* where <sup>D</sup>*<sup>b</sup>* is an operator acting on *nc* to be derived later on [see Eq. (22) given below]; and second, it can be used to give the relation between the scalar potential and the operator <sup>D</sup>*<sup>b</sup>* . To that purpose, we start by noticing that there are two manners to deal with the field constraint *nana* <sup>¼</sup> 1; either by using the Lagrange multiplier Λ; or by solving it in terms of two angular field variables as given by Eq. (5). In the second case, we have the triad *na* ¼ ð Þ sin *β* cos *α*, sin *β* sin *α*, cos *β* and

$$u\_a = (\cos \beta \cos a, \cos \beta \sin a, -\sin \beta) \quad , \quad v\_a = (-\sin a, \cos a, 0) \tag{19}$$

but now *β* ¼ *β*ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* and *α* ¼ *α*ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* with 0≤ *β* ≤ *π* and 0 ≤*α*≤ 2*π:* Notice also that the variation of the filed constraint leads to *nadn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 teaching us interesting informations, in particular the two following useful ones. 1ð Þ the movement of *na* in the target space is a rotational movement; and so can be expressed like

$$dn\_a = \varepsilon\_{abc} \alpha^b n^c \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad d\mathbf{n} = \omega \wedge \mathbf{n} \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad \omega \sim \mathbf{n} \wedge d\mathbf{n} \tag{20}$$

where the 1-form *ω<sup>b</sup>* is the rotation vector to be derived below. By substituting (20) back into *nadna*, we obtain *εbcaωbnc na* which vanishes identically due to the property *εbcan<sup>c</sup> na* <sup>¼</sup> 0. 2ð Þ Having two degrees of freedom *<sup>α</sup>* and *<sup>β</sup>*, we can expand the differential *dna* like *uad<sup>β</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *va* sin *<sup>α</sup>d<sup>α</sup>* with the two vector fields *ua* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na <sup>∂</sup><sup>β</sup>* and *va* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>* as given above. Notice that the three unit fields ð Þ **n**, **u**, **v** plays an important role in this study; they form a vector basis of the field space; they obey the usual cross products namely **n** ¼ **u** ∧ **v** and its homologue which given by cyclic permutations; for example,

$$u\_a = \varepsilon\_{abc} v^b n^c, \quad v\_a = -\varepsilon\_{abc} u^b n^c \tag{21}$$

Putting these Eq. (21) back into the expansion of *dna* in terms of *dα*, *dβ*; and comparing with Eq. (20), we end up with the explicit expression of the 1-form angular "speed" vector *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup>*; it reads as follows *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *vbd<sup>β</sup>* � *ub* sin *<sup>α</sup>dα*. Notice that by

without any reference to the field action. ð Þ *iii* Under a scale transformation *ξ*<sup>0</sup> ¼ *ξ=λ* with a scaling parameter *λ*>0, the topological charge of the field (12) is invariant;

*<sup>Q</sup>*<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>Q</sup>*, *<sup>E</sup>*<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

This energy transformation shows that stable solitons with minimal energy correspond to *λ* ! ∞; and then to a trivial soliton spreading along the real axis. However, one can have non trivial solitonic configurations that are topologically protected and energetically stable with non diverging *λ*. This can done by turning on an appropriate potential energy density *V*ð Þ **n** in Eq. (10). An example of such

<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1, it can be put *<sup>g</sup>*

period of the free field case. For static field *α*ð Þ *x* , the sine Gordon equation reduces

In this subsection, we investigate the topological properties of 2d Skyrmions by extending the field theory study we have done above for 1d kinks to two space

dimensions. For that, we proceed as follows: First, we turn on the component *n*<sup>3</sup> so that the skyrmion field **n** is a real 3-vector with three components ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> constrained as in Eqs. (4) and (5); see **Figure 2**. Second, here we have **n** ¼ **n**ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y* ; that is a 3 component field living in the 2ð Þ þ 1 space time with Lorentzian metric and coordi-

has the same structure as Eq. (10); except that here the Lagrangian *L*3*<sup>D</sup>* involves two

<sup>4</sup> sin 4*α* ¼ 0; its solution for *M* > 0 is given by arctan exp ½ � *Mx*

<sup>8</sup> *n*<sup>4</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>4</sup>

<sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

representing a sine- Gordon field evolving from 0 to *<sup>π</sup>*

<sup>1</sup>�*v*<sup>2</sup> <sup>p</sup> .

nates *ξμ* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* . This means that *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �*dξ<sup>μ</sup>*

*3.2.1 Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya potential*

The field action <sup>S</sup>3*<sup>D</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

**3.2 Skyrmions in 2d space dimensions**

the solitonic solution is periodic with period *<sup>π</sup>*

*λ*

<sup>3</sup> ¼ 1 *dispatched on a 2-sphere. On right: a two space*

<sup>2</sup> � <sup>1</sup> � �, with positive *<sup>g</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>M</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

<sup>16</sup> ð Þ 1 � cos 4*α* leading to the well known sine-Gordon

<sup>4</sup> *n*<sup>2</sup> 1*n*2

<sup>4</sup> *:* For *<sup>M</sup>* <sup>&</sup>lt; 0, the soliton is an anti-kink evolving from *<sup>π</sup>*

<sup>4</sup> *:* Time dependent solutions can be obtained by help of boost

<sup>4</sup> sin 4*<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 with the symmetry property *<sup>α</sup>* ! *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>π</sup>*

<sup>2</sup>; that is the quarter of the old 2*π*

; explicitly *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**

*dtL*3*<sup>D</sup>* describing the space time dynamics of **n**ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y*

*E* (16)

, breaking *SO*ð Þ2 **<sup>n</sup>**;

2 . So,

<sup>2</sup> to 0

2. In terms of the angular field

<sup>2</sup> and describing a kink with

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>t</sup> dt* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>x</sup> dx* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>y</sup> dy*.

but its total energy (11) get scaled as follows

<sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

*dimensional magnetic skyrmion given by the stereographic projection of* <sup>2</sup> *to plane.*

potential is the one given by *<sup>g</sup>*

*On left: a spin configuration with n*<sup>2</sup>

Eq. [64, 65] namely *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μα* � *<sup>g</sup>*

by using the constraint *n*<sup>2</sup>

topological charge *<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

transformations *<sup>x</sup>* ! *<sup>x</sup>*�*vt* ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

with charge *<sup>Q</sup>* ¼ � <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>α</sup>*, it reads as *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ¼ *<sup>α</sup> <sup>g</sup>*

to *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *α dx*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>M</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

**10**

**Figure 2.**

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

using the space time coordinates *<sup>ξ</sup>*, we can also express Eq. (20) like *<sup>∂</sup>μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcω<sup>b</sup> μnc* with *ω<sup>b</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* given by *<sup>v</sup><sup>b</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μβ* � � � *ub* sin *<sup>α</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μα* � �*:* From this expression, we can compute the Laplacian *∂μ∂μna*; which, by using the above relations; is equal to *εabc∂<sup>μ</sup> ω<sup>b</sup> μnc* � � reading explicitly as *εabc ∂μω<sup>b</sup> μ* � �*nc* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup> <sup>μ</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>nc* ð Þ h i or equivalently like *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc* with operator <sup>D</sup>*<sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup> <sup>μ</sup>∂<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μω<sup>b</sup> μ* � �. Notice that the above operator has an interesting geometric interpretation; by factorising *ω<sup>b</sup> <sup>μ</sup>*, we can put it in the form *ωd <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>D</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup> <sup>d</sup>* where <sup>D</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup> <sup>d</sup>* appears as a gauge covariant derivative <sup>D</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup> <sup>d</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup><sup>b</sup> <sup>d</sup>∂<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>A</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup> d* with a non trivial gauge potential *<sup>A</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup> <sup>d</sup>* given by *ωμ <sup>d</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>ν</sup> ωb ν* � �*:* Comparing with (18) with *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc* , we obtain *<sup>∂</sup><sup>V</sup> <sup>∂</sup>na* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc* � <sup>Λ</sup>*na*; and then a scalar potential energy *V* given by Ð *εabc dn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>D</sup>*bnc* � � � <sup>Λ</sup><sup>Ð</sup> *nadn<sup>a</sup>* . The second term in this relation vanishes identically because *nadna* <sup>¼</sup> 0; thus reducing to

$$V = \int \varepsilon\_{abc} \left( dn^a \mathcal{D}^b n^c \right) \tag{22}$$

expansions *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup>*

charge density *J*

we have *J*

1 4*π*

1,3

**13**

*<sup>∂</sup>*½ � *<sup>α</sup>*, cos *<sup>β</sup>*

*∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>* � �*dξ<sup>μ</sup>*

where J3*<sup>D</sup>* is precisely the Jacobian det *<sup>∂</sup>na*

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

expression (23) of the topological current *J*

<sup>0</sup> given by <sup>1</sup>

**n**

equivalent relations; first into the form like sin *<sup>β</sup>*

*J* <sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*

relation describes a unit 2-sphere <sup>2</sup>

<sup>0</sup>*dx* <sup>∧</sup> *dy* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

topological charge *Q* reads as <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>*<sup>1</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>x</sup>*

homotopy property *π*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup>

winding number *π*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup>

; and putting back into *d*<sup>3</sup>

has a geometric origin; it follows from the field constraint relation *n*<sup>2</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* , we turn to determine the associated topological charge *<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

we find 2*na*ð Þ sin *<sup>α</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>β</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>* where we have used *<sup>ε</sup>abc ubvc* � *uc*

4*π* Ð 2 **n**

Replacing *na* by their expression in terms of the angles

ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> in terms of the ð Þ *x*, *y* space variables is given by

*<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> , *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>y</sup>*

plane. So, the field *na* defines a mapping between <sup>2</sup>

**n** � � <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>N</sup>*.

**4. Three dimensional magnetic skyrmions**

homologue concerning the kinks and 2d skyrmions.

charge given by the winding number <sup>2</sup>

properties both in target space <sup>4</sup>

� �; see below. Notice that *J*

*∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>*

degenerating the volume of the 3D target space down to a surface. This constraint

leading to J3*<sup>D</sup>* ¼ 0 and then to the above continuity equation. Having the explicit

*ubd<sup>β</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>v</sup><sup>b</sup>* sin *<sup>α</sup>dα*, we can calculate the area *dnb* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>c</sup>* in terms of the angles *<sup>α</sup>* and *<sup>β</sup>*;

*∂nc <sup>∂</sup><sup>y</sup>* � *<sup>∂</sup>nb ∂y*

4*π*

**<sup>n</sup>** around <sup>2</sup>

In this section, we study the dynamics of the 3d skyrmion and its topological

*<sup>ξ</sup>* parameterised by *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>*, *<sup>z</sup>* (with Lorentzian metric *<sup>g</sup>μν*). The spacetime dynamics of the 3d skyrmion is described by a four component field *nA*ð Þ*ξ* obeying a constraint relation *<sup>f</sup>*ð Þ¼ *<sup>n</sup>* 1; here the *<sup>f</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* is given by the quadratic form *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* invariant under SO 4ð Þ transformations isomorphic to SU 2ð Þ�SU 2ð Þ. The structure of the topological current of the 3d skyrmion is encoded in two types of Levi-Civita tensors namely the target space *εABCD* and the spacetime *εμνρτ* extending their

*<sup>∂</sup>*½ � *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* which is nothing but the Jacobian of the transformation from the ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* space to the unit 2-sphere with angular variables ð Þ *α*, *β* . The explicit expression of

but this is nothing but the stereographic projection of the 2-sphere <sup>2</sup>

*∂β ∂x ∂α <sup>∂</sup><sup>y</sup>* � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>β</sup> ∂y ∂β ∂x* � �; and second as

*<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> , *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>3</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> � <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>* towards <sup>2</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>* (with euclidian metric *δAB*) and in 4D spacetime

**<sup>n</sup>**; this corresponds just to the

is just the unit charge; the general value is an integer *Q* ¼ *N* with N being the

<sup>8</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>n</sup><sup>a</sup> <sup>∂</sup>nb ∂x*

ð Þ sin *β* cos *α*, sin *β* sin *α*, cos *β* , we can bring the above charge density *J*

**n**, we obtain the relation *d*<sup>3</sup>

� �. 2ð Þ The conservation law *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>J</sup>*

ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** ; and so a vanishing volume *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>3</sup>

<sup>8</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>abcn<sup>a</sup> dnb* <sup>∧</sup> *dnc* � �. Moreover using the differentials *dn<sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup>

<sup>8</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>abcε*0*ij <sup>∂</sup>inb<sup>∂</sup> jnc* � �*na*. Substituting *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>0</sup>*ijdx* <sup>∧</sup> *dy* by *<sup>d</sup>ξ<sup>i</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>d</sup><sup>ξ</sup> <sup>j</sup>*

*∂nc ∂x*

**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>J</sup>3*Dd*<sup>3</sup>

*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>0</sup>

¼ 0; thus

<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>3</sup> ¼ 1

<sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

*dxdyJ*<sup>0</sup> with

<sup>0</sup> into two

*<sup>ξ</sup>* on the real

*<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> (25)

**<sup>n</sup>** with topological

**n** � � 2 ð Þ **n**

*<sup>μ</sup>* in terms of the magnetic texture field

*vb* � � <sup>¼</sup> <sup>2</sup>*na:* So, the

<sup>0</sup> can be also presented like

ð Þ sin *β dαdβ* which is equal to 1. In fact this value

� � (24)

*ξ*

,

containing *<sup>ε</sup>abc na*D*bnc* � � as a sub-term. In the end of this analysis, let us compare this sub-term with the *εabcnbnc μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> <sup>Δ</sup>*<sup>a</sup>μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> with <sup>Δ</sup>*<sup>a</sup>μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>d</sup><sup>a</sup> <sup>μ</sup>*<sup>3</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*�<sup>2</sup> *εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup><sup>D</sup>* giving the general structure of the DM coupling (see end of subSection 2.1). For 1ð Þ þ 2 D spacetime, the general structure of DM interaction reads *εabcda* <sup>0</sup> *nb*∇*nc* � �*:***e***μνε*<sup>0</sup>*μν*; by setting **<sup>e</sup>**<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>e</sup>***μνε*<sup>0</sup>*μν* and **<sup>d</sup>***<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *da* <sup>0</sup>**e**<sup>0</sup> as well as *<sup>D</sup><sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>d</sup>***<sup>a</sup> :*∇, one brings it to the form *εabc naDbnc* � � which is the same as the one following from (22).

## *3.2.2 From kinks to 2d Skyrmions*

Here, we study the topological properties of the 2d Skyrmion with dynamics governed by the Lagrangian density (17). From the expression of the 1ð Þ þ 1 D topological current *J <sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ2*<sup>D</sup>* discussed in subSection 2.1, which reads as <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>μνna∂νn<sup>b</sup>εab*, one can wonder the structure of the 1ð Þ þ 2 D topological current *J <sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* that is associated with the 2d Skyrmion described by the 3-vector field *na*ð Þ*ξ* . It is given by

$$(J^{\mu})\_{3D} = \frac{1}{8\pi} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} n^a \partial\_\nu n^b \partial\_\nu n^c \varepsilon\_{abc} \tag{23}$$

where *εabc* is as before and where *εμνρ* is the completely antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensor in the 1ð Þ <sup>þ</sup> <sup>2</sup> D spacetime. The divergence *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>J</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* of the above spacetime vector vanishes identically; it has two remarkable properties that we want to comment before proceeding. 1ð Þ The *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>J</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* is nothing but the determinant of the 3 � 3 Jacobian matrix *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup> <sup>∂</sup>ξ<sup>μ</sup>* relating the three field variables *na* to the three spacetime coordinates *ξ<sup>μ</sup>*; this Jacobian det *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup> ∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>* � � is generally given by 1 <sup>3</sup>! *<sup>ε</sup>μνρ∂μna∂νnb∂νnbεabc*; it maps the spacetime volume *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>3</sup> *ξ* ¼ *dt* ∧ *dx* ∧ *dy* into the target space volume *d*<sup>3</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *dn*<sup>1</sup> <sup>∧</sup> *dn*<sup>2</sup> <sup>∧</sup> *dn*<sup>3</sup> . In this regards, recall that these two 3D volumes can be expressed in covariant manners by using the completely antisymmetric tensors *εμνρ* and *εabc* introduced earlier; and as noticed before play a central role in topology. The target space volume *d*<sup>3</sup> **n** can be expressed like 1 <sup>3</sup>! *<sup>ε</sup>abcdn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>b</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *dnc* ; and a similar relation can be also written down for the spacetime volume *d*<sup>3</sup> *ξ*. Notice also that by substituting the differentials *dna* by their using the space time coordinates *<sup>ξ</sup>*, we can also express Eq. (20) like *<sup>∂</sup>μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcω<sup>b</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>nc* ð Þ

*μ* � �

*<sup>d</sup>* appears as a gauge covariant derivative <sup>D</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup>*

*nadn<sup>a</sup>*

*εabc dna*

containing *<sup>ε</sup>abc na*D*bnc* � � as a sub-term. In the end of this analysis, let us compare

general structure of the DM coupling (see end of subSection 2.1). For 1ð Þ þ 2 D

<sup>0</sup>**e**<sup>0</sup> as well as *<sup>D</sup><sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>d</sup>***<sup>a</sup>*

Here, we study the topological properties of the 2d Skyrmion with dynamics governed by the Lagrangian density (17). From the expression of the 1ð Þ þ 1 D

associated with the 2d Skyrmion described by the 3-vector field *na*ð Þ*ξ* . It is given by

<sup>8</sup>*<sup>π</sup> εμνρn<sup>a</sup>*

where *εabc* is as before and where *εμνρ* is the completely antisymmetric Levi-

*∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>* � �

; and a similar relation can be also written down for the

spacetime vector vanishes identically; it has two remarkable properties that we

volumes can be expressed in covariant manners by using the completely antisymmetric tensors *εμνρ* and *εabc* introduced earlier; and as noticed before play a central

*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ2*<sup>D</sup>* discussed in subSection 2.1, which reads as <sup>1</sup>

*∂νnb∂νnc*

<sup>Δ</sup>*<sup>a</sup>μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> with <sup>Δ</sup>*<sup>a</sup>μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>d</sup><sup>a</sup>*

D*b*

*<sup>d</sup>* given by *ωμ*

*<sup>d</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>ν</sup> ωb ν*

*<sup>∂</sup>na* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc* � <sup>Λ</sup>*na*; and then a scalar potential

*<sup>μ</sup>*<sup>3</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup>D*�<sup>2</sup>

Laplacian *∂μ∂μna*; which, by using the above relations; is equal to *εabc∂<sup>μ</sup> ω<sup>b</sup>*

*nc* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup>∂<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μω<sup>b</sup>*

h i

*μ* � �

, we obtain *<sup>∂</sup><sup>V</sup>*

vanishes identically because *nadna* <sup>¼</sup> 0; thus reducing to

<sup>D</sup>*bnc* � � � <sup>Λ</sup><sup>Ð</sup>

*V* ¼ ð

*μ*1*μ*<sup>2</sup>

spacetime, the general structure of DM interaction reads *εabcda*

*εabc naDbnc* � � which is the same as the one following from (22).

one can wonder the structure of the 1ð Þ þ 2 D topological current *J*

*J <sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

Civita tensor in the 1ð Þ <sup>þ</sup> <sup>2</sup> D spacetime. The divergence *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>J</sup>*

want to comment before proceeding. 1ð Þ The *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>J</sup>*

<sup>3</sup>! *<sup>ε</sup>μνρ∂μna∂νnb∂νnbεabc*; it maps the spacetime volume *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>3</sup>

**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *dn*<sup>1</sup> <sup>∧</sup> *dn*<sup>2</sup> <sup>∧</sup> *dn*<sup>3</sup>

spacetime coordinates *ξ<sup>μ</sup>*; this Jacobian det *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup>*

role in topology. The target space volume *d*<sup>3</sup>

nant of the 3 � 3 Jacobian matrix *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup>*

target space volume *d*<sup>3</sup>

<sup>3</sup>! *<sup>ε</sup>abcdn<sup>a</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>b</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *dnc*

spacetime volume *d*<sup>3</sup>

interesting geometric interpretation; by factorising *ω<sup>b</sup>*

*εabc dn<sup>a</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup>* given by *<sup>v</sup><sup>b</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μβ* � � � *ub* sin *<sup>α</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μα* � �*:* From this expression, we can compute the

with *ω<sup>b</sup>*

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

*ωd <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>D</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup>*

reading explicitly as *εabc ∂μω<sup>b</sup>*

*<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc* with operator <sup>D</sup>*<sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ω</sup><sup>b</sup>*

with a non trivial gauge potential *<sup>A</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup>*

*<sup>d</sup>* where <sup>D</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup>*

this sub-term with the *εabcnbnc*

setting **<sup>e</sup>**<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>e</sup>***μνε*<sup>0</sup>*μν* and **<sup>d</sup>***<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *da*

*3.2.2 From kinks to 2d Skyrmions*

topological current *J*

1

1

**12**

with *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μna* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abc*D*bnc*

energy *V* given by Ð

*μnc*

*μnc* � �

*<sup>d</sup>∂<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>A</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>b</sup>*

*d*

or equivalently like *<sup>∂</sup>μ∂μna* <sup>¼</sup>

. Notice that the above operator has an

. The second term in this relation

*nc* � � (22)

*<sup>μ</sup>*, we can put it in the form

� �*:* Comparing with (18)

*<sup>d</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup><sup>b</sup>*

*εμ*<sup>1</sup> … *<sup>μ</sup><sup>D</sup>* giving the

*:*∇, one brings it to the form

<sup>0</sup> *nb*∇*nc* � �*:***e***μνε*<sup>0</sup>*μν*; by

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>μνna∂νn<sup>b</sup>εab*,

*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* that is

*εabc* (23)

*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* of the above

*ξ* ¼ *dt* ∧ *dx* ∧ *dy* into the

*<sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* is nothing but the determi-

*<sup>∂</sup>ξ<sup>μ</sup>* relating the three field variables *na* to the three

is generally given by

**n** can be expressed like

*ξ*. Notice also that by substituting the differentials *dna* by their

. In this regards, recall that these two 3D

expansions *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup> ∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>* � �*dξ<sup>μ</sup>* ; and putting back into *d*<sup>3</sup> **n**, we obtain the relation *d*<sup>3</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>J</sup>3*Dd*<sup>3</sup> *ξ* where J3*<sup>D</sup>* is precisely the Jacobian det *<sup>∂</sup>na ∂ξ<sup>μ</sup>* � �. 2ð Þ The conservation law *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup> <sup>J</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ3*<sup>D</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>0</sup> has a geometric origin; it follows from the field constraint relation *n*<sup>2</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>3</sup> ¼ 1 degenerating the volume of the 3D target space down to a surface. This constraint relation describes a unit 2-sphere <sup>2</sup> ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>** ; and so a vanishing volume *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>3</sup> **n** � � 2 ð Þ **n** ¼ 0; thus leading to J3*<sup>D</sup>* ¼ 0 and then to the above continuity equation. Having the explicit expression (23) of the topological current *J <sup>μ</sup>* in terms of the magnetic texture field *<sup>n</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* , we turn to determine the associated topological charge *<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *dxdyJ*<sup>0</sup> with charge density *J* <sup>0</sup> given by <sup>1</sup> <sup>8</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>abcε*0*ij <sup>∂</sup>inb<sup>∂</sup> jnc* � �*na*. Substituting *<sup>ε</sup>*<sup>0</sup>*ijdx* <sup>∧</sup> *dy* by *<sup>d</sup>ξ<sup>i</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>d</sup><sup>ξ</sup> <sup>j</sup>* , we have *J* <sup>0</sup>*dx* <sup>∧</sup> *dy* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>8</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>abcn<sup>a</sup> dnb* <sup>∧</sup> *dnc* � �. Moreover using the differentials *dn<sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *ubd<sup>β</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>v</sup><sup>b</sup>* sin *<sup>α</sup>dα*, we can calculate the area *dnb* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>c</sup>* in terms of the angles *<sup>α</sup>* and *<sup>β</sup>*; we find 2*na*ð Þ sin *<sup>α</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>β</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>* where we have used *<sup>ε</sup>abc ubvc* � *uc vb* � � <sup>¼</sup> <sup>2</sup>*na:* So, the topological charge *Q* reads as <sup>1</sup> 4*π* Ð 2 **n** ð Þ sin *β dαdβ* which is equal to 1. In fact this value is just the unit charge; the general value is an integer *Q* ¼ *N* with N being the winding number *π*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> **n** � �; see below. Notice that *J* <sup>0</sup> can be also presented like

$$J^0 = \frac{\varepsilon\_{abc}}{8\pi} n^a \left( \frac{\partial n^b}{\partial \mathbf{x}} \frac{\partial n^c}{\partial \mathbf{y}} - \frac{\partial n^b}{\partial \mathbf{y}} \frac{\partial n^c}{\partial \mathbf{x}} \right) \tag{24}$$

Replacing *na* by their expression in terms of the angles ð Þ sin *β* cos *α*, sin *β* sin *α*, cos *β* , we can bring the above charge density *J* <sup>0</sup> into two equivalent relations; first into the form like sin *<sup>β</sup>* 4*π ∂β ∂x ∂α <sup>∂</sup><sup>y</sup>* � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>β</sup> ∂y ∂β ∂x* � �; and second as 1 4*π <sup>∂</sup>*½ � *<sup>α</sup>*, cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>∂</sup>*½ � *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* which is nothing but the Jacobian of the transformation from the ð Þ *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>* space to the unit 2-sphere with angular variables ð Þ *α*, *β* . The explicit expression of ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*<sup>3</sup> in terms of the ð Þ *x*, *y* space variables is given by

$$n\_1 = \frac{2\varkappa}{\varkappa^2 + \jmath^2 + 1} \quad , \quad n\_2 = \frac{2\jmath}{\varkappa^2 + \jmath^2 + 1} \quad , \quad n\_3 = \frac{\varkappa^2 + \jmath^2 - 1}{\varkappa^2 + \jmath^2 + 1} \tag{25}$$

but this is nothing but the stereographic projection of the 2-sphere <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* on the real plane. So, the field *na* defines a mapping between <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* towards <sup>2</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** with topological charge given by the winding number <sup>2</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** around <sup>2</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**; this corresponds just to the homotopy property *π*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> **n** � � <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>N</sup>*.

## **4. Three dimensional magnetic skyrmions**

In this section, we study the dynamics of the 3d skyrmion and its topological properties both in target space <sup>4</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* (with euclidian metric *δAB*) and in 4D spacetime 1,3 *<sup>ξ</sup>* parameterised by *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>*, *<sup>z</sup>* (with Lorentzian metric *<sup>g</sup>μν*). The spacetime dynamics of the 3d skyrmion is described by a four component field *nA*ð Þ*ξ* obeying a constraint relation *<sup>f</sup>*ð Þ¼ *<sup>n</sup>* 1; here the *<sup>f</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* is given by the quadratic form *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* invariant under SO 4ð Þ transformations isomorphic to SU 2ð Þ�SU 2ð Þ. The structure of the topological current of the 3d skyrmion is encoded in two types of Levi-Civita tensors namely the target space *εABCD* and the spacetime *εμνρτ* extending their homologue concerning the kinks and 2d skyrmions.

## **4.1 From 2d skyrmion to 3d homologue**

As for the 1d and 2d solitons considered previous section, the spacetime dynamics of the 3d skyrmion in 1,3 is described by a field action <sup>S</sup>4*<sup>D</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *dtL*4*<sup>D</sup>* with Lagrangian realized as the space integral Ð *dxdydz*L4*D*. Generally, the Lagrangian density L4*<sup>D</sup>* is a function of the soliton *n*ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y*, *z* which is a real 4-component field [*n* ¼ ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*3, *n*<sup>4</sup> ] constrained like *f*½ �¼ *n*ð Þ*ξ* 1*:* For self ineracting field, the typical field expression of <sup>L</sup>4*<sup>D</sup>* is given by � <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ<sup>n</sup>* � �<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ� *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>Λ</sup>½ � *<sup>f</sup>*ð Þ� *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>1</sup> where *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* is a scalar potential; and where the auxiliary field Λð Þ*ξ* is a Lagrange multiplier carrying the field constraint. This density <sup>L</sup>4*<sup>D</sup>* reads in terms of the Hamiltonian as <sup>Π</sup>*: <sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *∂t* � Hð Þ **n** *:* Below, we consider a 4-component skyrmionic field constrained as *n:n* ¼ 1; and focuss on a simple Lagrangian density <sup>L</sup><sup>∘</sup> ¼ � <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ<sup>n</sup>* � � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ� *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>Λ</sup>½ � *<sup>n</sup>:<sup>n</sup>* � <sup>1</sup> to describe the degrees of freedom of *n*. Being a unit 4-component vector, we can solve the constraint *n:n* ¼ 1 in terms of three angular angles ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* ; by setting

$$\mathfrak{n} = (\mathbf{m}\sin\gamma, \cos\gamma), \quad \mathbf{m} = (\sin\beta\cos a, \sin\beta\sin a, \cos\beta) \tag{26}$$

in <sup>4</sup>

property of *d*<sup>4</sup>

because on <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>*; as such its volume 4-form *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>4</sup>

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

expressed as *dJ* with the 3-form *J* given by

*<sup>n</sup>*, the 4-form *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>4</sup>

expanding the differentials like *<sup>d</sup>n<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *EA*

*4.2.2 Topological symmetry in spacetime*

**<sup>m</sup>**ð Þ¼ *<sup>ξ</sup> <sup>x</sup>*

with *<sup>r</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

obtain the following configuration

which we have the property *π*<sup>3</sup> <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>* fibered over <sup>2</sup>

*r* , *y r* , *z r*

current on the 3-sphere <sup>3</sup>

volume 3-form *εabcd*<sup>3</sup>

Ð 3 ð Þ *n d*3 *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>π</sup>*<sup>2</sup> 2 .

1

**15**

*n* on <sup>3</sup>

vanishes identically when restricted to the 3-sphere; i.e.: *d*<sup>4</sup>

*<sup>J</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 4!

*<sup>α</sup>* reads as follows

with these angular coordinates, we have mapping *f* : <sup>4</sup>

*<sup>J</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 4!3!

where we have substituted the 3-form *dαbdα<sup>c</sup>*

*n*, which reads as <sup>1</sup>

*J* of the 3D skyrmion and its conservation *dJ* ¼ 0. Indeed, because of the property

This 3-form describes precisely the topological current in the target space; this is

*<sup>a</sup> dα<sup>a</sup>* with *EA*

*bE<sup>C</sup> <sup>c</sup> ED d* � �*εabcd*<sup>3</sup>

*α*. In this regards, recall that the volume of the 3-sphere is

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> arccos

skyrmion field constraint *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 in terms of three angles *<sup>α</sup><sup>a</sup>* as given by Eq. (26);

*εABCD nAEB*

In the spacetime 1,3 with coordinates *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>*, *<sup>z</sup>* , the 3d skyrmion is described by a four component field *nA*ð Þ*ξ* and is subject to the local constraint relation *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1. A typical static configuration of the 3d skyrmion is obtained by solving the field sonctraint in terms of the space coordinates; it is given by Eq. (26)

with the local space time fields **m**ð Þ*ξ* and *γ ξ*ð Þ thought of as follows

� �, *γ ξ*ð Þ¼ arcsin <sup>2</sup>*rR*

*<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>z</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>p</sup> , giving the radius of <sup>2</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>*<sup>~</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>2</sup>*xR*

describing a compactification of the space <sup>3</sup>

From this view, the *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>~</sup> : *<sup>ξ</sup>* ! *<sup>n</sup>*~ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* is then a mapping from <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>*; the value *<sup>R</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>r</sup>* corresponds to *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>π</sup>*

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup> , <sup>2</sup>*yR*

charge given by the winding number characterising the wrapping <sup>3</sup>

*n*

that *γ ξ*ð Þ in Eq. (30) has a spherical symmetry as it is a function only of *r* (no angles *α*, *β*, *γ*). Moreover, as this configuration obeys sin *γ*ð Þ¼ 0 0 and sin *γ*ð Þ¼ ∞ 0; we assume *γ*ð Þ¼ 0 *n*0*π* and *γ*ð Þ¼ ∞ *n*∞*π*. Putting these relations back into (26), we

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup> , <sup>2</sup>*zR*

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup> ,

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

� � (31)

� � <sup>¼</sup> . In this regards, recall that 3-spheres <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>* into <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>d</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 0 (where we have hidden the wedge product <sup>∧</sup> ), it follows that *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>4</sup>

<sup>4</sup>! *εABCDdn<sup>A</sup>* ∧ *dn<sup>B</sup>* ∧ *dn<sup>C</sup>* ∧ *dn<sup>D</sup>*,

¼ 0. This vanishing

*n* can be

*n* � � 3 *n*

*εABCDnAdnBdnCdn<sup>D</sup>* (28)

*<sup>n</sup>* ! <sup>3</sup>

*dα<sup>d</sup>* on the 3-sphere <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>*, and *R* associated with the circle

<sup>2</sup> and *R* > >*r* to *γ* ¼ *π*. Notice

*<sup>ξ</sup>* which is homotopic to <sup>3</sup>

**<sup>n</sup>** with topological

*<sup>n</sup>* on <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>* into <sup>3</sup>

*n*.

*<sup>ξ</sup>* ; and for

*<sup>r</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>R</sup>*<sup>2</sup> (30)

*<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>A</sup>*

*<sup>n</sup>* with <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>∂</sup>α<sup>a</sup>* ; then the conserved

*α* (29)

*<sup>n</sup>* ≃<sup>3</sup> *<sup>α</sup>*. By

*<sup>α</sup>* by the

*<sup>n</sup>* is a key ingredient in the derivation of the topological current

*n* vanishes; and then *dJ* vanishes. By solving, the

where **m** is a unit 3-vector parameterising the unit sphere <sup>2</sup> ½ � *<sup>α</sup>* . Putting this field realisation back into <sup>L</sup>∘, we obtain � cos 2*<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μγ* � �<sup>2</sup> � <sup>1</sup>� cos 2*<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>4</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>m</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> � <sup>Λ</sup>½ � **<sup>m</sup>***:***<sup>m</sup>** � <sup>1</sup> *:* Notice that by restricting the 4D spacetime 1,3 to the 3D hyperplane z=const; and by fixing the component field *γ* to *<sup>π</sup>* <sup>2</sup>, the above Lagrangian density reduces to the one describing the spacetime dynamics of the 2d skyrmion. Notice also that we can expand the differential *dn<sup>A</sup>* in terms of *dγ*, *dβ*, *dα*; we find the following

$$d\mathfrak{n}\_{a} = m\_{a}\cos\gamma d\chi + \sin\gamma(u\_{a}d\beta + v\_{a}\sin\beta da), \quad d\mathfrak{n}\_{4} = -\sin\gamma d\chi \tag{27}$$

For convenience, we sometimes refer to the three ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* collectively like *α<sup>a</sup>* ¼ ð Þ *<sup>α</sup>*1, *<sup>α</sup>*2, *<sup>α</sup>*<sup>3</sup> ; so we have *<sup>d</sup>n<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *EA <sup>a</sup> dα<sup>b</sup>* with *EA <sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***n***<sup>A</sup> <sup>∂</sup>α<sup>a</sup> :*

#### **4.2 Conserved topological current**

First, we investigate the topological properties of the 3d skyrmion from the target space view; that is without using the spacetine variables ð Þ¼ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>*, *<sup>z</sup> <sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* . Then, we turn to study the induced topological properties of the 3d skyrmion viewed from the side of the 4D space time 1,3.

#### *4.2.1 Topological current in target space*

The 3d skyrmion field is described by a real four component vector *n<sup>A</sup>* subject to the constraint relation *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1; so the soliton has SO 4ð Þ� *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>1</sup> � *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>2</sup> symmetry leaving invariant the condition *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 that reads explicitly as ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>1</sup> 2 þ ð Þ *n*<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>3</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>4</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>*:* The algebraic condition *<sup>f</sup>*½ �¼ *<sup>n</sup>* 1 induces in turns the constraint equation *df* <sup>¼</sup> 0 leading to **<sup>n</sup>***Ad***n***<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 and showing that *<sup>n</sup><sup>A</sup>* and *<sup>d</sup>n<sup>A</sup>* orthogonal 4-vectors in <sup>4</sup> ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* . From this constraint, we can construct *<sup>n</sup>Adn<sup>B</sup>* � *<sup>n</sup>Bdn<sup>A</sup>* � �*=*2 which is a 4�4 antisymmetric matrix <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *AB* generating the SO 4ð Þ rotations; this <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *AB* contains 3+3 degrees of freedom generating the two *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>1</sup> and *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>2</sup> making SO 4ð Þ; the first three degrres are given by <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *ab* with *<sup>a</sup>*, *<sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1, 2, 3; and the other three concern <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *<sup>a</sup>*<sup>4</sup> *:* Notice also that, from the view of the target space, the algebraic relation *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 describes a unit 3-sphere <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* sitting *Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

**4.1 From 2d skyrmion to 3d homologue**

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

Lagrangian realized as the space integral Ð

and focuss on a simple Lagrangian density <sup>L</sup><sup>∘</sup> ¼ � <sup>1</sup>

field expression of <sup>L</sup>4*<sup>D</sup>* is given by � <sup>1</sup>

realisation back into <sup>L</sup>∘, we obtain � cos 2*<sup>γ</sup>*

by fixing the component field *γ* to *<sup>π</sup>*

ð Þ *<sup>α</sup>*1, *<sup>α</sup>*2, *<sup>α</sup>*<sup>3</sup> ; so we have *<sup>d</sup>n<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *EA*

**4.2 Conserved topological current**

the side of the 4D space time 1,3.

<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>4</sup>

orthogonal 4-vectors in <sup>4</sup>

ð Þ *n*<sup>2</sup>

**14**

<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>3</sup>

*4.2.1 Topological current in target space*

As for the 1d and 2d solitons considered previous section, the spacetime dynam-

density L4*<sup>D</sup>* is a function of the soliton *n*ð Þ *t*, *x*, *y*, *z* which is a real 4-component field [*n* ¼ ð Þ *n*1, *n*2, *n*3, *n*<sup>4</sup> ] constrained like *f*½ �¼ *n*ð Þ*ξ* 1*:* For self ineracting field, the typical

scalar potential; and where the auxiliary field Λð Þ*ξ* is a Lagrange multiplier carrying the field constraint. This density <sup>L</sup>4*<sup>D</sup>* reads in terms of the Hamiltonian as <sup>Π</sup>*: <sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**

Hð Þ **n** *:* Below, we consider a 4-component skyrmionic field constrained as *n:n* ¼ 1;

Notice that by restricting the 4D spacetime 1,3 to the 3D hyperplane z=const; and

one describing the spacetime dynamics of the 2d skyrmion. Notice also that we can

*dn<sup>a</sup>* ¼ *ma* cos *γdγ* þ sin *γ*ð Þ *uadβ* þ *va* sin *βdα* , *dn*<sup>4</sup> ¼ � sin *γdγ* (27)

*<sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***n***<sup>A</sup> <sup>∂</sup>α<sup>a</sup> :*

For convenience, we sometimes refer to the three ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* collectively like *α<sup>a</sup>* ¼

First, we investigate the topological properties of the 3d skyrmion from the target space view; that is without using the spacetine variables ð Þ¼ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>*, *<sup>z</sup> <sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>*

we turn to study the induced topological properties of the 3d skyrmion viewed from

The 3d skyrmion field is described by a real four component vector *n<sup>A</sup>* subject to the constraint relation *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1; so the soliton has SO 4ð Þ� *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>1</sup> � *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>2</sup> sym-

<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>*:* The algebraic condition *<sup>f</sup>*½ �¼ *<sup>n</sup>* 1 induces in turns the

ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* . From this constraint, we can construct

metry leaving invariant the condition *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 that reads explicitly as ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>1</sup>

constraint equation *df* <sup>¼</sup> 0 leading to **<sup>n</sup>***Ad***n***<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 and showing that *<sup>n</sup><sup>A</sup>* and *<sup>d</sup>n<sup>A</sup>*

*<sup>n</sup>Adn<sup>B</sup>* � *<sup>n</sup>Bdn<sup>A</sup>* � �*=*2 which is a 4�4 antisymmetric matrix <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *AB* generating the SO 4ð Þ rotations; this <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *AB* contains 3+3 degrees of freedom generating the two *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>1</sup> and *SO*ð Þ<sup>3</sup> <sup>2</sup> making SO 4ð Þ; the first three degrres are given by <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *ab* with *<sup>a</sup>*, *<sup>b</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1, 2, 3; and the other three concern <sup>Ω</sup>½ � *<sup>a</sup>*<sup>4</sup> *:* Notice also that, from the view of the target space, the algebraic relation *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 describes a unit 3-sphere <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>a</sup> dα<sup>b</sup>* with *EA*

*n* ¼ ð Þ **m** sin *γ*, cos *γ* , **m** ¼ ð Þ sin *β* cos *α*, sin *β* sin *α*, cos *β* (26)

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μγ* � �<sup>2</sup> � <sup>1</sup>� cos 2*<sup>γ</sup>*

describe the degrees of freedom of *n*. Being a unit 4-component vector, we can solve the constraint *n:n* ¼ 1 in terms of three angular angles ð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* ; by setting

*dtL*4*<sup>D</sup>* with

½ � *<sup>α</sup>* . Putting this field

*∂t* �

. Then,

2 þ

*<sup>n</sup>* sitting

*dxdydz*L4*D*. Generally, the Lagrangian

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ<sup>n</sup>* � �<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ� *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>Λ</sup>½ � *<sup>f</sup>*ð Þ� *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>1</sup> where *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* is a

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ<sup>n</sup>* � � *<sup>∂</sup><sup>μ</sup>* ð Þ� *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>Λ</sup>½ � *<sup>n</sup>:<sup>n</sup>* � <sup>1</sup> to

<sup>4</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>m</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> � <sup>Λ</sup>½ � **<sup>m</sup>***:***<sup>m</sup>** � <sup>1</sup> *:*

<sup>2</sup>, the above Lagrangian density reduces to the

ics of the 3d skyrmion in 1,3 is described by a field action <sup>S</sup>4*<sup>D</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

where **m** is a unit 3-vector parameterising the unit sphere <sup>2</sup>

expand the differential *dn<sup>A</sup>* in terms of *dγ*, *dβ*, *dα*; we find the following

in <sup>4</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*; as such its volume 4-form *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>4</sup> *n*, which reads as <sup>1</sup> <sup>4</sup>! *εABCDdn<sup>A</sup>* ∧ *dn<sup>B</sup>* ∧ *dn<sup>C</sup>* ∧ *dn<sup>D</sup>*, vanishes identically when restricted to the 3-sphere; i.e.: *d*<sup>4</sup> *n* � � 3 *n* ¼ 0. This vanishing property of *d*<sup>4</sup> *n* on <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* is a key ingredient in the derivation of the topological current *J* of the 3D skyrmion and its conservation *dJ* ¼ 0. Indeed, because of the property *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 0 (where we have hidden the wedge product <sup>∧</sup> ), it follows that *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>4</sup> *n* can be expressed as *dJ* with the 3-form *J* given by

$$J = \frac{1}{4!} \epsilon\_{ABCD} \mathfrak{n}^A d\mathfrak{n}^B d\mathfrak{n}^C d\mathfrak{n}^D \tag{28}$$

This 3-form describes precisely the topological current in the target space; this is because on <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*, the 4-form *<sup>d</sup>*<sup>4</sup> *n* vanishes; and then *dJ* vanishes. By solving, the skyrmion field constraint *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1 in terms of three angles *<sup>α</sup><sup>a</sup>* as given by Eq. (26); with these angular coordinates, we have mapping *f* : <sup>4</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* ! <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* with <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* ≃<sup>3</sup> *<sup>α</sup>*. By expanding the differentials like *<sup>d</sup>n<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *EA <sup>a</sup> dα<sup>a</sup>* with *EA <sup>a</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>A</sup> <sup>∂</sup>α<sup>a</sup>* ; then the conserved current on the 3-sphere <sup>3</sup> *<sup>α</sup>* reads as follows

$$J = \frac{1}{4!3!} \varepsilon\_{ABCD} \left( \mathfrak{n}^A E\_b^B E\_c^C E\_d^D \right) \mathfrak{e}^{abc} d^3 a \tag{29}$$

where we have substituted the 3-form *dαbdα<sup>c</sup> dα<sup>d</sup>* on the 3-sphere <sup>3</sup> *<sup>α</sup>* by the volume 3-form *εabcd*<sup>3</sup> *α*. In this regards, recall that the volume of the 3-sphere is Ð 3 ð Þ *n d*3 *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>π</sup>*<sup>2</sup> 2 .

#### *4.2.2 Topological symmetry in spacetime*

In the spacetime 1,3 with coordinates *<sup>ξ</sup><sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, *<sup>x</sup>*, *<sup>y</sup>*, *<sup>z</sup>* , the 3d skyrmion is described by a four component field *nA*ð Þ*ξ* and is subject to the local constraint relation *<sup>n</sup>An<sup>A</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 1. A typical static configuration of the 3d skyrmion is obtained by solving the field sonctraint in terms of the space coordinates; it is given by Eq. (26) with the local space time fields **m**ð Þ*ξ* and *γ ξ*ð Þ thought of as follows

$$\mathbf{m}(\xi) = \left(\frac{\mathbf{x}}{r}, \frac{\mathbf{y}}{r}, \frac{z}{r}\right), \quad \boldsymbol{\chi}(\xi) = \arcsin \frac{2rR}{r^2 + R^2} = \arccos \frac{r^2 - R^2}{r^2 + R^2} \tag{30}$$

with *<sup>r</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi *<sup>x</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>y</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>z</sup>*<sup>2</sup> <sup>p</sup> , giving the radius of <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>*, and *R* associated with the circle 1 *<sup>ξ</sup>* fibered over <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>*; the value *<sup>R</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>r</sup>* corresponds to *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>π</sup>* <sup>2</sup> and *R* > >*r* to *γ* ¼ *π*. Notice that *γ ξ*ð Þ in Eq. (30) has a spherical symmetry as it is a function only of *r* (no angles *α*, *β*, *γ*). Moreover, as this configuration obeys sin *γ*ð Þ¼ 0 0 and sin *γ*ð Þ¼ ∞ 0; we assume *γ*ð Þ¼ 0 *n*0*π* and *γ*ð Þ¼ ∞ *n*∞*π*. Putting these relations back into (26), we obtain the following configuration

$$\tilde{\mathfrak{n}} = \left( \frac{2\varkappa R}{r^2 + R^2}, \frac{2yR}{r^2 + R^2}, \frac{2zR}{r^2 + R^2}, \frac{r^2 - R^2}{r^2 + R^2} \right) \tag{31}$$

describing a compactification of the space <sup>3</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* into <sup>3</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* which is homotopic to <sup>3</sup> *n*. From this view, the *<sup>n</sup>*<sup>~</sup> : *<sup>ξ</sup>* ! *<sup>n</sup>*~ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* is then a mapping from <sup>3</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* into <sup>3</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** with topological charge given by the winding number characterising the wrapping <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* on <sup>3</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* ; and for which we have the property *π*<sup>3</sup> <sup>3</sup> *n* � � <sup>¼</sup> . In this regards, recall that 3-spheres <sup>3</sup>

have a Hopf fibration given by a circle <sup>1</sup> sitting over <sup>2</sup> (for short <sup>3</sup> � <sup>1</sup> ⋉<sup>2</sup> ); this non trivial fibration can be viewed from the relation <sup>3</sup> � *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> and the factorisation *<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ� <sup>1</sup> *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> *<sup>=</sup>U*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> with the coset *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> *<sup>=</sup>U*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> identified with <sup>2</sup> ; and *<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> with <sup>1</sup> . Applying this fibration to <sup>3</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* and <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*, it follows that *n*~ : <sup>3</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* ! <sup>3</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*; and the same thing for the bases <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* ! <sup>2</sup> *<sup>n</sup>* and for the fibers <sup>1</sup> *<sup>ξ</sup>* ! <sup>1</sup> *<sup>n</sup>*. Returning to the topological current and the conserved topological charge *<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> <sup>3</sup>*d*<sup>3</sup> **r***J* <sup>0</sup>ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** , notice that in space time the differential *dn<sup>A</sup>* expands like *∂μn<sup>A</sup>* � �*dξ<sup>μ</sup>*; then using the duality relation *J*½ � *νρτ* ¼ *εμνρτJ <sup>μ</sup>*, we find, up to a normalisation by the volume of the 3-sphere *π*2*=*2, the expression of the topological current *J <sup>μ</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* in terms of the 3D skyrmion field

$$J^{\mu} = \frac{1}{12\pi^2} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\tau} n^a \partial\_\nu n^b \partial\_\rho n^c \partial\_\tau n^c \varepsilon\_{abcd} \tag{32}$$

by two free angles *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* , *<sup>β</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* ; they appear in the Berry term *LB* ¼ �ℏ*S*ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup>*

We begin by introducing the variables describing the skyrmion in the magnetic background field **n r**ð Þ. We denote by *Ms* the mass of the skyrmion, and by **<sup>R</sup>** and **<sup>R</sup>**\_ its space position and its velocity. For concreteness, we restrict the investigation to

components *xi* ¼ ð Þ *x*, *y* . Because of the Euclidean metric *δij*; we often we use both notations *<sup>X</sup><sup>i</sup>* and *Xi* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>ijX <sup>j</sup>* without referring to *<sup>δ</sup>ij*. Furthermore; we limit the discussion to the interesting case where the only source of displacements in 1,2

due to the skyrmion **R**ð Þ*t* (rigid skyrmion). In this picture, the description of the

In this representation, the velocity **n**\_ of the skyrmion dissolved in the back-

ables are spacetime fields *β*ð Þ *t*, **r** and *α*ð Þ *t*, **r** . Similarly, the density H is the Hamiltonian density with arguments as <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** � � and magnetic **<sup>n</sup>** as in Eq. (35). In this field action <sup>S</sup>*s*, the prefactor a�<sup>2</sup> is required by the continuum limit of lattice Hamiltonians *Hlatt* living on a square lattice with spacing parameter a. Recall that for

To fix ideas, we illustrate this limit on the typical hamiltonian *HHDMZ*, it describes the Heisenberg model on the lattice <sup>2</sup> augmented by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya

eter. So, the continuum limit H of this lattice Hamiltonian involves the target space

as well the metric *gμν* and the completely antisymmetry *εμνρ* of the space time 1,2

terms of *δab* and *εabc* tensors, the continuous hamiltonian density reads as follows

*<sup>n</sup><sup>a</sup>∂inb* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>a</sup>*εabcda*

**d***μ:* **n r**ð Þ*<sup>ν</sup>* ∧ **n r***<sup>ρ</sup>*

limit where a is too small, these sums turn into 2D space integrals like a�<sup>2</sup> Ð

X *μ*, *ν*, *ρ*

metric *δab* and the topological Levi-Civita tensor *εabc* of the target space <sup>3</sup>

skyrmion **R**ð Þ*t* dissolved in the background magnet **n r**ð Þ is given by

ground magnet can be expressed into manners; either like �*X*\_ *<sup>i</sup> <sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>ξ</sup>* and refer to **R** by the components *Xi* ¼ ð Þ *X*, *Y* and to **r** by the

*<sup>∂</sup>xi*. With this parametrisation, the dynamics of the skyrmion is

*<sup>ξ</sup>* with coordinates *ξ* ¼ ð Þ *t*, **r** ; and of the skymion as a

**n r**ð Þ¼ , *t* **n r**½ � � **R**ð Þ*t* (35)

*dtLs* with Lagrangian given by a space integral *Ls* ¼

L*<sup>s</sup>* ¼ *γ*ℏ*S*H � ℏ*S*L*<sup>B</sup>* (36)

*<sup>μ</sup>*ð Þ … ,

� � � � *<sup>ε</sup>μνρ* �<sup>X</sup>

P

� �*=*a where a is the square lattice param-

Below, we think of the above magnetisation as a ferromagnetic background **n r**ð Þ

massive point- like particle **R**ð Þ*t* moving in this background.

filling the spatial region of 1,*<sup>d</sup>*

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

*5.1.1 Rigid skyrmion*

the spacetime 1,2

because *<sup>∂</sup>*

ℏ*s* a2 Ð *d*2 *<sup>∂</sup>X<sup>i</sup>* ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>*

described by an action <sup>S</sup>*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

**r**L*<sup>s</sup>* and spacetime density as follows

In this relation, the density <sup>L</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* ¼ �ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>*

these *Hlatt*'s, one generally has discrete sums like P

� �**n r**ð Þ� *<sup>ν</sup> <sup>D</sup>*

and the Zeeman interactions [66, 67]

X h i *μ*, *ν*

**n r***<sup>μ</sup>*

with **r***<sup>ν</sup>* ¼ **r***<sup>μ</sup>* þ a**e***νμ*; that is **e***νμ* ¼ **r***<sup>ν</sup>* � **r***<sup>μ</sup>*

H ¼ *<sup>J</sup>*a2 2 *δab∂<sup>i</sup>*

*HHDMZ* ¼ �*J*

**17**

*dt :*

*<sup>ξ</sup>* is

*<sup>∂</sup>xi*; this is

*<sup>∂</sup>X<sup>i</sup>*; or as *<sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>i</sup> <sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>t</sup>* where now the angular vari-

*μ*

*<sup>μ</sup> nbDνρnc* � �*εμνρ* � **<sup>B</sup>***:***<sup>n</sup>** (38)

**B***:***n r***<sup>μ</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup>*,*<sup>ν</sup>*ð Þ … and so on; in the

*d*2 **r**ð Þ … .

� � (37)

**<sup>n</sup>**; it involves

*<sup>ξ</sup>* . In

In terms of the angular variables, this current reads like <sup>N</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>να∂ρβ∂τγεμνρτ* with N ¼ <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*π*<sup>2</sup> ð Þ sin *β* ð Þ sin *γ* 2 . From this current expression, we can determine the associated topological charge *Q* by space integration over the charge density

$$J^0(t, \mathbf{r}) = -\frac{\sin^2 \chi}{2\pi^2 r^2} \frac{d\chi}{dr} \tag{33}$$

Because of its spherical symmetry, the space volume *d*<sup>3</sup> **r** can be substituted by <sup>4</sup>*πr*<sup>2</sup>*dr*; then the charge *<sup>Q</sup>* reads as the integral � <sup>4</sup>*<sup>π</sup>* 2*π*<sup>2</sup> Ð *<sup>γ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>∞</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>0</sup> sin <sup>2</sup> *γdγ* whose integration leads to the sum of two terms coming from the integration of sin <sup>2</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> � <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> cos 2*γ*. The integral first reads as <sup>1</sup> *<sup>π</sup>* ½ � *γ*ð Þ� 0 *γ*ð Þ ∞ ; by substituting *γ*ð Þ¼ 0 *n*0*π*, it contributes like *Nπ*. The integral of the second tem gives <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup>* ½ � sin 2*γ*ð Þ� 0 sin 2*γ*ð Þ ∞ ; it vanishes identically. So the topological charge is given by

$$Q = \frac{\chi(\mathbf{0}) - \chi(\infty)}{\pi} = N \tag{34}$$

## **5. Effective dynamics of skyrmions**

In this section, we investigate the effective dynamics of a point-like skyrmion in a ferromagnetic background field while focussing on the 2d configuration. First, we derive the effective equation of a rigid skyrmion and comment on the underlying effective Lagrangian. We also describe the similarity with the dynamics of an electron in a background electromagnetic field. Then, we study the effect of dissipation on the skyrmion dynamics.

## **5.1 Equation of a rigid skyrmion**

To get the effective equation of motion of a rigid skyrmion, we start by the spin ð Þ <sup>0</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> *<sup>D</sup>* action <sup>S</sup>*spin* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *dtLspin* describing the time evolution of a coherent spin vector modeled by a rotating magnetic moment **<sup>n</sup>**ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* with velocity **<sup>n</sup>**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *dt*; and make some accommodations. For that, recall that the Lagrangian *Lspin* has the structure *LB* � ℏ*SγH* where *LB* is the Berry term having the form *LB* ¼ *qe***A***:***n**\_ with geometric (Berry) potential **A** � h i **n**j**n**\_ ; and where *H* is the Hamiltonian of the magnetic moment **<sup>n</sup>**ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* obeying the constraint **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1. This magnetisation constraint is solved

by two free angles *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* , *<sup>β</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* ; they appear in the Berry term *LB* ¼ �ℏ*S*ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>d</sup><sup>α</sup> dt :* Below, we think of the above magnetisation as a ferromagnetic background **n r**ð Þ filling the spatial region of 1,*<sup>d</sup> <sup>ξ</sup>* with coordinates *ξ* ¼ ð Þ *t*, **r** ; and of the skymion as a massive point- like particle **R**ð Þ*t* moving in this background.

## *5.1.1 Rigid skyrmion*

have a Hopf fibration given by a circle <sup>1</sup> sitting over <sup>2</sup> (for short <sup>3</sup> � <sup>1</sup>

non trivial fibration can be viewed from the relation <sup>3</sup> � *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> and the factorisation *<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ� <sup>1</sup> *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> *<sup>=</sup>U*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> with the coset *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> *<sup>=</sup>U*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> identified with <sup>2</sup>

that in space time the differential *dn<sup>A</sup>* expands like *∂μn<sup>A</sup>* � �*dξ<sup>μ</sup>*; then using the

<sup>12</sup>*π*<sup>2</sup> *εμνρτna∂νnb∂ρnc*

ated topological charge *Q* by space integration over the charge density

<sup>0</sup>ð Þ¼� *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>**

*<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>*ð Þ� <sup>0</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>∞</sup>

In this section, we investigate the effective dynamics of a point-like skyrmion in a ferromagnetic background field while focussing on the 2d configuration. First, we derive the effective equation of a rigid skyrmion and comment on the underlying effective Lagrangian. We also describe the similarity with the dynamics of an electron in a background electromagnetic field. Then, we study the effect of dissi-

To get the effective equation of motion of a rigid skyrmion, we start by the spin

some accommodations. For that, recall that the Lagrangian *Lspin* has the structure *LB* � ℏ*SγH* where *LB* is the Berry term having the form *LB* ¼ *qe***A***:***n**\_ with geometric (Berry) potential **A** � h i **n**j**n**\_ ; and where *H* is the Hamiltonian of the magnetic moment **<sup>n</sup>**ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* obeying the constraint **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1. This magnetisation constraint is solved

vector modeled by a rotating magnetic moment **<sup>n</sup>**ð Þ*<sup>t</sup>* with velocity **<sup>n</sup>**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>d</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**

*dtLspin* describing the time evolution of a coherent spin

*J*

Because of its spherical symmetry, the space volume *d*<sup>3</sup>

leads to the sum of two terms coming from the integration of sin <sup>2</sup>

<sup>4</sup>*πr*<sup>2</sup>*dr*; then the charge *<sup>Q</sup>* reads as the integral � <sup>4</sup>*<sup>π</sup>*

like *Nπ*. The integral of the second tem gives <sup>1</sup>

**5. Effective dynamics of skyrmions**

pation on the skyrmion dynamics.

**5.1 Equation of a rigid skyrmion**

ð Þ <sup>0</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>1</sup> *<sup>D</sup>* action <sup>S</sup>*spin* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

**16**

identically. So the topological charge is given by

In terms of the angular variables, this current reads like <sup>N</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>να∂ρβ∂τγεμνρτ* with

sin <sup>2</sup> *γ* 2*π*<sup>2</sup>*r*<sup>2</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>* ! <sup>2</sup>

topological current and the conserved topological charge *<sup>Q</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>* and <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>* and for the fibers <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>*, it follows that *n*~ : <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>ξ</sup>* ! <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>μ</sup>*, we find, up to a normalisation by the volume of the

*∂τnc*

. From this current expression, we can determine the associ-

*dγ*

2*π*<sup>2</sup> Ð *<sup>γ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>∞</sup> *<sup>γ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>0</sup> sin <sup>2</sup>

*<sup>π</sup>* ½ � *γ*ð Þ� 0 *γ*ð Þ ∞ ; by substituting *γ*ð Þ¼ 0 *n*0*π*, it contributes

<sup>3</sup>*d*<sup>3</sup> **r***J*

*<sup>μ</sup>*ð Þ*<sup>ξ</sup>* in terms of the 3D

*εabcd* (32)

*dr* (33)

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup>* ½ � sin 2*γ*ð Þ� 0 sin 2*γ*ð Þ ∞ ; it vanishes

*<sup>π</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>N</sup>* (34)

**r** can be substituted by

*<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> � <sup>1</sup>

*γdγ* whose integration

<sup>2</sup> cos 2*γ*.

*dt*; and make

. Applying this fibration to <sup>3</sup>

3-sphere *π*2*=*2, the expression of the topological current *J*

*J <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

2

*<sup>U</sup>*ð Þ<sup>1</sup> with <sup>1</sup>

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

skyrmion field

N ¼ <sup>1</sup>

the same thing for the bases <sup>2</sup>

duality relation *J*½ � *νρτ* ¼ *εμνρτJ*

<sup>2</sup>*π*<sup>2</sup> ð Þ sin *β* ð Þ sin *γ*

The integral first reads as <sup>1</sup>

⋉<sup>2</sup>

<sup>0</sup>ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** , notice

*<sup>ξ</sup>* ! <sup>3</sup>

*<sup>n</sup>*. Returning to the

); this

; and

*<sup>n</sup>*; and

We begin by introducing the variables describing the skyrmion in the magnetic background field **n r**ð Þ. We denote by *Ms* the mass of the skyrmion, and by **<sup>R</sup>** and **<sup>R</sup>**\_ its space position and its velocity. For concreteness, we restrict the investigation to the spacetime 1,2 *<sup>ξ</sup>* and refer to **R** by the components *Xi* ¼ ð Þ *X*, *Y* and to **r** by the components *xi* ¼ ð Þ *x*, *y* . Because of the Euclidean metric *δij*; we often we use both notations *<sup>X</sup><sup>i</sup>* and *Xi* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>ijX <sup>j</sup>* without referring to *<sup>δ</sup>ij*. Furthermore; we limit the discussion to the interesting case where the only source of displacements in 1,2 *<sup>ξ</sup>* is due to the skyrmion **R**ð Þ*t* (rigid skyrmion). In this picture, the description of the skyrmion **R**ð Þ*t* dissolved in the background magnet **n r**ð Þ is given by

$$\mathbf{n}(\mathbf{r},t) = \mathbf{n}[\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{R}(t)] \tag{35}$$

In this representation, the velocity **n**\_ of the skyrmion dissolved in the background magnet can be expressed into manners; either like �*X*\_ *<sup>i</sup> <sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>∂</sup>X<sup>i</sup>*; or as *<sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>i</sup> <sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>∂</sup>xi*; this is because *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>∂</sup>X<sup>i</sup>* ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>∂</sup>xi*. With this parametrisation, the dynamics of the skyrmion is described by an action <sup>S</sup>*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *dtLs* with Lagrangian given by a space integral *Ls* ¼ ℏ*s* a2 Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>s</sup>* and spacetime density as follows

$$
\mathcal{L}\_s = \gamma \hbar \mathbf{S} \mathcal{H} - \hbar \mathbf{S} \mathcal{L}\_B \tag{36}
$$

In this relation, the density <sup>L</sup>*<sup>B</sup>* ¼ �ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>t</sup>* where now the angular variables are spacetime fields *β*ð Þ *t*, **r** and *α*ð Þ *t*, **r** . Similarly, the density H is the Hamiltonian density with arguments as <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** � � and magnetic **<sup>n</sup>** as in Eq. (35). In this field action <sup>S</sup>*s*, the prefactor a�<sup>2</sup> is required by the continuum limit of lattice Hamiltonians *Hlatt* living on a square lattice with spacing parameter a. Recall that for these *Hlatt*'s, one generally has discrete sums like P *<sup>μ</sup>*ð Þ … , P *<sup>μ</sup>*,*<sup>ν</sup>*ð Þ … and so on; in the limit where a is too small, these sums turn into 2D space integrals like a�<sup>2</sup> Ð *d*2 **r**ð Þ … . To fix ideas, we illustrate this limit on the typical hamiltonian *HHDMZ*, it describes the Heisenberg model on the lattice <sup>2</sup> augmented by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya and the Zeeman interactions [66, 67]

$$H\_{\rm HDMZ} = -f \sum\_{\langle \mu, \nu \rangle} \mathbf{n}(\mathbf{r}\_{\mu}) \mathbf{n}(\mathbf{r}\_{\nu}) - D \sum\_{\mu, \nu, \rho} \mathbf{d}\_{\mu} \cdot \left[ \mathbf{n}(\mathbf{r}\_{\nu}) \wedge \mathbf{n}(\mathbf{r}\_{\rho}) \right] \varepsilon^{\mu \nu \rho} - \sum\_{\mu} \mathbf{B} . \mathbf{n}(\mathbf{r}\_{\mu}) \tag{37}$$

with **r***<sup>ν</sup>* ¼ **r***<sup>μ</sup>* þ a**e***νμ*; that is **e***νμ* ¼ **r***<sup>ν</sup>* � **r***<sup>μ</sup>* � �*=*a where a is the square lattice parameter. So, the continuum limit H of this lattice Hamiltonian involves the target space metric *δab* and the topological Levi-Civita tensor *εabc* of the target space <sup>3</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**; it involves as well the metric *gμν* and the completely antisymmetry *εμνρ* of the space time 1,2 *<sup>ξ</sup>* . In terms of *δab* and *εabc* tensors, the continuous hamiltonian density reads as follows

$$\mathcal{H} = \frac{J\mathbf{a}^2}{2} \delta\_{ab} \partial^i n^a \partial\_i n^b + \mathbf{a} \varepsilon\_{abc} d^a\_\mu \left( n^b D\_{\nu\rho} n^c \right) \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} - \mathbf{B}. \mathbf{n} \tag{38}$$

with ∇*νρ* ¼ **e***νμ:*∇. Below, we set J=1 and, to factorise out the normalisation factor a2, scale the parameters of the model like *da <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>a</sup><sup>~</sup> *d a <sup>μ</sup>* and **<sup>B</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> a2**B**~. For simplicity, we sometimes set as well a¼ 1*:*

#### *5.1.2 Skyrmion equation without dissipation*

To get the effective field equation of motion of the point-like skyrmion without dissipation, we calculate the vanishing condition of the functional variation of the action; that is *δ* Ð *dtd*<sup>2</sup> **<sup>r</sup>**<sup>L</sup> � � <sup>¼</sup> 0. General arguments indicate that the effective equation of the skyrmion with topological charge *qs* in the background magnet has the form

$$M\_s \ddot{X}\_i = q\_s \mathcal{E}\_i + q\_s e\_{ijx} \dot{X}^j \mathcal{B}^x \tag{39}$$

*δLB* ¼ 2ℏ*S*

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

*<sup>B</sup>* ¼ �2*qs*

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>ijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup> X*\_ *j* � *qs* <sup>A</sup>*iX*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

<sup>ℏ</sup>*SεzijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

vanishes identically as explicitly exhibited below,

describing the rigid 2d skyrmion in a ferromagnet is

potential of an effective magnetic field <sup>B</sup>*<sup>z</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

Next, using the relation *εijd*<sup>2</sup>

where we have set <sup>A</sup>*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>2</sup>ℏ*SεzijX <sup>j</sup>*

resulting *δLB* reduces to 2*qs*

effective coupling *Lint*

it reads as follows *LB* <sup>¼</sup> *Ms*

namely *MsX*€ *<sup>j</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>f</sup> <sup>j</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>4</sup>*qs*

**5.2 Implementing dissipation**

learn that the time variation *dH*

*5.2.1 Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation*

the old conservative **<sup>f</sup>** ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup>

equation.

**<sup>f</sup>** � *<sup>α</sup>*

**19**

[68, 69]

Ð 1

*Ms* 2 *X*\_ *i* ð *d*2 **r** 1 2 *<sup>ε</sup>abcnb <sup>∂</sup>nc ∂xi*

∧ *dx <sup>j</sup>*

<sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> <sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>δ</sup><sup>Y</sup>* � *<sup>Y</sup>*\_ *<sup>δ</sup><sup>X</sup>* � � that reads also like

<sup>ℏ</sup>*SεijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

This variation is very remarkable because it is contained in the variation of the

*X*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*, we end up with an effective Lagrangian *LB* associated with the Berry term;

From this Lagrangian, we learn the equation of the motion of the rigid skyrmion

So far we have considered magnetic moment obeying the constraint **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1 with

ð *d*2

Due to dissipation, the force **F** acting on the rigid skyrmion **R**ð Þ*t* has two terms,

modified; its deformed expression is obtained by shifting the old force **f** like **F** ¼

*<sup>γ</sup>* **n**\_ with *α* a positive damping parameter (Gilbert parameter). As such, the previous LL relation gives the so called Landau-Lifschitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation

*<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ; and an extra force *δ***f** linearly dependent in

Using this equation, we deduce the typical properties **n***:***n**\_ ¼ **f***:***n**\_ ¼ 0 from which we

time evolution given by the LL equation **<sup>n</sup>**\_ ¼ �*γ***<sup>f</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** where the force **<sup>f</sup>** ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup>

; for the limit *Ms* <sup>¼</sup> 0, it reduces to *<sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

*dt* of the Hamiltonian, which reads as ℏ*Sγ*

**<sup>r</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *dx<sup>i</sup>*

*δLB* ¼ �2*qs*

<sup>ℏ</sup>*SεijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

*Leff* <sup>¼</sup> *Ms* 2 **R**\_ 2 � *qs*

*dH*

magnetisation velocity **<sup>n</sup>**\_ . Due to this extra force *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>f</sup>** ¼ � *<sup>α</sup>*

*dt* ¼ �ℏ*S<sup>γ</sup>*

In presence of dissipation, we loose energy; and so one expects that *dH*

indicating that the rigid skyrmion has a damped dynamics. In what follows, we study the effect of dissipation in the ferromagnet and derive the damped skyrmion

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnadnb* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>c</sup>* gives precisely the skyrmion topological charge *qs*

*∂na ∂x <sup>j</sup>*

� �*εij <sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>δ</sup><sup>Y</sup>* � *<sup>Y</sup>*\_ *<sup>δ</sup><sup>X</sup>* � � (42)

*X <sup>j</sup>* which can be presented like *Lint*

; this vector can be interpreted as the vector

, the first factor becomes

*:* So, the

*<sup>B</sup>* ¼ �*qs*

<sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 4*qs*

> Ð *d*2 **r** *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na <sup>n</sup>*\_ *<sup>a</sup>* ,

*dt* < 0;

<sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> εzji f <sup>j</sup>* .

*∂***n**.

<sup>A</sup>*iX*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

*δX <sup>j</sup>* (43)

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>zij∂i*A*i*. By adding the kinetic term

**<sup>A</sup>***:***R**\_ � Vð Þ *<sup>R</sup>* (44)

**r f**ð Þ *:***n**\_ (45)

*<sup>γ</sup>* **n**\_ , the LL equation gets

*:* So, the effective Lagrangian *Leff*

from which one can wonder the effective Lagrangian describing the effective dynamics of the skyrmion. It is given by

$$L\_s = \frac{\mathbf{M}\_s}{2} \delta\_{\dot{\eta}} \dot{\mathbf{X}}^i \dot{\mathbf{X}}^j - q\_s \varepsilon\_{\dot{x}\dot{\eta}} \mathcal{B}^x \dot{\mathbf{X}}^i \dot{\mathbf{X}}^j - q\_s \mathcal{V}(\mathbf{X}) \tag{40}$$

Notice that the right hand of Eq. (39) looks like the usual Lorentz force (*qe***E** þ *qe***r**\_ ∧ **B**) of a moving electron with *qe* in an external electromagnetic field *Ei* ð Þ , *Bi* ; the corresponding Lagrangian is *<sup>m</sup>* 2 **r**\_ <sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *qe***B***:*ð Þ� **<sup>r</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>r</sup>**\_ *qe***E***:***r**. This similarity between the skyrmion and the electron in background fields is because the skyrmion has a topological charge *qs* that can be put in correspondence with *qe* ; and, in the same way, the background field magnet E*i*, B*<sup>i</sup>* can be also put in correspondence with the electromagnetic field *Ei* ð Þ , *Bi* . To rigourously derive the spacetime Eqs. (39) and (40), we need to perform some manipulations relying on computing the effective expression of S*<sup>s</sup>* ¼ ℏ*S* Ð *dt* Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>s</sup>* � � and its time variation *<sup>δ</sup>*S*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0. However, as L*<sup>s</sup>* has two terms like *γ*ℏ*S*H � ℏ*S*L*B*, the calculations can be split in two stages; the first stage concerns the block *γ*ℏ*S* Ð *d*2 **<sup>r</sup>**<sup>H</sup> with <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** � � which is a function of the magnetic texture (35); that is **n r**ð Þ � **R** . The second stage regards the determination of the integral ℏ*S* Ð *d*2 **r**L*B*. The computation of the first term is straightforwardly identified; by performing a space shift **r** ! **r** þ **R**, the Hamiltonian density becomes <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** � � with **n r**ð Þ and where the dependence in **<sup>R</sup>** becomes explicit; thus allowing to think of the integral *γ*ℏ*S* Ð *d*2 **r**H as nothing but the scalar energy potential Vð Þ¼ **R** ℏ*Sγ* Ð *d*2 **r**Hð Þ *t*, **r**, **R** *:* So, we have

$$\frac{\delta}{\delta \mathbf{X}^a} \left( \hbar \mathbf{S} \boldsymbol{\chi} \int d^2 \mathbf{r} \mathcal{H} \right) = \frac{\partial \mathcal{V}}{\partial \mathbf{X}^a} \tag{41}$$

Concerning the calculation of the ℏ*S* Ð *d*2 **r**L*B*, the situation is somehow subtle; we do it in two steps; first we calculate the *δ* Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>B</sup>* � � because we know the variation *δ*L*<sup>B</sup> <sup>δ</sup>na* which is equal to <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnbn*\_*<sup>c</sup>* . Then, we turn backward to determine ℏ*S* Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>B</sup>* by integration. To that purpose, recall also that the Berry term L*<sup>B</sup>* is given by �ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup> ∂t* ; and its variation *<sup>δ</sup>*L*<sup>B</sup> δna ∂n<sup>a</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>* is equal to <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnbn*\_ *<sup>c</sup>* . To determine the time variation *δLB* ¼ *δ* Ð *d*2 **<sup>r</sup>***δ*L*B*, we first expand it like <sup>Ð</sup> *d*2 **r** *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>na <sup>δ</sup>na*; and use *<sup>δ</sup>na* <sup>¼</sup> � *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>* to put it into the form -<sup>Ð</sup> *d*2 **r** *<sup>δ</sup>*L*<sup>B</sup> δna ∂n<sup>a</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>* . Then, substituting *<sup>δ</sup>*L*<sup>B</sup> <sup>δ</sup>na* by its expression <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnbn*\_ *<sup>c</sup>* with *<sup>n</sup>*\_*<sup>c</sup>* expanded like -*<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>c</sup> <sup>∂</sup>X<sup>i</sup> <sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>i</sup>* , we end up with

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

with ∇*νρ* ¼ **e***νμ:*∇. Below, we set J=1 and, to factorise out the normalisation factor

To get the effective field equation of motion of the point-like skyrmion without dissipation, we calculate the vanishing condition of the functional variation of the

tion of the skyrmion with topological charge *qs* in the background magnet has the

E*<sup>i</sup>* þ *qs*

from which one can wonder the effective Lagrangian describing the effective

Notice that the right hand of Eq. (39) looks like the usual Lorentz force (*qe***E** þ *qe***r**\_ ∧ **B**) of a moving electron with *qe* in an external electromagnetic field

between the skyrmion and the electron in background fields is because the skyrmion has a topological charge *qs* that can be put in correspondence with *qe*

> Ð *dt* Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>s</sup>*

Ð *d*2

Ð *d*2

becomes explicit; thus allowing to think of the integral *γ*ℏ*S*

*δ <sup>δ</sup>X<sup>a</sup>* <sup>ℏ</sup>*S<sup>γ</sup>* 2 **r**\_

in the same way, the background field magnet E*i*, B*<sup>i</sup>* can be also put in correspondence with the electromagnetic field *Ei* ð Þ , *Bi* . To rigourously derive the spacetime Eqs. (39) and (40), we need to perform some manipulations relying on computing

However, as L*<sup>s</sup>* has two terms like *γ*ℏ*S*H � ℏ*S*L*B*, the calculations can be split in two

function of the magnetic texture (35); that is **n r**ð Þ � **R** . The second stage regards the

straightforwardly identified; by performing a space shift **r** ! **r** þ **R**, the Hamiltonian density becomes <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** � � with **n r**ð Þ and where the dependence in **<sup>R</sup>**

> ð *d*2 **r**H � �

> > Ð *d*2

integration. To that purpose, recall also that the Berry term L*<sup>B</sup>* is given by

*δna ∂n<sup>a</sup>*

> *d*2 **r** *<sup>δ</sup>*L*<sup>B</sup> δna ∂n<sup>a</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>*

Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>B</sup>*

**<sup>r</sup>***δ*L*B*, we first expand it like <sup>Ð</sup>

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>* is equal to <sup>1</sup>

*<sup>∂</sup>X<sup>i</sup> <sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

Ð *d*2

*MsX*€*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *qs*

**<sup>r</sup>**<sup>L</sup> � � <sup>¼</sup> 0. General arguments indicate that the effective equa-

*<sup>ε</sup>ijzX*\_ *<sup>j</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>a</sup><sup>~</sup> *d a*

*<sup>μ</sup>* and **<sup>B</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> a2**B**~. For simplicity, we

<sup>B</sup>*<sup>z</sup>* (39)

Vð Þ *X* (40)

; and,

<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *qe***B***:*ð Þ� **<sup>r</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>r</sup>**\_ *qe***E***:***r**. This similarity

**<sup>r</sup>**<sup>H</sup> with <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** � � which is a

*<sup>∂</sup>X<sup>a</sup>* (41)

**r**L*B*, the situation is somehow subtle; we

� � because we know the variation

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnbn*\_ *<sup>c</sup>*

. Then, substituting *<sup>δ</sup>*L*<sup>B</sup>*

*d*2 **r** *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup>

, we end up with

**r**H as nothing but the

Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>B</sup>* by

. To determine the

*<sup>δ</sup>na* by its

*<sup>δ</sup>na <sup>δ</sup>na*; and use *<sup>δ</sup>na* <sup>¼</sup>

� � and its time variation *<sup>δ</sup>*S*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0.

**r**L*B*. The computation of the first term is

**r**Hð Þ *t*, **r**, **R** *:* So, we have

<sup>¼</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>V</sup>

. Then, we turn backward to determine ℏ*S*

Ð *d*2

a2, scale the parameters of the model like *da*

*5.1.2 Skyrmion equation without dissipation*

*dtd*<sup>2</sup>

dynamics of the skyrmion. It is given by

*Ei* ð Þ , *Bi* ; the corresponding Lagrangian is *<sup>m</sup>*

stages; the first stage concerns the block *γ*ℏ*S*

the effective expression of S*<sup>s</sup>* ¼ ℏ*S*

determination of the integral ℏ*S*

scalar energy potential Vð Þ¼ **R** ℏ*Sγ*

*δ*L*<sup>B</sup>*

� *<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>a</sup>*

**18**

*<sup>δ</sup>na* which is equal to <sup>1</sup>

time variation *δLB* ¼ *δ*

*∂t*

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>* to put it into the form -<sup>Ð</sup>

�ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>β</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>α</sup>*

expression <sup>1</sup>

Concerning the calculation of the ℏ*S*

do it in two steps; first we calculate the *δ*

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnbn*\_*<sup>c</sup>*

; and its variation *<sup>δ</sup>*L*<sup>B</sup>*

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnbn*\_ *<sup>c</sup>* with *<sup>n</sup>*\_*<sup>c</sup>* expanded like -*<sup>∂</sup>n<sup>c</sup>*

Ð *d*2

*Ls* <sup>¼</sup> *Ms* 2 *<sup>δ</sup>ijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup> X*\_ *j* � *qs <sup>ε</sup>zij*B*<sup>z</sup> Xi X*\_ *j* � *qs*

sometimes set as well a¼ 1*:*

action; that is *δ* Ð

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

form

$$\delta L\_B = 2\hbar S \left( \int d^2 \mathbf{r} \frac{\mathbf{1}}{2} \varepsilon\_{abc} n^b \frac{\partial n^c}{\partial \alpha^i} \frac{\partial n^a}{\partial \alpha^j} \right) \epsilon^{jl} (\dot{X} \delta Y - \dot{Y} \delta X) \tag{42}$$

Next, using the relation *εijd*<sup>2</sup> **<sup>r</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *dx<sup>i</sup>* ∧ *dx <sup>j</sup>* , the first factor becomes Ð 1 <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcnadnb* <sup>∧</sup> *dn<sup>c</sup>* gives precisely the skyrmion topological charge *qs :* So, the resulting *δLB* reduces to 2*qs* <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> <sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>δ</sup><sup>Y</sup>* � *<sup>Y</sup>*\_ *<sup>δ</sup><sup>X</sup>* � � that reads also like

$$
\delta L\_B = -2q\_s \hbar \mathcal{S} \epsilon\_{\vec{\eta}} \dot{\mathbf{X}}^{\vec{\iota}} \delta \mathbf{X}^{\vec{\jmath}} \tag{43}
$$

This variation is very remarkable because it is contained in the variation of the effective coupling *Lint <sup>B</sup>* ¼ �2*qs* <sup>ℏ</sup>*SεijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup> X <sup>j</sup>* which can be presented like *Lint <sup>B</sup>* ¼ �*qs* <sup>A</sup>*iX*\_ *<sup>i</sup>* where we have set <sup>A</sup>*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>2</sup>ℏ*SεzijX <sup>j</sup>* ; this vector can be interpreted as the vector potential of an effective magnetic field <sup>B</sup>*<sup>z</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>zij∂i*A*i*. By adding the kinetic term *Ms* 2 *X*\_ *i X*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*, we end up with an effective Lagrangian *LB* associated with the Berry term; it reads as follows *LB* <sup>¼</sup> *Ms* <sup>2</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>ijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup> X*\_ *j* � *qs* <sup>A</sup>*iX*\_ *<sup>i</sup> :* So, the effective Lagrangian *Leff* describing the rigid 2d skyrmion in a ferromagnet is

$$L\_{\rm eff} = \frac{M\_\star}{2} \dot{\mathbf{R}}^2 - q\_\star \mathbf{A} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{R}} - \mathcal{V}(\mathbf{R}) \tag{44}$$

From this Lagrangian, we learn the equation of the motion of the rigid skyrmion namely *MsX*€ *<sup>j</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>f</sup> <sup>j</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>4</sup>*qs* <sup>ℏ</sup>*SεzijX*\_ *<sup>i</sup>* ; for the limit *Ms* <sup>¼</sup> 0, it reduces to *<sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 4*qs* <sup>ℏ</sup>*<sup>S</sup> εzji f <sup>j</sup>* .

#### **5.2 Implementing dissipation**

So far we have considered magnetic moment obeying the constraint **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1 with time evolution given by the LL equation **<sup>n</sup>**\_ ¼ �*γ***<sup>f</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** where the force **<sup>f</sup>** ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup> *∂***n**. Using this equation, we deduce the typical properties **n***:***n**\_ ¼ **f***:***n**\_ ¼ 0 from which we learn that the time variation *dH dt* of the Hamiltonian, which reads as ℏ*Sγ* Ð *d*2 **r** *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>na <sup>n</sup>*\_ *<sup>a</sup>* , vanishes identically as explicitly exhibited below,

$$\frac{dH}{dt} = -\hbar S\chi \int d^2 \mathbf{r}(\mathbf{f}, \dot{\mathbf{n}})\tag{45}$$

In presence of dissipation, we loose energy; and so one expects that *dH dt* < 0; indicating that the rigid skyrmion has a damped dynamics. In what follows, we study the effect of dissipation in the ferromagnet and derive the damped skyrmion equation.

#### *5.2.1 Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation*

Due to dissipation, the force **F** acting on the rigid skyrmion **R**ð Þ*t* has two terms, the old conservative **<sup>f</sup>** ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ; and an extra force *δ***f** linearly dependent in magnetisation velocity **<sup>n</sup>**\_ . Due to this extra force *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>f</sup>** ¼ � *<sup>α</sup> <sup>γ</sup>* **n**\_ , the LL equation gets modified; its deformed expression is obtained by shifting the old force **f** like **F** ¼ **<sup>f</sup>** � *<sup>α</sup> <sup>γ</sup>* **n**\_ with *α* a positive damping parameter (Gilbert parameter). As such, the previous LL relation gives the so called Landau-Lifschitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation [68, 69]

$$
\dot{\mathbf{n}} = -\gamma \mathbf{f} \wedge \mathbf{n} + a \dot{\mathbf{n}} \wedge \mathbf{n} \tag{46}
$$

dependence into **r**, the **f***:∂ <sup>j</sup>***n** can be expressed like *∂*

*<sup>j</sup>* H � **<sup>f</sup>***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***n***:* Notice also that the term *<sup>∂</sup>*

4*πqs X*\_ *l*

*<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>G</sup>* **<sup>z</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>**\_ � *ηα*

effective equation of motion of rigid skyrmions with STT.

ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ψ</sup>†

<sup>L</sup>*e*½ �¼ <sup>Ψ</sup>, **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>ℏ</sup>Ψ† *<sup>i</sup><sup>∂</sup>*

*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>∇</sup> and *<sup>σ</sup>:***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>σ</sup>xnx* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>y</sup>*

explicit dependence <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** � �*:* Recall that *<sup>∂</sup>tot*

exp

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

*<sup>∂</sup>***R**. Therefore, the integral **<sup>f</sup>***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �*d*<sup>2</sup>

**<sup>r</sup>** that gives � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>V</sup>

**6. Electron-skyrmion interaction**

is given by Hund coupling *JH* Ψ†

derivation term *∂*

exp

dissipation *Ms***R**€ ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>V</sup>

**6.1 Hund coupling**

electronic vector density *j*

Lagrangian density <sup>L</sup>*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>Ψ† *<sup>i</sup><sup>∂</sup>*

*6.1.1 Emergent gauge potential*

*He*�*<sup>n</sup>* ¼ �*JH***n***:j*

where **<sup>P</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>

ℏ

**21**

the gyrostropic constant**.**

is equal to *∂*

� *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup>

Ð *∂tot j* H � �*d*<sup>2</sup>

Ð *∂* exp *j* H � �*d*<sup>2</sup> exp *<sup>j</sup>* H � *<sup>∂</sup>tot*

*<sup>j</sup>* <sup>H</sup> is given by *<sup>∂</sup>*

**r** has two contributions namely the

� � (52)

exp

*<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:* Putting this value back into (51), we end up with

4*πηα γ X*\_ *l*

**<sup>R</sup>**\_ � � where the constant *<sup>G</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>4</sup>*π*ℏ*Sqs*

*<sup>σ</sup>a*<sup>Ψ</sup> � �*:n<sup>a</sup>* which leads to emergent *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> gauge

*σ*Ψ, the interaction between localised and itiner-

� �<sup>Ψ</sup> (53)

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>m</sup>* � *JHσ:***<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>j</sup>* H has been added because the Hamiltonian density has an

**r** which, being a total derivative, vanishes identically; and the term

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>* <sup>þ</sup>

Implementing the kinetic term of the skyrmion, we obtain the equation with

In this section, we investigate the interacting dynamics between electrons and skyrmions with spin transfer torque (STT) [70]. The electron-skyrmion interaction

potential that mediate the interaction between the spin texture **n**ð Þ *t*, **r** and the two spin states ð Þ Ψ↑, Ψ<sup>↓</sup> of the electron. We also study other aspects of electron/ skyrmion system like the limit of large Hund coupling; and the derivation of the

We start by recalling that a magnetic atom (like iron, manganese, ...) can be modeled by a localized magnetic moment **n**ð Þ *t*, **r** and mobile carriers represented by a two spin component field Ψð Þ *t*, **r** ; the components of the fields **n** and Ψ are respectively given by *<sup>n</sup><sup>a</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** with a=1,2,3; and by <sup>Ψ</sup>*α*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** with *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ↑↓. Using the

ant electrons of the magnetic atom are bound by the Hund coupling reading as

the dynamics of the interacting electron with the backround **n** is given by the

*∂t*

ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* with Hund parameter *JH* <sup>&</sup>gt;0 promoting alignment of **<sup>n</sup>** and *<sup>j</sup>*

*<sup>∂</sup><sup>t</sup>* Ψ � *He*�*<sup>n</sup>* expanding as follows

*nz*.

<sup>Ψ</sup> � <sup>Ψ</sup>† **<sup>P</sup>**<sup>2</sup>

*ny* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>z</sup>*

Because of the ferromagnetic Hund coupling (*JH* > 0), the spin observable ^

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>z</sup>* of the conduction electron tends to align with the orientation *<sup>σ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>σ</sup>:***<sup>n</sup>** of the magnetisation **n** — with angle *θ* ¼ ð Þ **e***z*^, **n** —; this alinement is accompanied by a

<sup>¼</sup> *γεzlj <sup>∂</sup>*<sup>V</sup>

*qs*

*<sup>j</sup>* H; the explicit

*<sup>j</sup>* H can be also expressed like

*<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** which

*<sup>a</sup>*<sup>2</sup> stands for

ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* . So,

*S z <sup>e</sup>* ¼

exp *<sup>j</sup>* H þ *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup>

where its both sides have **n**\_ . From this generalised relation, we still have **n***:***n**\_ ¼ 0 (ensuring **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1); however **<sup>f</sup>***:***n**\_ 6¼ **<sup>0</sup>** as it is equal to the Gilbert term namely �*α*ð Þ **f** ∧ **n** *:***n**\_ *:* Notice that Eq. (46) still describe a rotating magnetic moment in the target space (*d***n** ¼ 0); but with a different angular velocity Ω which, in addition to **f**, depends moreover on the Gilbert parameter and the magnetisation **n**. By factorising Eq. (46) like **n**\_ ¼ Ω ∧ **n**, we find

$$\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{-\boldsymbol{\gamma}}{\mathbf{1} + a^2} [\mathbf{f} + a(\mathbf{f} \wedge \mathbf{n})] \tag{47}$$

Notice that in presence of dissipation (*α* 6¼ 0), the variation of the hamiltonian *dH dt* given by (45) is no longer non vanishing; by first replacing **f***:***n**\_ ¼ �*α*ð Þ **f** ∧ **n** *:***n**\_ and putting back in it, we get

$$\frac{dH}{dt} = a\hbar \mathbf{S} \int d^2 \mathbf{r} \chi(\mathbf{f} \wedge \mathbf{n}) . \text{in} \tag{48}$$

then, substituting *<sup>γ</sup>***<sup>f</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>α</sup>***n**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** � **<sup>n</sup>**\_ ; we find that *dH dt* is given by �*α*ℏ*s* Ð *d*2 **r***:***n**\_ <sup>2</sup> indicating that *dH dt* <0; and consequently a decreasing energy *H t*ð Þ (loss of energy) while increasing time.

## *5.2.2 Damped skyrmion equation*

To obtain the damped skyrmion equation due to the Gilbert term, we consider the rigid magnetic moment **n r**½ � � **R**ð Þ*t* ; and compute the expression of the skyrmion velocity **R**\_ in terms of the conservative force **f** and the parameter *α*. To that purpose we start from Eq. (46) and multiply both equation sides by ∧ *d***n** while assuming **f***:***n** ¼ 0 (the conservative force transverse to magnetisation), we get **n**\_ ∧ *d***n** ¼ �*γ*ð Þ **f***:d***n n** þ *α*ð Þ *d***n***:***n**\_ **n**. Then, multiply scalarly by **n**, which corresponds to a projection along the magnetisation, we obtain

$$\mathbf{n}.(\dot{\mathbf{n}} \wedge d\mathbf{n}) = -\boldsymbol{\chi}(\mathbf{f}.d\mathbf{n}) + a(d\mathbf{n}.\dot{\mathbf{n}}) \tag{49}$$

Substituting *d***n** and **n**\_ by their expansions *dxi* ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** and �*X*\_ *<sup>i</sup>* ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** , then multiplying by ∧ *dxl* ; we end up with a relation involving *dx <sup>j</sup>* ∧ *dxl* (which reads as *εzjld*<sup>2</sup> **r**); so we have

$$\dot{X}^{l}(4\pi f^{0}d^{2}\mathbf{r}) = -\varkappa e^{0lj}(\mathbf{f}.\partial\_{j}\mathbf{n})d^{2}\mathbf{r} + a e^{0lj}\dot{X}\_{j}\left(\partial\_{j}\mathbf{n}\right)^{2}d^{2}\mathbf{r} \tag{50}$$

where we have set *J* <sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>zij***n***:* ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � � � � , defining the magnetization density, and where we have replaced *<sup>∂</sup>i***n***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � � by *<sup>δ</sup>ij*ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>k***<sup>n</sup>** 2 . By integrating over the 2d space while using Ð *J* <sup>0</sup>*d*<sup>2</sup> **<sup>r</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>4</sup>*πqs* and setting *<sup>η</sup> <sup>j</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 4*π* Ð *d*2 **<sup>r</sup>** *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>η</sup>*, we arrive at the relation

$$4\pi q\_s \dot{\mathbf{X}}^l = \gamma \epsilon^{0lj} \int (\mathbf{f}, \partial\_j \mathbf{n}) d^2 \mathbf{r} - 4\pi \eta a \epsilon^{0lj} \dot{\mathbf{X}}^l \tag{51}$$

with *<sup>ε</sup>zxy* ¼ �*εzxy* ¼ �1. The remaining step is to replace the conservative force **<sup>f</sup>** by � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** and proceeds in performing the integral over **<sup>f</sup>***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �. Because of the explicit **n**\_ ¼ �*γ***f** ∧ **n** þ *α***n**\_ ∧ **n** (46)

<sup>1</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>α</sup>*<sup>2</sup> ½ � **<sup>f</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>α</sup>*ð Þ **<sup>f</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** (47)

**r***γ*ð Þ **f** ∧ **n** *:***n**\_ (48)

*dt* is given by �*α*ℏ*s*

Ð *d*2 **r***:***n**\_ <sup>2</sup>

ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** , then multiply-

**r** (50)

**r**); so

∧ *dxl* (which reads as *εzjld*<sup>2</sup>

*d*2

**<sup>r</sup>** � <sup>4</sup>*πηαε*<sup>0</sup>*ljX*\_ *<sup>l</sup>* (51)

. By integrating over the 2d

**<sup>r</sup>** *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>η</sup>*, we arrive at the

where its both sides have **n**\_ . From this generalised relation, we still have **n***:***n**\_ ¼ 0

Notice that in presence of dissipation (*α* 6¼ 0), the variation of the hamiltonian

*dt* <0; and consequently a decreasing energy *H t*ð Þ (loss of energy)

**n***:*ð Þ¼� **n**\_ ∧ *d***n** *γ*ð Þþ **f***:d***n** *α*ð Þ *d***n***:***n**\_ (49)

ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** and �*X*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

**<sup>r</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> *αε*<sup>0</sup>*ljX*\_ *<sup>j</sup> <sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup>

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>π</sup> <sup>ε</sup>zij***n***:* ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � � � � , defining the magnetization den-

2

4*π* Ð *d*2

*dt* given by (45) is no longer non vanishing; by first replacing **f***:***n**\_ ¼ �*α*ð Þ **f** ∧ **n** *:***n**\_ and

To obtain the damped skyrmion equation due to the Gilbert term, we consider

the rigid magnetic moment **n r**½ � � **R**ð Þ*t* ; and compute the expression of the skyrmion velocity **R**\_ in terms of the conservative force **f** and the parameter *α*. To that purpose we start from Eq. (46) and multiply both equation sides by ∧ *d***n** while assuming **f***:***n** ¼ 0 (the conservative force transverse to magnetisation), we get **n**\_ ∧ *d***n** ¼ �*γ*ð Þ **f***:d***n n** þ *α*ð Þ *d***n***:***n**\_ **n**. Then, multiply scalarly by **n**, which corresponds to

ð *d*2

(ensuring **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1); however **<sup>f</sup>***:***n**\_ 6¼ **<sup>0</sup>** as it is equal to the Gilbert term namely �*α*ð Þ **f** ∧ **n** *:***n**\_ *:* Notice that Eq. (46) still describe a rotating magnetic moment in the target space (*d***n** ¼ 0); but with a different angular velocity Ω which, in addition to **f**, depends moreover on the Gilbert parameter and the magnetisation **n**. By

<sup>Ω</sup> <sup>¼</sup> �*<sup>γ</sup>*

*dH dt* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>α</sup>*ℏ*<sup>S</sup>*

then, substituting *<sup>γ</sup>***<sup>f</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>α</sup>***n**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** � **<sup>n</sup>**\_ ; we find that *dH*

factorising Eq. (46) like **n**\_ ¼ Ω ∧ **n**, we find

*dH*

putting back in it, we get

indicating that *dH*

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

ing by ∧ *dxl*

we have

relation

by � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup>

**20**

while increasing time.

*5.2.2 Damped skyrmion equation*

a projection along the magnetisation, we obtain

Substituting *d***n** and **n**\_ by their expansions *dxi*

<sup>0</sup>*d*<sup>2</sup>

<sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

4*πqs X*\_ *l*

sity, and where we have replaced *<sup>∂</sup>i***n***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � � by *<sup>δ</sup>ij*ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>k***<sup>n</sup>**

*X*\_ *<sup>l</sup>* 4*πJ*

*J* <sup>0</sup>*d*<sup>2</sup>

where we have set *J*

space while using Ð

; we end up with a relation involving *dx <sup>j</sup>*

**<sup>r</sup>** � � ¼ �*γε*<sup>0</sup>*lj* **<sup>f</sup>***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �*d*<sup>2</sup>

<sup>¼</sup> *γε*<sup>0</sup>*lj*

**<sup>r</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>4</sup>*πqs* and setting *<sup>η</sup> <sup>j</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

ð

**f***:∂ <sup>j</sup>***n** � �*d*<sup>2</sup>

with *<sup>ε</sup>zxy* ¼ �*εzxy* ¼ �1. The remaining step is to replace the conservative force **<sup>f</sup>**

*<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** and proceeds in performing the integral over **<sup>f</sup>***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �. Because of the explicit

dependence into **r**, the **f***:∂ <sup>j</sup>***n** can be expressed like *∂* exp *<sup>j</sup>* H � *<sup>∂</sup>tot <sup>j</sup>* H; the explicit derivation term *∂* exp *<sup>j</sup>* H has been added because the Hamiltonian density has an explicit dependence <sup>H</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**, *<sup>∂</sup>μ***n**, **<sup>r</sup>** � �*:* Recall that *<sup>∂</sup>tot <sup>j</sup>* <sup>H</sup> is given by *<sup>∂</sup>* exp *<sup>j</sup>* H þ *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** *:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** which is equal to *∂* exp *<sup>j</sup>* H � **<sup>f</sup>***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***n***:* Notice also that the term *<sup>∂</sup>* exp *<sup>j</sup>* H can be also expressed like � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>H</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***R**. Therefore, the integral **<sup>f</sup>***:<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �*d*<sup>2</sup> **r** has two contributions namely the Ð *∂tot j* H � �*d*<sup>2</sup> **r** which, being a total derivative, vanishes identically; and the term Ð *∂* exp *j* H � �*d*<sup>2</sup> **<sup>r</sup>** that gives � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>V</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:* Putting this value back into (51), we end up with

$$4\pi q\_s \dot{\mathbf{X}}^l = \gamma e^{xlj} \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{V}}{\partial \mathbf{X}^j} + \frac{4\pi \eta \alpha}{\mathcal{Y}} \dot{\mathbf{X}}^l\right) \tag{52}$$

Implementing the kinetic term of the skyrmion, we obtain the equation with dissipation *Ms***R**€ ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>*<sup>V</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>G</sup>* **<sup>z</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>**\_ � *ηα qs* **<sup>R</sup>**\_ � � where the constant *<sup>G</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>4</sup>*π*ℏ*Sqs <sup>a</sup>*<sup>2</sup> stands for the gyrostropic constant**.**

## **6. Electron-skyrmion interaction**

In this section, we investigate the interacting dynamics between electrons and skyrmions with spin transfer torque (STT) [70]. The electron-skyrmion interaction is given by Hund coupling *JH* Ψ† *<sup>σ</sup>a*<sup>Ψ</sup> � �*:n<sup>a</sup>* which leads to emergent *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> gauge potential that mediate the interaction between the spin texture **n**ð Þ *t*, **r** and the two spin states ð Þ Ψ↑, Ψ<sup>↓</sup> of the electron. We also study other aspects of electron/ skyrmion system like the limit of large Hund coupling; and the derivation of the effective equation of motion of rigid skyrmions with STT.

### **6.1 Hund coupling**

We start by recalling that a magnetic atom (like iron, manganese, ...) can be modeled by a localized magnetic moment **n**ð Þ *t*, **r** and mobile carriers represented by a two spin component field Ψð Þ *t*, **r** ; the components of the fields **n** and Ψ are respectively given by *<sup>n</sup><sup>a</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** with a=1,2,3; and by <sup>Ψ</sup>*α*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** with *<sup>α</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ↑↓. Using the electronic vector density *j* ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ψ</sup>† *σ*Ψ, the interaction between localised and itinerant electrons of the magnetic atom are bound by the Hund coupling reading as *He*�*<sup>n</sup>* ¼ �*JH***n***:j* ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* with Hund parameter *JH* <sup>&</sup>gt;0 promoting alignment of **<sup>n</sup>** and *<sup>j</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* . So, the dynamics of the interacting electron with the backround **n** is given by the Lagrangian density <sup>L</sup>*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>Ψ† *<sup>i</sup><sup>∂</sup> <sup>∂</sup><sup>t</sup>* Ψ � *He*�*<sup>n</sup>* expanding as follows

$$\mathcal{L}\_{\epsilon}[\Psi, \mathbf{n}] = \hbar \Psi^{\dagger} \frac{i\partial}{\partial t} \Psi - \Psi^{\dagger} \left(\frac{\mathbf{P}^{2}}{2m} - J\_{H}\sigma.\mathbf{n}\right) \Psi \tag{53}$$

where **<sup>P</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>i</sup>* <sup>∇</sup> and *<sup>σ</sup>:***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>σ</sup>xnx* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>y</sup> ny* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>z</sup> nz*.

#### *6.1.1 Emergent gauge potential*

Because of the ferromagnetic Hund coupling (*JH* > 0), the spin observable ^ *S z <sup>e</sup>* ¼ ℏ <sup>2</sup> *<sup>σ</sup><sup>z</sup>* of the conduction electron tends to align with the orientation *<sup>σ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>σ</sup>:***<sup>n</sup>** of the magnetisation **n** — with angle *θ* ¼ ð Þ **e***z*^, **n** —; this alinement is accompanied by a

local phase change of the electronic wave function Ψ which becomes *ψ* ¼ *U*Ψ where *U t*ð Þ¼ , **<sup>r</sup>** *<sup>e</sup>i*Θð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*,**<sup>r</sup>** is a unitary *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> transformation mapping *<sup>σ</sup><sup>z</sup>* into *<sup>σ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**; that is *<sup>σ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *U*†*σzU*. For later use, we refer to the new two components of the electronic field like *ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>**, *ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** (for short *ψα*\_ with label *α*\_ ¼ �) such that the gauge transformation reads as *ψα*\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>U</sup><sup>α</sup> <sup>α</sup>*\_Ψ*α*; that is *ψ*� ¼ *U*�<sup>↓</sup>Ψ<sup>↑</sup> þ *U*�<sup>↑</sup>Ψ↓. This local rotation of the electronic spin wave induces a non abelian gauge potential with components <sup>A</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ �*iU∂μU*† mediating the interaction between the electron and the magnetic texture. Indeed, putting the unitary change into L*e*½ � Ψ, **n** , we end up with an equivalent Lagrangian density; but now with new field variables as follows

where we have used the local basis vectors **m**ð Þ*θ* , **e**ð Þ*θ* and **f**ð Þ*θ* . This is an orthogonal triad which turn out to be intimately related with the triad vectors given

1

CA

temporal component ℨ<sup>0</sup> and the three spatial ones ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* — denoted in Section 2

*<sup>ψ</sup>*� <sup>¼</sup> 0 into Eq. (54) and using *<sup>χ</sup>*†*σ<sup>x</sup><sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>χ</sup>*†*σ<sup>y</sup><sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 and *<sup>χ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup><sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *χχ* as well as

where ℨ0, ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* ð Þ define the four components of the emergent abelian gauge

Here, we investigate the full dynamics of the electron/skyrmion system *e*� f g , **n** described by the Lagrangian density L*tot* containing the parts L**<sup>n</sup>** þ L*<sup>e</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>**; the electronic Lagrangian L*<sup>e</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** is given by Eq. (54). The Lagrangian L**n**, describing the skyrmion dynamics, is as in eqs (5)–(7) namely �ℏ*S*ℨ<sup>0</sup> � H**<sup>n</sup>** with ℨ<sup>0</sup> ¼

<sup>8</sup>*<sup>m</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup>

� � � *<sup>H</sup>*<sup>~</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** like

� �*<sup>ψ</sup>* � *<sup>ψ</sup>*† *Pi* <sup>þ</sup> ℏℨ*iσ<sup>z</sup>* ð Þ<sup>2</sup>

*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>ℨ</sup><sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup> *Pi*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>i</sup>*

� <sup>ℨ</sup>0*σ<sup>z</sup>*

*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup>

motion of *ψ* and **n** are obtained as usual by computing the extremisation of this

*∂ ∂t*

<sup>4</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup>

by <sup>1</sup>

� � given by

*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*χ*† *<sup>i</sup>∂*<sup>0</sup> � <sup>ℨ</sup>0*σ<sup>z</sup>* ð Þ*<sup>χ</sup>* � *<sup>χ</sup>*† *Pi* <sup>þ</sup> ℏℨ*<sup>a</sup>*

prepotential ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* associated with the Pauli matrix *σ<sup>z</sup>*

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>φ</sup>*\_ and <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

to the magnetic texture are related to the magnetisation field like *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>*

*<sup>∂</sup>μθ* � <sup>1</sup> 2

from which we learn that the two first components combine in a complex gauge

In the large Hund coupling (*JH* >>1), the spin of the electron is quasi- aligned with the magnetisation **n**; so the electronic dynamics is mainly described by the chiral wave function *<sup>ψ</sup>*þ, 0 � � denoted below as *<sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>χ</sup>*, 0 . Thus, the effective properties of the interaction between the electron and the skyrmion can be obtained by restricting the above relations to the polarised electronic spin wave *χ*. By setting

> *<sup>i</sup> σ<sup>a</sup>* � �<sup>2</sup> 2*m*

þ ℏ2 8*m*

!

0

B@

sin *θ* cos *φ* sin *θ* sin *φ* cos *θ* � 1

1

CA

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>e</sup>i<sup>φ</sup>***w**�*∂μ***<sup>n</sup>** with **<sup>w</sup>**� <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>u</sup>** � *<sup>i</sup>***v**; and the third

*<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* as in Eq. (55); it contains the

, the Lagrangian (54) reduces to the

*<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> � *JHσ<sup>z</sup>*

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>∂</sup>iφ*; their variation with respect

; their explicit expressions are

*<sup>ψ</sup>*†*ψ*, the full Lagrangian density <sup>L</sup>*tot*

2*m* !

*Pi*

� �*σ<sup>z</sup>*. The equations of

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

*χ* (58)

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**.

*ψ* (59)

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μφ* whose structure recalls the

*∂μφ* (57)

by Eq. (5); the relationships read respectively like **n**ð Þ *θ=*2 , **u**ð Þ *θ=*2 and **v**ð Þ *θ=*2 involving *θ=*2 angle instead of *θ*. Substituting these basis vectors by their angular

> � sin *φ* cos *φ* 0

0

B@

*<sup>μ</sup>* which is equal to *<sup>i</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup>* has the remarkable form <sup>1</sup>

values, we obtain

field *W*�

component *A*<sup>3</sup>

replacing *Ax*

polarised <sup>L</sup>ð Þ pol

<sup>L</sup>ð Þ pol

given by <sup>ℨ</sup><sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

<sup>L</sup><sup>~</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*, <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>*

1

**23**

*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>1</sup>

respectively as *a*<sup>0</sup> and *ai*—.

*<sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>x</sup>* � �<sup>2</sup> *A*1 *μ A*2 *μ A*3 *μ*

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

1

CCA <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 2

0

BB@

*<sup>μ</sup>* � *iA*<sup>2</sup>

geometric Berry term (7). Below, we set *A*<sup>3</sup>

<sup>þ</sup> *Ay <sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>y</sup>* � �<sup>2</sup>

*<sup>e</sup>* ¼ L*<sup>e</sup> χ*, **n**, Z*<sup>μ</sup>*

**6.2 Skyrmion with spin transfer torque**

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>φ</sup>*\_ *:* By setting <sup>H</sup>~**<sup>n</sup>** ¼ H**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup>

with can be then presented like <sup>L</sup><sup>~</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*, <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>*

� � ¼ �ℏ*S*ℨ<sup>0</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*ψ*† *<sup>i</sup>*

with *Pi* <sup>þ</sup> ℏℨ*iσ<sup>z</sup>* ð Þ<sup>2</sup> expanding as *<sup>P</sup>*<sup>2</sup>

$$\mathcal{L}\_{\epsilon} \left[ \boldsymbol{\psi}, \mathcal{A}\_{\mu} \right] = \hbar \boldsymbol{\psi}^{\dagger} \left( i \partial\_{0} - A\_{0}^{a} \sigma\_{a} \right) \boldsymbol{\psi} - \boldsymbol{\psi}^{\dagger} \left( \frac{\left( \mathbf{P} + \hbar \mathbf{A}^{a} \sigma\_{a} \right)^{2}}{2m} - J\_{H} \boldsymbol{\sigma}^{x} \right) \boldsymbol{\psi} \tag{54}$$

Here, the vector potential matrix A*<sup>μ</sup>* is valued in the *SU*ð Þ2 Lie algebra generated by the Pauli matrices *σ<sup>a</sup>*; so it can be expanded as *A<sup>x</sup> <sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>x</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *Ay <sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>y</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *Az μσ<sup>z</sup>* with components *A<sup>a</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *Tr <sup>σ</sup><sup>a</sup>*A*<sup>μ</sup>* � �. Notice that in going from the old <sup>L</sup>*e*½ � <sup>Ψ</sup>, **<sup>n</sup>** to the new <sup>L</sup>~*<sup>e</sup> <sup>ψ</sup>*, <sup>A</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* � �, the spin texture **n** has disappeared; but not completely as it is manifested by an emergent non abelian gauge potential A*μ*; so everything is as if we have an electron interacting with an external field A*μ*. To get the explicit relation between the gauge potential and the magnetisation, we use the isomorphism *SU*ð Þ� <sup>2</sup> <sup>3</sup> and the Hopf fibration <sup>1</sup> � <sup>2</sup> to write the unitary matrix *<sup>U</sup>* as follows

$$\begin{aligned} U = e^{i\gamma} \begin{pmatrix} \cos\frac{\theta}{2} & e^{-i\rho}\sin\frac{\theta}{2} \\ e^{+i\rho}\sin\frac{\theta}{2} & -\cos\frac{\theta}{2} \end{pmatrix} \quad , \quad \mathcal{A}\_{\mu} = \begin{pmatrix} \mathcal{S}\_{\mu} & W\_{\mu}^{-} \\ W\_{\mu}^{+} & -\mathcal{S}\_{\mu} \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned} \tag{55}$$

where the factor *ei<sup>γ</sup>* describes <sup>1</sup> and where, for later use, we have set *W*� *<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ *A*1 *<sup>μ</sup>* � *iA*<sup>2</sup> *<sup>μ</sup>* and <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>3</sup> *<sup>μ</sup>*. So, a specific realisation of the gauge transformation is given by fixing *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *cst* (say *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0); it corresponds to restricting <sup>3</sup> down to <sup>2</sup> and SU 2ð Þ reduces down to SU 2ð Þ/U 1ð Þ. In this parametrisation, we can also express the unitary matrix U like **<sup>m</sup>***:<sup>σ</sup>* with magnetic vector **<sup>m</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> sin *<sup>θ</sup>* <sup>2</sup> cos *<sup>φ</sup>*, sin *<sup>θ</sup>* <sup>2</sup> sin *<sup>φ</sup>*, cos *<sup>θ</sup>* 2 � � obeying the property **<sup>m</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1; the same constraint as before. By putting back into *<sup>U</sup>σ:***n***U*†, and using some algebraic relations like *<sup>ε</sup>abdεdce* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>acδbe* � *<sup>δ</sup>bcδae*, we obtain ½ � 2ð Þ **m***:***n m** � **n** *:σ*. Then, substituting **n** by its expression sin ð Þ *θ* cos *φ*, sin *θ* sin *φ*, cos *θ* , we end up with the desired direction *σ<sup>z</sup>* appearing in Eq. (54). On the other hand, by putting *<sup>U</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>m</sup>***:<sup>σ</sup>* back into �*iU∂μU*† , we obtain an explicit relation between the gauge potential and the magnetic texture namely *Aa <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcmb∂μmc*. From this expression, we learn the entries of the potential matrix A*<sup>μ</sup>* of Eq. (55); the relation with the texture **n** is given in what follows seen that **m**ð Þ¼ *θ* **n**ð Þ *θ=*2 .

#### *6.1.2 Large Hund coupling limit*

We start by noticing that the non abelian gauge potential *A<sup>a</sup> <sup>μ</sup>* obtained above can be expressed in a condensed form like *<sup>ε</sup>abcma∂μmb* (for short **<sup>m</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***m**Þ; so it is normal to **m**; and then it can be expanded as follows

$$A^a\_\mu = \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{e}^a \partial\_\mu \theta - \mathbf{f}^a \sin\frac{\theta}{2} \partial\_\mu \varphi \tag{56}$$

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

local phase change of the electronic wave function Ψ which becomes *ψ* ¼ *U*Ψ where *U t*ð Þ¼ , **<sup>r</sup>** *<sup>e</sup>i*Θð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*,**<sup>r</sup>** is a unitary *SU*ð Þ<sup>2</sup> transformation mapping *<sup>σ</sup><sup>z</sup>* into *<sup>σ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>**; that is *<sup>σ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> *U*†*σzU*. For later use, we refer to the new two components of the electronic field like *ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>**, *ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** (for short *ψα*\_ with label *α*\_ ¼ �) such that the gauge transformation reads

spin wave induces a non abelian gauge potential with components <sup>A</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ �*iU∂μU*† mediating the interaction between the electron and the magnetic texture. Indeed, putting the unitary change into L*e*½ � Ψ, **n** , we end up with an equivalent Lagrangian

� �*<sup>ψ</sup>* � *<sup>ψ</sup>*† **<sup>P</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>**A***<sup>a</sup>* ð Þ *<sup>σ</sup><sup>a</sup>* <sup>2</sup>

Here, the vector potential matrix A*<sup>μ</sup>* is valued in the *SU*ð Þ2 Lie algebra generated

� �, the spin texture **n** has disappeared; but not completely as it is manifested by an emergent non abelian gauge potential A*μ*; so everything is as if we have an electron interacting with an external field A*μ*. To get the explicit relation between the gauge potential and the magnetisation, we use the isomorphism *SU*ð Þ� <sup>2</sup> <sup>3</sup> and

� �. Notice that in going from the old <sup>L</sup>*e*½ � <sup>Ψ</sup>, **<sup>n</sup>** to the new

density; but now with new field variables as follows

by the Pauli matrices *σ<sup>a</sup>*; so it can be expanded as *A<sup>x</sup>*

<sup>0</sup>*σ<sup>a</sup>*

the Hopf fibration <sup>1</sup> � <sup>2</sup> to write the unitary matrix *<sup>U</sup>* as follows

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>e</sup>*�*i<sup>φ</sup>* sin *<sup>θ</sup>*

<sup>2</sup> � cos

unitary matrix U like **<sup>m</sup>***:<sup>σ</sup>* with magnetic vector **<sup>m</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> sin *<sup>θ</sup>*

We start by noticing that the non abelian gauge potential *A<sup>a</sup>*

be expressed in a condensed form like *<sup>ε</sup>abcma∂μmb* (for short **<sup>m</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***m**Þ; so it is

*<sup>a</sup>* sin *<sup>θ</sup>* 2

2

1

where the factor *ei<sup>γ</sup>* describes <sup>1</sup> and where, for later use, we have set *W*�

by fixing *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *cst* (say *<sup>γ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0); it corresponds to restricting <sup>3</sup> down to <sup>2</sup> and SU 2ð Þ reduces down to SU 2ð Þ/U 1ð Þ. In this parametrisation, we can also express the

obeying the property **<sup>m</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1; the same constraint as before. By putting back into *<sup>U</sup>σ:***n***U*†, and using some algebraic relations like *<sup>ε</sup>abdεdce* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>acδbe* � *<sup>δ</sup>bcδae*, we obtain ½ � 2ð Þ **m***:***n m** � **n** *:σ*. Then, substituting **n** by its expression sin ð Þ *θ* cos *φ*, sin *θ* sin *φ*, cos *θ* , we end up with the desired direction *σ<sup>z</sup>* appearing in Eq. (54). On the other hand, by

learn the entries of the potential matrix A*<sup>μ</sup>* of Eq. (55); the relation with the texture **n**

*θ* 2

� � <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*ψ*† *<sup>i</sup>∂*<sup>0</sup> � *Aa*

cos *θ*

*<sup>e</sup>*þ*i<sup>φ</sup>* sin *<sup>θ</sup>*

*<sup>α</sup>*\_Ψ*α*; that is *ψ*� ¼ *U*�<sup>↓</sup>Ψ<sup>↑</sup> þ *U*�<sup>↑</sup>Ψ↓. This local rotation of the electronic

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>m</sup>* � *JHσ<sup>z</sup>* !

*<sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>y</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *Az*

*μ*

<sup>2</sup> cos *<sup>φ</sup>*, sin *<sup>θ</sup>*

, we obtain an explicit relation between the gauge

*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>abcmb∂μmc*. From this expression, we

*∂μφ* (56)

� �

*<sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>x</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *Ay*

CA , <sup>A</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>μ</sup> <sup>W</sup>*�

*<sup>μ</sup>*. So, a specific realisation of the gauge transformation is given

*W*þ *<sup>μ</sup>* �ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>*

!

*ψ* (54)

*μσ<sup>z</sup>* with compo-

(55)

*<sup>μ</sup>* ¼

<sup>2</sup> sin *<sup>φ</sup>*, cos *<sup>θ</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup>* obtained above can

2

as *ψα*\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>U</sup><sup>α</sup>*

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

nents *A<sup>a</sup>*

<sup>L</sup>~*<sup>e</sup> <sup>ψ</sup>*, <sup>A</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>*

*A*1 *<sup>μ</sup>* � *iA*<sup>2</sup>

**22**

L*<sup>e</sup> ψ*, A*<sup>μ</sup>*

*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup>

*U* ¼ *e iγ*

<sup>2</sup> *Tr <sup>σ</sup><sup>a</sup>*A*<sup>μ</sup>*

0

B@

*<sup>μ</sup>* and <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>3</sup>

putting *<sup>U</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>m</sup>***:<sup>σ</sup>* back into �*iU∂μU*†

*6.1.2 Large Hund coupling limit*

potential and the magnetic texture namely *Aa*

is given in what follows seen that **m**ð Þ¼ *θ* **n**ð Þ *θ=*2 .

normal to **m**; and then it can be expanded as follows

*Aa <sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 2 e*a <sup>∂</sup>μθ* � <sup>f</sup>

where we have used the local basis vectors **m**ð Þ*θ* , **e**ð Þ*θ* and **f**ð Þ*θ* . This is an orthogonal triad which turn out to be intimately related with the triad vectors given by Eq. (5); the relationships read respectively like **n**ð Þ *θ=*2 , **u**ð Þ *θ=*2 and **v**ð Þ *θ=*2 involving *θ=*2 angle instead of *θ*. Substituting these basis vectors by their angular values, we obtain

$$
\begin{pmatrix} A\_{\mu}^{1} \\ A\_{\mu}^{2} \\ A\_{\mu}^{3} \end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} -\sin\phi \\ \cos\phi \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \partial\_{\mu}\theta - \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} \sin\theta\cos\phi \\ \sin\theta\sin\phi \\ \cos\theta - 1 \end{pmatrix} \partial\_{\mu}\rho \tag{57}
$$

from which we learn that the two first components combine in a complex gauge field *W*� *<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>A</sup>*<sup>1</sup> *<sup>μ</sup>* � *iA*<sup>2</sup> *<sup>μ</sup>* which is equal to *<sup>i</sup>* <sup>2</sup> *<sup>e</sup>i<sup>φ</sup>***w**�*∂μ***<sup>n</sup>** with **<sup>w</sup>**� <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>u</sup>** � *<sup>i</sup>***v**; and the third component *A*<sup>3</sup> *<sup>μ</sup>* has the remarkable form <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μφ* whose structure recalls the geometric Berry term (7). Below, we set *A*<sup>3</sup> *<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* as in Eq. (55); it contains the temporal component ℨ<sup>0</sup> and the three spatial ones ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* — denoted in Section 2 respectively as *a*<sup>0</sup> and *ai*—.

In the large Hund coupling (*JH* >>1), the spin of the electron is quasi- aligned with the magnetisation **n**; so the electronic dynamics is mainly described by the chiral wave function *<sup>ψ</sup>*þ, 0 � � denoted below as *<sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> ð Þ *<sup>χ</sup>*, 0 . Thus, the effective properties of the interaction between the electron and the skyrmion can be obtained by restricting the above relations to the polarised electronic spin wave *χ*. By setting *<sup>ψ</sup>*� <sup>¼</sup> 0 into Eq. (54) and using *<sup>χ</sup>*†*σ<sup>x</sup><sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>χ</sup>*†*σ<sup>y</sup><sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> 0 and *<sup>χ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup><sup>χ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *χχ* as well as replacing *Ax <sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>x</sup>* � �<sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> *Ay <sup>μ</sup>σ<sup>y</sup>* � �<sup>2</sup> by <sup>1</sup> <sup>4</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> , the Lagrangian (54) reduces to the polarised <sup>L</sup>ð Þ pol *<sup>e</sup>* ¼ L*<sup>e</sup> χ*, **n**, Z*<sup>μ</sup>* � � given by

$$\mathcal{L}\_{\varepsilon}^{(\text{poll})} = \hbar \chi^{\dagger} (i \partial\_{0} - \mathfrak{Z}\_{0} \sigma^{x}) \chi - \chi^{\dagger} \left( \frac{\left( P\_{i} + \hbar \mathfrak{Z}\_{i}^{a} \sigma\_{a} \right)^{2}}{2m} + \frac{\hbar^{2}}{8m} \left( \partial\_{\mu} \mathbf{n} \right)^{2} - f\_{H} \sigma^{x} \right) \chi \tag{58}$$

where ℨ0, ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* ð Þ define the four components of the emergent abelian gauge prepotential ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* associated with the Pauli matrix *σ<sup>z</sup>* ; their explicit expressions are given by <sup>ℨ</sup><sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>φ</sup>*\_ and <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>∂</sup>iφ*; their variation with respect to the magnetic texture are related to the magnetisation field like *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**.

#### **6.2 Skyrmion with spin transfer torque**

Here, we investigate the full dynamics of the electron/skyrmion system *e*� f g , **n** described by the Lagrangian density L*tot* containing the parts L**<sup>n</sup>** þ L*<sup>e</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>**; the electronic Lagrangian L*<sup>e</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** is given by Eq. (54). The Lagrangian L**n**, describing the skyrmion dynamics, is as in eqs (5)–(7) namely �ℏ*S*ℨ<sup>0</sup> � H**<sup>n</sup>** with ℨ<sup>0</sup> ¼ 1 <sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>1</sup> � cos *<sup>θ</sup> <sup>φ</sup>*\_ *:* By setting <sup>H</sup>~**<sup>n</sup>** ¼ H**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup> <sup>8</sup>*<sup>m</sup> <sup>∂</sup>μ***<sup>n</sup>** � �<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*ψ*, the full Lagrangian density <sup>L</sup>*tot* with can be then presented like <sup>L</sup><sup>~</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*, <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>μ</sup>* � � � *<sup>H</sup>*<sup>~</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** like

$$\vec{\mathcal{L}}[\nu, \mathfrak{Z}\_{\mu}] = -\hbar \mathfrak{Z} \mathfrak{Z}\_0 + \hbar \nu^\dagger \left( i \frac{\partial}{\partial t} - \mathfrak{Z}\_0 \sigma^x \right) \nu - \nu^\dagger \left( \frac{(P\_i + \hbar \mathfrak{Z}\_i \sigma^x)^2}{2m} \right) \nu \tag{59}$$

with *Pi* <sup>þ</sup> ℏℨ*iσ<sup>z</sup>* ð Þ<sup>2</sup> expanding as *<sup>P</sup>*<sup>2</sup> *<sup>i</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup><sup>2</sup> *<sup>i</sup>* <sup>ℨ</sup><sup>2</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup> *Pi*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>i</sup> Pi* � �*σ<sup>z</sup>*. The equations of motion of *ψ* and **n** are obtained as usual by computing the extremisation of this

Lagrangian density with respect to the corresponding field variables. In general, we have *δ*L*tot* ¼ ð Þ *δ*L*tot=δ***n** *:δ***n** þ ð Þ *δ*L*tot=δψ :δψ* þ *hc* which vanishes for *δ*L*tot=δ***n** ¼ 0 and *<sup>δ</sup>*L*tot=δψ*† <sup>¼</sup> 0.

#### *6.2.1 Modified Landau-Lifshitz equation*

Regarding the spin texture **n**, the associated field equation of motion is given by *δ*L*tot=δ***n** ¼ 0; the contributions to this equation of motion come from the variations <sup>L</sup><sup>~</sup> and <sup>H</sup>~**<sup>n</sup>** with respect to *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** namely

$$\frac{\delta \tilde{\mathcal{H}}}{\delta \mathbf{n}} - \frac{\delta \tilde{\mathcal{L}}}{\delta \tilde{\mathcal{S}}\_{\mu}} \frac{\delta \mathbf{\mathcal{S}}\_{\mu}}{\delta \mathbf{n}} = \mathbf{0} \tag{60}$$

To compare this equation with the usual LL equation (ℏ*S***n**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>H***<sup>n</sup>**

*ψ*, describing the electronic spin density *ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>**

<sup>a</sup>�*<sup>d</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ρ</sup><sup>z</sup> e* 2 � �**n**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>H***<sup>n</sup>**

coupling. Notice that for *<sup>ψ</sup>* ! 0, this equation reduces to <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>S</sup>*

�<sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>S</sup>*

*ω*ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>*

that the vector **<sup>n</sup>** rotates with *<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* ¼ � *<sup>δ</sup>H***<sup>n</sup>**

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> ð Þ <sup>J</sup> *:*∇**<sup>n</sup>** ; and ð Þ *ii* the electronic spin density *<sup>ρ</sup><sup>z</sup>*

*<sup>s</sup>* and *J i e∂i* � �*na* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>J</sup>*

*6.2.2 Rigid skyrmion under spin transfer torque*

*<sup>e</sup>* where we have set *<sup>∂</sup>ina* ð Þ*V<sup>i</sup>*

*ρz <sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup>*

*S*

*N*þ**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>e</sup>* � *<sup>N</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>S</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *ne* 2 � �*va*

integral of Ð

that is

and set

**25**

as <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** with <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* ¼ J *<sup>i</sup>*

*<sup>e</sup>* with *N*�**<sup>n</sup>**

velocity *<sup>n</sup>*\_ *<sup>a</sup>* ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>in<sup>a</sup>* ð Þ*V<sup>i</sup>*

*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *neva*

*d*2

energy potential *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ¼ **<sup>R</sup>** <sup>Ð</sup>

velocity **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>X</sup>*\_ , *<sup>Y</sup>*\_ � �, is given by *Ms*

of Hund coupling (which corresponds to putting *ψ* to zero), we multiply Eq. (63) by ∧ **n** in order to bring it to a comparable relation with LL equation. By setting

*δ***n**

where, due to **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1, the space gradient <sup>J</sup> *:*∇**<sup>n</sup>** is normal to **<sup>n</sup>**; and so it can be set

describes the dynamics of the spin texture interacting with electrons through Hund

*<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* � � <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** indicating that the LL rotation is drifted by <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* coming from two

trons. Moreover, if assuming **n**ð Þ¼ *t*, **r n r**ð Þ � **V***st* with a uniform **V***s*, then the drift

*a*

equation, we end up with the following relation between the **V***<sup>s</sup>* and **v***<sup>e</sup>* velocities

sources: ð Þ*<sup>i</sup>* the term <sup>ℏ</sup>½ � ð Þ <sup>J</sup> *:*<sup>∇</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** which deforms LL vector *<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* drifted by the

<sup>a</sup>�*<sup>d</sup>* of the magnetic texture per unit volume; it involves the number *Ne* ¼

� � � �

*<sup>i</sup>* . The above equation is a modified LL equation; it

*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *Ne*

*<sup>e</sup>* standing for the filling factor of polarized conduction elec-

*<sup>s</sup>* and *J a <sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *neva e* .

*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *va*

**r**L*<sup>s</sup>* and Eq. (36). To begin, recall that in absence of the STT effect,

Here, we investigate the dynamics of a 2D rigid skyrmion [**n** ¼ **n r**ð Þ� � **R** under a spin transfer torque (STT) induced by itinerant electrons. For that, we apply the method, used in sub-subSection 5.1.2 to derive *Ls* from the computation space

the Lagrangian *Ls* of the 2D skyrmion's point- particle, with position **R** ¼ ð Þ *X*, *Y* and

induced by Hund coupling, the Lagrangian *Ls* gets deformed into <sup>L</sup>~*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *Ls* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls*,

**<sup>r</sup>**Hð Þ **<sup>r</sup>**, **<sup>R</sup>** and a constant *<sup>G</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>4</sup>*π*<sup>ℏ</sup>

*d*2

� �*<sup>ψ</sup>* � *<sup>ψ</sup>*† *Pi* <sup>þ</sup> ℏℨ*iσ<sup>z</sup>* ð Þ<sup>2</sup>

Ð *d*2 **r***ψ*†*σ<sup>z</sup>*

The deviation Δ*Ls* with respect to *Ls* in (65) comes from those terms in Eq. (66). Notice that this expression involves the wave function *ψ* coupled to the emergent

<sup>L</sup>~*tot* <sup>¼</sup> L �<sup>~</sup> <sup>H</sup>~**<sup>n</sup>** with <sup>L</sup><sup>~</sup> given by Eq. (59). For convenience, we set L¼� <sup>~</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*S*ℨ<sup>0</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>L</sup>~*<sup>e</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>**

<sup>2</sup> **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>2</sup> � *<sup>G</sup>*

*d*2

<sup>L</sup>~*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *Ms* 2 **R**\_ 2 � *G* 2

To determine <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls*, we start from <sup>L</sup>~*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup>

<sup>L</sup>~*<sup>e</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*ψ*† *<sup>i</sup>*

gauge potential field ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ ℨ0, ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* ð Þ; that is �ℏ

*∂ ∂t*

� <sup>ℨ</sup>0*σ<sup>z</sup>*

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** . By turning on *ψ*, we have **n**\_ �

*<sup>e</sup>* . Putting back into the modified LLG

<sup>2</sup> **<sup>z</sup>***:* **<sup>R</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>**\_ � � � *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ **<sup>R</sup>** with effective scalar

a2 *qs*

**<sup>z</sup>***:* **<sup>R</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>**\_ � � � *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þþ **<sup>R</sup>** <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls* (65)

2*m* !

*ψ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> and

**<sup>r</sup>**L~*tot* with Lagrangian density as

*S:* Under STT

*ψ* (66)

<sup>2</sup> � *<sup>ψ</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** j j<sup>2</sup>

∧ **n** � ℏ½ � ð Þ J *:*∇ **n** (64)

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ∧ **n**Þ in absence

; we find

<sup>a</sup>�*<sup>d</sup>* **<sup>n</sup>**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** showing

<sup>a</sup>�*<sup>d</sup>*; this term adds to the density

The variation *<sup>δ</sup>*H**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** depends on the structure of the skyrmion Hamiltonian density <sup>H</sup>~; its contribution to the equation of motion can be presented like *<sup>λ</sup>∂μ∂μ***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>F</sup>** with some factor *λ*. However, the variation *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** describes skyrmion-electron interaction; and can be done explicitly into two steps; the first step concerns the calculation of the time like component *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> *δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ; it gives � <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>S</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup>* ½ � *<sup>ψ</sup>* ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** ; it is normal to **<sup>n</sup>** and to velocity **n**\_ and involves the eletron spin density *ρ<sup>z</sup> <sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup>ψ*.

The second step deals with the calculation of the space like component � *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ; the factor *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* gives �ℏ<sup>J</sup> *<sup>i</sup>* with a 3-component current vector density reading as follows

$$\mathcal{L}\_i = \frac{1}{2m} \left( \psi^\dagger \sigma^x P\_i \psi - P\_i \psi^\dagger \sigma^x \psi \right) + \frac{\hbar}{m} \left( \psi^\dagger \psi \right) \mathfrak{Z}\_i \tag{61}$$

This vector two remarkable properties: 1ð Þ it is given by the sum of two contributions as it it reads like <sup>J</sup> ð Þ <sup>þ</sup>**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>i</sup>* þ J ð Þ �**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>i</sup>* with

$$\begin{split} \mathcal{L}\_{l}^{(+\mathbf{n})} &= \frac{\hbar}{m} (\overline{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\_{+\mathbf{n}} \boldsymbol{\nu}\_{+\mathbf{n}}) \mathfrak{Z}\_{l} + \frac{1}{2m} \left( \overline{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\_{+\mathbf{n}} \frac{\hbar}{i} \partial\_{l} \boldsymbol{\nu}\_{+\mathbf{n}} - \frac{\hbar}{i} \partial\_{l} \overline{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\_{+\mathbf{n}} \boldsymbol{\nu}\_{+\mathbf{n}} \right) \\ \mathcal{L}\_{l}^{(-\mathbf{n})} &= \frac{\hbar}{m} (\overline{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\_{-\mathbf{n}} \boldsymbol{\nu}\_{-\mathbf{n}}) \mathfrak{Z}\_{l} - \frac{\hbar}{2im} \left( \overline{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\_{-\mathbf{n}} \frac{\hbar}{i} \partial\_{l} \boldsymbol{\nu}\_{-\mathbf{n}} - \frac{\hbar}{i} \partial\_{l} \overline{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\_{-\mathbf{n}} \boldsymbol{\nu}\_{-\mathbf{n}} \right) \end{split} \tag{62}$$

These vectors are respectively interpreted as two spin polarised currents; the <sup>J</sup> ð Þ <sup>þ</sup>**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>i</sup>* is associated with the *ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** wave function as it points in the same direction as **n**; the <sup>J</sup> ð Þ �**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>i</sup>* is however associated with *ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** pointing in the opposite direction of **n**. 2ð Þ Each one of the two <sup>J</sup> ð Þ <sup>þ</sup>**<sup>n</sup>** and <sup>J</sup> ð Þ �**<sup>n</sup>** are in turn given by the sum of two contributions as they can be respectively split like <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>m</sup> ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>***ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>ℨ</sup> <sup>þ</sup> **<sup>j</sup>** *<sup>ψ</sup>*þ**<sup>n</sup>** and <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>m</sup> ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>***ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** ð Þℨ þ **j** *<sup>ψ</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** with vector density **<sup>j</sup>** *<sup>ψ</sup>* standing for the usual current vector **j** *<sup>ψ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>m</sup> ψ***P** \$ *ψ*. The contribution <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>m</sup>* ð Þ *ψψ* ℨ is proportional to the emergent gauge field ℨ; it defines a spin torque transfert to the vector current density J *<sup>i</sup>*.

Regarding the factor *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** , it gives <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup> ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** ; by substituting, the total contribution of *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** leads to � <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> <sup>J</sup> *<sup>i</sup> <sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** that reads in a condensed form like � <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> ð Þ J *:*∇**n** ∧ **n**. Putting back into Eq. (60), we end up with the following modified LL equation

$$-\frac{\hbar}{2}\left[2\mathbf{S} + \boldsymbol{\psi}^{\dagger}\boldsymbol{\sigma}^{x}\boldsymbol{\psi}\right](\dot{\mathbf{n}}\wedge\mathbf{n}) + \frac{\hbar}{2}(\mathcal{J}.\nabla\mathbf{n})\wedge\mathbf{n} - \frac{\delta H\_{\mathbf{n}}}{\delta\mathbf{n}} = \mathbf{0} \tag{63}$$

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

Lagrangian density with respect to the corresponding field variables. In general, we have *δ*L*tot* ¼ ð Þ *δ*L*tot=δ***n** *:δ***n** þ ð Þ *δ*L*tot=δψ :δψ* þ *hc* which vanishes for *δ*L*tot=δ***n** ¼ 0 and

Regarding the spin texture **n**, the associated field equation of motion is given by *δ*L*tot=δ***n** ¼ 0; the contributions to this equation of motion come from the variations

*δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>*

<sup>H</sup>~; its contribution to the equation of motion can be presented like *<sup>λ</sup>∂μ∂μ***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> **<sup>F</sup>** with

tion; and can be done explicitly into two steps; the first step concerns the calculation

*δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>*

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ; it gives � <sup>ℏ</sup>

The second step deals with the calculation of the space like component � *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup>

*Pi<sup>ψ</sup>* � *Piψ*†*σ<sup>z</sup> <sup>ψ</sup>* <sup>þ</sup>

*<sup>i</sup>* with

<sup>2</sup>*im <sup>ψ</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>**

These vectors are respectively interpreted as two spin polarised currents; the

*<sup>i</sup>* is associated with the *ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** wave function as it points in the same direction as **n**;

*<sup>i</sup>* is however associated with *ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** pointing in the opposite direction of **n**. 2ð Þ Each one of the two <sup>J</sup> ð Þ <sup>þ</sup>**<sup>n</sup>** and <sup>J</sup> ð Þ �**<sup>n</sup>** are in turn given by the sum of two contribu-

*<sup>ψ</sup>* standing for the usual current vector **j**

*<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** that reads in a condensed form like � <sup>ℏ</sup>

ℏ

Putting back into Eq. (60), we end up with the following modified LL equation

*<sup>m</sup> ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>***ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>ℨ</sup> <sup>þ</sup> **<sup>j</sup>**

*<sup>m</sup>* ð Þ *ψψ* ℨ is proportional to the emergent gauge field ℨ; it defines a spin

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ <sup>J</sup> *:*∇**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** � *<sup>δ</sup>H***<sup>n</sup>**

1 2*m*

This vector two remarkable properties: 1ð Þ it is given by the sum of two contri-

*ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** ℏ *i*

> ℏ *i*

gives �ℏ<sup>J</sup> *<sup>i</sup>* with a 3-component current vector density reading as follows

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** depends on the structure of the skyrmion Hamiltonian density

ℏ *m*

*<sup>∂</sup>lψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** � <sup>ℏ</sup> *i*

*<sup>∂</sup>lψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** � <sup>ℏ</sup> *i*

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> <sup>0</sup> (60)

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** describes skyrmion-electron interac-

*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup>ψ*.

*<sup>∂</sup>lψ*þ**n***ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>∂</sup>lψ*�**n***ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** (62)

*<sup>ψ</sup>*þ**<sup>n</sup>** and <sup>ℏ</sup>

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>i***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** ; by substituting, the total contribution

*<sup>ψ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>m</sup> ψ***P** \$ *ψ*. The

*<sup>m</sup> ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>***ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** ð Þℨ þ

<sup>2</sup> ð Þ J *:*∇**n** ∧ **n**.

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>¼</sup> 0 (63)

<sup>2</sup> <sup>2</sup>*<sup>S</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup>* ½ � *<sup>ψ</sup>* ð Þ **<sup>n</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** ; it is normal to **<sup>n</sup>**

*ψ*†*ψ* ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* (61)

*δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ; the

*δ*H~ *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � *<sup>δ</sup>*L<sup>~</sup> *δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>*

*δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> *δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup>

*<sup>i</sup>* þ J ð Þ �**<sup>n</sup>**

and to velocity **n**\_ and involves the eletron spin density *ρ<sup>z</sup>*

<sup>J</sup> *<sup>i</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>1</sup> 2*m ψ*† *σz*

*ψ*þ**n***ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** <sup>ℨ</sup>*<sup>l</sup>* <sup>þ</sup>

tions as they can be respectively split like <sup>ℏ</sup>

<sup>2</sup> <sup>J</sup> *<sup>i</sup>*

� ℏ 2

torque transfert to the vector current density J *<sup>i</sup>*.

<sup>2</sup>*<sup>S</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** , it gives <sup>1</sup>

*σz <sup>ψ</sup>* ð Þþ **<sup>n</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>**

*<sup>ψ</sup>*�**n***ψ*�**<sup>n</sup>** ð Þℨ*<sup>l</sup>* � <sup>ℏ</sup>

*<sup>δ</sup>*L*tot=δψ*† <sup>¼</sup> 0.

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

*6.2.1 Modified Landau-Lifshitz equation*

<sup>L</sup><sup>~</sup> and <sup>H</sup>~**<sup>n</sup>** with respect to *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** namely

some factor *λ*. However, the variation *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup>

The variation *<sup>δ</sup>*H**<sup>n</sup>**

factor *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>*

<sup>J</sup> ð Þ <sup>þ</sup>**<sup>n</sup>**

**j**

of *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup> *δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>*

**24**

the <sup>J</sup> ð Þ �**<sup>n</sup>**

contribution <sup>ℏ</sup>

of the time like component *<sup>δ</sup>*<sup>L</sup>

butions as it it reads like <sup>J</sup> ð Þ <sup>þ</sup>**<sup>n</sup>**

<sup>J</sup> ð Þ <sup>þ</sup>**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>l</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup> *m*

<sup>J</sup> ð Þ �**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>l</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup> *m*

*<sup>ψ</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** with vector density **<sup>j</sup>**

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** leads to � <sup>ℏ</sup>

Regarding the factor *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>*

To compare this equation with the usual LL equation (ℏ*S***n**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>H***<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** ∧ **n**Þ in absence of Hund coupling (which corresponds to putting *ψ* to zero), we multiply Eq. (63) by ∧ **n** in order to bring it to a comparable relation with LL equation. By setting *ρz <sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σ<sup>z</sup> ψ*, describing the electronic spin density *ψ*þ**<sup>n</sup>** � � � � <sup>2</sup> � *<sup>ψ</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** j j<sup>2</sup> ; we find

$$-\hbar \left[\frac{\mathbf{S}}{\mathbf{a}^{-d}} + \frac{\rho\_\epsilon^x}{2}\right] \dot{\mathbf{n}} = \frac{\delta H\_\mathbf{n}}{\delta \mathbf{n}} \wedge \mathbf{n} - \hbar [(\mathcal{J}.\nabla)\mathbf{n}] \tag{64}$$

where, due to **<sup>n</sup>**<sup>2</sup> <sup>¼</sup> 1, the space gradient <sup>J</sup> *:*∇**<sup>n</sup>** is normal to **<sup>n</sup>**; and so it can be set as <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** with <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* ¼ J *<sup>i</sup> ω*ð Þ*<sup>e</sup> <sup>i</sup>* . The above equation is a modified LL equation; it describes the dynamics of the spin texture interacting with electrons through Hund coupling. Notice that for *<sup>ψ</sup>* ! 0, this equation reduces to <sup>ℏ</sup> *<sup>S</sup>* <sup>a</sup>�*<sup>d</sup>* **<sup>n</sup>**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** showing that the vector **<sup>n</sup>** rotates with *<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* ¼ � *<sup>δ</sup>H***<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** . By turning on *ψ*, we have **n**\_ � *<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* � � <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** indicating that the LL rotation is drifted by <sup>Ω</sup>ð Þ*<sup>e</sup>* coming from two sources: ð Þ*<sup>i</sup>* the term <sup>ℏ</sup>½ � ð Þ <sup>J</sup> *:*<sup>∇</sup> **<sup>n</sup>** which deforms LL vector *<sup>ω</sup>*ð Þ *<sup>n</sup>* drifted by the **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> ð Þ <sup>J</sup> *:*∇**<sup>n</sup>** ; and ð Þ *ii* the electronic spin density *<sup>ρ</sup><sup>z</sup> <sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *Ne* <sup>a</sup>�*<sup>d</sup>*; this term adds to the density *S* <sup>a</sup>�*<sup>d</sup>* of the magnetic texture per unit volume; it involves the number *Ne* ¼ *N*þ**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>e</sup>* � *<sup>N</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>e</sup>* with *N*�**<sup>n</sup>** *<sup>e</sup>* standing for the filling factor of polarized conduction electrons. Moreover, if assuming **n**ð Þ¼ *t*, **r n r**ð Þ � **V***st* with a uniform **V***s*, then the drift velocity *<sup>n</sup>*\_ *<sup>a</sup>* ¼ � *<sup>∂</sup>in<sup>a</sup>* ð Þ*V<sup>i</sup> <sup>s</sup>* and *J i e∂i* � �*na* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>J</sup> a <sup>e</sup>* . Putting back into the modified LLG equation, we end up with the following relation between the **V***<sup>s</sup>* and **v***<sup>e</sup>* velocities *<sup>S</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> *ne* 2 � �*va <sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *neva <sup>e</sup>* where we have set *<sup>∂</sup>ina* ð Þ*V<sup>i</sup> <sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *va <sup>s</sup>* and *J a <sup>e</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *neva e* .

#### *6.2.2 Rigid skyrmion under spin transfer torque*

Here, we investigate the dynamics of a 2D rigid skyrmion [**n** ¼ **n r**ð Þ� � **R** under a spin transfer torque (STT) induced by itinerant electrons. For that, we apply the method, used in sub-subSection 5.1.2 to derive *Ls* from the computation space integral of Ð *d*2 **r**L*<sup>s</sup>* and Eq. (36). To begin, recall that in absence of the STT effect, the Lagrangian *Ls* of the 2D skyrmion's point- particle, with position **R** ¼ ð Þ *X*, *Y* and velocity **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>X</sup>*\_ , *<sup>Y</sup>*\_ � �, is given by *Ms* <sup>2</sup> **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>2</sup> � *<sup>G</sup>* <sup>2</sup> **<sup>z</sup>***:* **<sup>R</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>**\_ � � � *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ **<sup>R</sup>** with effective scalar energy potential *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ¼ **<sup>R</sup>** <sup>Ð</sup> *d*2 **<sup>r</sup>**Hð Þ **<sup>r</sup>**, **<sup>R</sup>** and a constant *<sup>G</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>4</sup>*π*<sup>ℏ</sup> a2 *qs S:* Under STT induced by Hund coupling, the Lagrangian *Ls* gets deformed into <sup>L</sup>~*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *Ls* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls*, that is

$$
\tilde{\mathbf{L}}\_{\text{s}} = \frac{M\_{\text{s}}}{2}\dot{\mathbf{R}}^2 - \frac{G}{2}\mathbf{z}\left(\mathbf{R}\wedge\dot{\mathbf{R}}\right) - V(\mathbf{R}) + \Delta L\_{\text{s}} \tag{65}
$$

To determine <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls*, we start from <sup>L</sup>~*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *d*2 **<sup>r</sup>**L~*tot* with Lagrangian density as <sup>L</sup>~*tot* <sup>¼</sup> L �<sup>~</sup> <sup>H</sup>~**<sup>n</sup>** with <sup>L</sup><sup>~</sup> given by Eq. (59). For convenience, we set L¼� <sup>~</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*S*ℨ<sup>0</sup> <sup>þ</sup> <sup>L</sup>~*<sup>e</sup>*�**<sup>n</sup>** and set

$$\tilde{\mathcal{L}}\_{\epsilon-\mathbf{n}} = \hbar \psi^\dagger \left( i \frac{\partial}{\partial t} - \mathbf{\mathcal{G}}\_0 \sigma^x \right) \psi - \psi^\dagger \left( \frac{\left( P\_i + \hbar \mathbf{\mathcal{G}}\_i \sigma^x \right)^2}{2m} \right) \psi \tag{66}$$

The deviation Δ*Ls* with respect to *Ls* in (65) comes from those terms in Eq. (66). Notice that this expression involves the wave function *ψ* coupled to the emergent gauge potential field ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* ¼ ℨ0, ℨ*<sup>i</sup>* ð Þ; that is �ℏ Ð *d*2 **r***ψ*†*σ<sup>z</sup> ψ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> and

� <sup>1</sup> 2*m* Ð *d*2 **<sup>r</sup>***ψ*† *Pi* <sup>þ</sup> ℏℨ*iσ<sup>z</sup>* ð Þ<sup>2</sup> h i*ψ*. Thus, to obtain <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls*, we first calculate the variation *δ*ð Þ Δ*Ls δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup> <sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* and put *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:δ***R**. Once, we have the explicit expression of this variation, we turn backward to deduce the value of Δ*Ls*. To that purpose, we proceed in two steps as follows: ð Þ*i* We calculate the temporal contribution *δ*ð Þ Δ*Ls δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> *δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:δ***R**; and ð Þ *ii* we compute the spatial *<sup>δ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:δ***R***:* Using the variation *δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> ¼ 1 <sup>2</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>***n***:* **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �*X*\_ *<sup>j</sup>* , the contribution of the first term can be put as follows

$$\frac{\delta(\Delta L\_t)}{\delta \mathbf{\hat{3}}\_0} \frac{\delta \mathbf{\hat{3}}\_0}{\delta \mathbf{X}^l} \delta \mathbf{X}^l = -\frac{\hbar}{2} \mathbf{J}\_0^x \varepsilon\_{\mathbf{\hat{x}}\dot{\boldsymbol{\beta}}} \left[ \dot{\mathbf{X}}^l \delta \mathbf{X}^j \right] \tag{67}$$

[72, 73]. Consequently, the attractive properties of ferromagnetic skyrmions make them promising candidates for high-density and low-power spintronic technology. Besides, ferromagnetic skyrmions have the potential to encode bits in low-power magnetic storage devices. Therefore, alternative technology of forming and controlling skyrmions is necessary for their use in device engineering. This investigation was performed by using the field theory method based on coherent spin states described by a constrained spacetime field captured by *f*ð Þ¼ **n** 1. Such condition supports the topological symmetry of magnetic solitons which is found to be characterised by integral topological charges *Q* that are interpreted in terms of magnetic skyrmions and antiskyrmion; these topological states can be imagined as

Regarding these two skyrmionic configurations, it is interesting to notice that, unlike magnetic skyrmions, the missing rotational symmetry of antiskyrmions leads to anisotropic DMI, which is highly relevant for racetrack applications. It follows that antiskyrmions exist in certain Heusler materials having a particular type of DMI, including MnPtPdSn [36] and MnRhIrSn [74]. It is then deduced that stabilized antiskyrmions can be observed in materials exhibiting D2*<sup>d</sup>* symmetry such as layered systems with heavy metal atoms. Furthermore, the antiskyrmion show some interesting features, namely long lifetimes at room temperature and a parallel motion to the applied current [75]. Thus, antiskyrmions are easy to detect using conventional experimental techniques and can be considered as the carriers of

To lift the limitations associated with ferromagnetic skyrmions for low-power spintronic devices, recent trends combine multiple subparticles in different magnetic surroundings. Stable room-temperature antiferromagnetic skyrmions in synthetic Pt/Co/Ru antiferromagnets result from the combination of two FM nanoobjects coupled antiferromagnetically [76]. Compared to their ferromagnetic analogs, antiferromagnetic skyrmions exhibit different dynamics and are driven with several kilometers per second by currents. Coupling two subsystems with mutually reversed spins, gives rise to ferrimagnetic skyrmions as detected in GdFeCo films using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy [77]. At ambient temperature, these skyrmions move at a speed of 50*m=s* with a reduced skyrmion Hall angle of 20°. Characterized by uncompensated magnetization, the vanishing angular momentum line can be utilized as a self-focusing racetrack for skyrmions. Another technologi-

cally promising object is generated by the coexistence of skyrmions and

antiskyrmions in materials with D2*<sup>d</sup>* symmetry. The resulting spin textures constitute information bits '0' and '1' generalizing the concept of racetrack device. Insensitive to the repulsive interaction between the two distinct nano-objects, such emergent devices are promising solution for racetrack storage applications.

L. B. Drissi would like to acknowledge "Académie Hassan II des Sciences et Techniques-Morocco". She also acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for financial support via the George Forster Research Fellowship for

(winding) quasiparticle excitations with *Q* >0 and *Q* <0 respectively.

information in racetrack devices.

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

**Acknowledgements**

**27**

experienced scientists (Ref. 3.4 - MAR - 1202992).

where we have set *<sup>ρ</sup><sup>z</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σz<sup>ψ</sup>* and **<sup>J</sup>** *z* <sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *d*2 **r** *ρz* <sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>zkl***n***:*ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>k***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>l***<sup>n</sup>** *:* Notice that the right hand side in above relation can be also put into the form <sup>ℏ</sup> 2 *J z* <sup>0</sup>*εzij <sup>δ</sup>X*\_ *<sup>i</sup> X j* h i � *δ* <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *εzijJ z* 0*X*\_ *i X j* h i indicating that <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls* must contain the term <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *εzijJ z* 0*X*\_ *i X <sup>j</sup>* which reads as well like <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>J</sup>*0**z***:* **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** � �. Regarding the spatial part *<sup>δ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> : δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup> <sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup>* , we have quite similar calculations allowing to put it in the following form

$$\frac{\delta(\Delta L\_i)}{\delta \mathbf{\hat{3}}\_i} . \frac{\delta \mathbf{\hat{3}}\_i}{\delta \mathbf{X}^l} \delta \mathbf{X}^l = -\hbar e\_{\text{xij}} \mathbf{J}^{\text{ri}} \delta \mathbf{X}^j \tag{68}$$

where we have set *J zi*ðÞ¼ *<sup>t</sup>* <sup>Ð</sup> *d*2 **<sup>r</sup>**<sup>J</sup> *zi*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** with <sup>J</sup> *zi*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** given by Eq. (61). Here also notice that the right hand of above equation can be put as well like *δ* �ℏ*εzijJ ziX <sup>j</sup>* � � indicating that Δ*Ls* contains in addition to <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *<sup>J</sup>*0**z***:* **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** � �, the term �ℏ*εzijJ ziX <sup>j</sup>* which reads also as �ℏ**z***:<sup>J</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** with two component vector *<sup>J</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>J</sup> zx*,*J zy* ð Þ. Thus, we have the following modified skyrmion equation

$$\tilde{\mathbf{L}}\_{t} = \frac{M\_{t}}{2}\dot{\mathbf{R}}^{2} - \frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{G} + \hbar f\_{0})\mathbf{z}.\\(\dot{\mathbf{R}} \wedge \mathbf{R}) + \hbar \mathbf{z}. (\mathbf{J} \wedge \mathbf{R}) - V(\mathbf{R}) \tag{69}$$

from which we determine the modified equation of motion of the rigid skyrmion in presence of spin transfer torque.

## **7. Comments and perspectives**

In this bookchapter, we have studied the basic aspects of the solitons dynamics in various 1ð Þ þ *d* spacetime dimensions with *d* ¼ 1, 2, 3; while emphasizing the analysis of their topological properties and their interaction with the environment. After having introduced the quantum SU 2ð Þ spins, their coherent vector representation **S** ¼ Rð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* **S**<sup>0</sup> with **S**<sup>0</sup> standing for the highest weight spin state; and their link with the magnetic moments *μ*⋉*S***n**, we have revisited the time evolution of coherent spin states; and proceeded by investigating their spatial distribution while focusing on kinks, 2d and 3d skyrmions. We have also considered the rigid skyrmions dissolved in the magnetic texture without and with dissipation. Moreover, we explored the interaction between electrons and skyrmions and analyzed the effect of the spin transfer torque. In this regard, we have refined the results concerning the modified LL equation for the rigid skyrmion in connection with emergent non abelian SU 2ð Þ gauge fields. It is found that the magnetic skyrmions, existing in a ferromagnetic (FM) medium, show interesting behaviors such as emergent electrodynamics [71] and current-driven motion at low current densities

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

� <sup>1</sup> 2*m* Ð *d*2

*δ*ð Þ Δ*Ls δ*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>*

*δ*ð Þ Δ*Ls δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> *δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup>

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>***n***:* **<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup> <sup>j</sup>***<sup>n</sup>** � �*X*\_ *<sup>j</sup>*

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

1

*δ* <sup>ℏ</sup> <sup>2</sup> *εzijJ z* 0*X*\_ *i X j* h i

well like <sup>ℏ</sup>

*δ* �ℏ*εzijJ*

�ℏ*εzijJ*

**26**

where we have set *J*

<sup>L</sup>~*<sup>s</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *Ms* 2 **R**\_ 2 � 1 2

in presence of spin transfer torque.

**7. Comments and perspectives**

**<sup>r</sup>***ψ*† *Pi* <sup>þ</sup> ℏℨ*iσ<sup>z</sup>* ð Þ<sup>2</sup> h i

*<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* and put *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>δ</sup>*ℨ*<sup>μ</sup>*

*ψ*. Thus, to obtain Δ*Ls*, we first calculate the variation

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:δ***R***:* Using the variation *δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup> ¼

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>ε</sup>zkl***n***:*ð Þ *<sup>∂</sup>k***<sup>n</sup>** <sup>∧</sup> *<sup>∂</sup>l***<sup>n</sup>** *:* Notice that the

*ziδX <sup>j</sup>* (68)

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>J</sup>*0**z***:* **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** � �, the term

2 *J z* <sup>0</sup>*εzij <sup>δ</sup>X*\_ *<sup>i</sup>*

<sup>2</sup> *εzijJ z* 0*X*\_ *i*

**<sup>r</sup>**<sup>J</sup> *zi*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** with <sup>J</sup> *zi*ð Þ *<sup>t</sup>*, **<sup>r</sup>** given by Eq. (61). Here

*<sup>G</sup>* <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>*J*<sup>0</sup> ð Þ**z***:* **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** � � <sup>þ</sup> <sup>ℏ</sup>**z***:*ð Þ� *<sup>J</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** *<sup>V</sup>*ð Þ **<sup>R</sup>** (69)

(67)

�

*zx*,*J zy* ð Þ.

*X j* h i

*X <sup>j</sup>* which reads as

, we have quite similar

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:δ***R**. Once, we have the explicit expression of this

*δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> : δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup> <sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup>*

*δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>*

2 **J** *z* <sup>0</sup>*εzij <sup>X</sup>*\_ *<sup>i</sup> <sup>δ</sup><sup>X</sup> <sup>j</sup>* h i

, the contribution of the first term can be put as follows

*<sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup> <sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup>* ¼ �ℏ*εzij<sup>J</sup>*

*ziX <sup>j</sup>* which reads also as �ℏ**z***:<sup>J</sup>* <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** with two component vector *<sup>J</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>J</sup>*

from which we determine the modified equation of motion of the rigid skyrmion

In this bookchapter, we have studied the basic aspects of the solitons dynamics in various 1ð Þ þ *d* spacetime dimensions with *d* ¼ 1, 2, 3; while emphasizing the analysis of their topological properties and their interaction with the environment. After having introduced the quantum SU 2ð Þ spins, their coherent vector representation **S** ¼ Rð Þ *α*, *β*, *γ* **S**<sup>0</sup> with **S**<sup>0</sup> standing for the highest weight spin state; and their link with the magnetic moments *μ*⋉*S***n**, we have revisited the time evolution of coherent spin states; and proceeded by investigating their spatial distribution while

focusing on kinks, 2d and 3d skyrmions. We have also considered the rigid skyrmions dissolved in the magnetic texture without and with dissipation. Moreover, we explored the interaction between electrons and skyrmions and analyzed the effect of the spin transfer torque. In this regard, we have refined the results concerning the modified LL equation for the rigid skyrmion in connection with emergent non abelian SU 2ð Þ gauge fields. It is found that the magnetic skyrmions, existing in a ferromagnetic (FM) medium, show interesting behaviors such as emergent electrodynamics [71] and current-driven motion at low current densities

variation, we turn backward to deduce the value of Δ*Ls*. To that purpose, we proceed in two steps as follows: ð Þ*i* We calculate the temporal contribution

*<sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup> <sup>δ</sup>X<sup>l</sup>* ¼ � <sup>ℏ</sup>

*z* <sup>0</sup> <sup>¼</sup> <sup>Ð</sup> *d*2 **r** *ρz*

indicating that Δ*Ls* must contain the term <sup>ℏ</sup>

*<sup>δ</sup>***<sup>R</sup>** *:δ***R**; and ð Þ *ii* we compute the spatial *<sup>δ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls*

*δ*ð Þ Δ*Ls δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup>

where we have set *<sup>ρ</sup><sup>z</sup>* <sup>¼</sup> *<sup>ψ</sup>*†*σz<sup>ψ</sup>* and **<sup>J</sup>**

*δ*ℨ<sup>0</sup>

right hand side in above relation can be also put into the form <sup>ℏ</sup>

<sup>2</sup> *<sup>J</sup>*0**z***:* **<sup>R</sup>**\_ <sup>∧</sup> **<sup>R</sup>** � �. Regarding the spatial part *<sup>δ</sup>*ð Þ <sup>Δ</sup>*Ls*

*δ*ð Þ Δ*Ls δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup> : δ*ℨ*<sup>i</sup>*

*d*2

also notice that the right hand of above equation can be put as well like

calculations allowing to put it in the following form

*zi*ðÞ¼ *<sup>t</sup>* <sup>Ð</sup>

*ziX <sup>j</sup>* � � indicating that Δ*Ls* contains in addition to <sup>ℏ</sup>

Thus, we have the following modified skyrmion equation

[72, 73]. Consequently, the attractive properties of ferromagnetic skyrmions make them promising candidates for high-density and low-power spintronic technology. Besides, ferromagnetic skyrmions have the potential to encode bits in low-power magnetic storage devices. Therefore, alternative technology of forming and controlling skyrmions is necessary for their use in device engineering. This investigation was performed by using the field theory method based on coherent spin states described by a constrained spacetime field captured by *f*ð Þ¼ **n** 1. Such condition supports the topological symmetry of magnetic solitons which is found to be characterised by integral topological charges *Q* that are interpreted in terms of magnetic skyrmions and antiskyrmion; these topological states can be imagined as (winding) quasiparticle excitations with *Q* >0 and *Q* <0 respectively.

Regarding these two skyrmionic configurations, it is interesting to notice that, unlike magnetic skyrmions, the missing rotational symmetry of antiskyrmions leads to anisotropic DMI, which is highly relevant for racetrack applications. It follows that antiskyrmions exist in certain Heusler materials having a particular type of DMI, including MnPtPdSn [36] and MnRhIrSn [74]. It is then deduced that stabilized antiskyrmions can be observed in materials exhibiting D2*<sup>d</sup>* symmetry such as layered systems with heavy metal atoms. Furthermore, the antiskyrmion show some interesting features, namely long lifetimes at room temperature and a parallel motion to the applied current [75]. Thus, antiskyrmions are easy to detect using conventional experimental techniques and can be considered as the carriers of information in racetrack devices.

To lift the limitations associated with ferromagnetic skyrmions for low-power spintronic devices, recent trends combine multiple subparticles in different magnetic surroundings. Stable room-temperature antiferromagnetic skyrmions in synthetic Pt/Co/Ru antiferromagnets result from the combination of two FM nanoobjects coupled antiferromagnetically [76]. Compared to their ferromagnetic analogs, antiferromagnetic skyrmions exhibit different dynamics and are driven with several kilometers per second by currents. Coupling two subsystems with mutually reversed spins, gives rise to ferrimagnetic skyrmions as detected in GdFeCo films using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy [77]. At ambient temperature, these skyrmions move at a speed of 50*m=s* with a reduced skyrmion Hall angle of 20°. Characterized by uncompensated magnetization, the vanishing angular momentum line can be utilized as a self-focusing racetrack for skyrmions. Another technologically promising object is generated by the coexistence of skyrmions and antiskyrmions in materials with D2*<sup>d</sup>* symmetry. The resulting spin textures constitute information bits '0' and '1' generalizing the concept of racetrack device. Insensitive to the repulsive interaction between the two distinct nano-objects, such emergent devices are promising solution for racetrack storage applications.

## **Acknowledgements**

L. B. Drissi would like to acknowledge "Académie Hassan II des Sciences et Techniques-Morocco". She also acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for financial support via the George Forster Research Fellowship for experienced scientists (Ref. 3.4 - MAR - 1202992).

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

## **Author details**

Lalla Btissam Drissi1,2\*, El Hassan Saidi1,2, Mosto Bousmina2,3 and Omar Fassi-Fehri<sup>2</sup>

1 LPHE, Modeling and Simulations, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco

**References**

(2021).

[1] B. Göbel, I. Mertig, O. A. Tretiakov,

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

> skyrmion interaction profiles, Nature Communications 9 (2018) 4395.

[12] X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, M. Ezawa, G. P. Zhao, W. Zhao, (2015) "Magnetic Skyrmion transistor: Skyrmion motion in a voltage-gated nanotrack", Sc.

[13] T. H. R. Skyrme, "A unified field theory of mesons and baryons", Nucl.

[14] S. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. Kivelson, E. Rezayi, Skyrmions and the crossover from the integer to fractional quantum Hall effect at small Zeeman energies, Physical Review B 47 (1993) 16419.

[15] Y. Ohuchi, et al. 2018, "Electric-field control of anomalous and topological Hall effects in oxide bilayer thin films,"

[16] U. Al Khawaja, H. Stoof, Skyrmions in a ferromagnetic Bose–Einstein condensate, Nature 411 (2001) 918.

[17] J. Fukuda, S. Žumer, Quasi-twodimensional skyrmion lattices in a chiral

[18] S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. A. Kivelson, E. H. Rezayi, PRB. B47, 16419

[19] S. E. Barrett, G. Dabbagh, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, R. Tycko, PRL 74,

[20] V. F. Mitrovic, M. Horvatic, C. Berthier, S. A. Lyon, M. Shayegan, PRB

nematic liquid crystal, Nature Communications 2 (2011) 246.

(1993).

5112 (1995).

76, 115335 (2007).

[11] G. Finocchio, F. Buttner, R. Tomasello, M Carpentieri, M. Klaui, (2016) "Magnetic Skyrmions: from fundamental to applications", J. Phys. D.

Appl. Phys, 49, 423001.

Phys. 31, (1962) 556-569.

Nat. Commun. 9, 213

Rep. 5, 11369.

[2] N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, 2013, "Topological properties and dynamics of

[3] L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, A signature index for third order topological insulators, J Phys Condens Matter.

[4] L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, Domain walls in topological tri-hinge matter, Eur.

[5] J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, A. Fert, Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures, Nature Nanotechnology 8 (2013) 839.

[6] A. Fert, V. Cros, J. Sampaio, Skyrmions on the track, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 (2013) 152–156.

224505.

017001.

**29**

(2017) 261–268.

[7] G. Yang, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, Majorana bound states in magnetic skyrmions, Physical Review B 93 (2016)

[8] K. M. Hals, M. Schecter, M. S. Rudner, Composite topological excitations in ferromagnetsuperconductor heterostructures, Physical Review Letters 117 (2016)

[9] G. Yu, P. Upadhyaya, Q. Shao, H. Wu, G. Yin, X. Li, C. He, W. Jiang, X. Han, P. K. Amiri, et al., Roomtemperature skyrmion shift device for memory application, Nano Letters 17

[10] I. L. Fernandes, J. Bouaziz, S. Blügel, S. Lounis, Universality of defect-

magnetic Skyrmions", Nature Nanotechnol. 8, 899-911

(2020), 32(36): 365704.

Phys. J. Plus (2021) 136: 68.

Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles, Physics Reports 895, 1

2 Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology, Rabat, Morocco

3 Euromed Research Institute, Euro-Mediterranean University of Fes, Fes, Morocco

\*Address all correspondence to: lalla-btissam.drissi@um5.ac.ma; b.drissi@academiesciences.ma

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

## **References**

[1] B. Göbel, I. Mertig, O. A. Tretiakov, Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles, Physics Reports 895, 1 (2021).

[2] N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, 2013, "Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic Skyrmions", Nature Nanotechnol. 8, 899-911

[3] L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, A signature index for third order topological insulators, J Phys Condens Matter. (2020), 32(36): 365704.

[4] L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, Domain walls in topological tri-hinge matter, Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2021) 136: 68.

[5] J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, A. Fert, Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures, Nature Nanotechnology 8 (2013) 839.

[6] A. Fert, V. Cros, J. Sampaio, Skyrmions on the track, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 (2013) 152–156.

[7] G. Yang, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, Majorana bound states in magnetic skyrmions, Physical Review B 93 (2016) 224505.

[8] K. M. Hals, M. Schecter, M. S. Rudner, Composite topological excitations in ferromagnetsuperconductor heterostructures, Physical Review Letters 117 (2016) 017001.

[9] G. Yu, P. Upadhyaya, Q. Shao, H. Wu, G. Yin, X. Li, C. He, W. Jiang, X. Han, P. K. Amiri, et al., Roomtemperature skyrmion shift device for memory application, Nano Letters 17 (2017) 261–268.

[10] I. L. Fernandes, J. Bouaziz, S. Blügel, S. Lounis, Universality of defectskyrmion interaction profiles, Nature Communications 9 (2018) 4395.

[11] G. Finocchio, F. Buttner, R. Tomasello, M Carpentieri, M. Klaui, (2016) "Magnetic Skyrmions: from fundamental to applications", J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys, 49, 423001.

[12] X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, M. Ezawa, G. P. Zhao, W. Zhao, (2015) "Magnetic Skyrmion transistor: Skyrmion motion in a voltage-gated nanotrack", Sc. Rep. 5, 11369.

[13] T. H. R. Skyrme, "A unified field theory of mesons and baryons", Nucl. Phys. 31, (1962) 556-569.

[14] S. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. Kivelson, E. Rezayi, Skyrmions and the crossover from the integer to fractional quantum Hall effect at small Zeeman energies, Physical Review B 47 (1993) 16419.

[15] Y. Ohuchi, et al. 2018, "Electric-field control of anomalous and topological Hall effects in oxide bilayer thin films," Nat. Commun. 9, 213

[16] U. Al Khawaja, H. Stoof, Skyrmions in a ferromagnetic Bose–Einstein condensate, Nature 411 (2001) 918.

[17] J. Fukuda, S. Žumer, Quasi-twodimensional skyrmion lattices in a chiral nematic liquid crystal, Nature Communications 2 (2011) 246.

[18] S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. A. Kivelson, E. H. Rezayi, PRB. B47, 16419 (1993).

[19] S. E. Barrett, G. Dabbagh, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, R. Tycko, PRL 74, 5112 (1995).

[20] V. F. Mitrovic, M. Horvatic, C. Berthier, S. A. Lyon, M. Shayegan, PRB 76, 115335 (2007).

**Author details**

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

Rabat, Morocco

**28**

and Omar Fassi-Fehri<sup>2</sup>

b.drissi@academiesciences.ma

provided the original work is properly cited.

Lalla Btissam Drissi1,2\*, El Hassan Saidi1,2, Mosto Bousmina2,3

2 Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology, Rabat, Morocco

\*Address all correspondence to: lalla-btissam.drissi@um5.ac.ma;

1 LPHE, Modeling and Simulations, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in

3 Euromed Research Institute, Euro-Mediterranean University of Fes, Fes, Morocco

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

[21] L. Brey, H. A. Fertig, R. Côté, A. H. Mac Donald, PRL 75, 2562 (1995).

[22] Y. Gallais, J. Yan, A. Pinczuk, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, PRL 100, 086806 (2008).

[23] H. Zhu, G. Sambandamurthy, Y. P. Chen, P. Jiang, L. W. Engel, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, PRL 104, 226801 (2010).

[24] A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1 (2017).

[25] H. Vakili, Y. Xie, and A. W. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. B 102, 174420 (2020).

[26] S. Muhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Joinetz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, *R. georgii*, and P. Boni, Science 323, 915 (2009).

[27] X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Nature (London) 465, 901 (2010).

[28] X. Z. Yu, N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, K. Kimoto, W. Z. Zhang, S. Ishiwata, Y. Matsui, and Y. Tokura, Nat. Mater. 10, 106 (2010)

[29] T. Tanigaki, K. Shibata, N. Kanazawa, X. Yu, Y. Onose, H. S. Park, D. Shindo, and Y. Tokura, Nano Lett. 15, 5438 (2015).

[30] I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of weak ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 4 (1958) 241–255.

[31] T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120 (1960) 91.

[32] M. V. Mohammad and S. Satpathy, "Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in the presence of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling", Phys. Rev. B, 97 (2018) 094419.

[33] N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013).

[34] S. Heinze, K. Von Bergmann, M. Menzel, J. Brede, A. Kubetzka, R. Wiesendanger, G. Bihlmayer, S. Blügel, Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions, Nature Physics 7 (2011) 713–718.

interaction and magnetocrystalline anisotropy in a two-dimensional ferromagnetic monolayer. Physical Review B. 97 (2019) 054416.

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

> Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson. Role of direct exchange and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions in magnetic properties of graphene derivatives: C2F and C2H. Physical Review B. 94 (2016)

[52] D. I. Badrtdinov, S. A. Nikolaev, A. N. Rudenko, M. I. Katsnelson, and V. V. Mazurenko. Nanoskyrmion engineering

[53] F. Z. Ramadan, F. J dos Santos, L. B.

with s p-electron materials: Sn monolayer on a SiC (0001) surface. Physical Review B. 98 (2018) 184425

Drissi and S. Lounis, Complex magnetism of the two-dimensional antiferromagnetic Ge2F: from a Neel

antiferromagnetic skyrmion, RCS

on S3, Nucl. Phys. B 749 (2006)

[56] D. Finkelstein, J. Rubinstein,

(1968) 1762–1779.

(1983) 552–566.

Connection between spin, statistics, and kinks, Journal of Mathematical Physics 9

[57] G. S. Adkins, C. R. Nappi, E. Witten, Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model, Nuclear Physics B 228

[58] J. Xia, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, Z. Hou, W. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Zhou, Currentdriven dynamics of frustrated skyrmions in a synthetic

antiferromagnetic bilayer, Physical Review Applied 11 (2019) 044046.

[54] R. Ahl Laamara, L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, D-string fluid in conifold, I: Topological gauge model, Nucl. Phys. B, 743, (2006), 333-353; D-string fluid in conifold: II. Matrix model for D-droplets

[55] E. H. Saidi, Quantum line operators from Lax pairs, Jour of Math Physics 61, 063501 (2020); Gapped gravitinos, isospin 1/2 particles, and N=2 partial breaking, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2019, 013B01, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/pty144.

spin-texture to a potential

214411.

(2021).

206-224.

[44] L. B. Drissi, K. Sadki, M.H. Kourra, and M. Bousmina, Strain-engineering of Janus SiC monolayer functionalized with H and F atoms. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 123 (2018) 185106.

[45] Y. Mao, H. Xu, J. Yuan, and J. Zhong. Functionalization of the electronic and magnetic properties of silicene by halogen atoms unilateral adsorption: a first-principles study. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 30 (2018) 365001.

[46] L. B. Drissi, F. Z. Ramadan, and S. Lounis. Halogenation of SiC for band-

[47] M. Sun, Q. Ren, Y. Zhao, J. P. Chou, J. Yu, and W. Tang, Electronic and magnetic properties of 4d series

transition metal substituted graphene: a first-principles study. Carbon 120

[48] L. B. Drissi, F. Z. Ramadan, and N. B-J Kanga. Fluorination-control of electronic and magnetic properties in GeC-hybrid. Chemical Physics Letters.

[49] E. J. Kan, H. J. Xiang, F. Wu, C. Tian, C. Lee, J. L. Yang, et al. Prediction for room-temperature half-metallic ferromagnetism in the half-fluorinated single layers of BN and ZnO. Applied Physics Letters. 97 (2010) 122503.

[50] Y. Ma, Y. Dai, M. Guo, C. Niu, L. Yu, and B. Huang. Magnetic properties

group-IV and III-V binary compounds. Applied Surface Science. 257 (2018)

[51] A. N. Mazurenko, S. A. Rudenko, D.

of the semifluorinated and semihydrogenated 2D sheets of

S. Nikolaev, A. Medvedeva, I.

7845-7850.

**31**

gap engineering and excitonic Functionalization. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 29 (2017) 455001.

(2017) 265-273.

659 (2016) 148-153.

[35] J. A. Garlow, S. D. Pollard, M. Beleggia, T. Dutta, H. Yang, Y. Zhu, Physical Review Letters 122 (2019) 237201.

[36] A. K. Nayak, V. Kumar, T. Ma, P. Werner, E. Pippel, R. Sahoo, F. Damay, U. K. Röß ler, C. Felser, S. S. Parkin,, Nature 548 (2017) 561.

[37] A. Leonov, M. Mostovoy, Multiply periodic states and isolated skyrmions in an anisotropic frustrated magnet, Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 8275.

[38] R. Ozawa, S. Hayami, Y. Motome, Zero-field skyrmions with a high topological number in itinerant magnets, Physical Review Letters 118 (2017) 147205.

[39] C. Lee, J. L. Yang, et al., Monolayer honeycomb structures of group-IV elements and III-V binary compounds: First-principles calculations. Physical Review B. 15 (2010) 155453.

[40] L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, M. Bousmina, O. Fassi-Fehri, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 24(48), (2012) 485502

[41] L. B. Drissi, N. B. Kanga, S. Lounis, F. Djeffal, and S. Haddad, Electronphonon dynamics in 2D carbon basedhybrids XC (X= Si, Ge, Sn), Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 31 (2019) 135702.

[42] W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking, Physical Review B. 77 (2019) 235406.

[43] J. Liu, M. Shi, J. Lu, and M. P. Anantram, Analysis of electrical-fielddependent Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya

*Magnetic Skyrmions: Theory and Applications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96927*

interaction and magnetocrystalline anisotropy in a two-dimensional ferromagnetic monolayer. Physical Review B. 97 (2019) 054416.

[21] L. Brey, H. A. Fertig, R. Côté, A. H. Mac Donald, PRL 75, 2562 (1995).

[34] S. Heinze, K. Von Bergmann, M. Menzel, J. Brede, A. Kubetzka, R. Wiesendanger, G. Bihlmayer, S. Blügel, Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions, Nature Physics 7 (2011) 713–718.

[35] J. A. Garlow, S. D. Pollard, M. Beleggia, T. Dutta, H. Yang, Y. Zhu, Physical Review Letters 122 (2019)

[36] A. K. Nayak, V. Kumar, T. Ma, P. Werner, E. Pippel, R. Sahoo, F. Damay, U. K. Röß ler, C. Felser, S. S. Parkin,,

[37] A. Leonov, M. Mostovoy, Multiply periodic states and isolated skyrmions in an anisotropic frustrated magnet, Nat.

[38] R. Ozawa, S. Hayami, Y. Motome, Zero-field skyrmions with a high topological number in itinerant magnets, Physical Review Letters 118

[39] C. Lee, J. L. Yang, et al., Monolayer honeycomb structures of group-IV elements and III-V binary compounds: First-principles calculations. Physical

[41] L. B. Drissi, N. B. Kanga, S. Lounis, F. Djeffal, and S. Haddad, Electronphonon dynamics in 2D carbon basedhybrids XC (X= Si, Ge, Sn), Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 31 (2019)

[42] W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking, Physical

[43] J. Liu, M. Shi, J. Lu, and M. P. Anantram, Analysis of electrical-fielddependent Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya

Review B. 77 (2019) 235406.

Review B. 15 (2010) 155453.

[40] L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, M. Bousmina, O. Fassi-Fehri, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 24(48),

Nature 548 (2017) 561.

Commun. 6 (2015) 8275.

(2017) 147205.

(2012) 485502

135702.

237201.

[22] Y. Gallais, J. Yan, A. Pinczuk, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, PRL 100, 086806

[23] H. Zhu, G. Sambandamurthy, Y. P. Chen, P. Jiang, L. W. Engel, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, PRL 104,

[24] A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros,

[25] H. Vakili, Y. Xie, and A. W. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. B 102, 174420 (2020).

[26] S. Muhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Joinetz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, *R. georgii*, and P. Boni, Science 323, 915

[27] X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Nature (London) 465, 901 (2010).

[28] X. Z. Yu, N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, K. Kimoto, W. Z. Zhang, S. Ishiwata, Y. Matsui, and Y. Tokura, Nat. Mater. 10,

Kanazawa, X. Yu, Y. Onose, H. S. Park, D. Shindo, and Y. Tokura, Nano Lett. 15,

[30] I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of weak ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Sol.

[31] T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism,

[32] M. V. Mohammad and S. Satpathy, "Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in the presence of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling", Phys. Rev. B, 97

[33] N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Nat.

Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013).

[29] T. Tanigaki, K. Shibata, N.

Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1 (2017).

(2008).

(2009).

106 (2010)

5438 (2015).

4 (1958) 241–255.

(2018) 094419.

**30**

Phys. Rev. 120 (1960) 91.

226801 (2010).

*Magnetic Skyrmions*

[44] L. B. Drissi, K. Sadki, M.H. Kourra, and M. Bousmina, Strain-engineering of Janus SiC monolayer functionalized with H and F atoms. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 123 (2018) 185106.

[45] Y. Mao, H. Xu, J. Yuan, and J. Zhong. Functionalization of the electronic and magnetic properties of silicene by halogen atoms unilateral adsorption: a first-principles study. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 30 (2018) 365001.

[46] L. B. Drissi, F. Z. Ramadan, and S. Lounis. Halogenation of SiC for bandgap engineering and excitonic Functionalization. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 29 (2017) 455001.

[47] M. Sun, Q. Ren, Y. Zhao, J. P. Chou, J. Yu, and W. Tang, Electronic and magnetic properties of 4d series transition metal substituted graphene: a first-principles study. Carbon 120 (2017) 265-273.

[48] L. B. Drissi, F. Z. Ramadan, and N. B-J Kanga. Fluorination-control of electronic and magnetic properties in GeC-hybrid. Chemical Physics Letters. 659 (2016) 148-153.

[49] E. J. Kan, H. J. Xiang, F. Wu, C. Tian, C. Lee, J. L. Yang, et al. Prediction for room-temperature half-metallic ferromagnetism in the half-fluorinated single layers of BN and ZnO. Applied Physics Letters. 97 (2010) 122503.

[50] Y. Ma, Y. Dai, M. Guo, C. Niu, L. Yu, and B. Huang. Magnetic properties of the semifluorinated and semihydrogenated 2D sheets of group-IV and III-V binary compounds. Applied Surface Science. 257 (2018) 7845-7850.

[51] A. N. Mazurenko, S. A. Rudenko, D. S. Nikolaev, A. Medvedeva, I.

Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson. Role of direct exchange and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions in magnetic properties of graphene derivatives: C2F and C2H. Physical Review B. 94 (2016) 214411.

[52] D. I. Badrtdinov, S. A. Nikolaev, A. N. Rudenko, M. I. Katsnelson, and V. V. Mazurenko. Nanoskyrmion engineering with s p-electron materials: Sn monolayer on a SiC (0001) surface. Physical Review B. 98 (2018) 184425

[53] F. Z. Ramadan, F. J dos Santos, L. B. Drissi and S. Lounis, Complex magnetism of the two-dimensional antiferromagnetic Ge2F: from a Neel spin-texture to a potential antiferromagnetic skyrmion, RCS (2021).

[54] R. Ahl Laamara, L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, D-string fluid in conifold, I: Topological gauge model, Nucl. Phys. B, 743, (2006), 333-353; D-string fluid in conifold: II. Matrix model for D-droplets on S3, Nucl. Phys. B 749 (2006) 206-224.

[55] E. H. Saidi, Quantum line operators from Lax pairs, Jour of Math Physics 61, 063501 (2020); Gapped gravitinos, isospin 1/2 particles, and N=2 partial breaking, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2019, 013B01, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/pty144.

[56] D. Finkelstein, J. Rubinstein, Connection between spin, statistics, and kinks, Journal of Mathematical Physics 9 (1968) 1762–1779.

[57] G. S. Adkins, C. R. Nappi, E. Witten, Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model, Nuclear Physics B 228 (1983) 552–566.

[58] J. Xia, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, Z. Hou, W. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Zhou, Currentdriven dynamics of frustrated skyrmions in a synthetic antiferromagnetic bilayer, Physical Review Applied 11 (2019) 044046.

[59] M. Weiß enhofer, U. Nowak, Orientation-dependent current-induced motion of skyrmions with various topologies, Physical Review B 99 (2019) 224430

[60] J. H. Han, Skyrmions in CMP, Spinger Tracts in Modern Physics 278

[61] L. D. Landau, E.M Lifshitz, Theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys, Z. Sowietunion 8, 153 (1935).

[62] M. V. Berry; Quantal phase factors accompaying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984).

[63] A. Hatcher, (2002), Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-79540-1, MR 1867354.

[64] S. Coleman, "The quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model", Phys. Rev. D 11, 2088 (1975).

[65] A. M. Kosevich, B. Ivanov, A. Kovalev, Magnetic solitons, Physics Reports 194 (1990) 117–238.

[66] S. Huang, C. Zhou, G. Chen, H. Shen, A. K. Schmid, K. Liu, Y. Wu, Stabilization and current-induced motion of antiskyrmion in the presence of anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 144412.

[67] K.-W. Kim, K.-W. Moon, N. Kerber, J. Nothhelfer, K. Everschor-Sitte, Asymmetric skyrmion Hall effect in systems with a hybrid Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Physical Review B 97 (2018) 224427.

[68] T. Gilbert, A Lagrangian formulation of the gyromagnetic equation of the magnetization field, Physical Review 100 (1955) 1243.

[69] Y. Nakatani, Y. Uesake, and N. Hayashi, "Direct solution of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbertequation for micromagnetics", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 28, 1989, pp. 2485-2507.

[70] D. C. Ralph, M. D. Stiles, Spin Transfer Torques, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1190-1216 (2008).

[71] P. Bruno, V. Dugaev, M. Taillefumier, Topological Hall effect and Berry phase in magnetic nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 096806.

**Chapter 2**

**Abstract**

spintronics.

**33**

**1. Introduction**

Such as Bloch, Néel and Anti skyrmions [3].

Interfaces and

*Rajesh Kumar Rajagopal*

Skyrmions in Thin Films,

Magnetic skyrmions are small whirling topological defects in a texture magnetization state. Their stabilization and dynamics depend strongly on their topological properties. Skyrmions are induced by non-centrosymmetric crystal structure of magnetic compounds and thin films. Skyrmions are extremely small, with diameters in the nanometer range, and behave as particles that can be created, moved and annihilated. This makes them suitable for information storage and logic technologies. Skyrmions had been observed only at low temperature, and mostly under large applied magnetic fields. An intense research in this field has led to the identification

of skyrmions in thin-film and multilayer structures in these heterostrutres skyrmions are able to survive at room temperature and can be manipulated by electrical currents. Utilizing interlayer magnetic exchange bias with synthetic antiferromagnet with can be used to isolated antiferromagnetic skyrmions at room temperature. The development of skyrmion-based topological spintronics holds promise for applications in the writing, processing and reading functionalities at room temperature and can be extended further to all-electrical manipulation

**Keywords:** Skyrmions, thin films, interfaces, magnetism, multilayers

Skyrmions in magnetic materials are topological spin textures that are stabilized

Bloch-type skyrmions Bloch-type skyrmion is the first category in chiral magnetic materials, where the spins are lying within the tangential plane of the system,

in various types of magnetic interactions. Non-centrosymmetric bulk magnetic materials exhibit chiral, polar, or *D*2d symmetry which provide a good area to study the topological spin structures and emergent electromagnetic responses arising from them [1, 2]. In these materials without the presence of inversion symmetry, Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) can gradually twists the ferromagnetic spin arrangement, giving rise to helimagnetic structure in zero field as well as skyrmions in presence of a magnetic field. The stabilization of Skyrmions is not only due to deformation of helical spin structure but the topologically protected state from external perturbations and thus appropriate for carrying information in robust manner. Skyrmions can be different in to three types of as schematically shown in **Figure 1** have been observed experimentally, which were theoretically predicted

Antiferromagnetism

[72] T. Dohi, S. DuttaGupta, S. Fukami, H. Ohno, Formation and currentinduced motion of synthetic antiferromagnetic skyrmion bubbles, Nature Communications 10 (2019) 5153.

[73] X. Yu, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Kaneko, W. Zhang, K. Kimoto, Y. Matsui, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, Biskyrmion states and their current-driven motion in a layered manganite, Nature Communications 5 (2014) 3198.

[74] J. Jena, R. Stinshoff, R. Saha, A. K. Srivastava, T. Ma, H. Deniz, P. Werner, C. Felser, S. S. Parkin, Observation of magnetic antiskyrmions in the low magnetization ferrimagnet Mn2Rh0.95Ir0.05Sn, Nano Letters 20 (2019) 59.

[75] M. Hoffmann, B. Zimmermann, G. P. Müller, D. Schürhoff, N. S. Kiselev, C. Melcher, S. Blügel, Antiskyrmions stabilized at interfaces by anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 308.

[76] W. Legrand, D. Maccariello, F. Ajejas, S. Collin, A. Vecchiola, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V. Cros, A. Fert, Room-temperature stabilization of antiferromagnetic skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nature Materials 19 (2020) 34.

[77] S. Woo, K. M. Song, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, S. Finizio, J. Raabe, N. J. Lee, S.-I. Kim, et al., Current-driven dynamics and inhibition of the skyrmion Hall effect of ferrimagnetic skyrmions in GdFeCo films, Nature Communications 9 (2018) 959.

## **Chapter 2**

[59] M. Weiß enhofer, U. Nowak, Orientation-dependent current-induced motion of skyrmions with various topologies, Physical Review B 99 (2019) [70] D. C. Ralph, M. D. Stiles, Spin Transfer Torques, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1190-1216 (2008).

Taillefumier, Topological Hall effect and Berry phase in magnetic nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 096806.

[72] T. Dohi, S. DuttaGupta, S. Fukami, H. Ohno, Formation and currentinduced motion of synthetic

antiferromagnetic skyrmion bubbles, Nature Communications 10 (2019) 5153.

[73] X. Yu, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Kaneko, W. Zhang, K. Kimoto, Y. Matsui, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, Biskyrmion states and their current-driven motion in a

[74] J. Jena, R. Stinshoff, R. Saha, A. K. Srivastava, T. Ma, H. Deniz, P. Werner, C. Felser, S. S. Parkin, Observation of magnetic antiskyrmions in the low

Mn2Rh0.95Ir0.05Sn, Nano Letters 20

[75] M. Hoffmann, B. Zimmermann, G. P. Müller, D. Schürhoff, N. S. Kiselev, C. Melcher, S. Blügel, Antiskyrmions stabilized at interfaces by anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 308.

[76] W. Legrand, D. Maccariello, F. Ajejas, S. Collin, A. Vecchiola, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V. Cros, A. Fert, Room-temperature stabilization of

antiferromagnetic skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nature

of the skyrmion Hall effect of ferrimagnetic skyrmions in GdFeCo films, Nature Communications 9 (2018)

959.

[77] S. Woo, K. M. Song, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, S. Finizio, J. Raabe, N. J. Lee, S.-I. Kim, et al.,

Current-driven dynamics and inhibition

Materials 19 (2020) 34.

layered manganite, Nature Communications 5 (2014) 3198.

magnetization ferrimagnet

(2019) 59.

[71] P. Bruno, V. Dugaev, M.

[60] J. H. Han, Skyrmions in CMP, Spinger Tracts in Modern Physics 278

of the dispersion of magnetic

Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984).

[63] A. Hatcher, (2002), Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-79540-1, MR 1867354.

[64] S. Coleman, "The quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model", Phys. Rev. D 11, 2088 (1975).

[65] A. M. Kosevich, B. Ivanov, A. Kovalev, Magnetic solitons, Physics Reports 194 (1990) 117–238.

and current-induced motion of antiskyrmion in the presence of anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya

97 (2018) 224427.

[68] T. Gilbert, A Lagrangian formulation of the gyromagnetic equation of the magnetization field, Physical Review 100 (1955) 1243.

Lifshitz-Gilbertequation for

Vol. 28, 1989, pp. 2485-2507.

**32**

[69] Y. Nakatani, Y. Uesake, and N. Hayashi, "Direct solution of the Landau-

micromagnetics", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,

[66] S. Huang, C. Zhou, G. Chen, H. Shen, A. K. Schmid, K. Liu, Y. Wu, Stabilization

interaction, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 144412.

[67] K.-W. Kim, K.-W. Moon, N. Kerber, J. Nothhelfer, K. Everschor-Sitte, Asymmetric skyrmion Hall effect in systems with a hybrid Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Physical Review B

[61] L. D. Landau, E.M Lifshitz, Theory

permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys, Z. Sowietunion 8, 153 (1935).

[62] M. V. Berry; Quantal phase factors accompaying adiabatic changes. Proc. R.

224430

*Magnetic Skyrmions*
