Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach

*Surabhi Hota*

## **Abstract**

Soil is a highly heterogenous system where a number of physical, chemical and biological processes are taking place. The study of these processes requires analytical techniques. The electromagnetic radiations in the form spectroscopy, X-Ray diffraction, magnetic resonance etc. have been used in the field of soil analysis since decades. The study of soil nutrients, mineralogy, organic matter and complex compounds in soils use these techniques and are successful tools till date. But these come with a limitation of lesser spatial and spectral resolution, time consuming sample preparation and destructive methods of study which are mostly ex-situ. In contrast to the conventional spectroscopic techniques, the synchrotron facility is of high precision and enables non-destructive study of the samples to a nano scale. The technique uses the high intensity synchrotron radiation which is produced in a special facility, where the electrons are ejected using very high voltage and accelerated in changing magnetic field, at a speed of light resulting in a very bright radiation that enables a very précised study of the subject. For example, in studying the dynamics of P and N in soils, SR aided XAS are used to study the K-edge spectra of these nutrients, without any matrix interference, which used to be a problem in conventional SEM, IR or NMR spectroscopy. These radiations provide high energy in GeV, which imparts high sensitivity and nanoscale detection. Basically, the SR facility improves the precision of the existing spectroscopic techniques. This chapter discusses how the Synchrotron radiations aid to improve precision in various field of soil analysis such as, carbon chemistry, nutrient dynamics, heavy metal and contaminant speciation and rhizosphere study. However, the technique also come with major limitations of requirement of very high skill for preparation of samples, inadequate availability of references for studies related to absorption spectrum and control of radiation damage. Applications and limitations of the technique thoroughly reviewed in this chapter with an aim to provide a brief idea of this new dimension of soil analysis.

**Keywords:** Soil, Synchrotron, analysis, energy, resolution

#### **1. Introduction**

Soil is a heterogenous system and habitat for numerous flora and fauna, where umpteen chemical, physical and biological processes are operating to make it a living system. These processes are, element mineralization and immobilization, redox reactions, decomposition of organic matters by microbes, movement of nutrient elements towards the plant roots and related soil water movements, the complex processes near the rhizosphere, accumulation and distribution of elements and their chemical transformations in to different complexes and valency, weathering of rocks and minerals

to form soil and related soil forming processes. To understand these processes, several techniques have been developed and experimented by the soil researchers from time to time. And there are numerous remarkable techniques that have aided to the human understanding of complex matters. Most of these techniques use source of energy and illumination for quantification of the elements and studying the complex structure of a system. Such techniques are Diffraction/scattering for crystallography; Polarimetry for measuring the shape of complex molecules and the properties of magnetic materials; Imaging for highly detailed imaging of small animals, and ultimately humans, to the substructure level of biological and physical material, using light from infrared to hard X-rays; Spectroscopy for analysis of chemical compositions and speciation of elements [1]. However, these techniques have several limitations in terms of their sensitivity, spatial resolution, lengthy sample preparation procedures and most of them are dependent upon destructive sampling and ex-situ analysis. With the development of synchrotron facility around the world, the exploitation and study of these processes have been made possible to the molecular level and in-situ because of the unique qualities of a synchrotron radiation viz.; high brightness, wide energy spectrum, highly polarized radiation and time structured emission. This gives the SR an advantage of due to high proton flux, possibility of beam tunability and weak scattering, high sensitivity resulted from acceleration of heavy ion beams to high energy.

Synchrotron Radiation (SR) is basically an electromagnetic radiation which is emitted when the charged particles are radially accelerated. Natural synchrotron radiation (SR) is as old as the stars produced due to charged particles spiraling around magnetic field lines in space [2], while short-wavelength synchrotron radiation generated artificially by in circular acceleration of relativistic electrons only ways back to early nineties [3, 4]. The synchrotron principle was invented by Vladimir Veksler in 1944 [5]. Edwin McMillan constructed the first electron synchrotron in 1945 [6]. The first ever synchrotron was successfully made in 1947 under the direction of Herbert Pollock at General Electric Research Laboratory, NY. And the first synchrotron radiation was observed by Floyd Haber on 24th April, 1947. This was a remarkable achievement in the field of physics which today has led to large, fullfledged synchrotron facilities around the world. The first-generation synchrotron facilities were only being used to study the fundamental properties of matter and was more of a particle accelerator [2]. Presently, the synchrotron facilities have upgraded to third generation, which enable the use of low energy or soft and high energy or hard X-rays, UV and longer wavelengths. The first ever third-generation hard X-ray source was European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble followed by the Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratory with an energy of 7 GeV. The synchrotron is one of the first accelerator concepts to operate as largescale facilities, where bending, beam focusing and acceleration could be separated into different components and where the magnetic field is guided in a time dependent manner, to synchronize with a particle beam of increasing kinetic energy.

There are more than 50 facilities in operation worldwide (http://www.lightsources.org) and are being used by more than 15,000 researchers. Some large facilities are listed in **Table 1**. There are a few large synchrotron facilities that have been operating with high electron energies, as high as 8 GeV (SPring-8 in Harima Science Garden City in Japan). PETRA III, which took up operation in 2009, is the most brilliant storage-ring-based X-ray radiation source in the world. As the most powerful light source of its kind (https://petra3.desy.de/ index \_eng.html). These machines are physically large (850 to 1,440 m in circumference) with a capability for 40 or more beamlines. There is are also many smaller facilities (120 to 280 m in circumference) which have come in to existence in recent past, having lower electron energies (from 1.3 to 3 GeV). There are also some fourth-generation synchrotron facilities which have been conceptualized by few countries recently.


#### *Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

#### **Table 1.**

*Synchrotron facilities around the world.*

Synchrotron facilities can generate frequencies over entire range of the electromagnetic spectrum. In addition to having a high intensity, the synchrotron light has other properties useful to researchers. Wavelengths produced by SR, may range from 10 to 11 m hard X-rays) to 106 m (infrared light), emitted in short pulses (~100 ps wide spaced at 2 ns), partially coherent and arrives in parallel rays, highly polarized, isolation of specific wavelengths are possible with the use of diffraction or crystal gratings. And most importantly, light is released as a very narrow cone [7] which is then focused to provide a very narrow beam at the work station.

There are a number of techniques that have been used by the researchers for study of soils, they are: STXM- Scanning Transmission X-ray Microscopy, NEXAFS- Near Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy, FTIR- Fourier Transform InfraRed Spectroscopy, μXRD- Micro X-ray Diffraction, EELS- Electron Energy Loss Structure spectroscopy, EXAFS- Extended Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy, XANES- X-Ray Absorption Near Edge Structure Spectroscopy [8], HRTEM-High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy, SXRF- Synchrotron Based X-ray Radiation Fluorescence, XFS- X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, X-ray

μ-computed tomography [9–11], SEM- Scanning Electron Microscopy, TEM-Transmission Electron Microscopy.

These synchrotron-based techniques have proved to increase the precision of determination of many soil parameters such as carbon chemistry of soil [12, 13], rhizosphere nutrient transport and other mechanisms [14, 15], heavy metal quantification and remediation, microbe-metal interaction mineral transformation, study of physical parameters of soil, soil fertility study.

Methodology: This chapter reviews the works done in the field of soil analysis for physical, chemical and biological parameters, using SR facility, all over the world and how it has aided to the improvement in precision and accuracy of the study.

## **2. Components and working of a synchrotron facility**

A synchrotron facility in general, consists of:


magnets, there is a photon port to allow the light to travel down the beam lines to the research stations.


## **3. Organic carbon chemistry in soils observed by synchrotron based spectroscopy**

Soil is believed to be the largest pool of terrestrial organic carbon containing about 1500 Pg C which is higher than the atmospheric and biotic pools combined [17, 18]. Organic C is crucial in maintaining the balance of inorganic form, specially, CO2 in the atmosphere, which in turn, controls the global climate scenario [19]. The entire carbon cycle revolves around the organic C fraction. The decomposition of organic matter, from animal and plant residues and subsequent humification, leads to the formation of complex organic compound leading to significant structural and composition changes [20]. Organic compounds released from animals, plants, microbial cells, have a range of size and complexity from monomers to mixtures of biopolymers. This complexity makes chemistry of soil organic matters difficult to study. Organic C shows very high chemical and spatial complexity, creating significant analytical problems in the existing methods [21–24]. Soils characteristically have low amounts of C as compared to pure biological samples. They require relatively higher energy to substantially improve the detection limits and data that allow better quantification of C chemistry. The existing techniques are mostly destructive, or the samples are processed ex-situ, for analysis. This sometimes causes the loss of delicate structure of the complex organic matter. SR based spectroscopic techniques have proven to be an advanced tool to study the organic C chemistry of soils, as it enables the non- destructive micro and nano-scale analysis and enables keen study of reactivity, composition, heterogeneity, physical site of organic materials, and mineral-organic matter interactions. The high energy of SR provides very high spatial and spectral resolution.

SR-based scanning transmission Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray microscopy (STXM) and C (1 s) near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS), have proven to be unique and non-invasive in studying the complex processes of C chemistry in soils, in the recent past. These techniques have been used to reveal the Spatial organization of C forms in microstructures, functional group chemistry of C, interaction of C with soil matrix, surface Interactions of organic C and minerals.

The identification of the compound structure of the SOC and DOC involves basically, identifying the type of chemical bonds and functional groups in a molecule. And because of complex nature of the spectrum produced by the organic compounds, the identification and differentiation of the bond become difficult with low energy, conventional spectroscopic techniques. At low spectral resolution, the peaks seem to be overlapping and the fingerprinting becomes only partially useful. This limitation has been overcome by the incorporation of SR in to the spectroscopic techniques. The identification of the structural characteristics with high precision has become possible and even the study of impact of management on SOC cycle and composition could be successfully carried out by aid of SR based techniques in various studies [13, 23, 25–32].

The aided advantage of SR is its brightness, which can be defined as the photon flux or power emitted per source area and solid angle, is 100–1000 times greater than the brightness obtained from a conventional source [33, 34]. FTIR spectroscopy has been considered the most powerful technique for identifying types of chemical bonds and functional groups in a molecule which produces IR absorption spectrum, in the form similar to fingerprint. FTIR combined with microscopy allows probing of small areas in shorter time intervals and with an optimum signalto-noise ratios. However, SR-FTIR spectroscopy could reveal the quantity, structure composition, and distribution of chemical constituents in humus fractions [13, 23]. In some studies, it has also been used to identify stable soil aggregates and black C particles chemistry [27, 35] and these studies show that, the SR-FTIR spectra has stronger band width compared to conventional FTIR. Studies revealed that, FTIR spectra below 1450 cm-1 normally leads to overlapping bands of indefinite quantity. SR-FTIR has a spectrum ranging from 4000 to 400 cm−1 and could measure the molecular level vibration of organic and inorganic functional groups [36, 37]. SR-FTIR can also identify the changes in intensities and vibrational characteristics of bands, shifts in frequencies and shapes of a particular band [38]. These properties have been exploited to study the molecular level changes in SOM composition due to management practices [13, 23, 39]. it was also made possible by this technique to study organo-mineral assemblages [27, 35].

NEXAFS is also such a technique which is being used by many researchers for similar studies in recent past. It is highly element-specific as the different elements show X-ray absorption peaks at different energies [40]. NEXAFS when combined to STXM, information as précised as 30–50 nm spatial resolution could be obtained. This technique is termed as NEXAFS spectromicroscopy. This technique has been used in study of humic fractions mined from highly complex soil matrices [13, 23, 24, 29, 41, 42], study nanostructures of polymers [43] and fingerprinting of C in biological materials [44, 45].

The results obtained from the SR-based techniques are basically an improvement over the pre-existing spectroscopic techniques, where the bond stretch (eg. C-O or O-H), π and σ transitions [23] are taken as the reference for speciation of the C containing species. However, the spectral signatures, or fingerprints of pure biological materials obtained from SR based spectroscopy can serve as a reference for interpretation of the results obtained from conventional spectroscopy. The results can then be quantified using chemometrical methods, multivariate analysis, regression modeling, principal component analysis or predictive modeling [27, 46]. In laboratory analysis of samples, chemical analysis of C samples can only provide the total OC, or different pools of C or fractions of humus, which are mostly quantitative. But the SR based techniques can reveal what is the actual composition of the TOC fraction or humus fraction. These revelations can be related to the stage of weathering of a soil, its pedogenesis and can also correlate the data to predict the responsible chemical, physical and biological processes. Information related to

fingerprints of organic compounds such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates and lipids, predictive models and algorithms can be developed, which can be used by researchers with basic facilities, to predict the organic C chemistry and related processes. However, the data from fingerprints of standard substances is still inadequate to fully identify functional group chemistry for soil organic C and a strenuous effort is required to fill that breach.

## **4. Synchrotron based techniques in elemental speciation in soils**

Soil is a very heterogenous system and the chemical and biological processes happening inside it are even more complex. The important processes, as mentioned in the introductory section, are dependent upon the concentration of different elements involved in process, their distribution and their chemical behavior, which makes their speciation very much crucial. Also, the speciation of environmental contaminants such as heavy metals are important as they lead to degradation of soils [47, 48]. XAS is a powerful technique to provide answer to questions related to the chemistry of an element present in ant system starting from minerals, to biological specimens and solutions [49–52]. The XAS technique basically scans the object of study using a range of X-ray energies. Hence, with the advent of synchrotron, the energy of X-ray could be increased. XANES and EXAFS are the two techniques XAS techniques which have been used in many studies for studying the elements in heterogenous environments, by selecting appropriate energies of the incoming X-ray photon with the aid of SR facilities and thereby generating chemical maps of an element in relation to its oxidation state and chemical bonding [53]. K-edge XANES has been used to test the speciation of Al on the thin surface coatings of quartz and feldspar grains in a loess soil [54], and studying the coordination of Al in imogolite and allophones [55].

X-ray techniques such as low-energy XRF (LEXRF) has been used to quantify Al in plant tissues to determine the toxicity levels. A study was carried out to determine Al accumulation in tea plants, in the soils with high acidity, resulted to high concentration of Al. it revealed that Al accumulated mainly within the cell walls of the leaf epidermal cells, also confirming that the apoplast are the tolerance mechanism of toxicity in tea plants because of results showing Al accumulation in apoplast and traces in symplast. Similar study in soybean showed higher accumulation of Al in roots [56] using LEXRF. Cr speciation has been done by using EXAFS in soils contaminated by leather tanning, reporting the dominant form as Cr (III) with low levels of Cr (VI) [57]. Different industrially contaminated soils have been studied for determination of and speciation of Cr using this technique [58, 59]. XANES has been used to identify associations of metals in contaminated environments. Fandeur et al. [60] reported that Cr (VI) was found in closed association with Mn-oxides concluding the role of Mn-oxides in oxidation of Cr (III) to Cr (VI). Jacobson et al. [61] reported Cu to be present in hotspots that are associated with organic matter within the soil matrix using in-situ XANES. Similarly, a study by [62], revealed the Cu hotspots not to be associated with calcium (Ca) carbonates, Fe oxides, or Cu sulfates. EXAFS has been used for speciation of As, based on the absorption spectra of As-O distances. Grafe et al. [63] used m-XRF and m-XAS to study the speciation of As in a chromated copper-arsenate (CCA) contaminated soil to determine the effects of co-contaminating metal cations (Cu, Zn, Cr) on As speciation. X-ray computed μ-tomography (SR-μCT) is also a powerful technique that enables study of internal structure and composition of sample without sectioning it physically. Other advantage over conventional technique is enables a 3D study of the subject. 2D study of the samples limit the projection of metals present in the

sample, only in the direction of beam. SR-μCT has higher sensitivity, resolution and speed. SR-XRF is also a powerful technique devised to study the elements in environment. It has a very précised detection limit for many elements (<0.01 ppm).

## **5. Synchrotron based techniques in study of mineral structure, their occurrence and abundance in soils**

It is known that X-ray diffraction (XRD) is a basic technique which has been used widely for the characterization and identification of crystalline structure of minerals. But it comes with some imitations like it cannot be used to study amorphous minerals, the slide preparation procedures are very much time consuming, requires invasive sampling. Also, the low energy and low flux make the diffractometer geometry very limited. The use of diffracted X-rays, instead of transmitted X-rays restricts the analysis of hydrated and oxygen samples. Compared to the conventional technique, the SR-XRD provides very high sensitivity due to energy tunable nature and high flux. It enables the non-invasive study of trace matters, amorphous minerals, hydrated and oxygen samples, thin films and solution phase. The study of areas as small as 1 mm2 can be done with a beam spatial resolutions of <5 mm.

synchrotron-based techniques of XRD and XAFS, have greatly improved the understanding about the structural and chemical properties of amorphous minerals, such as iron oxide minerals like lepidocrocite, goethite and hematite. Their transformations of metastable phases to stable phases of iron oxides [64] and chemical reactions occurring on their surfaces have also been possible to study with the aid of these techniques., and chemical reactions occurring on their surfaces. [65] used XANES spectroscopy for identification and quantification of iron compounds in soils. Massive improvements have been achieved in understanding the structure of poorly crystalline and nanosized iron oxides species like ferrihydrite, by synchrotron XRD, EXAFS, and total X-ray scattering data. Studies also have used laboratory XRD to determine changes in the structural properties of goethite and hematite due to substitution by Al3+ than Fe3+ in mineral structure (up to 33 mol.%). Atomistic and long-range scales data regarding substitution of trace to low amounts of other elements in the structure of iron oxides on the basis of indirect, dissolution data have been predicted using synchrotron XRD and EXAFS [66–70]. The valence state of substituent elements, coordination states and their effects on element substitution in iron oxides nave been revealed by XANES spectroscopy [66].

## **6. Synchrotron based techniques in study of microbial interactions with contaminants/pollutants in the soil**

SR-FTIR spectromicroscopy is a powerful technique which has come in to use in recent years for study of microbial activities with high spatial resolution to μm scale and temporal resolution to seconds scale, enabling keen study of processes at cellular level [71]. It combines three techniques viz.; microscopy, mid IR spectroscopy and SR based light source, which makes it possible to precisely locate the target, obtain its vibrational spectra and obtain very high signal to noise ratio.

Earlier FTIR spectromicroscopy technique used an aperture to take reading of smaller areas within the sample, because to take reading, one had to adjust the incoming light to either eliminate some part of it or to distribute it among detectors, uniformly. This resulted to reduction in signal strength. The thermal emission sources are limited to focus an area of 75–100 mm in diameter only. In contrast to these conventional sources, a synchrotron infrared source can obtain spectra from

*Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

smaller target areas without using aperture [72]. In SR-FTIR Spectro microscopy, one can use the infrared beam to visualize a spot as small as the diameter of its wavelength resulting to 0.7 times of spatial resolution [73–75].

The study of action of microbes over a geological surface (here, soil) is based on the fact that, the changes carried out by microbial action (mineralization, immobilization, biodegradation) is monitored by the study of the vibrational spectra of the substrate (heavy metal or pollutant). Many studies have been carried out to find out the reference spectra of several contaminants such as, Chromium and molybdenum hexacarbonyls [76], Pentacyanonitrosyl-complexes of chromium and molybdenum [77], Aromatic chromium tricarbonyls [78], Explosive molecule vapors [79], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) [80–83], Fluoranthene and benzofluoranthenes [84], Organo-arsenic (III), −antimony (III) and -bismuth (III) thiolates [85], PAHs incorporating the peropyrene structure [86], Nonregular PAHs [87], large PAHs [88] Naphthalene and anthracene [89], 1-nitropyrene [72] Toluene-.

3,4-dithiolatoantimony (III) derivatives [90], Trimethylarsine oxide [91] phosphorus tricyanide [92] Oil spill [93] Quinoline and Phenanthridine in Solid Argon and H2O [94] 6-nitrochrysene [95, 96] Arsenate on Fe-Ce bimetal oxide [97].

A general step-by-step scheme of studying the microbe interaction is given as follows:

Visual examination of the specimen surface under stereoscope to study the overall morology and topography.

↓ Application of sterile liquid to keep the surface microbes alive during study. ↓

Removal of uneven fragments over the surface to prevent hinderance in scattering using mini hammer.

↓ Cleaning of specimen surface by sonification and UV-radiation sterilization.

↓ Specimen placed inside the sterile chamber of microscope and identification of surface to be studied.

#### ↓

Microscopic volume of sample collected from field or microbial culture on to the specimen surface selected.

> ↓ Coupling FTIR-spectroscopic system to SR light source.

## ↓

Recording of vibrational spectrum of target sample.

Apart from the above-mentioned organic contaminants, metal contaminants speciation and bioavailability has also been widely determined using SR techniques. In a study [98] XAS was used to explore the short-term aging profile and the long-term speciation of dissolved Cu, CuO, and CuS nanoparticles, concluding that the short-term reactions with nanoparticles are dependent on the Cu form and soil chemistry, while the long-term reaction are independent of the form of Cu and transformed into iron oxyhydroxide or natural organic matter bound Cu. Similarly, Colzato et al. [99] used Cadmium L-edge XANES to study short-term temporal changes in Cd speciation and long-term changes in Cd extractability to conclude that highly weathered Oxisols and less weathered Entisols and Mollisols contain Cd bound to organic matter and Fe and Al oxides. Mariet et al. [100] used EXAFS to study a century old Pb leftover from metallurgical activities and reported the presence of Pb mainly as sorbed to Fe oxy(hydr)oxides, which was a significant finding of great consequence to environment. SR based techniques have also been used

recently to study real time biodegradation of organic chemicals [101], where it was predicted that humic acid accelerates the degradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by enhancing the solubility of the PAH, thereby increasing PAH bioavailability to microorganisms. SR-FTIR was used to study the effect of HA on the degradation kinetics of pyrene by Mycobacterium sp. on a magnetite surface [101].

## **7. Synchrotron based techniques in studying soil nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) dynamics**

Phosphorus is a major essential nutrient to plants and directly involved in the metabolic activities of plants, maintain structural integrity and directly affecting the economic yield of crops due to its crucial role in fruit setting and flower development. P found in many forms in soil, organic or inorganic. The form of P in a soil decides its fate of mineralization, fixation, and availability as well as interaction with other compounds in soil. This makes the study of P speciation very much important. But low concentrations of P in chemical and organic species make it difficult to specify the form of occurrence of P due to matrix interferences [102, 103] using conventional techniques like SEM, IR spectroscopy and NMR spectroscopy.

But due to the aided advantages of SR-XAS, a matrix interference free data has been made possible. The technique uses XAS spectra for identification of the species. However, it represents the average of spectra of all the P species present, hence, model analogues of P species are used as reference to extract the individual spectra from the overall spectra. The conventional techniques involve the chemical processing of sample followed by colorimetric analysis, or other extractant methods, which mostly involves the removal of P from its natural environment (soil matrix or colloid) and resulting to possible alteration of original form of occurrence. However, use of SR techniques such as XANES and EXAFS have proved to be promising in soil P speciation. These techniques involve the study of spectrum produced by only one element (i.e., K-edge spectrum of P) of target irrespective of other elements present. Brandes et al. [104] have studied the phosphorus K-edge XANES spectra of potassium phosphate and various organic P species. The K-edge spectrum of P species in XANES can be identified by characteristic line feature, for example, a pre-white line feature indicated the PO4 tetrahedra in coordination with a transition metal. Similarly, a weak pre-white line showing absorption peak at 2–5 eV indicated Fe (III) phosphate and adsorbed Phosphate on it [16]. Such features are very prominent for P minerals like phosphorsiderite and strengite [105]. Simlar studies have been carried out by few researchers till date, which uses XANES for speciation of Soil P [106–113]. XANES has been used to study adsorbed species of P on Fe and Al oxides [110].

N is also a major essential plant nutrient involved in structural integrity to metabolic activities of plants. The inorganic forms of N have been well explored and its analysis procedure in soil system is well established. But the nature of soil organic nitrogen (SON) has still remained relatively unexplored given its importance in the N cycle [114], as half of the SON have been termed as the unknown N [115]. The dissolved organic N (DON) also has the same fate as SON in terms of its characterization [116]. There are several methods that have been devised to characterize the SON fraction as hydrolysable N, NH3-N and unidentified N, such as, acid hydrolysis [117], pyrolysis, mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy [118, 119]. The use of X-ray spectroscopic methods in this field has come in to existence in recent past only [25, 120–124], which come with their obvious limitations of low energy, sensitivity and incapability to determine very small fraction of samples and limited number of reference spectra.

As mentioned in the previous regarding P determination, XANES K-edge N spectra has been used in few recent studies for speciation of SON and DON, which *Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

are present in very low concentrations, due to their highly sensitive beamline characteristics. And these works have been focusses in the direction of developing appropriate N reference standards [125]. The N K-edge XANES requires very high flux beamline critical of the study subject, and it occurs at photon energy of around 400 eV. An N-XANES represents the average of spectra of all the N species present, hence, reference spectrum of N species is used to extract the individual spectra from the overall spectra. This is almost like a fingerprinting technique where reference spectra and resultant K-edge spectra are compared to conclude the speciation. The peak resonance spectra of ammonium compounds were found to be around 401 eV [126], for KNO3 and Ca (NO3)2 it is around 412 eV, pyridinebased compounds at 398.7 eV. N-XANES has been used to characterize Maillard reaction-produced humic substances in DOM-related geomaterials [122], to study the aquatic sediment humic acids and their characterization to pyridines and oxidized pyridines [123]. These approaches had the major disadvantages of physical alteration and poor correlation between soil properties and chemical characteristics of extracts [125]. Because organic N fraction is closely associated with the clay size fractions of soil, the analytical technique that did not involve much chemical alteration, came in to popularity in the recent years, with the advent of SR based XANES. N-XANES has been used to study the dynamics of N-compounds in the rhizosphere of field pea (Pisum sativa L.) [127], characterizing heterocyclic (pyridinic) N in pyridines, pyrazines, nitrilic-N, –N¼, amide N and –NH– and nitroaromatic-N. N K-edge XANES was used to derive the spectra of soil to study the changes in SON compound by changes in pedoclimatic properties and cultivation duration [128].

#### **8. Synchrotron based techniques in soil rhizosphere studies**

Soil rhizosphere is a very complex yet important part of soil–plant root interaction. The microbes inhabiting the rhizosphere, the root exudates from plants, their interactions with each other and with the surrounding environment is crucial for nutrient cycling, nutrient release from SOM and ultimately plant growth. However, the study of rhizosphere has not been easy due to its complexity. The very fine root structures are not easily identifiable with existing techniques. The visualization of complex processes taking place in the rhizosphere require very high intensity beam as well as nanoscale spatial resolution, which have been met recently by some interventions which use SR for study.

STXM has been used to investigate the rhizosphere in few recent studies, for studying OC distribution within bacterial biofilms at fine scale [129–131] soil microaggregates [12, 26, 51] and bacteria-soil mineral interfaces [132]. Along with STXM, NEXAFS has been used to study oxidative damage of lignocellulosic materials [133] in bleaching and if such technique could be used in soil, it may help in quantifying the degradation of plant cells [134]. Synchrotron -IR microscopy (SIRM) is such a technique which has enabled the non-invasive mapping of root zone by using mid-IR spectroscopic signature. For SIRM studies, seedlings are sown in rhizoboxes, with modification of Lexan faces with windows such as Zn Selenide windows [135] and diamond window [136]. These windows allow direct observation of root-soil interface using SIRM.SIRM enables to focus the IR ton area as small as 6–10 mm [74, 75].

#### **9. Limitations**

SR based techniques have proven to be a boon in the field of soil analysis. However, it is still unexplored and there is a lot of scope for further research in this field. No technique is perfect and SR based techniques also come with several limitations. For example, μ- XRF uses hard X-ray beamlines for metal and metalloids with Z > 20, and at this beam line the lighter elements (N, P and S) cannot be studied. Similarly, soft X-ray cannot be used for heavy elements. The interpretation of data in K-edge XANES requires very much skill and accuracy, also when a specific element is being detected, there are chances of self-absorption leading to faulty interpretation. Also, the low energy of K-edge shell and low concentrations of the elements in soil pose limitations to this technique. Studies involving preparation of thin sections require very high skill. Detailed mapping of spatial distribution of organic C also poses challenges when information on single locations needs to be interpolated to processes encountered at the Pedon or landscape scale. Also, constraints such as sample preparation, control of radiation damage, or spectral quantification are faced in SR-FTIR studies. Other limitation of SR-FTIR is that it cannot be applied to all geological materials, because it is not possible to obtain IR-spectrum for those elements which are opaque at IR e.g., Iron oxides or sulfides and non-silica bearing minerals. The data from spectral information of standard substances is still insufficient to fully identify functional group chemistry for soil organic C and a concerted effort is required to fill that gap as soon as possible. However, these limitations also indicate the areas where the future research should be focused.

## **10. Future perspective**

The SR based techniques are far more improved in terms of their accuracy compared to the pre-existing techniques that use EM radiation for chemical and physical analysis of soils. Soils are inseparable entity of agriculture production systems and environment as a whole. The advent of SR techniques has provided a better insight into the soil nutrient dynamics, organic C speciation, soil mineralogy, fate of trace elements, metal contaminants, organic pollutant bioavailability and microbial interactions. These results obtained from SR based techniques can be used to make significant predictions for sustainability of an agricultural system. For example, the forms of nutrient in a soil can indicate the underlying biogeochemical process which is occurring in real time and can be a good indicator of soil health. The correlation of the different forms with soil microbial flora and fauna will give insight into the health status of a soil. The forms of OC in soils are very good indicator of soil genesis, aggregate stability and capacity of a soil to provide nutrition for the microbial population. The clay coatings on the ped faces, cutans and other micromorphological features can be accurately visualized to understand the soil development processes and their stage of weathering, which in turn, decides the nutrient holding capacity, permeability, infiltration etc. and these are important parameters to decide cropping systems. The future researches should be focused towards overcoming the short falls of the techniques. For SR absorption techniques, a wide range of spectral libraries should be priority. The different techniques should be combined together to increase the array of analysis of the samples. In addition to this, significant constraints like need sample preparation, control of radiation damage and spectral quantification should be addressed.

## **11. Conclusion**

The SR based techniques are remarkable improvement over the pre-existing spectroscopic techniques. The use of SR in soils is quite new and fairly unexplored dimension. Not a very less but also not a lot of research has been done towards

#### *Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

analysis of soil parameters. The techniques such as XAS, FTIR and XRD have been widely used in soil studies, for soil nutrient dynamics, organic C speciation, soil mineralogy, fate of trace elements, metal contaminants, organic pollutant bioavailability and microbial interactions. The exploration of unexplored at nano scales has been possible with the advent of this technique. However, some limitations such as unavailability of adequate spectral references, converting the qualitative data in to quantifiable terms high skill requirements for handling and sample preparations and most importantly, the confinement of SR facilities to select places have restricted their wide adoption. Hence, future researches focused in this direction to popularize and further explore this technique to make it reachable in public domain.

## **Author details**

Surabhi Hota ICAR—National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Jorhat, Assam, India

\*Address all correspondence to: surabhi.hota@gmail.com; surabhi.hota@icar.gov.in

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## **References**

[1] Nolan AL, Lombi E, McLaughlin MJ. Metal bioaccumulation and toxicity in soils - Why bother with speciation? Aust J Chem. 2003; 56:77-91 doi:10.1071/ CH02226

[2] Lombi E, Susini J. Synchrotron-based techniques for plant and soil science: opportunities, challenges and future perspectives. Plant Soil. 2009; 320:1-35. DOI 10.1007/s11104-008-9876-x

[3] Baldwin GC. Origin of synchrotron radiation. Phys Today. 1975; 28(1):9-17

[4] Pollock HC. The discovery of synchrotron radiation Am J Phys. 1983; 51:278-280

[5] Veksler VI. "A new method of accelerating relativistic particles". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS. 1944;43 (8): 346-348.

[6] Jackson J. David and W.K.H. Panofsky (1996). "EDWIN MATTISON MCMILLAN: A Biographical Memoir". National Academy of Sciences.

[7] Balerina, A., and S. Mobilio. Introduction to synchrotron radiation. In: S. Mobilio, F. Boscherini, and C. Meneghini, editors, Synchrotron radiation. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2015; doi:10.1007/978-3- 642-55315-8\_1

[8] Beauchemin S, Hesterberg D, Beauchemin M. Principal component analysis approach for modeling sulfur KXANES spectra of humic acids. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2002; 66:83-91

[9] Al-Raoush RI, Willson CS. Extraction of physically realistic pore network properties from three-dimensional synchrotron X-ray microtomography images of unconsolidated porous media systems. J Hydrol (Amst). 2005; 300:44- 64 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.05.005

[10] Altman SJ, Peplinski WJ, Rivers ML. Evaluation of synchrotron X-ray computerized microtomography for the visualization of transport processes in low-porosity materials. J Contam Hydrol. 2005a; 78:167-183 doi:10.1016/ j.jconhyd.2005.05.004

[11] Altman SJ, Rivers ML, Reno MD, Cygan RT, McLain AA. Characterization of adsorption sites on aggregate soil samples using synchrotron X-ray computerized microtomography. Environ Sci Technol. 2005b; 39:2679- 2685 DOI:10.1021/es049103y

[12] Wan J, Tyliszczak T, Tokunaga TK. Organic carbon distribution, speciation, and elemental correlations within soil microaggregates: applications of STXM and NEXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2007; 71: 5439-5449.

[13] Solomon D, Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Liang B, Scha¨fer T. Carbon Kedge NEXAFS and FTIRATR spectroscopic investigation of organic carbon speciation in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005;69: 107-119.

[14] Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW. Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol. 2005;168: 293 – 303.

[15] Cardon ZG, Gage DJ. Resource exchange in the rhizosphere: molecular tools and the microbial perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2006; 37:459-488

[16] Toor GS, Hunger S, Peak JD, Sims JT, Sparks DL. Advances in the characterization of phosphorus in organic wastes: environmental and agronomic applications. Adv. Agron. 2006;89: 1-72.

[17] Batjes N H,. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1996; 47:151-163.

*Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

[18] Schlesinger WH. Biogeochemistry: Analysis of Global Change, second ed. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. 1997

[19] Stevenson FJ, Cole MA. Cycles of Soil, second ed John Wiley and Sons, London. 1999.

[20] Wershaw RL. Membrane-Micelle Model for Humus in Soils and Sediments and Its Relation to Humification. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper. 2410. United States Government Printing Office. 1994

[21] Gleixner G, Poirier N, Bol R, Balesdent J. Molecular dynamics of organic matter in a cultivated soil. Org. Geochem. 2002;33: 357-366.

[22] Ko¨gel-Knabner I. Analytical approaches for characterizing soil organic matter. Org. Geochem. 2000;31: 609-625

[23] Solomon D, Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Amelung W, Lobe I, Ngoze S. Long-term impacts of anthropogenic perturbations on the dynamics and speciation of organic carbon in tropical forest and subtropical grassland ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007a; 13: 511-530.

[24] Solomon D, Lehmann J, Thies J, Schafer T, Liang B, Kinyangi J. Molecular signature and sources of biochemical recalcitrance of organic C in Amazonian Dark Earths. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2007b;71: 2285-2298.

[25] Jokic A, Cutler JN, Ponomarenko E, van der Kamp G, Anderson D. Organic carbon and sulfur compounds in wetland soils: insights on structure and transformation processes using K-edge XANES and NMR spectroscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2003; 67: 2585-2597

[26] Kinyangi J, Solomon D, Liang B, Lerotic M, Wirick S, Lehmann J. Nanoscale biogeocomplexity of the organomineral assemblage in soil: application of STX microscopy and C-1s NEXAFS spectroscopy. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2006;70: 1708-1718.

[27] Lehmann J, Liang B, Solomon D, Lerotic M, Luiza˜o F, Kinyangi J. Nearedge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy for mapping nanoscale distribution of organic carbon forms in soil: application to black carbon particles. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2005; 19: 1013-1025.

[28] Myneni SCB, Brown JT, Martinez GA, Meyer-Ilse W. Imaging of humic substance molecular structures in water and soil. Science 1999;286: 1335-1337

[29] Scha¨fer T, Hertkorn N, Artinger R, Claret F, Bauer A. Functional group analysis of natural organic colloids and clay association kinetics using C(1s) spectromicroscopy. J. Phys. France. 2003; 104: 409-412.

[30] Scheinost A C, Kretzschmar R, Christl I, Jacobsen C. Carbon group chemistry of humic and fulvic acid: a comparison of C-1s NEXAFS and 13C-NMR spectroscopies. In: Ghabbour, E.A., Davies, G. (Eds.), Humic Substances: Structures, Models and Functions. Royal Society of Chemistry, Gateshead, UK,2001. pp. 39-47.

[31] Schumacher M, Christl I, Scheinost AC, Jacobsen C, Kretzschmar R. Chemical heterogeneity of organic soil colloids investigated by scanning transmission X-ray microscopy and C-1s NEXAFS microspectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005; 39: 9094-9100.

[32] Schumacher M, Christl I, Vogt RD, Barmettler K, Jacobsen C, Kretzschmar R. Chemical composition of aquatic dissolved organic matter in five boreal forest catchments sampled in spring and fall seasons. Biogeochemistry. 2006; 80: 263-275.

[33] Carr GL, Reffner JA, Williams GP. Performance of an infrared

microspectrometer at the NSLS. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1995; 66: 1490-1492.

[34] Miller LM, Dumas P, Chemical imaging of biological tissue with synchrotron infrared light. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006; 1758: 846-857

[35] Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Solomon D. Organic matter stabilization in soil microaggregates: implications from spatial heterogeneity of organic carbon contents and carbon forms. Biogeochemistry. 2007;85: 45-57.

[36] Bonetta DT, Facette M, Raab TK, Somerville CR. Genetic dissection of plant cell-wall biosynthesis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2002;30: 298-301.

[37] Marinkovic NS, Huang R, Bromberg P, Sullivan M, Toomey J, Miller LM. Center for Synchrotron Biosciences' U2B beamline: an international resource for biological infrared spectroscopy. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2002;9: 189-197.

[38] Johnston CT, Aochi YO. Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectroscopy. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI, 1996;pp. 269-321.

[39] Solomon D, Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Liang B, Hanley K, Heymann K. Carbon (1s) NEXAFS spectroscopy of biogeochemically relevant organic reference compounds. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009; 73: 1817-1830

[40] Sto¨hr J. N85EXAFS Spectroscopy. Springer Series in Surface Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Germany. 1992.

[41] Scha¨fer T, Buckau G, Artinger R, Kim JI, Geyer S, Wolf M. Origin and mobility of fulvic acids in the Gorleben aquifer system: implications from isotopic data and carbon/sulfur XANES. Org. Geochem. 2005;36: 567-582.

[42] Scha¨ferT, Chanudet V, Claret F, Filella M. Spectromicroscopy mapping of colloidal/particulate organic matter in Lake Brienz, Switzerland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41: 7864-7869.

[43] Smith AP, Urquhart SG, Winesett DA, Mithchell G, Ade H. Use of near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectromicroscopy to characterize multicomponent polymeric systems. Appl. Spectrosc. 2001; 55: 1676-1681.

[44] Hitchcock AP, Sto¨ver HD, Croll LM, Childs RF. Chemical mapping of polymer microstructure using soft X-ray spectromicroscopy. Aust. J. Chem. 2005;58: 423-432.

[45] Lerotic M, Jacobsen C, Scha¨fer T, Vogt S. Cluster analysis of soft X-ray spectromicroscopy data. Ultramicroscopy. 2004; 100: 35-57.

[46] Rumpel C, Janik L J, Skjemstad J O, Ko¨gel-Knabner I. Quantification of carbon derived from lignite in soils using mid-infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares. Org. Geochem. 2001; 32: 831-839.

[47] Sharma GK, Hota S, Kumar A, Ray P, Fagodiya RK, Malav LC, Yadav KK, Gupta DK, Khan SA, Ray SK. Recent Development in Bioremediation of Soil Pollutants Through Biochar for Environmental Sustainability. In: Singh J., Singh C. (eds) Biochar Applications in Agriculture and Environment Management. Springer, Cham. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-40997-5\_6

[48] Hota S, Sharma G K, Subrahmanyam G, Kumar A, Shabnam A A, Baruah P, Kaur T, Yadav A N. Fungal Communities for Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil for Sustainable Environments. In: Yadav A N.Recent Trends in Mycological Research, Fungal Biology. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030- 68260-6\_2

[49] Brown GE, Bargar JR, Towle S.N. Use of X-ray absorption spectroscopy to

#### *Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

study reaction mechanisms at oxidewater interfaces. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997a ;213: 36-Geoc.

[50] Brown G E, Foster A, Ostergren J, Bargar JR. X-ray absorption spectroscopy and molecular environmental science. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997b; 214: 10-Geoc.

[51] Schulze DG, Bertsch PM. Synchrotron X-ray techniques in soil, plant, and environmental research. Adv. Agron. 1995;55: 1-66.

[52] Sparks DS, Borda MJ. Kinetics and mechanisms of sorption-desorption in soils: a multiscale assesment. In: Violante, A., Huang, P.M., Gadd, G.M. (Eds.), Biophysico-Chemical Processes of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments. 2008. Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York.

[53] Ginder-Vogel M, Sparks D L. The Impacts of X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy on Understanding Soil Processes and Reaction Mechanisms. In: Singh B, Gräfe M, editors. Synchrotron-Based Techniques in Soils and Sediments. Vol.34. Elsevier; 2010.p. 1-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2481(10)34001-3.

[54] Doyle CS, SJ Traina, H Ruppert, T Kendelewicz, JJ Rehr, G E Brown. XANES studies at the Al K-edge of aluminium-rich surface phases in the soil environment. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 1999;6:621-623. DOI:10.1107/ S090904 9598015568

[55] Ildefonse P, RJ Kirkpatrick, B Montez, G Calas, AM Flank, P Lagarde. 27Al MAS NMR and aluminum X-ray absorption near edge structure study of imogolite and allophanes. Clays Clay Miner. 1994;42:276-287. DOI:10.1346/ CCMN.1994.0420306

[56] Kopittke PM, KL Moore, E Lombi, A Gianoncelli, BJ Ferguson, FPC Blamey. Identification of the primary lesion of toxic aluminum (Al) in plant

roots. Plant Physiol. 2015;167:1402-1411. DOI:10.1104/pp.114.253229

[57] Landrot G R, Tappero SM, Webb, DL Sparks. Arsenic and chromium speciation in an urban contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2012; 88:1196-1201. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.069

[58] Terzano R, Spagnuolo M, Vekemans B, De Nolf W, Janssens K, Falkenberg G. Assessing the origin and fate of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, and V in industrial polluted soil by combined microspectroscopic techniques and bulk extraction methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41: 6762-6769. doi:10.1021/ es070260h

[59] Hopp L, PS Nico, MA Marcus, S Peiffer. Arsenic and chromium partitioning in a Podzolic soil contaminated by chromated copper arsenate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:6481-6486. DOI:10.1021/ es800615f

[60] Fandeur DF, Juillot G Morin, L Olivi, A Cognigni, SM Webb. XANES evidence for oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) by Mn-oxides in a lateritic regolith developed on serpentinized ultramafic rocks of New Caledonia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:7384- 7390. doi:10.1021/es900498r

[61] Jacobson A R, S Dousset, F Andreux, P.C. Baveye. Electron microprobe and synchrotron X-ray fluorescence mapping of the heterogeneous distribution of copper in high-copper vineyard soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007; 41:6343- 6349. DOI:10.1021/es070707m

[62] Strawn DG, and Baker LL. Molecular characterization of copper in soils using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Environ. Pollut. 2009; 157:2813-2821. doi: 10.1016/j. envpol.2009.04.018

[63] Grafe M, Tappero RV, Marcus MA, Sparks DL. Arsenic speciation in multiple metal environments - II.

Micro-spectroscopic investigation of a CCA contaminated soil. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;321: 1-2.

[64] Gustafsson J P, Visual M.I.N.T.E.Q. KTH, Dep Land and Water Resource Engineering, Stockholm. 2006

[65] Pritzel J, Thieme J, Eusterhues K, Eichert D. Iron speciation in soils and soil aggregates by synchrotron-based X-ray microspectroscopy (XANES, m-XANES). Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2007; 58, 1027-1041.

[66] Singh B, Sherman D M, Gilkes RJ, Wells MA, Mosselmans JFW. Structural chemistry of Fe, Mn, and Ni in synthetic hematites as determined by extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. Clays Clay Miner. 2000;48, 521-527.

[67] Huynh T, Tong AR, Singh B, Kennedy BJ. Cd substituted goethites: a structural investigation by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Clays Clay Miner. 2003; 51, 397-402

[68] Kaur N, Singh B, Kennedy BJ, Gra¨fe M. The preparation and characterization of vanadium substituted goethite: the importance of temperature. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2009a; 73, 582-593.

[69] Kaur N, Gra¨fe M, Singh B, Kennedy B. Simultaneous incorporation of Cr, Zn, Cd, and Pb in the goethite structure. Clays Clay Miner. 2009b ;57, 234-250.

[70] Kaur N, Singh B, Kennedy B. Copper substitution alone and in the presence of chromium, zinc, cadmium and lead in goethite (a-FeOOH). Clay Miner. 2009c; 44, 293-309.

[71] Holman Hoi-Ying N. Synchrotron Infrared Spectromicroscopy for Studying Chemistry of Microbial Activity in Geologic Materials. In: Singh B, Gräfe M, editors. Synchrotron-Based Techniques in Soils and Sediments. Vol.34. Elsevier; 2010.p. 103-130. DOI:10.1016/S0166- 2481(10)34004-9.

[72] Carr GL. High-resolution microspectroscopy and sub-nanosecond time-resolved spectroscopy with the synchrotron infrared source. Vib. Spectrosc. 1999; 19: 53-60.

[73] Levenson E, Lerch P, Martin MC. Infrared imaging: synchrotrons vs. arrays, resolution vs. speed. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2006; 49: 45-52.

[74] Levenson E, Lerch P, Martin MC. Spatial resolution limits for synchrotronbased infrared spectromicroscopy. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2008a;51: 413-416.

[75] Levenson E, Lerch P, Martin MC. Spatial resolution limits for synchrotronbased spectromicroscopy in the mid- and near-infrared. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2008b; 15 :323-328

[76] Hawkins NJ, Mattraw HC, Sabol WW, Carpenter DR. Spectroscopy of gaseous carbonyls. 1. Infrared spectra and thermodynamic properties of chromium and molybdenum hexacarbonyls. J. Chem. Phys. 1955;23: 2422-2427

[77] Griffith WP, Lewis J, Wilkinson G. Infrared spectra of transition metalnitric oxide complexes. 4. The pentacyanonitrosyl-complexes of chromium and molybdenum. J. Chem. Soc. 1959; 872-875.

[78] Humphrey RE. The infrared spectra of aromatic chromium tricarbonyls. Spectrochim. Acta. 1961; 17: 93-100.

[79] Janni J, Gilbert BD, Field RW, Steinfeld JI. Infrared absorption of explosive molecule vapors. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 1997; 53: 1375-1381.

[80] Bauschlicher C W. Infrared spectra of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: nitrogen substitution. Chem. Phys. 1998;234; 87-94.

[81] Bauschlicher C W, Langhoff SR. Infrared spectra of polycyclic aromatic *Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

hydrocarbons: methyl substitution and loss of H. Chem. Phys. 1998; 234: 79-86.

[82] Hudgins DM, Sandford SA. Infrared spectroscopy of matrix isolated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. 1. PAHs containing two to four rings. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998a;102: 329-343.

[83] Hudgins DM, Sandford SA. Infrared spectroscopy of matrix isolated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. 2. PAHs containing five or more rings. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998b;102: 344-352.

[84] Hudgins DM, Sandford SA. Infrared spectroscopy of matrix isolated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. 3. Fluoranthene and the benzofluoranthenes. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1998c; 102: 353-360.

[85] Ludwig C, Dolny M, Gotze HJ. Fourier transform Raman and infrared spectra and normal coordinate analysis of organo-arsenic(III), −antimony(III) and -bismuth(III) thiolates. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2000;56: 547-555.

[86] Mattioda AL, Hudgins DM, Bauschlicher C, Allamandola, LJ Infrared spectra of matrixisolated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their ions: PAHs incorporating the peropyrene structure. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;224: U323.

[87] Pauzat F, Ellinger Y. The infrared signatures of nonregular PAHs. Chem. Phys. 2002;280: 267-282.

[88] Ruiter kamp R, Halasinski T, Salama F, Foing BH, Allamandola LJ, Schmidt W, .Spectroscopy of large PAHs: laboratory studies and comparison to the diffuse interstellar bands. Astron. Astrophys. 2002;390: 1153-1170.

[89] Chauhan HPS, Shaik NM, Kori K. Synthesis and characterization of some toluene-3,4-dithiolatobismuth (III) alkyl dithiocarbonates. Synth. React. Inorg. Met. Org. Chem. 2004;34: 323-333.

[90] Jensen JO, Jensen JL. Vibrational frequencies and structural determination of trimethylarsine oxide. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2004;60: 3065-3070.

[91] Jensen JO, Jensen JL. Vibrational frequencies and structural determination of trimethylarsine oxide. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2004;60: 3065-3070.

[92] Jensen JO. Vibrational frequencies and structural determination of phosphorus tricyanide. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2004;60: 2537-2540.

[93] Li J F, Fuller S, Cattle J, Way CP, Hibbert DB. Matching fluorescence spectra of oil spills with spectra from suspect sources. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2004; 514: 51-56.

[94] Bernstein MP, Mattioda AL, Sandford SA, Hudgins DM. Laboratory infrared spectra of polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles: quinoline and phenanthridine in solid argon and H2O. Astrophys. J. 2005;626: 909-918.

[95] Carrasco-Flores EA, Clavijo RE, Campos-Vallette MM, Aroca RF. Vibrational spectra and surface enhanced vibrational spectra of 1-nitropyrene. Appl. Spectrosc. 2004;58: 555-561.

[96] Carrasco-Flores EA, Clavijo RE, Campos-Vallette MM, Aroca RF. Vibrational and surface-enhanced vibrational spectra of 6-nitrochrysene. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2005; 61: 509-514.

[97] Zhang Y, Yang M, Dou X M, He H, Wang DS. Arsenate adsorption on an Fe-Ce bimetal oxide adsorbent: role of surface properties. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39: 7246-7253.

[98] Sekine R, Marzouk E, Khaksar M, Scheckel K, Stegemeier J, Lowry G. Aging of dissolved copper and copper-based

nanoparticles in five different soils: Short-term kinetics vs. long-term fate. J. Environ. Qual. 2017; 46:1198-1205. doi:10.2134/jeq2016.12.0485

[99] Colzato M, Kamogawa M, Carvalho H, Alleoni L, and Hesterberg D. 2017. Temporal changes in cadmium speciation in Brazilian soils evaluated using Cd LIII– edge XANES and chemical fractionation. J. Environ. Qual. 46:1206- 1214. doi:10.2134/jeq2016.08.0316

[100] Mariet A, Sarret G, Bégeot C, Walter-Simonnet A, and Gimbert F. 2017. Lead highly available in soils centuries after metallurgical activities. J. Environ. Qual. 46:1236-1242. doi:10.2134/ jeq2016.12.0469

[101] Holman HYN, Nieman K, Sorensen DL, Miller CD, Martin MC, Borch T, McKinney WR, Sims RC (2002) Catalysis of PAH biodegradation by humic acid shown in synchrotron infrared studies. Environ Sci Technol 36:1276-1280 doi:10.1021/es0157200

[102] Giesler R, Andersson T, Lovgren L, Persson P. Phosphate sorption in aluminum- and iron-rich humus soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005; 69: 77-86.

[103] Hinedi Z R, Chang A C. Solubility and P-31 magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic-resonance of phosphorus in sludge-amended soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1989;53: 1057-1061.

[104] Brandes JA, Ingall E, Paterson D. Characterization of minerals and organic phosphorus species in marine sediments using soft X-ray fluorescence spectromicroscopy. Mar. Chem. 2007; 103: 250-265

[105] Khare N, Martin JD, Hesterberg D. Phosphate bonding configuration on ferrihydrite based on molecular orbital calculations and XANES fingerprinting. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta .2007; 71: 4405-4415.

[106] Kelly SD, Hesterberg D, Ravel B. Analysis of soils and minerals using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. In: Ulery, A.L., Drees, L.R. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 5: Mineralogical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, 2008; 387-463.

[107] Manceau A, Marcus MA, Tamura N. Quantitative speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments by synchrotron X-ray techniques. In: Fenter, P., Rivers, M., Sturchio, N.C., Sutton, S. (Eds.), Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Applications of Synchrotron Radiation in Low-Temperature Geochemistry and Environmental Science. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 2002a pp. 341-428.

[108] Ajiboye B, Akinremi O O, Hu Y, Jurgensen A. XANES speciation of phosphorus in organically amended and fertilized Vertisol and Mollisol. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2008; 72: 1256-1262.

[109] Beauchemin, S., Hesterberg, D., Chou, J., Beauchemin, M., Simard, R.R., Sayers, D.E. Speciation of phosphorus in phosphorus-enriched agricultural soils using Xray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy and chemical fractionation. J. Environ. Qual. 2003;32: 1809-1819.

[110] Hesterberg D, Zhou WQ, Hutchison KJ, Beauchemin S, Sayers DE. XAFS study of adsorbed and mineral forms of phosphate. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 1999;6: 636-638.

[111] Lombi E, Scheckel KG, Armstrong RD, Forrester S, Cutler JN, Paterson D. Speciation and distribution of phosphorus in a fertilized soil: a synchrotronbased investigation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2006;70: 2038-2204

[112] Myneni SCB. Soft X-ray spectroscopy and spectromicroscopy studies of organic molecules in the environment. In: Fenter, M.L.R.P.A., Sturchio, N.C., Sutton, S.R. (Eds.),

*Synchrotron Based Techniques in Soil Analysis: A Modern Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99176*

Applications of Synchrotron Radiation in Low-Temperature Geochemistry and Environmental Sciences, vol. 49. The Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, 2002. pp. 485-579.

[113] Sato S, Solomon D, Hyland C, Ketterings QM, Lehmann J. Phosphorus speciation in manure and manureamended soils using XANES spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39: 7485-7491.

[114] Schulten HR, Schnitzer M. The chemistry of soil organic nitrogen: a review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1998;26: 1-15.

[115] Stevenson FJ. Humus Chemistry, Genesis, Composition, Reactions, second ed. 1994. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

[116] Jeff JC, Chappin FS, Vitousek PM. Breaks in the cycle: dissolved organic nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2003;1: 205-211

[117] Leinweber P, Schulten HR. Nonhydrolyzable organic nitrogen in soil size separates from long-term agricultural experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1998;62: 383-393.

[118] Catroux G, Schnitzer M. Chemical, spectroscopic, and biological characteristics of the organic matter in particle-size fractions separated from an Aquoll. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1987;51: 1200-1207.

[119] Knicker H. Biogenic nitrogen in soils as revealed by solid-state 13C and 15N NMR spectroscopy. J. Environ. Qual. 2000;29: 715-723.

[120] Abe T, Watanabe A. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of nitrogen functional groups in soil humic acids. Soil Sci. 2004; 169: 35-43

[121] Jokic A, Cutler JN, Anderson DW, Walley FL. Detection of heterocyclic N compounds in whole soils using

N-XANES spectroscopy. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2004b ;84: 291-293.

[122] Jokic A, Schulten HR, Cutler JN, Schnitzer M, Huang PM. A significant abiotic pathway for the formation of unknown nitrogen in nature. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004a ; L05502 doi:10.1029/ 2003GL018520.

[123] Vairavamurthy A, Wang S. Organic nitrogen in geomacromolecules: insights on speciation and transformation with K-edge XANES spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002;36: 3050-3056.

[124] Gustafsson J P, Visual M.I.N.T.E.Q. KTH, Dep Land and Water Resource Engineering, Stockholm. 2006

[125] Leinweber P, Kruse J, Walley F, Gillespie A, Eckhardt K, Blyth R I R, Regier T Z. Nitrogen Compounds in Dissolved and Solid Environmental Samples. In: Singh B, Gräfe M, editors. Synchrotron-Based Techniques in Soils and Sediments. Vol.34. Elsevier; 2010.p. 255-287.DOI:10.1016/S0166-2481(10) 34009-8.

[126] Leinweber P, Kruse J, Walley FL, Gillespie A, Eckhardt KU, Blyth RIR. Nitrogen K-edge XANES: an overview of reference compounds used to identify 'unknown' organic nitrogen in environmental samples. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2007;15: 500-551

[127] Gillespie AW, Walley FL, Farrell RE, Leinweber P, Schlichting A, Eckhardt KU. Profiling rhizosphere chemistry: evidence from C & N K-edge XANES and Py-FIMS. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009;73: 2002– 2012.

[128] Leinweber P, Walley FL, Kruse J, Jandl G, Eckhardt KU, Blyth R. Cultivation affects soil organic nitrogen: pyrolysis-mass spectrometry and N K-edge XANES evidence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009;73: 82-92

[129] Dynes JJ, Tyliszczak T, Araki T, Lawrence JR, Swerhone GDW,

Leppard GG. Speciation and quantitative mapping of metal species in microbial biofilms using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol.2006; 40: 1556-1565.

[130] Lawrence JR, Swerhone GDW, Leppard GG, Araki T, Zhang X, West MM. Scanning transmission X-ray, laser scanning, and transmission electron microscopy mapping of the exopolymeric matrix of microbial biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69: 5543-5554.

[131] Toner B, Fakra S, Villalobos M, Warwick T, Sposito G. Spatiallyresolved characterization of biogenic manganese Oxide production within a bacterial biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71: 1300-1310.

[132] Benzerara K, Yoon TH, Menguy N, Tyliszczak T, Brown GE. Nanoscale environments associated with bioweathering of a Mg-Fe-pyroxene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005;102: 979-982.

[133] Mancosky DG, Lucia LA, Nanko H, Wirick S, Rudie AW, Braun R. Novel visualization studies of lignocellulosic oxidation chemistry by application of C-near edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. Cellulose 2005; 12: 35-41.

[134] Raab T K, Lipson D A. The Rhizosphere: A Synchrotron-Based View of Nutrient Flow in the Root Zone. In: Singh B, Gräfe M, editors. Synchrotron-Based Techniques in Soils and Sediments. Vol.34. Elsevier; 2010.p. 171-198.DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2481(10)34007-4.

[135] Raab TK, Vogel JP. Ecological and agricultural applications of synchrotron IR microscopy. IR Phys. Technol. 2004;45: 393-402.

[136] Wetzel DL. A new approach to the problem of dispersive windows in IR microspectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc. 2002; 29: 291-297.

## **Chapter 14**
