**4. Sideways and rationale**

#### **4.1 Our personal encounter with macroquantum condensate astrophysics**

This segment permits us to recount an account of our experience with macroquantum condensate in astrophysics. Everything started by a to some degree "reasonable deduction" (or readers might call it: einfuhlung), when one of us (VC) got an old book by Nozieres and Pines [9], on superfluid Bose liquid. He inquired: Let us see what this

*A New Hypothesis of Spin Supercurrent as Plausible Mechanism of Biological Nonlocal… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102743*

book can bring to the domain of astronomy and cosmology. Before long, he tracked down many fascinating discoveries with regards to the writing, from W.H. Zurek to Grigory Volovik and so forth. That is the start of our undertaking for more than 18 years up to this point, coming about a few papers in a series [5, 10–14]. The soonest paper called "Cantorian superfluid vortex hypothesis" was distributed in January 2004, where VC presented a forecast of potential areas of three new circles of planetoids on the external side of Pluto. Then, at that point, after 2 years, VC distributed a paper in AFLB [5], where he laid out what are potential clarifications of macroquantum impacts in astronomy (for example, noticed likewise by Tifft and furthermore Virginia Trimble and so forth). One of the contentions in that AFLB paper is macroquantum condensate, for example, conceivable quantum impact actuated by BEC or superfluid-type medium [5].

More recently, we (VC, FS, YU) come up with an argument of cosmological entanglement supposing such a macroquantum effect is real.

#### **4.2 Observational evidence**

#### *4.2.1 Quantization of planetary orbit distances in the solar system*

In this section, we will review the work and results by us, during the past 17 years or so. The basic assumption here is that the Solar System's planetary orbits are quantized. But how do their orbits behave? Do they follow Titius-Bode's law? Our answer can be summarized as follows (**Figure 1**):

#### **Figure 1.**

*From NS turbulence to quantized vortices.*

And it seems that the proposed model is slightly better compared to Nottale-Schumacher's gravitational Schrödinger model and also Titius-Bode's empirical law [1, 11].

The evidence of quantization of planetary orbit distances seem to suggest to wave mechanics model at a large scale [5, 10–14]. See also Peter Coles [15].

#### *4.2.2 Observational finding on cosmological entanglement*

Interestingly there is a recent report from MIT suggesting that ancient quasars support such quantum entanglement at large-scale phenomena. In an article, it is reported about the possibility of cosmological entanglement [16], which can be paraphrased as follows:

"In 2014, … the William Herschel Telescope and the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo, both located on the equal mountain and separated via about a kilometer. One telescope focused on a particular quasar ….. Meanwhile, researchers at a station located between the two telescopes created pairs of entangled photons and beamed particles from each pair in contrary directions toward every telescope" [17].

Therefore, such a discovery has opened up a new way to look at the Universe: *an entangled Cosmos* [18, 19].

#### *4.2.3 Newtonian action at a distance: Smarandache's*

Hypothesis expresses that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles [20]. Eric Weisstein likewise composed ramifications of Smarandache's Hypothesis [21], which can be summarized as follows: "…the speed of light c is as of now not a biggest at which estimations can be sent and that abstract speeds of data or mass switch can occur. These confirmations fly notwithstanding every idea and investigation, as they misuse both Einstein's exceptional rule of relativity and causality and don't have any test support. It is genuine that current preliminaries have confirmed the presence of positive sorts of quantifiable superluminal quirks.…." [21].

While the thought is very basic and in view of known speculation of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen bridge, actually such a superluminal material science appears to be still difficult to acknowledge by the greater part of physicists. Beginning around 2011, there was a clear astounding outcome as declared by the OPERA group. Regardless, hardly any months after the fact, it was disavowed on the ground of mistakes in dealing with the estimation.

Permit us to offer not many remarks on such a clear inability to identify quicker than light speed as follows: Despite those discussions over the OPERA results, we believed that a seriously persuading test has been finished by Alain Aspect and so on; he had the option to show that quantum non-territory association is genuine. In 1980, Alain Aspect played out the first EPR try (Einstein-Podolski-Rosen) which demonstrated the presence of room nonlocality (Aspect 1982). Alain Aspect and his group at Orsay, Paris, led three Bell tests utilizing calcium course, i.e. the first and last utilized the CH74 disparity. The second was the first use of the CHSH imbalance.

The third (and generally well known) was organized with the end goal that the decision between the two settings on each side was made during the flight of the photons (as initially proposed by John Bell). A few experimenters demonstrated a comparative outcome until the distance of more than 90 km.

So, the thought of "spooky action at a distance" is a genuinely actual peculiarity. In addition, activity a way off was at that point referenced in Newton's *Principia Mathematica.* Regardless of obviously Einstein was attempting to make each of Newton's demeanors into nothing, our result suggests that the Maxwell equations in classical electrodynamics have "spooky interaction at a distance" type of interactions (as it has also been proven for Coulomb potential), which might be noticed both at limited scope tests just as in a cosmological scale, as ongoing confirmations show similar effect at a distance in relation to Smarandache's hypothesis.

## *4.2.4 Evidence of Cooper-pair tunneling in nuclei is likely to indicate superfluid vacuum model instead of gluon*

In a recent report published in *Phys. Rev. C*, Potel et al. wrote on a breakthrough on the subject was made through the study of one- and two-neutron transfer reactions with heavy-ion collisions in inverse and direct kinematics, enabled by the use of magnetic and γ-ray spectrometers, which suggest that there can be Cooper-pair tunneling in nuclei [22]. In retrospect, this finding seems to indicate that the superfluid vacuum model can be a better approach than the gluon model as in the Standard Model. See also [23, 24].

*A New Hypothesis of Spin Supercurrent as Plausible Mechanism of Biological Nonlocal… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102743*

Besides, the superfluid nuclear matter hypothesis is known for a quite long time, especially going beyond BCS theory, cf. Walecka, Matsuzaki, Lombardo *etc.* [25, 26].

#### *4.2.5 Initial evidence on the synchronicity between patient and doctor*

In a 2008 article, Alex Hankey argues in favor of Macroscopic Quantum Coherence in Patient-Practitioner-Remedy Entanglement. An interesting remark in his article goes, which can be paraphrased as follows: "A different relationship length implies that the quantum cognizance's initially infinitesimal connection length currently becomes naturally visible. We reason that, for the most part, at every basic precariousness (remembering input dangers for natural administrative frameworks), quantum vacillation fields display plainly visible quantum cognizance" [27].

Although he did not come up yet with a clear physical mechanism of such macroquantum coherence, one can arrive at a similar hypothesis of spin (supercurrent) interaction like Boldyreva's, as it is known in biological phenomena. See Likhtenshtein [28].

#### *4.2.6 Initial evidence on galactic synchronicity*

Although it is known that "One of the cornerstones of inflationary cosmology is that primordial density fluctuations have a quantum mechanical origin," as Kanno & Soda wrote, however, most physicists consider that such quantum mechanical effects disappear in CMB data due to decoherence [29].

We have discussed before that cosmological entanglement has been observed, which in turn, it can be attributed to the superfluid turbulent interstellar medium.

Presently, there is a new striking report by Charlotte Olsen et al., proposing that 36 cosmic systems appear to have "facilitated" in a such way that they seem to give synchronized stars arrangement. From Olsen et al. paper, they do not give a potential hypothetical explanation [30].

Notwithstanding, by theorizing such a twist supercurrent system likewise can occur at cosmic scale in view of superfluid interstellar medium, we can concoct a "potential" clarification, that such a lucid star arrangement is because of some sort of "*galactic synchronicity*." We know that such a term is not accessible yet in present cosmological vocabularies, however, we can predict that time for that term will come as well, as there is likewise a book, proposing that synchronicity is probably going to show up all around in Cosmos [31].

#### *4.2.7 Other experimental results*

Other reports seem to indicate that there are reasons to believe such a quantum effect between consciousness, mind-matter interaction, and also Aharonov-Bohm type interaction in the superfluid vortex [16, 32, 33]. Suter et al. also provide other experiment evidence, as they wrote in the abstract: "The data unambiguously show that Bzclearly deviates from an exponential law and represent the first direct, model independent proof for a nonlocal response in a superconductor" [34].

## **5. Discussion: four plausible applications in various fields**

a.A new theoretical model of high-temperature superconductivity may lead to extremely efficient energy generation and transmission

b.A new type of electronic device.

c.Superconductor quasi-crystalline vacua hypothesis.

d.The plausible new method of quantum communication.

The explanation for each of the aforementioned plausible applications will be discussed shortly below:
