**1. Introduction**

Vapor quality is a crucial parameter which affects the flow boiling heat transfer behavior [1, 2]. **Figure 1** shows flow development inside a vertical tube under a constant wall heat flux, where the fluid moves in the upward direction. The figure also depicts various two-phase flow regimes in a vertical tube on the left and typical variations in local boiling heat transfer coefficient versus vapor quality on the right. From **Figure 1**, it can be inferred that flow boiling heat transfer coefficient is typically maximized in the range of vapor quality between 50% and 85%, while the smallest heat transfer coefficients tend to appear in the vapor forced convection region due to the low thermal conductivity of vapor as compared to that of the liquid. Accordingly, the accuracy of vapor quality measurements plays a significant role in properly investigating the impact of vapor quality on the local flow boiling heat transfer coefficient. On the other hand, in order to develop more efficient two-phase flow heat transfer systems, a specific range of vapor qualities should be targeted in design of thermal systems to achieve a higher range of boiling heat transfer coefficients. This also clearly highlights the significance of accurate vapor quality measurements at both the inlet and outlet of a test section.

#### **Figure 1.**

*Typical variations in heat transfer coefficient with vapor quality for forced-convection flow boiling in a tube [1].*

Hardik and Prabhu [3] performed experiments to investigate the heat transfer and pressure drop of a diabatic two-phase water flow boiling in horizontal thin walled stainless steel tubes with different inner diameters under uniform wall heat flux conditions. To investigate the impact of vapor quality on the local boiling heat transfer coefficient, they measured vapor quality at the outlet of test section using a known range of uniform wall heat fluxes directly supplied by electrical heating tapes wrapped around the test sections. The effect of inlet vapor quality was not investigated in their study since a saturated liquid flow was provided at the inlet of test sections. In their study, the heat losses from the heating tapes were estimated using theoretical calculations of convective and radiative heat losses from the surface of test sections to the surroundings, and no single-phase experiments were conducted to empirically estimate heat losses at the same mass flux range of flow boiling tests.

A similar approach to measurement of outlet vapor quality was adopted by Yan *et al*. in two different studies [4, 5] to investigate the influence of crucial parameters, consisting of heat flux, mass flux, and vapor quality on the heat transfer performance of water flow boiling in a uniformly heated vertical nickel alloy tube as well as in a vertical 304 stainless steel (SS304) tube with twisted tape inserted under high heat flux conditions.

Although many experimental studies have been conducted to date to investigate the impact of local vapor quality on boiling heat transfer performance, majority of these studies have taken the similar approach to measure local vapor quality

**391**

*Experimental Approaches to Measurement of Vapor Quality of Two-Phase Flow Boiling*

only at the outlet of test section mainly under uniform wall heat flux boundary conditions using electrical heating [6–12]. There are limited studies investigating the effect of local vapor quality for other thermal boundary conditions [13, 14], while their techniques to measure local vapor quality are not reported clearly. Hence, there is a considerable gap in the literature concerning vapor quality measurement under other thermal boundary conditions (e.g. uniform wall temperature and unknown boundary conditions) than the uniform wall heat flux

The measurement and control of local vapor quality for uniform wall heat flux conditions using heating tapes wrapped around the test section is simpler than that for uniform wall temperature or variable wall heat flux conditions where the latent heat for two-phase flow boiling is supplied by a hot-side fluid at test section. In the latter case, there is no opportunity for a direct control of vapor quality at test section unless using in-situ measurements of local density through the existing

Concerning the existing gaps in the literature addressed above, the present study aims to investigate various experimental approaches to measure and control vapor qualities at both the inlet and outlet of a typical test section under different thermal boundary conditions imposed on a test section during two-phase flow boiling heat transfer process, including uniform wall temperature, uniform wall heat flux, and unknown boundary conditions. The experimental techniques are then compared based on their level of accuracy and overall uncertainty, costliness, as well as

Measurements of local vapor quality of a saturated boiling flow can strongly be affected by accuracy in estimating the heat losses and calibrating the latent heat supplies. This is due to the existence of latent heat during a boiling process with a constant saturation temperature of fluid while enthalpy increases with the increase of local vapor quality as a result of heat acquisition [1, 2]. This is therefore evident that inaccurate estimation of heat losses and imprecise calibration of latent heat supplies would pose unreliability in collected heat transfer data and large errors in

Although different theoretical and experimental approaches have been engaged

to date to estimate heat loss during flow boiling, majority of these methods are based on the estimation of heat loss from single-phase flow [6, 9–15]. Indeed, single-phase experiments were conducted to estimate heat loss percentages for a range of mass fluxes and heat fluxes. Then, the same heat loss percentages derived from the single-phase flow were directly used for two-phase flow at the same mass fluxes [6, 9–11]. Alternatively, the heat losses extracted from single-phase flow for a range of mass and heat fluxes were developed for flow boiling over another range of

mass and heat fluxes using either interpolation or extrapolation [12, 13, 15].

following energy balance for a range of flow rates:

In this commonly applied methodology, the amounts of heat experimentally supplied for the test section (*Qsuppl* ) to increase the temperature of single-phase flow from a known value of Tsp, in at the inlet to another known value of Tsp, out at the outlet are monitored and recorded for a range of flow rates. On the other hand, the actual amounts of heat transferred to the fluid (*Qtransf* ) can be calculated by the

*Q mCp T T transf* = ( *sp out sp in* , , − ) (1)

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94473*

instruments with a currently low accuracy.

simplicity in implementation.

**2. Heat loss considerations**

results as well.

using electrical heating.

#### *Experimental Approaches to Measurement of Vapor Quality of Two-Phase Flow Boiling DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94473*

only at the outlet of test section mainly under uniform wall heat flux boundary conditions using electrical heating [6–12]. There are limited studies investigating the effect of local vapor quality for other thermal boundary conditions [13, 14], while their techniques to measure local vapor quality are not reported clearly. Hence, there is a considerable gap in the literature concerning vapor quality measurement under other thermal boundary conditions (e.g. uniform wall temperature and unknown boundary conditions) than the uniform wall heat flux using electrical heating.

The measurement and control of local vapor quality for uniform wall heat flux conditions using heating tapes wrapped around the test section is simpler than that for uniform wall temperature or variable wall heat flux conditions where the latent heat for two-phase flow boiling is supplied by a hot-side fluid at test section. In the latter case, there is no opportunity for a direct control of vapor quality at test section unless using in-situ measurements of local density through the existing instruments with a currently low accuracy.

Concerning the existing gaps in the literature addressed above, the present study aims to investigate various experimental approaches to measure and control vapor qualities at both the inlet and outlet of a typical test section under different thermal boundary conditions imposed on a test section during two-phase flow boiling heat transfer process, including uniform wall temperature, uniform wall heat flux, and unknown boundary conditions. The experimental techniques are then compared based on their level of accuracy and overall uncertainty, costliness, as well as simplicity in implementation.
