Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia

*Simone Aparecida Capellini, Larissa Sellin, Ilaria D'Angelo, Noemi Del Bianco, Catia Giaconi and Giseli Donadon Germano*

### **Abstract**

This study aimed to characterize and compare the visual-motor perception and handwriting performance of students with mixed dyslexia and students with good academic performance. Twenty-six schoolchildren of both sexes participated in this study, aged 9 to 11 years and 11 months old, from fourth and fifth grades of an elementary school in municipal public schools, from an average socioeconomic level, divided into two groups: Group I (GI) composed of 13 students with a multidisciplinary diagnosis of mixed developmental dyslexia and Group II (GII) composed of 13 students with good academic performance from a municipal school and matched according to gender, education, and age to GI. All students in this study were subjected to the application of the following procedures: Developmental Test of Visual Perception III—DTVP-III, Dysgraphia Scale and writing analysis by NeuroScript MovAlyzeR 6.1 software. The results were analyzed statistically using the following tests: Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Friedman test, aiming to verify intragroup and intergroup differences for the variables of interest in the DTVP-III, the Dysgraphia Scale, and the measures of handwriting speed and pressure by the MovAlyzeR software. The results were analyzed statistically at a significance level of 5% (0.050). The results showed that there were statistically significant differences between GI and GII in the parameters of the Dysgraphia Scale, floating lines, irregular spaces between words, junction points, sudden movements, and dimension irregularities. GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI in the variables analyzed with the DTVP-III in visual-motor integration, reduced motricity perception, and general visual perception. There was no statistically significant difference between GI and GII in the variables analyzed by the MovAlyzeR software. The results of this study allowed us to conclude that students with mixed dyslexia present a lower performance profile than the students with good academic performance in general visual perception, reduced motricity visual perception, and visual-motor perception skills, which may be the cause of the quality of dysgraphic writing characterized by floating lines, irregular spaces, junction points, sudden movements, and dimension irregularities.

**Keywords:** dyslexia, evaluation, handwriting, visual motor perception skills

### **1. Introduction**

According to Reid [1], dyslexia refers to differences in individual processing, in which they are characterized by difficulties in the beginning of literacy, affecting the acquisition of reading, writing, and spelling. In addition, there are failures in cognitive, phonological and/or visual and memory processes, information retrieval, speed processing, time management, coordination, and automation [2].

Developmental dyslexia, according to Galaburda and Cestnick [3], is presented as a condition that manifests near the age of 3, in which the child demonstrates a delay in verbal development. For the author, dyslexia is considered to be phonological and occurs due to damage in the region of the upper temporal gyrus and temporoparietal regions, while visual dyslexia is associated with parieto-occipital regions.

Dyslexia can manifest itself through three subtypes, in which the phonological subtype is due to a dysfunction in the region of the upper temporal gyrus and the temporo-parietal regions, thus causing changes in auditory processing. Some authors indicate that the decrease in the auditory information processing capacity may be the basis of the problems manifested in this subtype [4].

Regarding prevalence, there is a variation of 6–17% of the school-age population [5]. In addition, dyslexia has a high probability of hereditary issues, in which the chances of being predominant in males are two to three times higher [6, 7]. They may also present deficits in fine motor skills, which cause changes in letter and spelling in copy tasks [8], difficulty in bimanual coordination, and manual dexterity that would justify the occurrence of dysgraphia in this population [9].

For there to be precision in the form of letters, it is necessary to use fine motor skills, visual perception, visuo-motor integration, maturity, and integration of cognition [10], making the development of writing a demanding process, long and complex [11]. The acquisition of handwriting requires that there is a combination of coordination of visuo-motor skills with motor, cognitive, and perceptual skills, being tactile-kinesthetic, organization in space, and time [11].

Mathes and Denton [12] also mentioned that there is a combination of biological and environmental phenomena in learning to write in which they involve motor, sensory-perceptual, and socio-emotional integrity. Schirmer et al. [13] described that the acquisition of written language, as well as oral language, involves several brain regions, among them the parieto-occipital area, in which there is the primary visual cortex, the main responsible for the processing of graphic symbols and areas of the parietal lobe that are responsible for visual–spatial issues of the spelling, information that is recognized and decoded in the Werneck area, in which it is responsible for the understanding of the language and for the written expression it is necessary to activate the primary motor cortex and Broca's area.

Thus, in order to make use of handwriting, representations are needed to assist the visual memory of each letter, the recognition of the features that make up each letter and the ability to reproduce features in a motorized way while respecting order and direction [14]. Visual perception is a system that is concerned with the identity of the object, as well as with the location in space, where it is directly linked with action systems [15]. Changes related to fine motor function can cause failures in the development of writing skills [16]. These changes affect the student's performance, influencing the quality and quantity of learning in the classroom, also relating the student's motivation and self-esteem. With this, the cause of changes in fine motor coordination is noticeable, which is mainly responsible for the writing layout (graphics/calligraphy) since it is one of the skills learned with more difficulty.

Those manifestations might be related with dysgraphia. Dysgraphia is referred to as a difficulty in written expression, in which the individual can present an appropriate intellectual novel and receive appropriate instructions for the

**139**

who did not write in cursive.

*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia*

The need to investigate and understand the perceptual-visual-motor performance

Thus, the aim of this chapter was to characterize and compare the visual-motor perception and handwriting performance of students with mixed subtype dyslexia

This project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences of the São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"

Twenty-six students, of both sexes, participated in this study, aged 9 years to 11 years and 11 months, from the fourth and fifth grade levels of an elementary school, with average socioeconomic level, divided into two groups: Group I (GI): composed of 13 students with a multidisciplinary diagnosis of developmental dyslexia of the mixed subtype; and Group II (GII): composed of 13 students with good academic performance, paired according to sex, education, and age group with GI. The GI students were assessed by an interdisciplinary team from Investigation Learning Disabilities Laboratory, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Marilia, São Paulo, Brazil, following criteria [20, 21]. As inclusion criteria, the presentation of the Free and Informed Consent Term signed by the parents or guardians was considered and they were not submitted to any speech therapy, pedagogical or psychopedagogical intervention. Failure to meet at least one of the criteria described above would automatically exclude students from the sample in this study. The GII students in this study were selected at a public school indicated by their teachers for having good academic performance in Portuguese and Mathematics. From this indication, students were submitted to the application of the School Performance Test—TDE [22]. Only schoolchildren who achieved average to superior performance were included in the GII of this study. The exclusion criterion for GII was the presence of sensory deficits (hearing and/or visual impairment), cognitive or physical, according to aspects described in the school record. Excluded from this study were students who had already undergone some type of speech therapy remediation or

The students were evaluated individually and submitted to the procedures:

• *Dysgraphic Scale* [18]: students were asked to write a dictation using a 2B pencil and sheet without lines and guidelines. Capitalized writing was performed, as the GI students were unable to execute the cursive letter. The evaluated items

(UNESP), Marília, São Paulo, Brazil, under the protocol number 3.098.493.

of these students with dyslexia is linked to the fact that many of the handwriting errors are identified as spelling errors in which they may actually be covering up errors of calligraphic nature, such as the poor shape of letter in which it triggers unintelligible

acquisition of handwriting during the literacy process. When submitted to the practice of writing during his academic training and, even so, he has the inability to produce an understandable and acceptable writing, it is called as dysgraphia [17]. In Brazil, there is a scarcity of procedures for evaluating handwriting; those that exist are available only for research purposes, in which, it is impossible for the education and health professional to use them, such as the Dysgraphic Scale [18]. Although there are international studies investigating the perception-visual-motor relationship, reading and writing in the population of students with dyslexia [16, 19], these studies are restricted in Brazil, thus making it difficult to establish

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

handwriting [19].

**2. Method**

the perception visual-motor profile of this population.

and students with good academic performance.

### *Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

acquisition of handwriting during the literacy process. When submitted to the practice of writing during his academic training and, even so, he has the inability to produce an understandable and acceptable writing, it is called as dysgraphia [17].

In Brazil, there is a scarcity of procedures for evaluating handwriting; those that exist are available only for research purposes, in which, it is impossible for the education and health professional to use them, such as the Dysgraphic Scale [18]. Although there are international studies investigating the perception-visual-motor relationship, reading and writing in the population of students with dyslexia [16, 19], these studies are restricted in Brazil, thus making it difficult to establish the perception visual-motor profile of this population.

The need to investigate and understand the perceptual-visual-motor performance of these students with dyslexia is linked to the fact that many of the handwriting errors are identified as spelling errors in which they may actually be covering up errors of calligraphic nature, such as the poor shape of letter in which it triggers unintelligible handwriting [19].

Thus, the aim of this chapter was to characterize and compare the visual-motor perception and handwriting performance of students with mixed subtype dyslexia and students with good academic performance.

### **2. Method**

*Dyslexia*

**1. Introduction**

According to Reid [1], dyslexia refers to differences in individual processing, in which they are characterized by difficulties in the beginning of literacy, affecting the acquisition of reading, writing, and spelling. In addition, there are failures in cognitive, phonological and/or visual and memory processes, information retrieval,

Developmental dyslexia, according to Galaburda and Cestnick [3], is presented as a condition that manifests near the age of 3, in which the child demonstrates a delay in verbal development. For the author, dyslexia is considered to be phonological and occurs due to damage in the region of the upper temporal gyrus and temporoparietal regions, while visual dyslexia is associated with parieto-occipital regions. Dyslexia can manifest itself through three subtypes, in which the phonological subtype is due to a dysfunction in the region of the upper temporal gyrus and the temporo-parietal regions, thus causing changes in auditory processing. Some authors indicate that the decrease in the auditory information processing capacity

Regarding prevalence, there is a variation of 6–17% of the school-age population

Mathes and Denton [12] also mentioned that there is a combination of biological and environmental phenomena in learning to write in which they involve motor, sensory-perceptual, and socio-emotional integrity. Schirmer et al. [13] described that the acquisition of written language, as well as oral language, involves several brain regions, among them the parieto-occipital area, in which there is the primary visual cortex, the main responsible for the processing of graphic symbols and areas of the parietal lobe that are responsible for visual–spatial issues of the spelling, information that is recognized and decoded in the Werneck area, in which it is responsible for the understanding of the language and for the written expression it

Thus, in order to make use of handwriting, representations are needed to assist the visual memory of each letter, the recognition of the features that make up each letter and the ability to reproduce features in a motorized way while respecting order and direction [14]. Visual perception is a system that is concerned with the identity of the object, as well as with the location in space, where it is directly linked with action systems [15]. Changes related to fine motor function can cause failures in the development of writing skills [16]. These changes affect the student's performance, influencing the quality and quantity of learning in the classroom, also relating the student's motivation and self-esteem. With this, the cause of changes in fine motor coordination is noticeable, which is mainly responsible for the writing layout (graphics/calligraphy) since it is one of the skills learned with more difficulty.

Those manifestations might be related with dysgraphia. Dysgraphia is referred

to as a difficulty in written expression, in which the individual can present an appropriate intellectual novel and receive appropriate instructions for the

[5]. In addition, dyslexia has a high probability of hereditary issues, in which the chances of being predominant in males are two to three times higher [6, 7]. They may also present deficits in fine motor skills, which cause changes in letter and spelling in copy tasks [8], difficulty in bimanual coordination, and manual dexterity that would justify the occurrence of dysgraphia in this population [9]. For there to be precision in the form of letters, it is necessary to use fine motor skills, visual perception, visuo-motor integration, maturity, and integration of cognition [10], making the development of writing a demanding process, long and complex [11]. The acquisition of handwriting requires that there is a combination of coordination of visuo-motor skills with motor, cognitive, and perceptual skills,

speed processing, time management, coordination, and automation [2].

may be the basis of the problems manifested in this subtype [4].

being tactile-kinesthetic, organization in space, and time [11].

is necessary to activate the primary motor cortex and Broca's area.

**138**

This project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences of the São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Marília, São Paulo, Brazil, under the protocol number 3.098.493.

Twenty-six students, of both sexes, participated in this study, aged 9 years to 11 years and 11 months, from the fourth and fifth grade levels of an elementary school, with average socioeconomic level, divided into two groups: Group I (GI): composed of 13 students with a multidisciplinary diagnosis of developmental dyslexia of the mixed subtype; and Group II (GII): composed of 13 students with good academic performance, paired according to sex, education, and age group with GI.

The GI students were assessed by an interdisciplinary team from Investigation Learning Disabilities Laboratory, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Marilia, São Paulo, Brazil, following criteria [20, 21]. As inclusion criteria, the presentation of the Free and Informed Consent Term signed by the parents or guardians was considered and they were not submitted to any speech therapy, pedagogical or psychopedagogical intervention. Failure to meet at least one of the criteria described above would automatically exclude students from the sample in this study. The GII students in this study were selected at a public school indicated by their teachers for having good academic performance in Portuguese and Mathematics. From this indication, students were submitted to the application of the School Performance Test—TDE [22]. Only schoolchildren who achieved average to superior performance were included in the GII of this study. The exclusion criterion for GII was the presence of sensory deficits (hearing and/or visual impairment), cognitive or physical, according to aspects described in the school record. Excluded from this study were students who had already undergone some type of speech therapy remediation or who did not write in cursive.

The students were evaluated individually and submitted to the procedures:

• *Dysgraphic Scale* [18]: students were asked to write a dictation using a 2B pencil and sheet without lines and guidelines. Capitalized writing was performed, as the GI students were unable to execute the cursive letter. The evaluated items

were floating lines; descending and/or ascending Lines; retouched letters; irregularity of dimension; poor forms; and total for handwriting under dictation. The punctuation is made by the sum of the number of mistakes made. The procedure is validated for the Brazilian population.


The data obtained were analyzed statistically in order to compare the intragroup and intergroup results. The IBM SPSS Statistics program (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), version 25.0, was used to obtain and analyze the results.

The results were analyzed statistically using the following tests, the Mann-Whitney test, Wilconxon signaled test, and the Friedman test, aiming to verify the intragroup and intergroup differences studied for the variables of interest in DTVP III, the Dysgraphic Scale, and the analysis of the speed and pressure measures of writing by the MovAlyzeR software aiming to characterize and compare the performance between the groups. The results were analyzed statistically at a significance level of 5% (0.050). The level of significance (p-value) is marked with an asterisk. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed by obtaining the values of mean, standard deviation, and p-value.

### **3. Results**

With the application of the Mann-Whitney test, it was possible to observe that there was a statistically significant difference in the comparison between GI and GII in floating lines, irregular space, junction point, sudden movements, and dimension irregularity, demonstrating that the group of students with good performance academic (GII) had a lower score in the cited parameters when compared with the group of students with mixed dyslexia GI (**Table 1**).

In the qualitative analysis of the Dysgraphic Scale, it was possible to observe that 100% of the students of GI presented quality of dysgraphic writing, whereas, 100% of the students of GII did not present quality of dysgraphic writing.

**Table 2** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of the comparison between GI and GII in the gross score subtests of DTVP-3.

**141**

*\*(p-value < 0.05).*

**Table 1.**

*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia*

Floating lines I 1.38 0.51 0.002\*

Descending and/or ascending lines I 0.77 0.26 0.144

Irregular space I 0.85 0.24 0.002\*

Retouched letters I 1.23 0.73 0.294

Junction points I 1 0.58 0.001\*

Collisions and grips I 2.04 0.8 0.268

Sudden movements I 1.23 0.73 0.002\*

Dimension irregularity I 1.39 0.65 0.006\*

Poor shape I 0.92 0.19 0.076

Total I 10.89 1.71 <0.001\*

II 0.62 0.51 Total 1 0.63

II 0.58 0.34 Total 0.67 0.31

II 0.39 0.36 Total 0.62 0.38

II 0.92 0.76 Total 1.08 0.74

II 0.08 0.19 Total 0.08 0.18

II 0.15 0.38 Total 0.58 0.64

II 1.5 1.22 Total 1.77 1.05

II 0.31 0.48 Total 0.77 0.77

II 0.58 0.64 Total 0.98 0.75

II 0.69 0.38 Total 0.81 0.32

II 5.81 1.56 Total 8.35 3.05

I 0.08 0.19 >0.999

**deviation**

**p-Value**

**Parameters Group Mean Standard** 

Referring to **Table 2**, it was possible to analyze that all subtests showed a statistically significant difference. According to the visual-motor coordination subtest, GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI. In the copy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the figure-ground subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the visual closure subtest, it is possible to observe that GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI. In Form constancy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI.

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value when comparing GI and GII performance.*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

M, N, U, and V curvatures and

angulations


*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

### **Table 1.**

*Dyslexia*

of the pen.

standard deviation, and p-value.

group of students with mixed dyslexia GI (**Table 1**).

of the students of GII did not present quality of dysgraphic writing.

between GI and GII in the gross score subtests of DTVP-3.

were floating lines; descending and/or ascending Lines; retouched letters; irregularity of dimension; poor forms; and total for handwriting under dictation. The punctuation is made by the sum of the number of mistakes made.

• *Visual Perception Development Test III—DTVP III* [2]: the procedure is validated for students aged 4 years to 12 years and 11 months. The protocol consists of a battery of five subtests being eye-hand coordination (EH), coping (C), figureground (FG), visual closure (VC), and form constancy (FC). The composite score generated allows the classification in relation to the general visual perception (GVP, composed by the somatory of all subtests), motor-reduced visual perception (MRVP, composed by the subtests figure-ground, visual closure and form constancy), and visual-motor integration (VMI, composed by the subtests coping and eye-hand coordination). The students were classified according to the composite scores. The students were classified according to the composite scores, being "very poor" (1), "poor" (2), "below average" (3), "average" (4), "above average" (5), "superior" (6), and "very superior" (7).

• *Analysis of writing by* the *NeuroScript* MovAlyzeR *Software*: the writing

analysis procedure was performed by a software that analyzes the movement performed through a graphics tablet, which is used to interpret the movements generated by a pen, providing data of inclination, speed, acceleration, and pressure of the pen. In addition, it is used to process handwritten images, being able to record and segment the writing, descent, elevation, and pauses

The data obtained were analyzed statistically in order to compare the intragroup and intergroup results. The IBM SPSS Statistics program (Statistical Package for the

Social Sciences), version 25.0, was used to obtain and analyze the results.

The results were analyzed statistically using the following tests, the Mann-Whitney test, Wilconxon signaled test, and the Friedman test, aiming to verify the intragroup and intergroup differences studied for the variables of interest in DTVP III, the Dysgraphic Scale, and the analysis of the speed and pressure measures of writing by the MovAlyzeR software aiming to characterize and compare the performance between the groups. The results were analyzed statistically at a significance level of 5% (0.050). The level of significance (p-value) is marked with an asterisk. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed by obtaining the values of mean,

With the application of the Mann-Whitney test, it was possible to observe that there was a statistically significant difference in the comparison between GI and GII in floating lines, irregular space, junction point, sudden movements, and dimension irregularity, demonstrating that the group of students with good performance academic (GII) had a lower score in the cited parameters when compared with the

In the qualitative analysis of the Dysgraphic Scale, it was possible to observe that 100% of the students of GI presented quality of dysgraphic writing, whereas, 100%

**Table 2** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of the comparison

The procedure is validated for the Brazilian population.

**140**

**3. Results**

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value when comparing GI and GII performance.*

Referring to **Table 2**, it was possible to analyze that all subtests showed a statistically significant difference. According to the visual-motor coordination subtest, GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI. In the copy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the figure-ground subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the visual closure subtest, it is possible to observe that GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI. In Form constancy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI.


*Caption: VMC—visual-motor coordination; CO—copy; FG—figure-ground; VC—visual closure; and FC—form constancy.*

### **Table 2.**

*Distribution of mean, standard deviation, and p-value for GI and GII in the gross score subtest.*

**Table 3** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of the comparison between GI and GII in the subtest Description of Terms.

Referring to **Table 3**, the subtests visual-motor coordination, visual closure, and constancy of form did not present a statistically significant difference. In the subtest visual-motor coordination, it is possible to observe that GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. In the copy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the figure-ground subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the visual closure subtest, it is possible to observe that both groups showed similar performance. In the form constancy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. **Table 4** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of the comparison between GI and GII in the somatory of terms.

According to **Table 4**, all subtests showed a statistically significant difference. It is possible to observe that in the visual-motor integration subtest, GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. In the Motor-Reduced Visual Perception subtest, GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI, as well as in the general visual perception subtest, in which GII also presented superior performance in relation to GI. **Table 5** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of the comparison between GI and GII in the subtest description of terms.

According to **Table 5**, all subtests showed a statistically significant difference. It is possible to observe that in the visual-motor integration subtest, GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. In the reduced visual perception to the motor subtest, GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI, as well as, in the general visual perception subtest, in which GII presented superior performance.

In this analysis, the Wilcoxon Signed Posts Test was applied in order to verify possible differences between the subtests in the groups.

**143**

and 2 of GII.

*perception.*

**Table 4.**

*subtest.*

*constancy.*

**Table 3.**

*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia*

**Subtests Group Mean Standard deviation p-Value** VMC I 4 0 0.149 II 4.31 0.75 Total 4.15 0.54 CO I 4 0 <0.001\* II 6 1.35 Total 5 1.39 FG I 4 0 0.033\* II 4.54 0.88 Total 4.27 0.67 VC I 3.92 0.28 >0.999 II 3.92 0.28 Total 3.92 0.27 FC I 4.08 0.28 0.056 II 4.62 0.87 Total 4.35 0.69 *Caption: VMC—visual-motor coordination; CO—copy; FG—figure-ground; VC—visual closure; and FC—form* 

**Table 6** shows the mean, standard deviation, and p-value for the speed and

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value of GI and GII in the visual motor integration* 

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value of GI and GII in the subtest description of terms.*

**Subtests Group Mean Standard deviation p-Value** VMI I 50.62 3.95 0.002\* II 80.85 21.61 Total 65.73 21.66 MRVP I 50.54 6.39 <0.001\* II 78.77 16.17 Total 64.65 18.77 GVP I 48.08 8.98 <0.001\* II 82.77 14.46 Total 65.42 21.26 *Caption: VMI: visual-motor integration; MRVP: motor-reduced visual perception; and GVP: general visual* 

According to **Table 6**, it is possible to observe that there was no statistically significant difference. In the speed subtest, Attempt 1 and Attempt 2 had similar average values. In the pressure subtest, it is possible to observe that in Attempt 1, there was a higher average in relation to Attempt 2. **Table 7** shows the values of mean, standard deviation, and p-value for the speed and pressure subtests in trials 1

pressure subtests in Attempts 1 and 2 of GI.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*


*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

*Caption: VMC—visual-motor coordination; CO—copy; FG—figure-ground; VC—visual closure; and FC—form constancy.*

### **Table 3.**

*Dyslexia*

*constancy.*

**Table 2.**

**Table 3** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of the comparison

*Distribution of mean, standard deviation, and p-value for GI and GII in the gross score subtest.*

**Subtests Group Mean Standard deviation p-Value**

Total 161 27.41

Total 34.5 9.35 FG I 49.23 8.31 <0.001\* II 59.54 3.41 Total 54.38 8.14 VC I 11.08 3.59 <0.001\* II 17.62 3.12 Total 14.35 4.69 FC I 38.62 7.48 0.001\* II 47.62 2.53 Total 43.12 7.14 *Caption: VMC—visual-motor coordination; CO—copy; FG—figure-ground; VC—visual closure; and FC—form* 

II 181.69 7.17 <0.001\*

II 41.46 6.96 <0.001\*

VMC I 140.31 24.2

CO I 27.54 5.36

Referring to **Table 3**, the subtests visual-motor coordination, visual closure, and constancy of form did not present a statistically significant difference. In the subtest visual-motor coordination, it is possible to observe that GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. In the copy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the figure-ground subtest, it is possible to observe that GII performed better than GI. In the visual closure subtest, it is possible to observe that both groups showed similar performance. In the form constancy subtest, it is possible to observe that GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. **Table 4** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of the comparison

According to **Table 4**, all subtests showed a statistically significant difference. It is possible to observe that in the visual-motor integration subtest, GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. In the Motor-Reduced Visual Perception subtest, GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI, as well as in the general visual perception subtest, in which GII also presented superior performance in relation to GI. **Table 5** shows the mean value, standard deviation, and p-value of

the comparison between GI and GII in the subtest description of terms.

possible differences between the subtests in the groups.

According to **Table 5**, all subtests showed a statistically significant difference. It is possible to observe that in the visual-motor integration subtest, GII presented a superior performance in relation to GI. In the reduced visual perception to the motor subtest, GII showed a superior performance in relation to GI, as well as, in the general visual perception subtest, in which GII presented superior

In this analysis, the Wilcoxon Signed Posts Test was applied in order to verify

between GI and GII in the subtest Description of Terms.

between GI and GII in the somatory of terms.

**142**

performance.

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value of GI and GII in the subtest description of terms.*


*Caption: VMI: visual-motor integration; MRVP: motor-reduced visual perception; and GVP: general visual perception.*

### **Table 4.**

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value of GI and GII in the visual motor integration subtest.*

**Table 6** shows the mean, standard deviation, and p-value for the speed and pressure subtests in Attempts 1 and 2 of GI.

According to **Table 6**, it is possible to observe that there was no statistically significant difference. In the speed subtest, Attempt 1 and Attempt 2 had similar average values. In the pressure subtest, it is possible to observe that in Attempt 1, there was a higher average in relation to Attempt 2. **Table 7** shows the values of mean, standard deviation, and p-value for the speed and pressure subtests in trials 1 and 2 of GII.

### *Dyslexia*


*Caption: VMI: visual-motor integration; MRVP: motor-reduced visual perception; and GVP: general visual perception.*

### **Table 5.**

*Distribution of mean, standard deviation, and p-value for GI and GII in the subtest description of terms.*


### **Table 6.**

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value in the GI subtests.*


### **Table 7.**

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value in attempts at GII.*

According to **Table 7**, it is possible to observe that there was no statistically significant difference. In the speed subtest, Attempt 1 had a higher average than Attempt 2. In order to verify a possible difference between both groups in the subtests of interest, the Mann-Whitney test was applied.

### **4. Discussion**

Based on the data obtained, it was observed that all students with mixed dyslexia (GI) presented the quality of dysgraphia writing in relation to the group with good academic performance (GII) regarding the Dysgraphia Scale procedure [18].

**145**

of writing.

*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia*

In the variables of DTVP III, visual-motor coordination, copy, background figure, form constancy, and visual closure, GI presented a lower performance in relation to GII, as well as in the variables of visual motor integration, reduced visual perception to the motor and general visual perception. In the analysis of the NeuroScript MovAlyzeR Software, there was no statistically significant difference between the

According to the literature, the presence of dysgraphia in students with dyslexia suggests the existence of changes in the tracing of letters in tasks involving copying,

Studies have shown that students with dyslexia present changes in motor skills, involving difficulty in bimanual coordination, manual dexterity, and fine motor

Regarding the variables studied in the Dysgraphia Scale [18], students with mixed dyslexia presented an inferior performance in floating lines, irregular space, junction point, sudden movements, and dimension irregularity. Students with dyslexia had a predominant score in retouched letters and junction points, considering that they were due to changes in the skills of discrimination, memory, visuo-spatial

Concerning the perceptual-visual-motor function, according to Brow and Rodger [26], there is a combination of the visual-motor, motor, cognitive, perception-visual skills (eye-hand coordination) position in space, spatial relationship, figure-ground, and form constancy. Therefore, students with dyslexia are prone to show manifestations of visual perception changes due to dysfunctions in the brain areas responsible for visual-spatial perception, which is responsible at the time of

In this study, it was proven that students with dyslexia showed changes indicating deficits in visual-motor perception, in addition to presenting an inferior performance in visual-motor coordination skills, position in space, copy, visual closure, visual motor speed, and constancy in a way when compared to the group with good

Visual-motor perception skills are related to handwriting, that is, graph-motor actions and also reading skills. These skills depend on the recognition of details, visual-spatial organization, and spatial relationship between integration figures of the parts of a whole, assigning meaning to the shapes of the letters and thus

Thus, it is considered that the difficulty in performing the skills of visual-motor perception and visual perception in these students compromise the performance of

There are technologies that assist in writing and analyzing handwriting, aiming to estimate parameters for movements performed in the motor act of writing. A study of Costa [30] analyzed through the Neuro Script MovAlyzeR software the number of segments, reaction time, and pressure of students and preschoolers. With regard to pressure, preschoolers showed less pressure when compared to students, also registering lower values in the pressure of the pencil grip. The study of Barrientos [31] states that the pressure exerted at the time of writing has a progressive increase according to age in the copy tasks in students with learning difficulties, and students without learning difficulties tend to have less pressure at the moment

The fact that there was no statistically significant difference between the variables studied (speed and pressure) in the comparison between the groups of this study raises some hypotheses such as the size of the studied sample of students with mixed dyslexia, requiring the continuation of the study, due to the fact that be a study limitation or the lack of handwriting practices in the academic grade of

handwriting, and dysgraphia may occur as described in the literature [28].

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

skills, justifying the occurrence of dysgraphia [9, 24, 25].

groups studied.

writing [19].

academic performance.

affecting the graph-motor performance [27–29].

and manual dexterity [23].

relationship, and form constancy.

### *Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

In the variables of DTVP III, visual-motor coordination, copy, background figure, form constancy, and visual closure, GI presented a lower performance in relation to GII, as well as in the variables of visual motor integration, reduced visual perception to the motor and general visual perception. In the analysis of the NeuroScript MovAlyzeR Software, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups studied.

According to the literature, the presence of dysgraphia in students with dyslexia suggests the existence of changes in the tracing of letters in tasks involving copying, and manual dexterity [23].

Studies have shown that students with dyslexia present changes in motor skills, involving difficulty in bimanual coordination, manual dexterity, and fine motor skills, justifying the occurrence of dysgraphia [9, 24, 25].

Regarding the variables studied in the Dysgraphia Scale [18], students with mixed dyslexia presented an inferior performance in floating lines, irregular space, junction point, sudden movements, and dimension irregularity. Students with dyslexia had a predominant score in retouched letters and junction points, considering that they were due to changes in the skills of discrimination, memory, visuo-spatial relationship, and form constancy.

Concerning the perceptual-visual-motor function, according to Brow and Rodger [26], there is a combination of the visual-motor, motor, cognitive, perception-visual skills (eye-hand coordination) position in space, spatial relationship, figure-ground, and form constancy. Therefore, students with dyslexia are prone to show manifestations of visual perception changes due to dysfunctions in the brain areas responsible for visual-spatial perception, which is responsible at the time of writing [19].

In this study, it was proven that students with dyslexia showed changes indicating deficits in visual-motor perception, in addition to presenting an inferior performance in visual-motor coordination skills, position in space, copy, visual closure, visual motor speed, and constancy in a way when compared to the group with good academic performance.

Visual-motor perception skills are related to handwriting, that is, graph-motor actions and also reading skills. These skills depend on the recognition of details, visual-spatial organization, and spatial relationship between integration figures of the parts of a whole, assigning meaning to the shapes of the letters and thus affecting the graph-motor performance [27–29].

Thus, it is considered that the difficulty in performing the skills of visual-motor perception and visual perception in these students compromise the performance of handwriting, and dysgraphia may occur as described in the literature [28].

There are technologies that assist in writing and analyzing handwriting, aiming to estimate parameters for movements performed in the motor act of writing. A study of Costa [30] analyzed through the Neuro Script MovAlyzeR software the number of segments, reaction time, and pressure of students and preschoolers. With regard to pressure, preschoolers showed less pressure when compared to students, also registering lower values in the pressure of the pencil grip. The study of Barrientos [31] states that the pressure exerted at the time of writing has a progressive increase according to age in the copy tasks in students with learning difficulties, and students without learning difficulties tend to have less pressure at the moment of writing.

The fact that there was no statistically significant difference between the variables studied (speed and pressure) in the comparison between the groups of this study raises some hypotheses such as the size of the studied sample of students with mixed dyslexia, requiring the continuation of the study, due to the fact that be a study limitation or the lack of handwriting practices in the academic grade of

*Dyslexia*

*perception.*

**Table 5.**

**Table 6.**

**144**

**4. Discussion**

**Table 7.**

According to **Table 7**, it is possible to observe that there was no statistically significant difference. In the speed subtest, Attempt 1 had a higher average than Attempt 2. In order to verify a possible difference between both groups in the

**Subtests Mean Standard deviation p-Value** T1-Speed 0.74 0.31 0.753

T1-PRE 102.19 34.87 0.695

**Subtests Group Mean Standard deviation p-Value** VMI I 4 0 <0.001\* II 5.46 1.13 Total 4.73 1.08 MRVP I 4 0 <0.001\* II 5.08 1.04 Total 4.54 0.91 GVP I 4 0 <0.001\* II 5.23 1.01 Total 4.62 0.94 *Caption: VMI: visual-motor integration; MRVP: motor-reduced visual perception; and GVP: general visual* 

*Distribution of mean, standard deviation, and p-value for GI and GII in the subtest description of terms.*

**Subtests Mean Standard deviation p-Value** T1-Speed 0.74 0.39 0.6

T1-PRE 79.17 41.06 0.463

Based on the data obtained, it was observed that all students with mixed dyslexia (GI) presented the quality of dysgraphia writing in relation to the group with good academic performance (GII) regarding the Dysgraphia Scale procedure [18].

subtests of interest, the Mann-Whitney test was applied.

T2- Speed 0.68 0.23

T2-Speed 0.75 0.38

T2-PRE 77.32 40.59

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value in the GI subtests.*

*Caption: Speed; PRE: Pression T1—Attempt 1, T2—Attempt 2.*

T2-PRE 95.73 29.98

*Distribution of mean values, standard deviation, and p-value in attempts at GII.*

*Caption: Speed; PRE: Pression T1—Attempt 1, T2—Attempt 2.*

elementary school in our country, making different profiles of students with or without specific learning disorders do not differ in terms of the parameters analyzed.

The hypothesis of this study was partially confirmed since the measures of visual-motor perception and quality of writing were fundamental for the differentiation of handwriting in students with mixed dyslexia and with good academic performance; however, the analysis of writing by the software used in this study did not allow stem differentiation.

The establishment of the handwriting profile of students with mixed dyslexia is extremely important for the discussion of the subtype, especially for the investigation of whether it has a perceptual-visual-motor profile and different writing quality than students with good school performance, thus allowing to characterize this population both for the performance of the differential diagnosis and for the performance of interventions in the clinical and educational context, taking into account the fact that Speech Language Pathology is the area that investigates the changes in information processing and, consequently, its impact on the acquisition and in the development of reading and writing and can help the teacher's understanding of handwriting alteration.

The teachers' lack of knowledge about the perceptual-visual-motor performance of students with mixed dyslexia causes confusion about the nature of the writing error, causing spelling errors to be confused with handwriting errors, for example, the poorly drawn letters that cause the writing of an unintelligible letter or word. Thus, it is necessary to use perceptual-visual-motor assessment procedures, so that educational intervention programs are designed in order to reduce the impact of poorly written letters on the spelling of students with dyslexia, more specifically students with mixed dyslexia.

### **5. Conclusion**

The results of this study allowed us to conclude that the students with mixed dyslexia in this study presented an inferior performance compared to the students with good academic performance in relation to the skills of visual-motor coordination copy, figure-background, visual closure, and constancy of form, characterized by changes in general visual perception, visual perception of reduced motricity, and visual-motor perception.

In the intragroup analysis of the GI, it was observed that the students with mixed dyslexia had a similar visual-motor perception performance between them, showing a statistically significant difference only in the subtests gross score and scalar score. In the GII, students with good academic performance showed a superior performance in most of the subtests studied, with a statistically significant difference in gross score, percentile of rank, scalar score, description of terms, visualmotor integration, reduced visual perception to motor, perception general visual, and scalar score. From the intergroup analysis, GII showed a superior performance in all studied subtests.

In the Dysgraphia Scale, it was possible to observe that all of the group of students with mixed dyslexia presented writing considered dysgraphic characterized by floating lines, irregular space, junction point, sudden movement, and irregularity of dimension.

With regard to the analysis of writing using the MovAlyzeR software, it was possible to verify that this instrument did not allow the differentiation between the groups of this study in the variables of speed and pressure.

At the end of this study, we concluded that it was possible to characterize and compare two different populations of students and, in addition, to observe the

**147**

**Author details**

Noemi Del Bianco2

Simone Aparecida Capellini1,2\*, Larissa Sellin1

2 Università di Macerata - UNIMC, Italy

provided the original work is properly cited.

, Catia Giaconi2

\*Address all correspondence to: sacap@uol.com.br

1 São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP, Brazil

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

, Ilaria D'Angelo2

and Giseli Donadon Germano1

,

*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia*

aspects that make them distinct from the evaluation of handwriting. It is clear that there is still a lack of studies that identify, along with other procedures, what characteristics students with difficulty regarding proficiency in handwriting present,

Thus, future studies should be carried out with an aim of investigating whether

the characteristics evidenced in this study may or may not be associated with changes in the final motor function, because only then it will be possible to plan appropriate guidelines and strategies for the students diagnosed with mixed

specifically students with the diagnosis of dyslexia and its subtypes.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

dyslexia to overcome their handwriting difficulties.

### *Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

aspects that make them distinct from the evaluation of handwriting. It is clear that there is still a lack of studies that identify, along with other procedures, what characteristics students with difficulty regarding proficiency in handwriting present, specifically students with the diagnosis of dyslexia and its subtypes.

Thus, future studies should be carried out with an aim of investigating whether the characteristics evidenced in this study may or may not be associated with changes in the final motor function, because only then it will be possible to plan appropriate guidelines and strategies for the students diagnosed with mixed dyslexia to overcome their handwriting difficulties.

### **Author details**

*Dyslexia*

elementary school in our country, making different profiles of students with or without specific learning disorders do not differ in terms of the parameters analyzed. The hypothesis of this study was partially confirmed since the measures of visual-motor perception and quality of writing were fundamental for the differentiation of handwriting in students with mixed dyslexia and with good academic performance; however, the analysis of writing by the software used in

The establishment of the handwriting profile of students with mixed dyslexia is extremely important for the discussion of the subtype, especially for the investigation of whether it has a perceptual-visual-motor profile and different writing quality than students with good school performance, thus allowing to characterize this population both for the performance of the differential diagnosis and for the performance of interventions in the clinical and educational context, taking into account the fact that Speech Language Pathology is the area that investigates the changes in information processing and, consequently, its impact on the acquisition and in the development of reading and writing and can help the teacher's

The teachers' lack of knowledge about the perceptual-visual-motor performance of students with mixed dyslexia causes confusion about the nature of the writing error, causing spelling errors to be confused with handwriting errors, for example, the poorly drawn letters that cause the writing of an unintelligible letter or word. Thus, it is necessary to use perceptual-visual-motor assessment procedures, so that educational intervention programs are designed in order to reduce the impact of poorly written letters on the spelling of students with dyslexia, more specifically

The results of this study allowed us to conclude that the students with mixed dyslexia in this study presented an inferior performance compared to the students with good academic performance in relation to the skills of visual-motor coordination copy, figure-background, visual closure, and constancy of form, characterized by changes in general visual perception, visual perception of reduced motricity, and

In the intragroup analysis of the GI, it was observed that the students with mixed dyslexia had a similar visual-motor perception performance between them, showing a statistically significant difference only in the subtests gross score and scalar score. In the GII, students with good academic performance showed a superior performance in most of the subtests studied, with a statistically significant difference in gross score, percentile of rank, scalar score, description of terms, visualmotor integration, reduced visual perception to motor, perception general visual, and scalar score. From the intergroup analysis, GII showed a superior performance

In the Dysgraphia Scale, it was possible to observe that all of the group of students

with mixed dyslexia presented writing considered dysgraphic characterized by floating lines, irregular space, junction point, sudden movement, and irregularity of

groups of this study in the variables of speed and pressure.

With regard to the analysis of writing using the MovAlyzeR software, it was possible to verify that this instrument did not allow the differentiation between the

At the end of this study, we concluded that it was possible to characterize and compare two different populations of students and, in addition, to observe the

this study did not allow stem differentiation.

understanding of handwriting alteration.

students with mixed dyslexia.

visual-motor perception.

in all studied subtests.

dimension.

**5. Conclusion**

**146**

Simone Aparecida Capellini1,2\*, Larissa Sellin1 , Ilaria D'Angelo2 , Noemi Del Bianco2 , Catia Giaconi2 and Giseli Donadon Germano1

1 São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP, Brazil

2 Università di Macerata - UNIMC, Italy

\*Address all correspondence to: sacap@uol.com.br

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## **References**

[1] Reid G. Dyslexia: A Practitioner's Handbook. Hoboken, Nova Jersey, EUA: John Wiley & Sons; 2016

[2] Hammill DD, Pearson NA, Voress JK. Developmental Test of Visual Perception: DTVP-2. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 1993

[3] Galaburda AM, Cestnick L. Dislexia del desarrollo. Revista de Neurologia. 2003;**36**(1):3-9

[4] van Setten ER, Hakvoort BE, van der Leij A, Maurits NM, Maassen BA. Predictors for grade 6 reading in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia. 2018;**68**(3):181-202

[5] Fletcher JM, Lyon GR, Fuchs LS, Barnes M. Learning Disabilities: From Identification to Intervention. New York: The Guilford Press; 2007

[6] Liederman J, Kantrowitz L, Flannery K. Male vulnerability to reading disability is not likely to be a myth: A call for new data. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005;**38**(2):109-129

[7] Pennington BF. Diagnosing Learning Disorders: A Neuropsychological Framework. New York, USA: Guilford Press; 2008

[8] Gomes TVB, Ugrinowitsch H, Marinho NFS, Benda RN. Efeitos da prática mental na aquisição de habilidades motoras em sujeitos novatos. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte. 2012;**26**(3):511-521

[9] Crawford SG, Dewey D. Co-occurring disorders: A possible key to visual perceptual deficits in children with developmental coordination disorder? Human Movement Science. 2008;**27**(1):154-169. DOI: 10.1016/j. humov.2007.09.002

[10] Stevenson NC, Just C. In early education, why teach handwriting before keyboarding? Early Childhood Education Journal. 2014;**42**(1):49-56

[11] Yu NY, Chang SH. Characterization of the fine motor problems in patients with cognitive dysfunction—A computerized handwriting analysis. Human Movement Science. 2019;**65**:71-79

[12] Mathes PG, Denton CA. The prevention and identification of reading disability. In: Seminars in Pediatric Neurology. Vol. 9, No. 3. Philadelphia, USA: WB Saunders; 2002. pp. 185-191

[13] Schirmer CR, Fontoura DR, Nunes ML. Distúrbios da aquisição da linguagem e da aprendizagem. Jornal de Pediatria. 2004;**80**(2):95-103

[14] Schickedanz JA. Much More than the ABCs: The Early Stages of Reading and Writing. Washington, DC: NAEYC; 1999

[15] Jeannerod M. Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self (No. 42). New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2006

[16] Feder KP, Majnemer A. Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2007;**49**(4):312-317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312.x

[17] Rosenblum S, Aloni T, Josman N. Relationships between handwriting performance and organizational abilities among children with and without dysgraphia: A preliminary study. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2010;**31**(2):502-509. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.016

[18] Lorenzini MV. A scale to detect dysgraphia based on the Ajuriaguerra

**149**

*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia*

[27] Falk TH, Tam C,

2011;**104**(3):e102-e111

[29] Ratzon NZ, Lahav O,

2009;**30**(6):1168-1176

2019

[28] Racine MB, Majnemer A, Shevell M, Snider L. Handwriting performance in children with attention deficit

hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of Child Neurology. 2008;**23**(4):399-406

Cohen-Hamsi S, Metzger Y, Efraim D, Bart O. Comparing different shortterm service delivery methods of visual-motor treatment for first grade students in mainstream schools.

Research in Developmental Disabilities.

[30] Costa BIM, et al. A relação entre o desempenho motor e o desempenho visuo-motor, em crianças entre os 4 e os 6 anos [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Évora, Portugal: Universidade de Évora;

[31] Barrientos P. Handwriting development in Spanish children with and without learning

2017;**50**(5):552-563

disabilities: A graphonomic approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities.

Schellnus H, Chau T. On the development of a computer-based handwriting assessment tool to objectively quantify handwriting proficiency in children. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

scale [Master in Special Education dissertation]. São Carlos, SP, Brazil: São

[19] Wuang YP, Su CY. Rasch analysis of the developmental test of visualmotor integration in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities.

[20] American Psychiatric Association.

DSM-5: Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed Editora;

[21] Germano GD, Reilhac C, Capellini SA, Valdois S. The phonological and visual basis of developmental dyslexia in Brazilian portuguese reading children. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;**5**:1169. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01169

[22] Stein LM. TDE - Teste de Desempenho Escolar: Manual para Aplicação e Interpretação. São Paulo, SP:

[23] Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ. Dyslexia, dysgraphia, procedural learning and the cerebellum. Cortex. 2011;**47**(1):117-127

[24] Getchell N, Pabreja P, Neeld K, Carrio V. Comparing children with and without dyslexia on the movement assessment battery for children and the test of gross motor development.

[25] Jefferies E, Sage K, Ralph MAL. Do deep dyslexia, dysphasia and dysgraphia

[26] Brown T, Rodger S. Validity of the developmental test of visual-motor integration supplemental developmental test of visual perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2008;**106**(3):659-678

Perceptual and Motor Skills.

share a common phonological impairment? Neuropsychologia.

2007;**105**(1):207-214

2007;**45**(7):1553-1570

Casa do Psicólogo; 1994

Carlos Federal University; 1993

2009;**30**(5):1044-1053

2014

*Visual-Motor Perception and Handwriting Performance of Students with Mixed Subtype Dyslexia DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93626*

scale [Master in Special Education dissertation]. São Carlos, SP, Brazil: São Carlos Federal University; 1993

[19] Wuang YP, Su CY. Rasch analysis of the developmental test of visualmotor integration in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2009;**30**(5):1044-1053

[20] American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5: Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed Editora; 2014

[21] Germano GD, Reilhac C, Capellini SA, Valdois S. The phonological and visual basis of developmental dyslexia in Brazilian portuguese reading children. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;**5**:1169. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01169

[22] Stein LM. TDE - Teste de Desempenho Escolar: Manual para Aplicação e Interpretação. São Paulo, SP: Casa do Psicólogo; 1994

[23] Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ. Dyslexia, dysgraphia, procedural learning and the cerebellum. Cortex. 2011;**47**(1):117-127

[24] Getchell N, Pabreja P, Neeld K, Carrio V. Comparing children with and without dyslexia on the movement assessment battery for children and the test of gross motor development. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2007;**105**(1):207-214

[25] Jefferies E, Sage K, Ralph MAL. Do deep dyslexia, dysphasia and dysgraphia share a common phonological impairment? Neuropsychologia. 2007;**45**(7):1553-1570

[26] Brown T, Rodger S. Validity of the developmental test of visual-motor integration supplemental developmental test of visual perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2008;**106**(3):659-678

[27] Falk TH, Tam C, Schellnus H, Chau T. On the development of a computer-based handwriting assessment tool to objectively quantify handwriting proficiency in children. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2011;**104**(3):e102-e111

[28] Racine MB, Majnemer A, Shevell M, Snider L. Handwriting performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of Child Neurology. 2008;**23**(4):399-406

[29] Ratzon NZ, Lahav O, Cohen-Hamsi S, Metzger Y, Efraim D, Bart O. Comparing different shortterm service delivery methods of visual-motor treatment for first grade students in mainstream schools. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2009;**30**(6):1168-1176

[30] Costa BIM, et al. A relação entre o desempenho motor e o desempenho visuo-motor, em crianças entre os 4 e os 6 anos [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Évora, Portugal: Universidade de Évora; 2019

[31] Barrientos P. Handwriting development in Spanish children with and without learning disabilities: A graphonomic approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2017;**50**(5):552-563

**148**

*Dyslexia*

**References**

[1] Reid G. Dyslexia: A Practitioner's Handbook. Hoboken, Nova Jersey, EUA: [10] Stevenson NC, Just C. In early education, why teach handwriting before keyboarding? Early Childhood Education Journal. 2014;**42**(1):49-56

Human Movement Science.

[12] Mathes PG, Denton CA. The

[13] Schirmer CR, Fontoura DR, Nunes ML. Distúrbios da aquisição da linguagem e da aprendizagem. Jornal de

Pediatria. 2004;**80**(2):95-103

[14] Schickedanz JA. Much More than the ABCs: The Early Stages of Reading and Writing. Washington, DC: NAEYC;

[15] Jeannerod M. Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self (No. 42). New York, USA: Oxford University

Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2007;**49**(4):312-317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312.x

[17] Rosenblum S, Aloni T, Josman N. Relationships between handwriting performance and organizational abilities among children with and without dysgraphia: A preliminary study. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2010;**31**(2):502-509. DOI:

[16] Feder KP, Majnemer A.

10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.016

[18] Lorenzini MV. A scale to detect dysgraphia based on the Ajuriaguerra

prevention and identification of reading disability. In: Seminars in Pediatric Neurology. Vol. 9, No. 3. Philadelphia, USA: WB Saunders; 2002. pp. 185-191

2019;**65**:71-79

1999

Press; 2006

[11] Yu NY, Chang SH. Characterization of the fine motor problems in patients with cognitive dysfunction—A computerized handwriting analysis.

[3] Galaburda AM, Cestnick L. Dislexia del desarrollo. Revista de Neurologia.

Maurits NM, Maassen BA. Predictors for grade 6 reading in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia.

[5] Fletcher JM, Lyon GR, Fuchs LS, Barnes M. Learning Disabilities: From Identification to Intervention. New York: The Guilford Press; 2007

[6] Liederman J, Kantrowitz L, Flannery K. Male vulnerability to reading disability is not likely to be a myth: A call for new data. Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[7] Pennington BF. Diagnosing Learning Disorders: A Neuropsychological Framework. New York, USA: Guilford

habilidades motoras em sujeitos novatos. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e

Co-occurring disorders: A possible key to visual perceptual deficits in children with developmental coordination disorder? Human Movement Science. 2008;**27**(1):154-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.

[8] Gomes TVB, Ugrinowitsch H, Marinho NFS, Benda RN. Efeitos da prática mental na aquisição de

Esporte. 2012;**26**(3):511-521

[9] Crawford SG, Dewey D.

humov.2007.09.002

John Wiley & Sons; 2016

PRO-ED; 1993

2003;**36**(1):3-9

[4] van Setten ER,

2018;**68**(3):181-202

2005;**38**(2):109-129

Press; 2008

[2] Hammill DD, Pearson NA, Voress JK. Developmental Test of Visual Perception: DTVP-2. Austin, TX:

Hakvoort BE, van der Leij A,

**151**

**Chapter 8**

Classroom

*Trevor O' Brien*

**Abstract**

**1. Introduction**

Understanding the

learn best must be considered paramount.

multi-sensory approach to teaching and learning.

Socio-Emotional Impact

of Dyslexia in the Inclusive

Much of the literature pertaining to children's experiences of dyslexia points to low self esteem and low self-concept as compared with typically developing peers (i.e. those without dyslexia). While the specific difficulties associated with dyslexia may present challenges for those children, the author outlines how external forces such as the environment, relationships and teacher understanding may contribute to (or alleviate) such negative self perceptions. While children may learn and process information differently, negative feelings are often compounded by a teacher's lack of knowledge regarding this different way of learning in the inclusive classroom. In order to develop truly inclusive practices in schools, it is imperative that contextual issues impacting children are understood and that this understanding is utilised to improve outcomes for all children, including those with dyslexia. It is also contended that children should be at the centre of this process and their views on how they

**Keywords:** dyslexia, self esteem, self concept, teacher understanding, multi-sesnsory

With a chapter focusing on affective issues relating to dyslexia, it is necessary to begin by considering how dyslexia has been constructed. The author adopts the view that dyslexia is socially constructed and the impairments experienced by students results in disabling children, due to a lack of teacher understanding and environmental issues [1]. This disabling may result in children having a lower sense of identity, particularly in terms of self-esteem and self-concept. If dyslexia is socially constructed, then these constructs may need to be identified in order to address the socio-emotional issues impacting young people. These issues, as they relate to dyslexia, are discussed in detail. It is argued throughout that teacher understanding of dyslexia is a critical consideration when aiming to support all children, including those with dyslexia. Listening to the views of children is considered important in this regard. The author concludes by providing the reader with some key insights in improving support in the inclusive classroom, with a focus on the imperative of a

### **Chapter 8**
