**4. Choline in dairy cows nutrition**

70 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

**Figure 2.** Choline and methyl groups metabolism in pre-ruminants. SAM, S-adenosyl-L-methionine. HCys, Homocysteine. TM, Transamethylation pathway. THF Tetrahydrofolate system. Choline oxidase (EC 1.1.3.17). Betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.5). Methionine synthase

**Figure 3.** Choline and methyl groups metabolism in adult ruminants in positive energy balance (adapted from Pinotti et al., 2002). SAM, S-adenosyl-L-methionine. HCys, Homocysteine. TM,

Transamethylation pathway. THF Tetrahydrofolate system. Choline oxidase (EC 1.1.3.17). Betainehomocysteine methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.5). Methionine synthase (EC 2.1.1.13). (adapted from

(EC 2.1.1.13). (adapted from Pinotti et al., 2002).

Pinotti et al., 2002).

The earliest investigations were interested in determining the effects of added dietary choline on milk production. For this purpose supplementation experiments using unprotected choline (Erman et al., 1984; Atkins et al., 1988; Sharma & Erdman, 1988b), were performed. In these studies using unprotected choline, neither milk production nor milk composition were affected, due, it was suggested, to rapid choline degradation in the rumen (Atkins et al., 1988; Sharma & Erdman, 1988b). In fact the work of Atkins et al. (1988) indicated that choline chloride was more degradable than naturally occurring choline in feed, while increasing choline chloride intake from 23 to 326 g/d only raised duodenal choline flow from 1.2 to 2.5 g/d, so that recovery was low indeed (Sharma & Erdman, 1988b). The mean estimates of rumen degradable choline (measured *in vitro*) actually were 80-98% for common feedstuffs and supplements (Table 2), indicating that use of choline-rich feedstuffs or additives in diets can only marginally increase the post ruminal flow of choline in ruminants (Sharma and Erdman, 1989a).

However, others studies (Sharma & Erdman, 1988a; Sharma & Erdman, 1989b) on the effects of abomasally infused choline, suggested a possible requirement for supplementing choline in lactating dairy cows. For example, Sharma & Erdman (1988a) investigated abomasal infusion of choline or methionine in dairy cows, either alone or with the choline synthesis inhibitor 2 amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (2AMP). They found that abomasal infusion of 30 g/d of choline was more effective than abomasal infusion of 45.6 g/d methionine (the molar equivalent of 30 g choline) in increasing milk yield and milk fat content. Additionally, milk production, milk fat percentage, milk fat yield, milk protein percentage, and milk protein yield of cows infused with 2AMP plus methionine were all lower than in cows infused with 2AMP plus choline (Sharma & Erdman, 1988a). These data suggest not only that supplemental choline is required to achieve maximal performance, but also that choline formed from methionine (Emmanuel & Kennelly, 1984) may be partially responsible for these stimulatory effects on milk production. Form a technical/feeding point of view these studies also evidenced that choline must be rumen-protected to be effective in dairy cow nutrition.


**Table 2.** Rumen stability: In vitro choline degradation (Sharma & Erdman, 1989a). Data obtained during four individual fermentation runs, samples were incubated in vitro with an inoculum mixture containing rumen fluid obtained from a rumen-fistulated dairy cow fed 17.5% corn silage and 28.7% grass silage and 53.8% concentrate diet.

## **4.1. Recent advance in choline supplementation in dairy cow**

Although the choline requirement of dairy cows is still unknown (National Research Council, 2001), higher choline availability (by feeding rumen-protected choline, RPC) can have a favorable effect on milk production (Erdman and Sharma 1991; Erdman, 1994; Hartwell et al. 2000; Piepenbrink and Overton 2003; Pinotti et al. 2003; Scheer et al. 2002). In dairy ruminants, in fact choline has been proposed as limiting nutrient, especially at the onset of lactation (Erdman and Sharma 1991; Pinotti et al., 2002). Based on those considerations, the effects of rumen-protected choline (RPC) supplementation to transition cows have been investigated in several studies (figure 4).

**Figure 4.** Levels of choline chloride supplementation [provided in a rumen-protected (RP) form] to transition dairy cows in published studies. Citations keys are reported on the x axis: (A)–(C) Erdman & Sharma, 1991; (D) Erdman, 1994; (E)- (F) Hartwell et al., 2000; (G) Scheer et al., 2002; (H) Pinotti et al., 2003; (I)–(K) Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003; (L) Pinotti et al., 2004; (M) Janovick Guretzky at al., 2006; (N)-(Q) Xu et al., 2006; (R) Zahra et al., 2006; (S) Elek et al., 2008; (T) Davidson et al., 2008. Choline chloride supplementation is shown on the y axis.

Findings in transition and early lactating dairy cows suggest that greater choline availability can improve not only milk production (Erdman and Sharma, 1991; Hartwell et al., 2000; Pinotti et al., 2003), but also lipid (Piepenbrink Overton, 2003; Pinotti et al., 2003), methyl group metabolism (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006) and choline secretion in milk (Deuchler et al., 1998; Elek et al., 2008; Pinotti et al., 2003; Pinotti et al, 2004). Furthermore, in the Pinotti et al. (2003) study, although plasma concentrations of vitamin E declined after parturition in choline-supplemented animals, the reduction was less than in controls, suggesting improved vitamin E status. However, the mechanisms of this effect have not been elucidated with certainty, even though an improved fat absorption and transport induced by choline supplementation has been proposed (Pinotti et al., 2003). Janovick Guretzky et al. (2006) found that choline supplementation did not affect milk production in either Holstein or Jersey transition cows, but in discussing their results they noted that calculated methionine balance was negative postpartum, so that supplemental choline might not have spared enough methionine to produce a physiological benefit. This conclusion is in line with another study (Brüsemeister & Südekum, 2006) that, in reviewing several published works on choline supplementation in dairy cows, concluded that negative methionine balance – and therefore a basal diet of adequate quality and composition (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006) – is essential for obtaining a response to rumen-protected choline. A further study of Zahra et al. (2006), reported that choline supplementation improves milk production (1.2 kg/day) in the first 60 d of lactation, although supplementation was only from 21 d prepartum to 28 days in milk. However, choline's effect on milk yield was attributable mainly to increased milk production (4.4 kg/day) in animals with body condition score ≥4 three weeks before calving, that were also consuming more feed. Supplementation of rumen-protected choline would therefore seem to be essential for optimising high-quality milk production in high-yielding dairy cows, as also reported in subsequent studies (Davidson et al., 2008; Elek et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2006), particularly in animals fed basal diets that limit post-ruminal methionine supply. The magnitude of the production response is likely to be affected by basal diet composition, the dose and mode of administration of the rumen-protected choline, and the stage of lactation, as discussed elsewhere (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; National Research Council, 2001).

72 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

Barley 79.4 Cottonseed 84.7 Soybean meal 82.9 Fish-meal 83.8

Choline stearate 98.0 Choline chloride 98.6

**4.1. Recent advance in choline supplementation in dairy cow** 

cows have been investigated in several studies (figure 4).

chloride supplementation is shown on the y axis.

**Table 2.** Rumen stability: In vitro choline degradation (Sharma & Erdman, 1989a). Data obtained during four individual fermentation runs, samples were incubated in vitro with an inoculum mixture containing rumen fluid obtained from a rumen-fistulated dairy cow fed 17.5% corn silage and 28.7%

Although the choline requirement of dairy cows is still unknown (National Research Council, 2001), higher choline availability (by feeding rumen-protected choline, RPC) can have a favorable effect on milk production (Erdman and Sharma 1991; Erdman, 1994; Hartwell et al. 2000; Piepenbrink and Overton 2003; Pinotti et al. 2003; Scheer et al. 2002). In dairy ruminants, in fact choline has been proposed as limiting nutrient, especially at the onset of lactation (Erdman and Sharma 1991; Pinotti et al., 2002). Based on those considerations, the effects of rumen-protected choline (RPC) supplementation to transition

**Figure 4.** Levels of choline chloride supplementation [provided in a rumen-protected (RP) form] to transition dairy cows in published studies. Citations keys are reported on the x axis: (A)–(C) Erdman & Sharma, 1991; (D) Erdman, 1994; (E)- (F) Hartwell et al., 2000; (G) Scheer et al., 2002; (H) Pinotti et al., 2003; (I)–(K) Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003; (L) Pinotti et al., 2004; (M) Janovick Guretzky at al., 2006; (N)-(Q) Xu et al., 2006; (R) Zahra et al., 2006; (S) Elek et al., 2008; (T) Davidson et al., 2008. Choline

**Supplements**

grass silage and 53.8% concentrate diet.

**Feedstuffs Effective degradation, %** 

With regard to metabolic health, few studies in dairy cow also investigated the effects of choline supplementation on lipid metabolism (Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003; Pinotti et al. 2003; Pinotti et al. 2004 ), and hepatic lipidosis (Grummer, 2006; van Vuuren et al., 2010). In dairy ruminants it is known that the necessity to increase the lipolysis of adipose fat stores is most critical during the first stage of lactation (Grummer, 1993; McCarthy et al., 1968). During this stage, fat mobilisation leads to increased blood levels of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) which are taken up by the liver and oxidised to ketone bodies or carbon dioxide or esterified to triglycerides. The liver normally packages the triglycerides in VLDLs and secretes them, but sudden increases in plasma NEFA may not be adequately processed by the ruminant liver (Gruffat et al., 1996; Pullen et al., 1990). Choline serves as methyl donor in the synthesis of carnitine (Griffith, 1987) which is essential for fatty acid oxidation.

The esterification of NEFA to triglycerides, and their secretion to VLDL also involves choline (Gruffat et al., 1996). In this context the NEFA/cholesterol ratio can be considered a measure of the fat retained in or metabolized by the liver and its lowered value observed in RPC cows suggested a lower risk of fatty liver in these animals (Holtenius, 1989). Thus the lowered plasma NEFA levels and the NEFA/cholesterol ratio in RPC-supplemented cows at parturition suggest more efficient liver function and improved lipid metabolism in general (Pinotti et al. 2003).

A subsequent study (Pinotti et al. 2004) provided similar results, in that plasma NEFA was reduced by 18% on day 20 of lactation in supplemented animals. Likewise, Chung et al. (2009) found that RPC have a dose dependent effect on reducing plasma NEFA concentration by 11% and 23% in cows receiving 25g and 50 g of rumen-protected choline. These findings are also consistent with the evidence that RPC supplementation to dairy cows throughout the periparturient period decreased liver accumulation of lipids (stored as intracellular triglycerides- van Vuuren et al., 2010) and increased liver glycogen content (Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003). The effects of choline at liver level have been recently confirmed in transition dairy cows (van Vuuren et al., 2010), in which RPC supplementation resulted in lower TAG concentration, by 36% and 32% compare to untreated animals, in week 1 and 3 post-partum, respectively. Results obtained in these studies indicated that not only hepatic fatty acid metabolism and cow performance are responsive to increasing the supply of choline (Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003), but also that choline supplementation can reduce cellular lipid accumulation in the liver especially during the transition period.

A further aspect investigated in some of these studies was the effect of choline on methyl group status of lactating cows. Studies carried out by Pinotti et al. (2004) showed that the administration of 50 g of (RPC, providing 20 g of choline chloride) to transition dairy cows increased plasma levels of choline-containing phospholipids and folates by the end of the transition period (20 days in milk). These findings indicate that that RPC supplementation is effective both in increasing choline availability and in optimizing methyl group metabolism: the increase in plasma folates may be attributable to a sparing effect of choline on methyl group metabolism. As noted, choline is an important source of labile methyl groups, but when it is in short supply, methyl groups (e.g. for methionine resynthesis from homocysteine) must be synthesized *de novo* by the THF system or derived from other sources. The THF system consumes gluconeogenic precursors, so in periods of glucose imbalance (e.g. early lactation) such precursors can also be limiting (Armentano 1994; Rukkwamsuk et al. 1999). An unexpected finding of studies in this area is that plasma vitamin B12 concentrations in RPC-supplemented cows were lower than in controls (Baldi & Pinotti 2006). Vitamin B12 is considered a marker of methyl group status, and the lower concentrations in treated animals appear inconsistent with the observed increases in plasma folates and choline-containing phospholipids. However, vitamin B12 is required as a coenzyme in the biosynthesis of methionine from homocysteine and in gluconeogenesis from propionate. Increased gluconeogenesis may therefore deplete vitamin B12, as indicated by the finding of a tendency toward higher concentrations of plasma glucose in RPCsupplemented cows. Nevertheless, these results were obtained from a limited number of animals, and therefore they should considered with caution since our knowledge of the interaction of choline with vitamins and other essential nutrients are incomplete.

## **4.2. Systematic analysis of choline supplementation in dairy cows**

74 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

(Pinotti et al. 2003).

The esterification of NEFA to triglycerides, and their secretion to VLDL also involves choline (Gruffat et al., 1996). In this context the NEFA/cholesterol ratio can be considered a measure of the fat retained in or metabolized by the liver and its lowered value observed in RPC cows suggested a lower risk of fatty liver in these animals (Holtenius, 1989). Thus the lowered plasma NEFA levels and the NEFA/cholesterol ratio in RPC-supplemented cows at parturition suggest more efficient liver function and improved lipid metabolism in general

A subsequent study (Pinotti et al. 2004) provided similar results, in that plasma NEFA was reduced by 18% on day 20 of lactation in supplemented animals. Likewise, Chung et al. (2009) found that RPC have a dose dependent effect on reducing plasma NEFA concentration by 11% and 23% in cows receiving 25g and 50 g of rumen-protected choline. These findings are also consistent with the evidence that RPC supplementation to dairy cows throughout the periparturient period decreased liver accumulation of lipids (stored as intracellular triglycerides- van Vuuren et al., 2010) and increased liver glycogen content (Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003). The effects of choline at liver level have been recently confirmed in transition dairy cows (van Vuuren et al., 2010), in which RPC supplementation resulted in lower TAG concentration, by 36% and 32% compare to untreated animals, in week 1 and 3 post-partum, respectively. Results obtained in these studies indicated that not only hepatic fatty acid metabolism and cow performance are responsive to increasing the supply of choline (Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003), but also that choline supplementation can

reduce cellular lipid accumulation in the liver especially during the transition period.

A further aspect investigated in some of these studies was the effect of choline on methyl group status of lactating cows. Studies carried out by Pinotti et al. (2004) showed that the administration of 50 g of (RPC, providing 20 g of choline chloride) to transition dairy cows increased plasma levels of choline-containing phospholipids and folates by the end of the transition period (20 days in milk). These findings indicate that that RPC supplementation is effective both in increasing choline availability and in optimizing methyl group metabolism: the increase in plasma folates may be attributable to a sparing effect of choline on methyl group metabolism. As noted, choline is an important source of labile methyl groups, but when it is in short supply, methyl groups (e.g. for methionine resynthesis from homocysteine) must be synthesized *de novo* by the THF system or derived from other sources. The THF system consumes gluconeogenic precursors, so in periods of glucose imbalance (e.g. early lactation) such precursors can also be limiting (Armentano 1994; Rukkwamsuk et al. 1999). An unexpected finding of studies in this area is that plasma vitamin B12 concentrations in RPC-supplemented cows were lower than in controls (Baldi & Pinotti 2006). Vitamin B12 is considered a marker of methyl group status, and the lower concentrations in treated animals appear inconsistent with the observed increases in plasma folates and choline-containing phospholipids. However, vitamin B12 is required as a coenzyme in the biosynthesis of methionine from homocysteine and in gluconeogenesis from propionate. Increased gluconeogenesis may therefore deplete vitamin B12, as indicated In the recent past different models (linear and logistic) were developed to permit the calculation of changes in milk yield and milk composition from amounts of rumenprotected choline in dairy cow diets. For example, Pinotti et al. (2010) investigated the effects of RPC administration on milk production by a regression model based on the results of 11 different studies (42 experimental groups) published between 1991 and 2008 (Davidson et al., 2008; Deuchler et al., 1998; Elek et al., 2008; Erdman et al., 1991; Hartwell et al., 2000; Janovick Guretzky et al., 2006; Pipenbrink and Overton, 2003; Pinotti et al., 2003; Pinotti et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2006; Zahra et al., 2006). The analysis included RPC supplementation (control/RPC) as fixed effect, the variability among experiments as random effect and their interaction. Treatments schedule, dry matter intake and dietary composition, accounted for most of the variability among experiments and were highly correlated in a preliminary data analysis; therefore, these variables were considered as experimental effects and treated as random components in the mixed model, assuming that the results of different experiments are affected by different experimental conditions. For each study, data were also weighted by the reciprocal of the squared standard error of the mean value, in order to consider the unequal variance among studies.


**Table 3.** Results from mixed model when the different amounts of RPC administrated were grouped into three supplementation levels (adapted from Pinotti et al., 2010).

The data reviewed in this analysis were consistent with the fact that choline supplementation significantly increased milk yield in dairy cows, even though, as expected, the dose of choline administered is also relevant (table 3). Considering three supplementation classes, i.e. control (no choline: 0 g/d), low level (<10 g/d of choline chloride in a rumen protected form) and high level (>10 g/d of choline chloride in a rumen protected form), the meta-analysis indicated that a low level (less than 10 g per day) of RPC supplementation tended to increase milk yield and a high level of supplementation of RPC significantly increased milk yield. This results were in line with another meta-analysis, performed using a nonlinear model (Sales et al., 2010), on the effects of rumen-protected choline in dairy cows, in which choline supplementation has a positive effect on milk yield and milk protein content, but not on milk fat content.

## **5. Other dairy ruminant**

In the case of small ruminants the effects of choline infusion on transmethylation reactions have been studied in sheep by Lobley et al. (1996), while Emmanuel and Kennely (1984) investigated methionine and choline incorporation into plasma and milk of lactating goats. More recently Banskalieva et al. (2005) assessed the efficacy of rumen-protected choline supplementation in meat goats. However, studies on choline supplementation and its effects on milk production, and lipid and methyl group status in periparturient dairy goats have been published only recently (Pinotti et al., 2008; Savoini et al., 2010). In a production trial (Pinotti et al., 2008) a supplementation of 4g/d of choline in rumen protected form was given to periparturient dairy goats, starting 4 weeks prior to expected kidding and continuing for 5 weeks after parturition. The quantity of choline given was based on experiments in dairy cows (Pinotti et al., 2005) and metabolic Body weight (BW0.75) of the goats at the beginning of the experiment. During the first 6 weeks of lactation, milk yield and four percent fatcorrected milk (FCM) yield were increased by 7 and 12%, respectively, in RPC supplemented than non-supplemented goats. Milk fat concentration, fat and protein yield were also increased by RPC treatment. The link between choline supplementation and milk response has been mainly attributed to the metabolic interchangeability of choline and methionine, in the sense that both can furnish labile methyl groups. This interchangeability has been investigated by Emmanuel and Kennelly (1984) in goats, who estimated that 6% of the choline pool was derived from methionine and that approximately 28% of methionine is used for choline synthesis via the pathway for the de novo biosynthesis of the choline moiety involving sequential methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine. Reduction of methyl group demands from the methionine pool may therefore offer production benefits to dairy ruminants and might be achieved by nutritional manipulation other than alteration of the methionine supply (Lobley et al., 1996). This was probably the situation in the study by Pinotti and coworkers (2008), in which during the early stages of lactation of dairy goats dietary methionine was probably limiting (goats received about 80% of the optimal level of methionine). These considerations imply that feed composition, mainly protein supply and the availability of methionine (National Research Council, 2001) influence the effects of choline supplementation not only in dairy cows (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; Brüsemeister & Südekum, 2006), but also in goats.

The milk production response to choline supplementation in dairy goats, was obtained without any detrimental effect on methyl groups status. In fact, folate availability at kidding was higher in choline-supplemented than in non-supplemented goats, while during lactation lack of a drop in plasma folate and vitamin B12 in the choline-supplemented animals, suggests that good methyl group status was maintained in choline-treated goats (Pinotti et al., 2008; Savoini et al., 2010). This results was obtained, even though RPC receiving goats were producing more milk than the choline un-suplemented ones.

76 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

and milk protein content, but not on milk fat content.

**5. Other dairy ruminant** 

Südekum, 2006), but also in goats.

performed using a nonlinear model (Sales et al., 2010), on the effects of rumen-protected choline in dairy cows, in which choline supplementation has a positive effect on milk yield

In the case of small ruminants the effects of choline infusion on transmethylation reactions have been studied in sheep by Lobley et al. (1996), while Emmanuel and Kennely (1984) investigated methionine and choline incorporation into plasma and milk of lactating goats. More recently Banskalieva et al. (2005) assessed the efficacy of rumen-protected choline supplementation in meat goats. However, studies on choline supplementation and its effects on milk production, and lipid and methyl group status in periparturient dairy goats have been published only recently (Pinotti et al., 2008; Savoini et al., 2010). In a production trial (Pinotti et al., 2008) a supplementation of 4g/d of choline in rumen protected form was given to periparturient dairy goats, starting 4 weeks prior to expected kidding and continuing for 5 weeks after parturition. The quantity of choline given was based on experiments in dairy cows (Pinotti et al., 2005) and metabolic Body weight (BW0.75) of the goats at the beginning of the experiment. During the first 6 weeks of lactation, milk yield and four percent fatcorrected milk (FCM) yield were increased by 7 and 12%, respectively, in RPC supplemented than non-supplemented goats. Milk fat concentration, fat and protein yield were also increased by RPC treatment. The link between choline supplementation and milk response has been mainly attributed to the metabolic interchangeability of choline and methionine, in the sense that both can furnish labile methyl groups. This interchangeability has been investigated by Emmanuel and Kennelly (1984) in goats, who estimated that 6% of the choline pool was derived from methionine and that approximately 28% of methionine is used for choline synthesis via the pathway for the de novo biosynthesis of the choline moiety involving sequential methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine. Reduction of methyl group demands from the methionine pool may therefore offer production benefits to dairy ruminants and might be achieved by nutritional manipulation other than alteration of the methionine supply (Lobley et al., 1996). This was probably the situation in the study by Pinotti and coworkers (2008), in which during the early stages of lactation of dairy goats dietary methionine was probably limiting (goats received about 80% of the optimal level of methionine). These considerations imply that feed composition, mainly protein supply and the availability of methionine (National Research Council, 2001) influence the effects of choline supplementation not only in dairy cows (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; Brüsemeister &

The milk production response to choline supplementation in dairy goats, was obtained without any detrimental effect on methyl groups status. In fact, folate availability at kidding was higher in choline-supplemented than in non-supplemented goats, while during lactation lack of a drop in plasma folate and vitamin B12 in the choline-supplemented animals, suggests that good methyl group status was maintained in choline-treated goats In a parallel study (Baldi et al. 2011) the effect of rumen-protected choline administration on metabolic profile, selected liver constituents, and on mRNA expressions of selected enzymes, transcription factors, and nuclear receptors involved in mammary lipid metabolism in dairy goats, have been investigated. It was evident from this study that at comparable milk yield during the first month of lactation, choline supplemented goats showed a lower level of plasma β-hydroxybutyrate, whereas no other differences were observed for other metabolites. The reasons for this difference are uncertain: authors conjecture that it might be due to the role of choline in lipid metabolism as already reported in dairy cows (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; Chung et al., 2009). With regard to liver variables, it has been reported that total liver lipid/ DNA content was significantly lower (-35%) in RPC than CTR goats. As already reported above, dairy cows receiving choline have also been reported to have reduced hepatocellular lipid accumulation (Cooke et al., 2007; Grummer, 2006).

Within the mammary tissue many selected enzymes [e.g. lipoprotein lipase (LPL)], transcription factors and nuclear receptors that can be affected by choline availability are involved in lipid uptake and milk fat secretion. Furthermore, choline is actively secreted into mammalian milk. The major choline-containing compounds in bovine milk are unesterified choline, phosphatidylcholine, and sphingomyelin (Pinotti et al., 2003). Kinsella (1973) reported that a bovine mammary gland yielding 25 litres milk secretes 10±3g phospholipids per day, corresponding on average to 5% of the phospholipids of the mammary tissue. The phospholipids of the membrane of the milk fat globule constitute the major cholinecontaining component of bovine milk (McPherson & Kitchen, 1983). The above data suggest that choline is an important metabolite in lactating mammary tissue, that it is used avidly when available (Kinsella, 1973), mainly in the lipid metabolism. Thus, it has been proposed that choline supplementation can have positive effects on lipid trafficking particularly lipid transport to and within extra-hepatic tissues (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; Cooke et al., 2007; Piepenbrink & Overton, 2003) including the mammary gland. However, at udder level in lactating goats, choline did not affect the expression of several mammary gland transcripts involved in lipid metabolism (Baldi et al. 2011). The effects of nutrition on the expression of mammary lipogenic genes in dairy ruminants (cows, ewes, goats) have been investigated mainly by feeding milk-fat depressing diets, characterized by high levels of concentrates, or conjugated linoleic acids (CLA), or other lipids (fish oil, vegetable oils, full fat seeds, etc.) (Bauman, 2008; Bernard et al., 2006; Harvatine and Bauman 2006; Lock et al., 2008). Absence of significant effects on gene expression observed in goats could be due to the dose or to the type of supplementation. Thus, while in Baldi et al. (2011) were supplied 4 g/d choline (about 0.2% of DMI), other studies used higher levels of supplementation (for fats 3.6-11.2% of DMI) or more potent nutritional factors (e.g. CLAs are potent inhibitors of mammary gland fat synthesis) (see Bernard et al., 2006 for review). Nevertheless, these results were obtained from a limited number of animals, and choline effects and function in lactating mammary tissue deserve further investigation.

## **6. Conclusions**

It can be concluded from this outline that dietary supply of choline may not always be sufficient to maximize milk production in both dairy cows and goat; and although the requirement for choline can in theory be satisfied by other nutrients, it is unlikely that this happens in practice especially at the onset of lactation. The magnitude of the production response is likely to be affected by basal diet composition, the dose of the rumen-protected choline, and the stage of lactation (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; National Research Council 2001). In particular with respect to lactation cycle several studies provided convincing evidence that protected choline positively affects lactation performance especially when feeding is initiated prior to calving and is continued during early lactation (Grummer, 2011). In fact, assuming that choline is limiting in high yielding dairy ruminants, the greatest demand for choline should occur at lactation onset. It is also at this stage that the availability of other choline-related nutrients (i.e. methionine, folates, and vitamin B12) is often low (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; Girard et al., 2010). From a metabolic and hephatic point of view, since choline is a lipotropic factor, it may be particularly beneficial at this time in view of the adipose and liver metabolism changes that occur during the transition from late pregnancy to early lactation (Piepenbrink and Overton 2003): choline may optimize the balance between fat retained and fat metabolized by the liver, thereby improving lipid metabolism in general. These roles of choline however, do not exclude that RPC supplementation is also effective in optimizing methyl group metabolism, which might be an added benefit of adequate choline supplementation. With regard to dose, even though an estimate of the minimum choline needed in dairy cows for maintenance functions (based on metabolic body size), is approximately 4 to 6 g/day (Donkin, 2011), production response were abstained when higher doses were fed (Pinotti et al., 2010). Consequently, although insufficient data are available to establish the choline requirement, it can be suggested that supplementation doses in this range are likely to be adequate for transition dairy ruminants.

However, it is also evident that our knowledge of the interaction of choline with vitamins and other essential nutrients is incomplete in the dairy ruminants. For example there are indications that both methyl group precursors (including choline) and appropriate co factors (folate and vitamin B12) are important for the optimal metabolic support of milk production (Pinotti et al., 2008), even though methionine may not always be involved in this scenario (Preynat et al, 2009).These aspects not only reflect the inadequacy of a nutritional approach based on the supply and utilisation of individual nutrients, but also suggest that the requirements of B-complex vitamins in dairy ruminants should be reconsidered.

## **Author details**

Luciano Pinotti *Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università di Milano, Italy* 

## **Acknowledgment**

78 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

doses in this range are likely to be adequate for transition dairy ruminants.

requirements of B-complex vitamins in dairy ruminants should be reconsidered.

*Animal Science and Food Safety, Università di Milano, Italy* 

However, it is also evident that our knowledge of the interaction of choline with vitamins and other essential nutrients is incomplete in the dairy ruminants. For example there are indications that both methyl group precursors (including choline) and appropriate co factors (folate and vitamin B12) are important for the optimal metabolic support of milk production (Pinotti et al., 2008), even though methionine may not always be involved in this scenario (Preynat et al, 2009).These aspects not only reflect the inadequacy of a nutritional approach based on the supply and utilisation of individual nutrients, but also suggest that the

It can be concluded from this outline that dietary supply of choline may not always be sufficient to maximize milk production in both dairy cows and goat; and although the requirement for choline can in theory be satisfied by other nutrients, it is unlikely that this happens in practice especially at the onset of lactation. The magnitude of the production response is likely to be affected by basal diet composition, the dose of the rumen-protected choline, and the stage of lactation (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; National Research Council 2001). In particular with respect to lactation cycle several studies provided convincing evidence that protected choline positively affects lactation performance especially when feeding is initiated prior to calving and is continued during early lactation (Grummer, 2011). In fact, assuming that choline is limiting in high yielding dairy ruminants, the greatest demand for choline should occur at lactation onset. It is also at this stage that the availability of other choline-related nutrients (i.e. methionine, folates, and vitamin B12) is often low (Baldi & Pinotti, 2006; Girard et al., 2010). From a metabolic and hephatic point of view, since choline is a lipotropic factor, it may be particularly beneficial at this time in view of the adipose and liver metabolism changes that occur during the transition from late pregnancy to early lactation (Piepenbrink and Overton 2003): choline may optimize the balance between fat retained and fat metabolized by the liver, thereby improving lipid metabolism in general. These roles of choline however, do not exclude that RPC supplementation is also effective in optimizing methyl group metabolism, which might be an added benefit of adequate choline supplementation. With regard to dose, even though an estimate of the minimum choline needed in dairy cows for maintenance functions (based on metabolic body size), is approximately 4 to 6 g/day (Donkin, 2011), production response were abstained when higher doses were fed (Pinotti et al., 2010). Consequently, although insufficient data are available to establish the choline requirement, it can be suggested that supplementation

**6. Conclusions** 

**Author details** 

Luciano Pinotti *Department of Health,*  This chapter has been developed in the frame of the COST Action FA0802 Feed for Health. The author wish also to thanks Dr. Gerwin Meijer from the Animal Science Group, Wageningen University, for his advisor in the early literature study on this topic, Prof. Antonella Baldi and Prof. Vittorio Dell'Orto, as well as all the member of the Animal Nutrition Research Group from the Veterinary Medicine Faculty of the Università di Milano (Italy), for their collaboration and support in several experiments carried out in this area.

## **7. References**

	- Chung, Y.-H.; Brown, N. E., Martinez, C. M., Cassidy, T. W. & Varga, G. A. (2009). Effects of rumen-protected choline and dry propylene glycol on feed intake and blood parameters for Holstein dairy cows in early lactation. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 92, No. 6, (June 2009), pp. 2729–2736, ISSN 0022-0302
	- Cooke, R.F.; Silva Del Río, N., Caraviello, D.Z., Bertics, S.J., Ramos, M.H. & Grummer, R.R. (2007). Supplemental Choline for Prevention and Alleviation of Fatty Liver in Dairy Cattle. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 90, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 2413-2418, ISSN 0022- 0302
	- Davidson, S.; Hopkins, B.A., Odle, J., Brownie, C., Fellner, V. & Whitlow, L.W. (2008). Supplementing limited methionine diets with rumen-protected methionine, betaine, and choline in early lactation holstein cows. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 91, Vol. 91, No. 4 (April 2008), pp 1552-1559, ISSN 0022-0302
	- Dawson, R. M. C.; Grime, D. W., & Lindsay, D. B. (1981). On the insensitivity of sheep to the almost complete microbial destruction of dietary choline before alimentary-tract absorption. *Biochemical Journal*, Vol. 196, No. 2 (May 1981), pp. 499-504, ISSN 1470- 8728
	- Deuchler, K. N.; Piperova, L. S. & Erdman, R. A. (1998). Milk choline secretion as an indirect indicator of postruminal choline supply. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 81, No. 1, (January 1998), pp. 238-242, ISSN 0022-0302
	- Dilger, R.N.; Garrow, T. A., & Baker, D. H. (2007). Betaine can partially spare choline in chicks but only when added to diets containing a minimal level of choline. *Journal of Nutrition*, Vol. 137, No. 10 (October 2007), pp. 2224-2228, ISSN 0022-3166
	- Donkin, S.S., (July, 2011) Rumen-Protected Choline, 11.07.2011, Available from http://www.extension.org/pages/26158/rumen-protected-choline#
	- Elek, P.; Newbold, J.R., Gaal, T., Wagner, L. & Husveth, F. (2008). Effects of rumen-protected choline supplementation on milk production and choline supply of periparturient dairy cows. *Animal*, Vol. 2, No. 11 (November 2008), pp.1595-1601.
	- Emmanuel, B. & Kennelly, J. J. (1984). Kinetics of methionine and choline and their incorporation into plasma lipids and milk components in lactating goats. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 67, No. 9 (September 1984), pp. 1912-1918, ISSN 0022- 0302
	- Erdman, R. A. & Sharma, B. K. (1991). Effect of dietary rumen-protected choline in lactating dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 74, No. 5 (May 1991), pp. 1641-1647, ISSN 0022- 0302
	- Erdman, R. A. (1994). Production responses in field study herds fed rumen protected choline. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 77(Suppl. 1), pp 186. (Abstr.) , ISSN 0022- 0302
	- Erdman. R. A.; Shaver, R. D., & Vandersall, J. H. (1984). Dietary choline for the lactating cow: possible effects on milk fat synthesis. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 67, No. 2 (February 1984), pp. 410-415, ISSN 0022-0302

Food and Nutrition Board (1998), Institute of Medicine. Choline, In *Dietary Reference Intakes: Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B-6, Vitamin B012, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline*, National Academy of Sciences, ISBN 0-39-06554-2, pp 390-422, Washington, D.C., US

80 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

2009), pp. 2729–2736, ISSN 0022-0302

4 (April 2008), pp 1552-1559, ISSN 0022-0302

1998), pp. 238-242, ISSN 0022-0302

0302

8728

0302

0302

0302

Chung, Y.-H.; Brown, N. E., Martinez, C. M., Cassidy, T. W. & Varga, G. A. (2009). Effects of rumen-protected choline and dry propylene glycol on feed intake and blood parameters for Holstein dairy cows in early lactation. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 92, No. 6, (June

Cooke, R.F.; Silva Del Río, N., Caraviello, D.Z., Bertics, S.J., Ramos, M.H. & Grummer, R.R. (2007). Supplemental Choline for Prevention and Alleviation of Fatty Liver in Dairy Cattle. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 90, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 2413-2418, ISSN 0022-

Davidson, S.; Hopkins, B.A., Odle, J., Brownie, C., Fellner, V. & Whitlow, L.W. (2008). Supplementing limited methionine diets with rumen-protected methionine, betaine, and choline in early lactation holstein cows. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 91, Vol. 91, No.

Dawson, R. M. C.; Grime, D. W., & Lindsay, D. B. (1981). On the insensitivity of sheep to the almost complete microbial destruction of dietary choline before alimentary-tract absorption. *Biochemical Journal*, Vol. 196, No. 2 (May 1981), pp. 499-504, ISSN 1470-

Deuchler, K. N.; Piperova, L. S. & Erdman, R. A. (1998). Milk choline secretion as an indirect indicator of postruminal choline supply. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 81, No. 1, (January

Dilger, R.N.; Garrow, T. A., & Baker, D. H. (2007). Betaine can partially spare choline in chicks but only when added to diets containing a minimal level of choline. *Journal of* 

Donkin, S.S., (July, 2011) Rumen-Protected Choline, 11.07.2011, Available from

Elek, P.; Newbold, J.R., Gaal, T., Wagner, L. & Husveth, F. (2008). Effects of rumen-protected choline supplementation on milk production and choline supply of periparturient dairy

Emmanuel, B. & Kennelly, J. J. (1984). Kinetics of methionine and choline and their incorporation into plasma lipids and milk components in lactating goats. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 67, No. 9 (September 1984), pp. 1912-1918, ISSN 0022-

Erdman, R. A. & Sharma, B. K. (1991). Effect of dietary rumen-protected choline in lactating dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 74, No. 5 (May 1991), pp. 1641-1647, ISSN 0022-

Erdman, R. A. (1994). Production responses in field study herds fed rumen protected choline. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 77(Suppl. 1), pp 186. (Abstr.) , ISSN 0022-

Erdman. R. A.; Shaver, R. D., & Vandersall, J. H. (1984). Dietary choline for the lactating cow: possible effects on milk fat synthesis. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 67, No. 2

*Nutrition*, Vol. 137, No. 10 (October 2007), pp. 2224-2228, ISSN 0022-3166

http://www.extension.org/pages/26158/rumen-protected-choline#

cows. *Animal*, Vol. 2, No. 11 (November 2008), pp.1595-1601.

(February 1984), pp. 410-415, ISSN 0022-0302


http://www.vtdairy.dasc.vt.edu/pdf/cow\_college/2011/18%20grummer-paper.pdf


during the periparturient period. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 89, No. 1, (January 2006), pp. 188-200, ISSN 0022-0302


McPherson, A. V. & Kitchen, B. J. (1983). Reviews of the progress of dairy science: the bovine milk fat globule membrane-its formation, composition, structure and behaviour in milk and dairy products. *Journal of Dairy Research*, Vol.50, No.1, pp. 107-133, ISSN: 0022-0299

82 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

Vol. 78, No. 8 (August 1995), pp. 1824-1836, ISSN 0022-0302

No. 4 (April 1996), pp. 591-602, ISSN 0022-0302

pp. 188-200, ISSN 0022-0302

pp. 227–234 ISSN0 031-6768

201–207, ISSN: 0029-6643

pp. 3291-3299, ISSN 0022-0302

7817-0133-3, New York, US

0024-4201

2662

438372-1

Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 241-247, ISSN: 03009831

during the periparturient period. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 89, No. 1, (January 2006),

Kempson, S.A. & Montrose, M.H. (2004). Osmotic regulation of renal betaine transport: transcription and beyond. *Euroopean Journal Physiology*, Vol. 449, No. 3 (December 2004),

Kennedy, G. D.; Young, P. B., Kennedy, S., Scott, J. M., Molloy, A. M., Weir, D. G., & Price J. (1995). Cobalt-vitamin B-12 deficiency and the activity of methylmalonyl CoA mutase and methionine synthase in cattle. *International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research*,

Kinsella, J. E. (1973). Preferential labelling of phosphatidylcholine during phospholipid synthesis by bovine mammary tissue. *Lipids*, Vol. 8, No. 7 (July 1973), pp. 393-400, ISSN

Kuksis, A. & Mookerjea, S. (1978). Choline. *Nutrition Reviews*, Vol. 36, No. 7 (July 1978), pp.

LaCount, D. W.; Drackley, J. K., & Weigel, D. J. (1995). Responses of dairy cows during early lactation to ruminal or abomasal administration of L-carnitine. J*ournal of Dairy Science*,

LaCount D. W.; Emmert L. S., & Drackley J. K. (1996). Dose response of dairy cows to abomasal administration of four amounts of L-carnitine. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 79,

Lobley, G. E.; Connell, A., & Revell, D. (1996). The importance of transmethylation reactions to methionine metabolism in sheep: effect of supplementation with creatine and choline. *British Journal of Nutrition*, Vol. 75, No. 1 (January 1996), pp. 47-56, ISSN 1475-

Lock, A.L.; Rovai, M., Gipson, T.A., De Veth, M. J. & Bauman, D. E. (2008). A conjugated linoleic acid supplement containing Trans-10, Cis-12 Conjugated Linoleic Acid reduces milk fat synthesis in lactating goats. *Journal Dairy Science*, 91, No. 9 (September 2008),

Mato, J. M.; Alvarez, L., Corrales, F. J., & Pajares, M. A. (1994). S-adenosylmethionine and the liver. In *The Liver: Biology and Pathobiology*, I. M. Arias, J. L. Boyer, N. Fausto, W. B. Jakoby, D. A. Schachter, & D. A. Shafritz (Ed.), pp. 461-470, Raven Press Ltd, ISBN 0-

McCarthy, R. D.; Porter, G. A., & Griel, L. C., Jr. (1968). Bovine ketosis and depressed fat test in milk: a problem of methionine metabolism and serum lipoprotein aberration. *Journal* 

McCarthy, R. D.; Porter, G. A. & Griel Jr., L.C. (1968). Bovine ketosis and depressed fat test in milk: a problem of methionine metabolism and serum lipoprotein aberration. *Journal* 

McDowell, L.R. (1989). Choline. In: *Vitamins in animal nutrition: comparative aspect to human nutrition*, L.R. McDowell (Ed.), New York: Academic Press, Inc., pp. 347-364, ISBN 0-12-

*of Dairy Science*, Vol. 51, No. 6 (June 1968), pp. 459-462, ISSN 0022-0302

*of Dairy Science*, Vol.51, No.3, (March 1968), pp. 459-462, ISSN 0022-0302

	- Pinotti, L.; Polidori, C., Campagnoli, A., Dell'Orto, V. & Baldi, A. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of rumen protected choline supplementation on milk production in dairy cows. In: *Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition*, G.M. Crovetto (Ed.), pp. 321-322, Wageningen Academic Publishers (EAAP publication N°127) ISBN978-90-8686-153-8, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
	- Pullen, D.L.; Liesman, J. S. & Emery, R. S. (1990). A species comparison of liver slice synthesis and secretion of triacylglycerol from non-esterified fatty acids in media. *Journal of Animal Science*, Vol.68, No.5, (May 1990), pp. 1395-1399, ISSN 0021- 8812
	- Robinson, B. S.; Snoswell, A. M., Runciman, W. B. & Upton, R. N. (1984). Uptake and output of various forms of choline by organs of conscious chronically catherized sheep. *Biochemical Journal*, Vol. 217, No. 2, pp. 399-408, ISSN 0264-6021
	- Ruiz, N.; Miles R. D. & Harms, R. H. (1983). Choline, methionine and sulphate interrelationships in poultry nutrition - A review. *World's Poultry Science Journal*, Vol.39, pp. 185-198, ISSN 0043-9339
	- Rukkwamsuk, T.; Wensing, T. & Geelen, M. J. H. (1999). Effect of fatty liver on hepatic gluconeogenesis in periparturient dairy cows*. Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 82, No.3, (March 1999), pp. 500-505, ISSN 0022-0302
	- Sales, J.; Homolkaa, P. & Koukolováa, V. (2010). Effect of dietary rumen-protected choline on milk production of dairy cows: A meta-analysis. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 93, No. 8, (August 2010), pp. 3746-3754, ISSN 0022-0302
	- Savoini, G.; Agazzi, A., Invernizzi, G., Cattaneo, D., Pinotti, L., & Baldi, A. (2010). Polyunsaturated fatty acids and choline in dairy goats nutrition: production and health benefits. *Small Ruminants Research*, Vol. 88, No. 1-2 (February 2010), 135-144, ISSN 0921- 4488
	- Scheer, W.A.; Lucy, M.C., Kerley, M.S. & Spain, J. N. (2002). Effects of feeding soybeans and rumen protected choline during late gestation and early lactation on performance of dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy Science* , Vol. 85, Suppl.1, pp. 276, ISSN 0022-0302
	- Scott, J. M. (1999). Folate and vitamin B12. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Vol. 58, No. 2 (June 1999) pp. 441-448, ISSN 0029-6651
	- Sharma, B. K. & Erdman, R. A. (1988a). Abomasal infusion of choline and methionine with or without 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol for lactating dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 71, No. 9, (September 1998), pp. 2406-2411, ISSN 0022-0302
	- Sharma, B. K. & Erdman, R. A. (1988b). Effects of high amounts of dietary choline supplementation on duodenal choline flow and production responses of dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 71, No.10, (October 1988), pp. 2670-2676, ISSN 0022- 0302
	- Sharma, B. K. & Erdman, R. A. (1989a). In vitro degradation of choline from selected feedstuffs and choline supplements. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 72, No. 10, (October 1989), pp. 2771-2776, ISSN 0022-0302

Sharma, B. K. & Erdman, R. A. (1989b). Effects of dietary and abomasally infused choline on milk production responses of lactating dairy cows. *Journal of Nutrition*, Vol. 119, No. 2, (February 1989), pp. 248-254, ISSN 0022-3166

84 Milk Production – An Up-to-Date Overview of Animal Nutrition, Management and Health

*Biochemical Journal*, Vol. 217, No. 2, pp. 399-408, ISSN 0264-6021

Wageningen, The Netherlands.

pp. 185-198, ISSN 0043-9339

(March 1999), pp. 500-505, ISSN 0022-0302

2 (June 1999) pp. 441-448, ISSN 0029-6651

1989), pp. 2771-2776, ISSN 0022-0302

8, (August 2010), pp. 3746-3754, ISSN 0022-0302

8812

4488

0302

Pinotti, L.; Polidori, C., Campagnoli, A., Dell'Orto, V. & Baldi, A. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of rumen protected choline supplementation on milk production in dairy cows. In: *Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition*, G.M. Crovetto (Ed.), pp. 321-322, Wageningen Academic Publishers (EAAP publication N°127) ISBN978-90-8686-153-8,

Pullen, D.L.; Liesman, J. S. & Emery, R. S. (1990). A species comparison of liver slice synthesis and secretion of triacylglycerol from non-esterified fatty acids in media. *Journal of Animal Science*, Vol.68, No.5, (May 1990), pp. 1395-1399, ISSN 0021-

Robinson, B. S.; Snoswell, A. M., Runciman, W. B. & Upton, R. N. (1984). Uptake and output of various forms of choline by organs of conscious chronically catherized sheep.

Ruiz, N.; Miles R. D. & Harms, R. H. (1983). Choline, methionine and sulphate interrelationships in poultry nutrition - A review. *World's Poultry Science Journal*, Vol.39,

Rukkwamsuk, T.; Wensing, T. & Geelen, M. J. H. (1999). Effect of fatty liver on hepatic gluconeogenesis in periparturient dairy cows*. Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 82, No.3,

Sales, J.; Homolkaa, P. & Koukolováa, V. (2010). Effect of dietary rumen-protected choline on milk production of dairy cows: A meta-analysis. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 93, No.

Savoini, G.; Agazzi, A., Invernizzi, G., Cattaneo, D., Pinotti, L., & Baldi, A. (2010). Polyunsaturated fatty acids and choline in dairy goats nutrition: production and health benefits. *Small Ruminants Research*, Vol. 88, No. 1-2 (February 2010), 135-144, ISSN 0921-

Scheer, W.A.; Lucy, M.C., Kerley, M.S. & Spain, J. N. (2002). Effects of feeding soybeans and rumen protected choline during late gestation and early lactation on performance of

Scott, J. M. (1999). Folate and vitamin B12. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Vol. 58, No.

Sharma, B. K. & Erdman, R. A. (1988a). Abomasal infusion of choline and methionine with or without 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol for lactating dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy* 

Sharma, B. K. & Erdman, R. A. (1988b). Effects of high amounts of dietary choline supplementation on duodenal choline flow and production responses of dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 71, No.10, (October 1988), pp. 2670-2676, ISSN 0022-

Sharma, B. K. & Erdman, R. A. (1989a). In vitro degradation of choline from selected feedstuffs and choline supplements. *Journal of Dairy Science*, Vol. 72, No. 10, (October

dairy cows. *Journal of Dairy Science* , Vol. 85, Suppl.1, pp. 276, ISSN 0022-0302

*Science*, Vol. 71, No. 9, (September 1998), pp. 2406-2411, ISSN 0022-0302

	- Zeisel, S. H.; Mar, M., Zhou, Z. & Da Costa, K. A. (1995). Pregnancy and lactation are associated with diminished concentrations of choline and its metabolites in rat liver. *Journal of Nutrition*, Vol. 125, No. 12, pp. 3049-3054, ISSN 0022-3166
