**Author details**

Cintia de Faria Ferreira Carraro1,2\*, André Celestino Martins1 , Ana Carolina da Silva Faria1 and Carla Cristina Almeida Loures1

1 The Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca (Cefet/RJ), Angra dos Reis, RJ, Brazil

2 Federal University Fluminense, Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil

\*Address all correspondence to: cintia.carraro@cefet-rj.br

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**91**

*Agroenergy from Residual Biomass: Energy Perspective DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93644*

> impacts on the ecological footprint: An investigation of the G7 countries. The Science of the Total Environment.

[10] Malico I, Pereira RN, Gonçalves AC, M 0 SA. Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy

[11] Özdenkçi K, De Blasio C, Sarwar G, Melin K, Koskinen J, Alopaeus V. Techno-economic feasibility of

supercritical water gasification of black

[12] Carrillo-Nieves D, Rostro Alanís MJ,

Iqbal HMN, Parra-Saldívar R. Current status and future trends of bioethanol production from agro-industrial wastes in Mexico. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;**102**:63-74

[13] Ike M, Donovan JD, Topple C, Masli EK. The process of selecting and prioritising corporate sustainability issues: Insights for achieving the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;**236**:117661

[14] Ferreira LRA, Otto RB, Silva FP, De Souza SNM, De Souza SS, Ando Junior OH. Review of the energy potential of the residual biomass for the distributed generation in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy

[15] Famoso F, Prestipino M, Brusca S, Galvagno A. Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators. Applied

Reviews. 2018;**94**:440-455

Energy. 2020;**247**:115315

[16] Edreis EMA, Yao H. Kinetic thermal behaviour and evaluation of physical structure of sugar cane bagasse

2020;**743**:140741

Reviews. 2019;**112**:960-977

liquor. Energy. 2019;189

de la Cruz Quiroz R, Ruiz HA,

[1] Kumar A, Samadder SR. A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Waste Management.

[2] REN21. Renewables 2018 e global status report (Paris: REN21 secretariat). Renewable Energy Policy Network for

the 21st Century; 2018. p. 2018

[3] Bilandzija N, Voca N, Jelcic B, Jurisic V, Matin A, Grubor M, et al. Evaluation of Croatian agricultural solid biomass energy potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[4] Rountree V. Nevada's experience with the renewable portfolio standard. Energy Policy. 2019;**129**:279-291

[5] Gutierrez AS, Eras JC, Hens L, Vandecasteele C. The energy potential of agriculture, agroindustrial, livestock, and slaughterhouse biomass wastes through direct combustion and anaerobic digestion. The case of Colombia. Journal

of Cleaner Production. 2020;269

[6] Sikka M, Thornton TF. Sustainable biomass energy and indigenous cultural models of wellbeing in an Alaska forest ecosystem. Ecology and Society.

[7] Bildirici M, Özaksoy F. An analysis of biomass consumption and economic

growth in transition countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2018;**31**:386-405. DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2018.1427610

[8] Aydin M. The effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth in BRICS countries: A countryspecific panel data analysis. Renewable

[9] Wang Z, Bui Q, Zhang B, Pham TL. Biomass energy production and its

Energy. 2019;**138**:620-627

**References**

2017;**69**:407-422

2018;**93**:225-230

2013;**18**:38

*Agroenergy from Residual Biomass: Energy Perspective DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93644*
