**Chapter 5**

Modelling and Numerical Analysis.

*Vortex Dynamics Theories and Applications*

[19] Girault V, Rivière B, Wheeler MF. A discontinuous Galerkin method with non-overlapping domain decomposition for the Stokes and Navier-Stokes problems. Math. Comp. 2005; 74: 53–84. [27] Shen J. Hopf bifurcation of the unsteady regularized driven cavity flow. J. Comput. Phys. 1991; 95: 228–245.

[28] Kaya S, Rivière B. A discontinuous subgrid eddy viscosity method for the time-dependent Navier-Stokes

equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2005;

43(4): 1572–1595.

[20] Wheeler MF. An elliptic collocationfinite element method with interior penalties. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1978;

[21] Rivière B, Wheeler MF, Girault V. Improved energy estimates for interior penalty, constrained and discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems. Part I. Comput. Geosci. 1999; 3: 337–

[22] Chorin AJ. On the convergence of discrete approximations to the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comp. 1969; 23:

[23] Song L, Zhang Z. Polynomial preserving recovery of an overpenalized symmetric interior penalty Galerkin method for elliptic problems. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. – Ser. B

[24] Song L, Zhang Z. Superconvergence

discontinuous Galerkin finite element gradient recovery method. J. Comput.

[25] Song L, Gie GM, and Shiue MC. Interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin methods with implicit time-integration techniques for nonlinear parabolic equations. Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations. 2013; 29(4):

[26] Foias C, Manley O, Rosa R and Temam R. Turbulence and Navier-Stokes equations. Cambridge University

2015; 20(5): 1405–1426.

property of an over-penalized

Phys. 2015; 299: 1004–1020.

2005; 39(6): 1115–1147.

15: 152–161.

360.

341–353.

1341–1366.

Press; 2001.

**98**
